Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Liz Glazowski - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

343:— due diligence is not being done when these tools are being used in this way. "Shoot them all and let the saps at AfD sort them out," is apparently the line of thinking. While I am personally sympathetic to the idea of a very high bar for so-called "Porn Bios," this blasting of 100 articles at the rate of 1 per minute, judging from the time logs, is not conducive to the spirit or practice of AfD. It is putting 272:. Redirecting non-notable articles to Listings of a subject which has been found to be non-notable is absurd. Playmate-hood, being inherently non-notable, does not prop up this article, nor can it prop up a List of playmates. Redirecting to non-notable lists only makes work for Admins who will have to delete these redirects later. Also, significantly, this is an inadequately-sourced BLP in a controversial area. 348:
sororities. The net result of these efforts was a lot of lost time by article creators and AfD participants and a lot of lost information from those articles annihilated as part of these campaigns. Meanwhile, the backlog of crap at New Pages festers. Something needs to be done about this problem. Mine is not a unique view — see
347:
ahead of the established article deletion process and is disrespectful both to the work of article creators and those of us who volunteer our time at AfD. We have seen similar automated mass annihilation efforts recently against modern Trotskyist political organizations and against fraternities and
263:
This should have been done after consensus determined Playmate-hood's non-notability. Other projects can cover this material, Knowledge (XXG) consensus has determined that Knowledge (XXG) is not that project. Should sourcing and claim of notability sufficient for Knowledge (XXG) later be found, the
202:
is not an award: It's a strategic commercial decision made by Playboy Corporation about how to better commercialize it products. Regardless of how much some Wikipedians love Playmates, we should write articles about them only when they were covered by independent third part sources. Also, texts
227:. Does not appear to be enough nontrivial reliably sourced content to justify an independent article. This has been the outcome of most recent AFD discussions for less prominent Playmates as well the way most recently named Playmates have been handled. 160: 51:. This takes into account the consensus that the subject is not notable, and also the fact that the person is indeed covered at the target list and that a redirect is therefore appropriate. 339:- The use of automated tools for mass deletions should not be allowed against large blocks of articles which have already been patrolled at New Pages. It is, simply put, a violation of 121: 191: 154: 313: 293: 290: 17: 224: 94: 89: 47: 98: 232: 81: 175: 344: 142: 381: 36: 228: 352:
at ANI. We need to keep them all as a matter of principle and ban the future use of automated tools in this way.
380:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
136: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
366: 328: 305: 281: 253: 236: 214: 132: 63: 355:
This argument will be copied-and-pasted in the debate sections for all automated AfDs of this campaign.
182: 277: 168: 340: 85: 362: 324: 301: 249: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
349: 148: 208: 273: 54: 350:
Knowledge (XXG):ANI#Massive_number_of_Playboy-related_AFD_nominations_by_a_single_user
77: 69: 358: 320: 297: 245: 115: 207:
are not the kind non-trivial coverage asked by the general notability criteria.
374:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
111: 107: 103: 167: 181: 192:Being a Playboy playmate does not make you notable 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 384:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 312:Note: This debate has been included in the 314:list of People-related deletion discussions 311: 289:Note: This debate has been added to the 48:List of Playboy Playmates of 1980#April 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 225:List of Playboy Playmates of 1980 1: 264:article can be re-started. 401: 329:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 306:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 282:19:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 254:15:50, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 237:02:35, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 215:02:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 377:Please do not modify it. 203:solely related to their 32:Please do not modify it. 367:14:07, 4 May 2011 (UTC) 291:WikiProject Pornography 64:06:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC) 229:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz 196:Playmate of the Month 200:Playmate of the Year 244:as per Hullaballoo 345:WP:I DON'T LIKE IT 44:The result was 357: 331: 317: 294:list of deletions 212: 62: 392: 379: 353: 318: 308: 210: 186: 185: 171: 119: 101: 61: 59: 52: 34: 400: 399: 395: 394: 393: 391: 390: 389: 388: 382:deletion review 375: 337:Procedural Keep 288: 194:. Being chosen 128: 92: 76: 73: 55: 53: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 398: 396: 387: 386: 370: 369: 333: 332: 309: 285: 284: 257: 256: 239: 189: 188: 125: 72: 67: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 397: 385: 383: 378: 372: 371: 368: 364: 360: 356: 351: 346: 342: 338: 335: 334: 330: 326: 322: 315: 310: 307: 303: 299: 295: 292: 287: 286: 283: 279: 275: 271: 269: 262: 259: 258: 255: 251: 247: 243: 240: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 219: 218: 217: 216: 213: 206: 201: 197: 193: 184: 180: 177: 174: 170: 166: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 138: 134: 131: 130:Find sources: 126: 123: 117: 113: 109: 105: 100: 96: 91: 87: 83: 79: 78:Liz Glazowski 75: 74: 71: 70:Liz Glazowski 68: 66: 65: 60: 58: 50: 49: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 376: 373: 354: 336: 267: 265: 260: 241: 220: 205:playmatehood 204: 199: 195: 190: 178: 172: 164: 157: 151: 145: 139: 129: 56: 46:redirect to 45: 43: 31: 28: 155:free images 57:Sandstein 341:WP:BEFORE 321:• Gene93k 298:• Gene93k 274:Dekkappai 270:redirect 242:Redirect 221:Redirect 122:View log 359:Carrite 246:Hasteur 209:Damiens 161:WP refs 149:scholar 95:protect 90:history 261:Delete 133:Google 99:delete 176:JSTOR 137:books 116:views 108:watch 104:links 16:< 363:talk 325:talk 302:talk 278:talk 250:talk 233:talk 169:FENS 143:news 112:logs 86:talk 82:edit 268:NOT 266:Do 223:to 211:.rf 198:or 183:TWL 120:– ( 365:) 327:) 316:. 304:) 296:. 280:) 252:) 235:) 163:) 114:| 110:| 106:| 102:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 361:( 323:( 319:— 300:( 276:( 248:( 231:( 187:) 179:· 173:· 165:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 140:· 135:( 127:( 124:) 118:) 80:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
List of Playboy Playmates of 1980#April
 Sandstein 
06:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Liz Glazowski
Liz Glazowski
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Being a Playboy playmate does not make you notable
Damiens.rf
02:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
List of Playboy Playmates of 1980

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.