143:. from the article, does sound a bit notable, but i must say, there are billions of chinese, if every notable chinese person were given a page, well, it would engulf Knowledge (XXG). Perhaps more stringent notability requirements are necessary for chinese people? Not being racist, just to keep the number manageable.
171:
When the
Malthusian nightmare that worries Jörg Vogt befalls us (though unlikely in immediate future), we will see more open platforms. When there're obelisks, only the kings' deeds were considered worth being noted, and then after Gutenberg, many mortals found their names recorded. Now we're in the
259:
is doing again the articles about
Chinese people which are not in Chinese wikipedia without considering what it's in this one or other wikipedias, because this article is also in French, German and Spanish. This article contains details of Li Dawei's life and his works, it has references, etc,etc.
161:
The existing notability criteria (multiple instances of non-trivial coverage in reliable sources) are emphatically fine; Knowledge (XXG) is not paper. The existence of this article doesn't interfere with the creation of articles about other notable authors in your country.
290:
Several major books, several reviews of his work. There's no problem finding reasons to keep. There is probably considerably more to be found, as is the case of some similar AfDs today.
114:
211:
184:
Added sources. Seems at least weakly notable; his latest book 卡通猫的美国梦 got reviewed by a major
Chinese newspaper (南方都市報, dunno what they call it in English)
152:
Sorry I may misunderstanding, my reading of your proposal appear to be racism - separate rule for
Chinese is unfair, we Chinamen are humanity also.
269:
The German, French, and
Spanish versions of the article do not provide any additional information that would show notability, either. --
242:. The closing administrator may choose to disregard your vote unless you provide a more convincing reason to keep the article. Cheers,
17:
87:
82:
311:
239:
36:
91:
74:
310:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
185:
243:
217:
198:
163:
188:
144:
296:
278:
264:
246:
233:
220:
201:
166:
156:
147:
134:
56:
261:
230:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
53:
197:(a decently-reputable literary magazine in China), but I'm still trying to verify this.
153:
274:
130:
78:
108:
49:
191:
255:
In this case, it is a BIG reason to keep the article, you guys can see what
187:, and he himself was written about as well as a Chinese magazine in Germany.
292:
270:
256:
126:
70:
62:
304:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
229:, he's more notable than other people you have in wikipedia.
104:
100:
96:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
314:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
210:: This debate has been included in the
48:, but clearly urgent work is required. -
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
193:claims he won the 2000 prize from
121:No real assertion of notability.
24:
212:list of China-related deletions
1:
172:age of Internet. Raptor2008
331:
297:23:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
279:18:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
265:16:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
247:10:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
234:09:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
221:08:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
202:08:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
167:08:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
157:08:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
148:07:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
135:04:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
57:15:51, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
307:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
240:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS
223:
215:
322:
309:
216:
206:
112:
94:
34:
330:
329:
325:
324:
323:
321:
320:
319:
318:
312:deletion review
305:
85:
69:
66:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
328:
326:
317:
316:
300:
299:
284:
283:
282:
281:
252:
251:
250:
249:
224:
204:
179:
178:
177:
176:
175:
174:
173:
119:
118:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
327:
315:
313:
308:
302:
301:
298:
295:
294:
289:
286:
285:
280:
276:
272:
268:
267:
266:
263:
258:
254:
253:
248:
245:
241:
237:
236:
235:
232:
228:
225:
222:
219:
213:
209:
205:
203:
200:
196:
192:
190:Incidentally
189:
186:
183:
180:
170:
169:
168:
165:
160:
159:
158:
155:
151:
150:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:
137:
136:
132:
128:
124:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
306:
303:
291:
287:
226:
207:
194:
181:
140:
122:
120:
45:
43:
31:
28:
141:Weak delete
154:Wen Hsing
145:Jörg Vogt
115:View log
71:Li Dawei
63:Li Dawei
195:October
88:protect
83:history
262:SISLEY
231:SISLEY
123:Delete
92:delete
50:Splash
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
288:Keep
275:talk
238:See
227:Keep
208:Note
182:Keep
131:talk
125:. --
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
46:KEEP
293:DGG
271:Nlu
257:Nlu
244:cab
218:cab
214:.
199:cab
164:cab
127:Nlu
113:– (
277:)
133:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
54:tk
52:-
273:(
129:(
117:)
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.