271:
mayor and as the first
African-American elected official in all of Utah County are not material to her being notable. She is also one of a short list of people who received enough coverage as a congressional candidate that she was clearly notable, even after her first race that she lost. In the case of Teaneck with the inordinate amount of people on the list of people from Teaneck, it really does feel like there has been an unjustified campaign to create articles on people from that community which undermines the broad, world-wide coverage nature of Knowledge (XXG).
222:- First African woman mayor of a sizeable municipality well researched and added to by other editors, why can people just nominate articles for deletion just because they feel like it? It is the same swat team of deletionists backing each otbers arguements from article to article, you can see that here from the list of Mayors of Teaneck on to the actial mayors' pages. It is extremely time consuming to keep answering to these people who have total free range to keep nominatng things for deletion until the cows come home.
1127:. Teaneck is not large enough that its mayors would be automatically notable just for being mayors, and being a place's first woman or first African-American (or first African-American woman) mayor is not an automatic notability boost either. If she'd been the first African-American women to serve as a mayor anywhere in the entire United States, then there'd be a notability case — but if she's merely the first in her own city or county, then that's not a notability freebie in the absence of adequate
1073:- Now that you have asked the question, as far as I can see from the search engine results that what comes up is Lizette Parker being mentioned. It seems that no one has deemed this statistic important enough to list; she just might have been the first black woman mayor of any sizeable municipality in the Garden State but of course we would need a source to clearly state that.
372:
anywhere, every single school board trustee anywhere, every single non-winning candidate for any office anywhere, and on and so forth, if "a few pieces of local media coverage exist" was in and of itself enough to hand them a GNG pass despite failing NPOL. But we don't: the rule is that if they don't pass NPOL, then they have to be demonstrated as significantly
997:. That's an achievement that was rightly honored/noted by the media and included in any list of African-American or New Jersey firsts. She justifiably deserves to be recognized here on Knowledge (XXG) as well, as her place in history is no less important than the first Muslim, Jewish, or female individuals to become mayor in Teaneck or Bergen County.
1292:
would clear GNG if all you had to do was show a few pieces of local coverage. If a person does not pass any of our subject-specific inclusion tests, but instead you're shooting for "notable because media coverage exists", then what's required to actually get them into
Knowledge (XXG) is significantly
407:
all the coverage is routine. The only article on her election is a local article from the Bergen paper which almost certainly would run an article on someone being elected no matter who they were. Her election was not even enough to cause coverage in New Jersey wide papers, let alone other papers in
1287:
media. Owners of independent non-chain local retail stores and restaurants would clear GNG if all you had to do was show a few pieces of local coverage; every mayor and every city councillor in any no-horse village (and non-winning candidates for those positions, too) would clear GNG if all you had
1131:
coverage. But the sourcing here isn't demonstrating that she's more notable than the norm, either — it comprises just one verification of the initial election results, some obituaries and one article about a piece of municipal infrastructure being named after her following her death — sources which
462:
receives in their local media: election-night "who won" summaries, obituaries, things in the city getting named after them after their death, and on and so forth. When it comes to mayors, the difference between "routine" coverage that cannot support notability and "extraordinary" coverage that can
291:
Firsts are for the
Guinness Book of World Records, WP:Notability only requires that "a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Maybe they get that coverage for being the first of something, maybe not, but we do not have articles only on the
893:
Dude, don't call me a liar. FACT #1: All of your sources are nothing more than obituaries. FACT #2: The Root may be national, but not well-known, besides they wrote little more than a few sentences. FACT #3: The AP article refers to her as "a 44-year-old New Jersey mayor" in the opening sentence,
270:
being the first
African-American woman mayor in the state of Utah for example (I list her because she is the only holder of a state-wide title of this type) might be enough for notability, but Parker's claim is not. For the record, since Mrs. Love is a member of congress, her previous service as
371:
still claim to pass GNG anyway, if "a couple of pieces of purely local coverage exist" were all it took to exempt them from having to pass NPOL just because they had "passed GNG" instead. We would have to keep an article about every single mayor of anywhere, every single city or town councillor
261:
Teanech is not a "sizable municipality" it is one of hundreds of mid-sized communities in New Jersey and in the greater New York City area. We would need indepth coverage to show notability, which is lacking here. At least the article does not say she was the first "African-American mayor" of
1016:
African-american mayor in county (and certainly not in the state). Can somebody please tell me who the first african-american female mayor in New Jersey was? I ask this because I honestly don't know and I doubt we have an article on her (we should and she certainly would be more notable).--
1015:
See, this is where I strongly disagree. Notability should not be determined by race or gender (or both). She is the first
African-American mayor of a county (in a town that doesn't even directly elect the mayor). As I and others stated before, she is neither the first female nor first
1288:
to do was show a few pieces of local coverage; high school football players would clear GNG if all you had to do was show a few pieces of local coverage; presidents of church bake sale committees would clear GNG if all you had to do was show a few pieces of local coverage; and even
408:
the metro-area she was in. On the other hand, there is a little more coverage of her death, but this is the type of straight news coverage that comes when a public office holder dies in office, and is still not enough to cause an article on her to avoid the not news rules.
555:
notable than all of her non-minority predecessors in the same position. If a town isn't large enough that its mayors would all automatically qualify for articles because mayor, then neither her gender nor her racial background make her a special case in the absence of
865:
is national, and the
Associated Press is an international wire service. And New York City media doesn't routinely cover small-town New Jersey news, so whether the New York media is "local" is questionable. Face it, you're wrong about this article.
1048:
It is none of our business why reliable sources cover a subject. We only require, at WP:GNG, that "a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Why they cover a topic is their business.
495:"Coverage is coverage" is wrong. The standard is significant coverage. If all coverage was equal, many high school quarterbacks or local police department spokesmen would become notable because they get mentioned often.....
169:
316:
1193:
mayors to be automatically notable just for being mayors per se. The key to making a mayor notable enough for a
Knowledge (XXG) article is not "coverage of her exists", because coverage
122:
659:
602:
551:
Being the first member of an underrepresented minority group to hold an otherwise non-notable political office is not an inclusion freebie that automatically makes a person
621:
163:
640:
847:
Besides being local, all these sources (and all except one in the article) are basically obituaries. You'd think she'd get some coverage while she was still alive.--
429:
678:
428:
Coverage is coverage, that is what defines notability. I really do not know what "routine" coverage is, or what the converse would be of "extraordinary coverage".
333:
This argument totally ignores the fact that we require above routine coveage for mayors to be notable, especially of places with less than 50,000 people.
262:
Teaneck, it says she was the first "African-American woman mayor" of
Teaneck. Nor does it assert she was the first African-American who was a mayor in
1104:
Those sources help establish believe that she was the first
African American woman mayor of a city in Bergen County but not the state in its totality
1262:
1185:
Every single mayor of anywhere would always clear GNG if all you had to do was show a couple of pieces of local coverage — yet
Knowledge (XXG) does
1095:
1054:
437:
358:
324:
297:
1032:
Being "first" isn't as notable as we try to make it sound sometimes. Who was the first mayor over 6 feet tall? Or the first one under 150 pounds?
129:
731:. Take a look at the list of many notable people who have called Teaneck home and see that it is a unique town whose diversity is worth noting.
538:
749:. NN mayor. There is no assertion of notability in the article. There are refs but they substantiate that she lived a very humdrum life.
1258:
1168:
1091:
1050:
879:
834:
433:
354:
320:
293:
953:
That's a part you often get wrong. It's not a question of coverage, it's a question of significant coverage. All coverage isn't equal.
723:
is noted for its racial diversity and diversity of its public officials. On a side note one of the vicinity's most noted residents is
1144:
show. To be considered notable enough for a Knowledge (XXG) article, a mayor of a city of just 39K needs to be shown as significantly
95:
90:
432:
Titles include "Lizette Parker, groundbreaking mayor of Teaneck, dies at 44" and "History-making N.J mayor remembered at funeral". --
17:
99:
822:
816:
589:
82:
184:
151:
802:
1365:
40:
1297:
media coverage than their equivalents in every other city could also show, demonstrating that they're significantly
1148:
notable than most other mayors of most other cities of 39K — but that's not what these sources are demonstrating.
1242:
940:
922:
780:
413:
338:
276:
263:
353:
WP:POL is for people that do not meet the GNG requirement but deserve an article, she meets the GNG standard. --
145:
1109:
1078:
736:
534:
227:
1326:
does not say that the coverage for local politicians needs to be international or national, just significant.
1234:
686:
1346:
1310:
1266:
1246:
1214:
1172:
1157:
1113:
1099:
1082:
1058:
1041:
1025:
1006:
993:- Parker is the first female African-American mayor of ANY community in New Jersey's most populous county,
985:
962:
944:
926:
903:
883:
856:
838:
784:
758:
740:
710:
690:
670:
651:
632:
613:
569:
542:
526:
504:
488:
441:
417:
393:
362:
342:
328:
301:
280:
249:
231:
213:
141:
64:
773:
WP:N#Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article
1361:
1163:
1037:
981:
958:
867:
829:
500:
36:
808:
240:
she was first African-american mayor of the county, not the country, not even the state, not notable.--
1205:
coverage of her exists than most other mayors could also show". Which is not what's in evidence here.
191:
1339:
1238:
936:
918:
776:
409:
334:
272:
727:
owner of one of history's most famous multi-cultural horses tbe Egyptian Jewish triple crown winner
1105:
1074:
812:
732:
530:
223:
177:
86:
1230:
682:
1162:
Another moronic argument. Nobody has suggested giving her a "freebie". She satisfies the GNG. —
384:
notable than most other non-winning political candidates, etc.) before they actually clear GNG.
1338:. There will of course be very notable political figures who don't receive national coverage.
1306:
1210:
1153:
1002:
706:
663:
644:
625:
606:
565:
484:
389:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1360:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1335:
1331:
1323:
201:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1033:
1021:
977:
954:
899:
852:
825:
728:
590:
https://www.theroot.com/1st-female-african-american-mayor-in-bergen-county-nj-1790855103/amp
496:
245:
209:
157:
1327:
447:
754:
1128:
78:
70:
55:
772:
768:
994:
798:
523:- Parker was the first African-American woman mayor of a vicinity in Bergen County.
1302:
1206:
1149:
998:
917:
Article has sufficient sources. GNG includes local sources and hum-drum sources.
702:
561:
480:
385:
116:
1271:
Nobody said there was a population requirement in the GNG per se. But what there
1017:
895:
848:
724:
241:
205:
935:
Also, routine coverage is coverage, and run-of-the-mill coverage is coverage.
750:
701:
John Lambert argues the case well. Claims to notability are insufficient.
463:
support notability is this: does the coverage just represent exactly what
430:
The Ghits are large including New York television and New York newspapers.
267:
819:
720:
976:. Merely having a job and run of the mill coverage doesn't pass GNG.
376:
notable than the norm for their level of prominence (significantly
317:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Mayors of Teaneck, New Jersey
1354:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
805:
446:
No, not all coverage is created equal when it comes to passing
1229:
Nor is there a "deletion freebie": this post indicates as per
1090:
That statement is already covered by 4 sources in the lede. --
204:, only reliable sources are obituaries in local newspaper.
1275:, is a rule that there are certain classes of people who
266:, no there also the first African-American woman mayor.
1233:
that it doesn't try to assess notability; and the post
112:
108:
104:
450:— there are certain kinds of coverage that absolutely
176:
1301:
notable than the norm for thelr level of prominence.
367:
Every single person in politics who fails NPOL could
1279:be deemed to pass GNG just because a smattering of
190:
861:You're either misinformed or (more likely) lying.
769:WP:N#Article content does not determine notability
1257:There is no population requirement in the GNG. --
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1368:). No further edits should be made to this page.
660:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
603:list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions
796:The nom is mistaken, unless one considers the
479:what any mayor of anywhere could always show?
380:notable than most other mayors, significantly
622:list of New York-related deletion discussions
8:
677:Note: This debate has been included in the
658:Note: This debate has been included in the
639:Note: This debate has been included in the
620:Note: This debate has been included in the
601:Note: This debate has been included in the
641:list of People-related deletion discussions
679:list of Women-related deletion discussions
676:
657:
638:
619:
600:
524:
1283:local coverage of them exists in their
582:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
292:first, or biggest, or the most. --
24:
824:—which carried a report from the
560:coverage about the distinction.
894:hardly sounds notable to me.--
1:
1347:21:56, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
1311:15:27, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
1267:01:15, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
1247:01:51, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
1215:15:27, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
1201:mayors — it's "significantly
1173:00:51, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
1158:22:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
1114:20:41, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
1100:19:58, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
1083:16:35, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
1059:19:56, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
1042:17:34, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
1026:04:54, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
1007:03:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
986:20:13, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
963:14:23, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
945:01:40, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
927:18:21, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
904:00:21, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
884:00:05, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
857:18:58, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
839:16:48, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
785:18:21, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
759:16:46, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
741:04:54, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
711:04:24, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
570:22:16, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
543:19:25, 09 December 2017 (UTC)
505:14:23, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
489:22:30, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
442:05:01, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
394:16:44, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
363:14:31, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
302:05:05, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
65:22:45, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
691:23:56, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
671:20:38, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
652:20:38, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
633:20:38, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
614:20:38, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
418:19:18, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
343:19:20, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
329:19:08, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
281:19:14, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
250:18:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
232:18:55, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
214:18:37, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
1385:
1237:potential merge targets.
264:Bergen County, New Jersey
1357:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
1132:are no different than
828:—"local newspaper". —
475:show, or is it going
1322:per above comments.
1330:is a criteria for
693:
673:
654:
635:
616:
545:
529:comment added by
410:John Pack Lambert
335:John Pack Lambert
273:John Pack Lambert
200:fails notability
63:
1376:
1359:
1344:
826:Associated Press
729:American Pharoah
668:
649:
630:
611:
592:
587:
477:above and beyond
315:See argument at
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
62:
60:
53:
34:
1384:
1383:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1366:deletion review
1355:
1342:Seraphim System
1340:
1239:Unscintillating
1171:
1129:reliable source
937:Unscintillating
919:Unscintillating
882:
837:
777:Unscintillating
664:
645:
626:
607:
597:
596:
595:
588:
584:
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1382:
1380:
1371:
1370:
1350:
1349:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1167:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1106:Masterknighted
1075:Masterknighted
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1045:
1044:
1010:
1009:
988:
970:
969:
968:
967:
966:
965:
948:
947:
930:
929:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
878:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
842:
841:
833:
790:
789:
788:
787:
762:
761:
733:Masterknighted
714:
713:
695:
694:
674:
655:
636:
617:
594:
593:
581:
580:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
531:Masterknighted
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
421:
420:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
348:
347:
346:
345:
309:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
284:
283:
255:
254:
253:
252:
235:
234:
224:Masterknighted
198:
197:
134:
79:Lizette Parker
73:
71:Lizette Parker
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1381:
1369:
1367:
1363:
1358:
1352:
1351:
1348:
1345:
1343:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1318:
1317:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1291:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1255:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1174:
1170:
1165:
1164:Malik Shabazz
1161:
1160:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1130:
1126:
1123:
1122:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1047:
1046:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1008:
1004:
1000:
996:
995:Bergen County
992:
989:
987:
983:
979:
975:
972:
971:
964:
960:
956:
952:
951:
950:
949:
946:
942:
938:
934:
933:
932:
931:
928:
924:
920:
916:
913:
912:
905:
901:
897:
892:
891:
890:
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
881:
869:
868:Malik Shabazz
864:
860:
859:
858:
854:
850:
846:
845:
844:
843:
840:
836:
831:
830:Malik Shabazz
827:
823:
821:
817:
815:
814:
809:
807:
803:
801:
800:
799:New York Post
795:
792:
791:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
766:
765:
764:
763:
760:
756:
752:
748:
745:
744:
743:
742:
738:
734:
730:
726:
722:
718:
712:
708:
704:
700:
697:
696:
692:
688:
684:
683:Coolabahapple
680:
675:
672:
669:
667:
661:
656:
653:
650:
648:
642:
637:
634:
631:
629:
623:
618:
615:
612:
610:
604:
599:
598:
591:
586:
583:
579:
571:
567:
563:
559:
554:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
522:
506:
502:
498:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
461:
458:town or city
457:
453:
449:
445:
444:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
419:
415:
411:
406:
403:
402:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
370:
366:
365:
364:
360:
356:
352:
351:
350:
349:
344:
340:
336:
332:
331:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
311:
310:
303:
299:
295:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
282:
278:
274:
269:
265:
260:
257:
256:
251:
247:
243:
239:
238:
237:
236:
233:
229:
225:
221:
218:
217:
216:
215:
211:
207:
203:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1356:
1353:
1341:
1319:
1298:
1294:
1289:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1124:
1070:
1069:
990:
973:
914:
876:
862:
811:
797:
793:
746:
716:
715:
698:
666:CAPTAIN RAJU
665:
647:CAPTAIN RAJU
646:
628:CAPTAIN RAJU
627:
609:CAPTAIN RAJU
608:
585:
577:
558:nationalized
557:
552:
525:— Preceding
520:
519:
476:
472:
468:
464:
459:
455:
451:
404:
381:
377:
373:
368:
312:
258:
219:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
57:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
1034:Niteshift36
978:Niteshift36
955:Niteshift36
725:Ahmed Zayat
497:Niteshift36
220:Strong Keep
164:free images
1197:exists of
578:References
58:Sandstein
1362:talk page
1231:WP:NEXIST
1189:consider
1136:mayor of
467:mayor of
454:mayor of
37:talk page
1364:or in a
1138:anywhere
863:The Root
813:The Root
539:contribs
527:unsigned
469:anywhere
268:Mia Love
123:View log
39:or in a
1336:WP:NPOL
1332:WP:NORG
1324:WP:NPOL
1303:Bearcat
1235:ignores
1207:Bearcat
1150:Bearcat
1071:Comment
999:Scanlan
820:WABC-TV
721:Teaneck
717:Comment
703:LibStar
562:Bearcat
521:Comment
481:Bearcat
405:Comment
386:Bearcat
202:WP:NPOL
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
1334:, not
1328:WP:AUD
1281:purely
1277:cannot
1195:always
1142:always
1140:could
1125:Delete
1018:Rusf10
974:Delete
896:Rusf10
849:Rusf10
818:, and
747:Delete
699:delete
473:always
471:could
460:always
448:WP:GNG
369:always
259:Delete
242:Rusf10
206:Rusf10
142:Google
100:delete
1285:local
1169:Stalk
880:Stalk
835:Stalk
751:Szzuk
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
1320:Keep
1307:talk
1299:more
1295:more
1263:talk
1243:talk
1211:talk
1203:more
1154:talk
1146:more
1110:talk
1096:talk
1079:talk
1055:talk
1038:talk
1022:talk
1003:talk
991:Keep
982:talk
959:talk
941:talk
923:talk
915:Keep
900:talk
853:talk
806:WPIX
794:Keep
781:talk
771:and
767:See
755:talk
737:talk
707:talk
687:talk
566:talk
553:more
535:talk
501:talk
485:talk
438:talk
414:talk
390:talk
382:more
378:more
374:more
359:talk
339:talk
325:talk
319:. --
313:Keep
298:talk
277:talk
246:talk
228:talk
210:talk
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
1259:RAN
1199:all
1191:all
1187:not
1134:any
1092:RAN
1051:RAN
775:.
465:any
456:any
452:any
434:RAN
355:RAN
321:RAN
294:RAN
192:TWL
121:– (
1309:)
1273:is
1265:)
1245:)
1213:)
1156:)
1112:)
1098:)
1081:)
1057:)
1049:--
1040:)
1024:)
1005:)
984:)
961:)
943:)
925:)
902:)
866:—
855:)
810:,
804:,
783:)
757:)
739:)
719:-
709:)
689:)
681:.
662:.
643:.
624:.
605:.
568:)
541:)
537:•
503:)
487:)
440:)
416:)
392:)
361:)
341:)
327:)
300:)
279:)
248:)
230:)
212:)
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
52:.
1305:(
1290:I
1261:(
1241:(
1209:(
1166:/
1152:(
1108:(
1094:(
1077:(
1053:(
1036:(
1020:(
1001:(
980:(
957:(
939:(
921:(
898:(
877:/
851:(
832:/
779:(
753:(
735:(
705:(
685:(
564:(
533:(
499:(
483:(
436:(
412:(
388:(
357:(
337:(
323:(
296:(
275:(
244:(
226:(
208:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.