407:- This has already closed "Keep" at least twice... Notability is not temporary, etc. I will also once again note my strong personal belief that all political parties of confirmed existence, their leaders, and their youth sections, without regard to size or ideology, should be auto-kept like we auto-keep secondary schools, towns, villages, rivers, professional athletes, etc. This is the sort of material that SHOULD be in a comprehensive encyclopedia.
687:
Andrew
Withers won his seat as an independent, which from reading various blogs I gather was unopposed. I think this has been wrongly claimed to be a Libertarian UK victory. If I'm wrong, can anyone cite any election won by the party, or alternately provide a link to criteria for keeping that the
885:
in any way I would not have started this AFD. When I checked the facts, I found
Withers had stood unopposed as an independent so I updated the article and provided a reference. The box either wrongly refers to Withers or there is an unreported victory -which seems a little unlikely. Regards
465:
Hi
Rangoon. My understanding is that Andrew Withers won an election as a parish councillor but in common with most politicians at this level, he stood as an independent. Had the party won a seat under its own name, that would have been notable. Please don't hesitate to correct if I'm wrong.
642:. The Telegraph and Politics.co.uk articles have provided that. Nothing I have seen suggests the party will ever win a seat or otherwise achieve "prominence and success." However that is irrelevant. Had the sources not been found, I would have asked for a redefinition of
480:
If correct then the infobox of the article is wrong. Even so I remain firmly of the view that this is a keep. This project is full of tens of thousands of articles on pop culture detritus, I think we can find a place for an established political party.
865:-- The party exists; it has contested general elections, though it has always failed to win, except at the NN level of parish councillors. Most parish council elections seem to be unopposed. At times it can be a job to find sufficient candidates.
425:
Don't have any problems with notability being permanent. I just can't see that it was ever established at any point in the 4 year history or even via the AFD discussions. According to the
Telegraph, its only notable for ..being a mistake! Regards
364:
Actually it's at least the 4th :) and I think I can remember it by a different article name. The solitary reason for deleting is its lack of notability. I've done what I can to improve it i.e. add the
Telegraph reference but it simply fails the
606:
is a failed proposal but even had this been adopted this article wouldn't meet the criteria as its never won any election under its own name or had a significant mention in a newspaper. Nor can we just alter the notability criteria. Regards
383:
It's the 4th AfD for this subject matter, but the first AfD was for an article with a slightly different name, so procedure-wise it should say that it's the 3rd nomination. Especially as the last one says that it's the 2nd nomination.
495:
Hi
Rangoon, the only election 'victory' known is Andrew Withers and as he stood an independent, that doesn't count, so I also think the infobox is wrong. This was a parish election so I don't even know if it was contested. Regards
621:
I believe that you are basically agreeing with me / reinforcing what I said. My point was that the nominator seemed to be arguing based on prominence and success as a political party rather than wp:gng/wp:notability criteria.
218:
726:
343:
116:
111:
106:
101:
447:- Established political parties are generally inherently notable, and this party is well established and has a seat in local government. The article is needed for proper coverage of contemporary British politics.
88:
792:
moved United
Kingdom Libertarian Party which appears the same as the one deleted to this article on the grounds the name was wrong. I'll contact Richard to see if he has any input. BTW have you made a vote?
601:
Hi North8000. I believe the notability guidelines on political parties are the same as everything else. There are lower criteria for musicians, schools etc. The only party political definition I've seen,
708:, by the way. It was a delete. I don't think there's sources out there to warrant this article. Back in the day I created lots of stubs about very minor UK parties, but I sort of regret that now.
905:- Party may be small but it exists and is registered with Electoral Commission. It is not just a front for some commercial and so as a valid political party it should be recognised.--
212:
96:
518:
705:
538:
284:
316:
171:
178:
558:
788:
Thanks for the info Morwen. Looking at the edits, Libertarian Party UK was deleted on 2 January 2011 and I voted for delete. I don't understand the details but
144:
139:
148:
603:
131:
646:
for political parties. Look forward to seeing you around on shipping articles. At least shipwrecks don't keep resurfacing once down :) Regards
914:
895:
874:
841:
819:
801:
783:
765:
751:
737:
717:
697:
680:
655:
633:
616:
592:
570:
550:
530:
505:
490:
475:
456:
435:
416:
393:
378:
355:
333:
300:
275:
72:
233:
200:
287:
in
January 2011 and reappeared with brackets perhaps by accident in November 2011. As there are now two sources, one kindly found by
17:
825:
194:
329:
190:
807:
264:
135:
53:
240:
933:
40:
870:
66:
806:
I intentionally didn't vote. By the way, I've had a poke at the deleted page. It yields another source,
127:
78:
929:
761:
733:
389:
351:
206:
36:
789:
256:
757:
729:
629:
588:
486:
452:
385:
347:
226:
906:
866:
312:
61:
881:
Thanks
Peterkingiron. Please be assured, if I really thought the party had won a seat, or meet
910:
566:
546:
526:
412:
325:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
928:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
828:
so those who don't think there should be an article have found the 2 sources needed to meet
815:
779:
747:
713:
676:
826:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/alexsingleton/4341751/How_Libertarians_undermine_liberty
260:
259:. I have only been able to find one source capable of conferring notability, ironically a
891:
837:
810:, which is I should say is definitely 1 of the 2 reliable independent sources needed.
797:
693:
651:
612:
501:
482:
471:
448:
431:
374:
296:
271:
882:
829:
643:
366:
639:
562:
542:
522:
408:
320:
581:
I believe that the nominator may be thinking of a different meaning of notability
165:
811:
775:
774:
one to those. If you're being snarky you'd do well to check your facts first.
743:
709:
672:
288:
263:
article suggesting the party shouldn't have been set up in the first place -see
887:
833:
824:
Well done! This really is irony/farce at its best. I have previously added
793:
689:
647:
608:
497:
467:
427:
370:
292:
267:
346:. Also, isn't this the 3rd nomination of this article with this spelling?
832:. I'll leave it at that and thanks to everyone for the contributions.
922:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
742:
Oh, my bad. Still, that one hadn't been linked yet from here.
704:
If anyone's looking for it, the most recent AFD for this was
117:
Articles for deletion/Libertarian Party (UK) (6th nomination)
112:
Articles for deletion/Libertarian Party (UK) (5th nomination)
107:
Articles for deletion/Libertarian Party (UK) (4th nomination)
102:
Articles for deletion/Libertarian Party (UK) (2nd nomination)
291:, I have no objection. I have also updated the article.
89:
Articles for deletion/Libertarian Party (United
Kingdom)
756:
Not checked the top right hand corner of the AfD then?
161:
157:
153:
225:
706:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Libertarian Party UK
285:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Libertarian Party UK
519:
list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions
317:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 9
311:
This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (
539:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
936:). No further edits should be made to this page.
283:As far as I can see, the article was deleted as
559:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
239:
8:
557:Note: This debate has been included in the
537:Note: This debate has been included in the
517:Note: This debate has been included in the
97:Articles for deletion/Libertarian Party (UK)
727:No, it wasn't. And the consensus was keep.
556:
536:
516:
604:Knowledge:Notability (political parties)
94:
86:
7:
85:
24:
808:this interview on politics.co.uk
342:- for various reasons given in
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
58:
1:
915:15:20, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
896:18:25, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
875:17:59, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
842:20:11, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
820:19:19, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
802:18:55, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
784:18:03, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
766:17:55, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
752:16:54, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
738:14:53, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
718:10:42, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
698:18:29, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
681:18:05, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
656:22:25, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
634:01:36, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
617:17:40, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
593:12:01, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
571:15:11, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
551:15:11, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
531:15:11, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
506:17:18, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
491:16:29, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
476:15:57, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
457:15:25, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
394:10:01, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
315:). I have transcluded it to
301:18:07, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
73:00:11, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
770:No, the one I mention is an
436:23:22, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
417:23:15, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
379:22:26, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
356:22:07, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
334:20:02, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
276:19:49, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
265:Talk:Libertarian Party (UK)
953:
638:My sole requirement was 2
925:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
128:Libertarian Party (UK)
84:AfDs for this article:
79:Libertarian Party (UK)
255::This article lacks
688:party satisfies?
309:Automated comment:
48:The result was
573:
553:
533:
336:
54:non-admin closure
944:
927:
640:reliable sources
627:
586:
344:the previous AfD
323:
307:
244:
243:
229:
181:
169:
151:
69:
64:
60:
34:
952:
951:
947:
946:
945:
943:
942:
941:
940:
934:deletion review
923:
671:per Rangoon11--
623:
582:
321:
261:daily telegraph
254:
186:
177:
142:
126:
123:
121:
82:
67:
62:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
950:
948:
939:
938:
918:
917:
899:
898:
878:
877:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
721:
720:
701:
700:
684:
683:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
596:
595:
575:
574:
554:
534:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
460:
459:
441:
440:
439:
438:
420:
419:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
359:
358:
337:
304:
303:
278:
250:
247:
246:
183:
122:
120:
119:
114:
109:
104:
99:
93:
92:
91:
83:
81:
76:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
949:
937:
935:
931:
926:
920:
919:
916:
912:
908:
904:
901:
900:
897:
893:
889:
884:
880:
879:
876:
872:
868:
867:Peterkingiron
864:
861:
860:
843:
839:
835:
831:
827:
823:
822:
821:
817:
813:
809:
805:
804:
803:
799:
795:
791:
787:
786:
785:
781:
777:
773:
769:
768:
767:
763:
759:
755:
754:
753:
749:
745:
741:
740:
739:
735:
731:
728:
725:
724:
723:
722:
719:
715:
711:
707:
703:
702:
699:
695:
691:
686:
685:
682:
678:
674:
670:
667:
666:
657:
653:
649:
645:
641:
637:
636:
635:
631:
626:
620:
619:
618:
614:
610:
605:
600:
599:
598:
597:
594:
590:
585:
580:
577:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
555:
552:
548:
544:
540:
535:
532:
528:
524:
520:
515:
507:
503:
499:
494:
493:
492:
488:
484:
479:
478:
477:
473:
469:
464:
463:
462:
461:
458:
454:
450:
446:
443:
442:
437:
433:
429:
424:
423:
422:
421:
418:
414:
410:
406:
403:
402:
395:
391:
387:
382:
381:
380:
376:
372:
368:
363:
362:
361:
360:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
338:
335:
331:
327:
324:
318:
314:
310:
306:
305:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
279:
277:
273:
269:
266:
262:
258:
257:wp:notability
253:
249:
248:
242:
238:
235:
232:
228:
224:
220:
217:
214:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
192:
189:
188:Find sources:
184:
180:
176:
173:
167:
163:
159:
155:
150:
146:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
124:
118:
115:
113:
110:
108:
105:
103:
100:
98:
95:
90:
87:
80:
77:
75:
74:
71:
70:
65:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
924:
921:
902:
862:
771:
668:
624:
583:
578:
444:
404:
339:
308:
280:
251:
236:
230:
222:
215:
209:
203:
197:
187:
174:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
213:free images
59:-- Cheers,
790:Richard BB
772:additional
930:talk page
863:Weak keep
625:North8000
584:North8000
563:• Gene93k
543:• Gene93k
523:• Gene93k
483:Rangoon11
449:Rangoon11
37:talk page
932:or in a
758:Lukeno94
730:Lukeno94
386:Lukeno94
348:Lukeno94
172:View log
39:or in a
907:Robnock
409:Carrite
322:Snotbot
219:WP refs
207:scholar
145:protect
140:history
68:Huntley
883:WP:GNG
830:WP:GNG
812:Morwen
776:Morwen
744:Morwen
710:Morwen
673:Neo139
644:wp:GNG
367:wp:gng
313:step 3
289:Morwen
252:Delete
191:Google
149:delete
369:test.
234:JSTOR
195:books
179:Stats
166:views
158:watch
154:links
63:Riley
16:<
911:talk
903:Keep
892:talk
888:JRPG
871:talk
838:talk
834:JRPG
816:Talk
798:talk
794:JRPG
780:Talk
762:talk
748:Talk
734:talk
714:Talk
694:talk
690:JRPG
677:talk
669:Keep
652:talk
648:JRPG
630:talk
613:talk
609:JRPG
589:talk
579:Keep
567:talk
547:talk
527:talk
502:talk
498:JRPG
487:talk
472:talk
468:JRPG
453:talk
445:Keep
432:talk
428:JRPG
413:talk
405:Keep
390:talk
375:talk
371:JRPG
352:talk
340:Keep
297:talk
293:JRPG
281:Keep
272:talk
268:JRPG
227:FENS
201:news
162:logs
136:talk
132:edit
50:keep
332:»
319:.
241:TWL
170:– (
52:. (
913:)
894:)
873:)
840:)
818:)
800:)
782:)
764:)
750:)
736:)
716:)
696:)
679:)
654:)
632:)
615:)
591:)
569:)
561:.
549:)
541:.
529:)
521:.
504:)
489:)
474:)
455:)
434:)
415:)
392:)
377:)
354:)
328:•
299:)
274:)
221:)
164:|
160:|
156:|
152:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
56:)
909:(
890:(
869:(
836:(
814:(
796:(
778:(
760:(
746:(
732:(
712:(
692:(
675:(
650:(
628:(
611:(
587:(
565:(
545:(
525:(
500:(
485:(
470:(
451:(
430:(
411:(
388:(
373:(
350:(
330:c
326:t
295:(
270:(
245:)
237:·
231:·
223:·
216:·
210:·
204:·
198:·
193:(
185:(
182:)
175:·
168:)
130:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.