283:". Well, not really. Granted there are slight variations here and there, and there are one or two unions that are just run in a completely different mannor that probably are notable enough for their own article, but on the whole all SUs are pretty much the same. There's pretty much nothing that differentiates one SU from the next, and I've made very sure that I've only nominated those that don't appear to have anything particularly notable about them. There are others that I may nominate, depending on the outcome of these few, but equally there are others that I won't nominate, 'cause I feel that they are notable enough to satisfy
253:
I can't see the benefit of deleting articles about
Student Unions. It is impossible to create a catch all article as each student union is run in a different way and have different policies. This discussion would be far better served by having it on all student unions and not individual discussion.
316:
about a better way forward of encouraging people to get decent sourcing whilst at the same time getting an actual policy about inherent notability in place, rather than the current mess of individual AFDs on the same basic issue having different outcomes.
313:
125:
255:
98:
93:
102:
334:
until we have a policy otherwise. Nominating them all in the hope of geting a few deleted each time is not a constructive way of establishing a consensus.
85:
203:
17:
151:
89:
345:
326:
302:
267:
245:
215:
193:
169:
67:
363:
36:
51:
81:
73:
322:
362:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
275:
I did consider creating one AfD for the lot, but wasn't sure, and as per the guidelines for creating AfD's "
136:- fails to assert any notability whatsoever, through means of external links to independant sources etc.
318:
165:
288:
137:
239:
209:
187:
263:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
258:
that reached no consensus, and I feel that the current AfDs will reach the same conclusion.
161:
229:
234:
58:
284:
225:
133:
341:
312:
As this AFD and others touch of exactly the same issues, see my lengthy comments at
259:
119:
179:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
314:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Southampton
University Students' Union
281:...each student union is run in a different way and have different policies
336:
204:
talk page for the
Student Affairs Task Force of WikiProject Universities
277:...if you are unsure of whether to bundle an article or not, do not
184:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (
356:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
160:
per nom. Local student groups are generally not notable.
115:
111:
107:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
366:). No further edits should be made to this page.
202:Note: This discussion has been listed on the
8:
256:AfD discussion for SOAS Students' Union
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
346:04:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
327:03:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
68:14:11, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
303:22:42, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
268:22:35, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
246:21:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
216:18:39, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
194:18:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
170:23:16, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
152:14:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
383:
254:There has already been an
82:Liverpool Students' Union
74:Liverpool Students' Union
359:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
72:
206:. --User:Ceyockey (
218:
213:
196:
191:
63:
374:
361:
319:Timrollpickering
300:
294:
242:
237:
207:
201:
185:
183:
181:
149:
143:
123:
105:
65:
61:
57:
54:
34:
382:
381:
377:
376:
375:
373:
372:
371:
370:
364:deletion review
357:
296:
295:
290:
240:
235:
177:
145:
144:
139:
96:
80:
77:
64:
59:
52:
50:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
380:
378:
369:
368:
351:
349:
348:
329:
307:
306:
305:
289:
279:". You state "
248:
219:
198:
197:
182:
174:
173:
172:
138:
132:Article fails
130:
129:
76:
71:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
379:
367:
365:
360:
354:
353:
352:
347:
343:
339:
338:
333:
330:
328:
324:
320:
315:
311:
308:
304:
301:
299:
293:
286:
282:
278:
274:
271:
270:
269:
265:
261:
257:
252:
249:
247:
244:
243:
238:
231:
227:
223:
220:
217:
212:
211:
205:
200:
199:
195:
190:
189:
180:
176:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
156:
155:
154:
153:
150:
148:
142:
135:
127:
121:
117:
113:
109:
104:
100:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
78:
75:
70:
69:
66:
62:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
358:
355:
350:
335:
331:
310:Keep for now
309:
297:
291:
280:
276:
272:
260:Andy Hartley
250:
233:
221:
208:
186:
178:
157:
146:
140:
131:
49:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
162:Vegaswikian
210:talk to me
188:talk to me
224:per nom,
298:Islander
147:Islander
126:View log
273:Comment
99:protect
94:history
236:Noetic
230:WP:ORG
228:, and
222:Delete
158:Delete
103:delete
60:(talk)
120:views
112:watch
108:links
53:Maxim
16:<
342:talk
332:Keep
323:talk
285:WP:N
264:talk
251:Keep
241:Sage
226:WP:N
166:talk
134:WP:N
116:logs
90:talk
86:edit
337:DGG
292:The
141:The
124:– (
344:)
325:)
287:.
266:)
214:)
192:)
168:)
118:|
114:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
48:.
340:(
321:(
262:(
232:—
164:(
128:)
122:)
84:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.