307:. Only thing that saves it is that it's going to confuse readers if some winners have articles and others don't on a arbitrary basis on which articles happen to have been taken to AfD. I'd rather a decision was taken on articles as a whole, and reasonable outcomes could be: 1) There is enough coverage of winners for all winners to be presumed notable; 2) Winning doesn't confer enough notability in its own right but some of the winners became notable by other means (in which case the template needs to say "notable winners" instead of just winners; or 3) non of them are notable independently of the programme. Should we go for 2) or 3), merging all the winners into a single article would be a reasonable compromise.
392:, and does not gain as wide an audience. As a reality television show, it is broadcast on Living TV, which is significantly smaller than the likes of the BBC, ITV, or even Channel Five. Furthermore, the British version of the show is not as popular as its American equivalent. As such, while the show is notable - It's a television program, after all - The winner is not unless they have achieved notability elsewhere.
191:. She did win a series of a what is a notable reality show. I am sure that it can be referenced. The winners of the other series all have articles. I agree about "up and coming" being a very bad sign. I have removed that. --
422:- The other winners - Seem to be the same. My solution would be to delete the articles of Fowler, Ratcliffe and Evans and mention their careers in the main article, whilst keeping McAvoy's as is.
326:
494:
and appearing in several television series. The
American and Australian counterparts are bigger notable than the British series, although it seen more in an internet forum sites.
232:
414:
seems to have appeared on a variety of other shows after winning and so in my opinion rightfully has an article. Lianne did not achieve this - She won in 2006, not recently.
143:
258:
462:
My point about the fact she wasn't a recent winner is that she's had time to gain notability away from the show, and apparently hasn't done so.
209:
Digression: I just put "up and coming" in the search box. It is a great way to find stuff that is either poorly written or just not notable. --
73:
17:
110:
105:
114:
97:
449:
312:
534:
440:
Winning recently confers no more notability than winning several years ago, but I'll take your word on the rest of it.
36:
174:. I always consider the phrase "Up and coming" as a strong indicator that they haven't arrived at notability yet.
376:
151:
47:
533:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
445:
308:
68:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
519:
502:
471:
453:
431:
415:
401:
363:
338:
316:
293:
273:
269:
247:
243:
218:
200:
183:
165:
79:
467:
427:
397:
388:
359:
214:
196:
179:
510:
Not notable, single claim is a tv show that since she's been unable to gain any notability on her own.
55:
here.) The consensus is to delete simply because she is not notable. Comparing her to other people is
334:
411:
63:
60:
495:
419:
286:
158:
101:
304:
515:
265:
239:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
52:
490:
has been more notability than Fowler, although she didn't win the series, she had covers in
355:
210:
192:
175:
56:
330:
444:
into main article (or separate article for winners) along with the others except McAvoy.
487:
463:
423:
393:
93:
85:
511:
282:
131:
382:
349:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
285:
is also nominated for deletion, is less fewer notability than Fowler.
527:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
491:
154:
and failing orphaned. It was prodded less than five weeks ago
155:
138:
127:
123:
119:
354:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
327:list of Living people-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
537:). No further edits should be made to this page.
233:list of Television-related deletion discussions
8:
259:list of England-related deletion discussions
253:
227:
257:: This debate has been included in the
231:: This debate has been included in the
325:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
554:
410:Regarding other winners,
339:00:01, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
317:17:22, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
294:14:50, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
274:14:02, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
248:14:02, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
219:12:28, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
201:12:01, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
184:08:55, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
166:08:23, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
80:00:27, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
530:Please do not modify it.
520:17:24, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
503:06:03, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
472:15:01, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
454:10:16, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
432:02:54, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
402:02:50, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
377:Britain's Next Top Model
364:00:31, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
152:Britain's Next Top Model
48:Britain's Next Top Model
32:Please do not modify it.
303:. This is a borderline
150:Only her notability in
416:Lucy Emily Ratcliffe
389:Britain's Got Talent
446:Chris Neville-Smith
309:Chris Neville-Smith
59:to the discussion.
420:Alex Evans (model)
44:The result was
366:
341:
276:
262:
250:
236:
545:
532:
500:
353:
351:
321:
291:
263:
237:
163:
141:
135:
117:
76:
71:
66:
34:
553:
552:
548:
547:
546:
544:
543:
542:
541:
535:deletion review
528:
496:
347:
287:
159:
137:
108:
92:
89:
74:
69:
64:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
551:
549:
540:
539:
523:
522:
505:
488:Abigail Clancy
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
457:
456:
435:
434:
405:
404:
368:
367:
352:
344:
343:
342:
319:
296:
277:
251:
224:
223:
222:
221:
204:
203:
186:
148:
147:
88:
83:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
550:
538:
536:
531:
525:
524:
521:
517:
513:
509:
506:
504:
501:
499:
498:ApprenticeFan
493:
489:
486:
483:
482:
473:
469:
465:
461:
460:
459:
458:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
438:
437:
436:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
412:Lauren McAvoy
409:
408:
407:
406:
403:
399:
395:
391:
390:
385:
384:
379:
378:
373:
370:
369:
365:
361:
357:
350:
346:
345:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
301:
297:
295:
292:
290:
289:ApprenticeFan
284:
281:
278:
275:
271:
267:
260:
256:
252:
249:
245:
241:
234:
230:
226:
225:
220:
216:
212:
208:
207:
206:
205:
202:
198:
194:
190:
187:
185:
181:
177:
173:
170:
169:
168:
167:
164:
162:
161:ApprenticeFan
156:
153:
145:
140:
133:
129:
125:
121:
116:
112:
107:
103:
99:
95:
94:Lianna Fowler
91:
90:
87:
86:Lianna Fowler
84:
82:
81:
77:
72:
67:
62:
58:
54:
50:
49:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
529:
526:
507:
497:
484:
441:
387:
381:
375:
371:
348:
322:
299:
298:
288:
283:Eboni Stocks
279:
266:TexasAndroid
254:
240:TexasAndroid
228:
188:
171:
160:
149:
46:redirect to
45:
43:
31:
28:
383:Big Brother
356:Ron Ritzman
211:DanielRigal
193:DanielRigal
176:Niteshift36
331:Erwin85Bot
464:Esteffect
424:Esteffect
394:Esteffect
300:Weak keep
189:Weak keep
57:irrelvant
51:. (Being
305:WP:BLP1E
144:View log
512:Fuzbaby
485:Comment
380:is not
111:protect
106:history
61:King of
508:Delete
372:Delete
172:Delete
139:delete
115:delete
442:Merge
280:Note:
142:) – (
132:views
124:watch
120:links
16:<
516:talk
468:talk
450:talk
428:talk
418:and
398:talk
360:talk
335:talk
329:. --
323:Note
313:talk
270:talk
255:Note
244:talk
229:Note
215:talk
197:talk
180:talk
128:logs
102:talk
98:edit
53:bold
492:FHM
386:or
264:--
238:--
518:)
470:)
452:)
430:)
400:)
374:.
362:)
337:)
315:)
272:)
261:.
246:)
235:.
217:)
199:)
182:)
157:.
130:|
126:|
122:|
118:|
113:|
109:|
104:|
100:|
78:♠
514:(
466:(
448:(
426:(
396:(
358:(
333:(
311:(
268:(
242:(
213:(
195:(
178:(
146:)
136:(
134:)
96:(
75:♣
70:♦
65:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.