697:(not policy, but a consensus worth respecting). For fun, I also did a Lexis search which turned up over 1000 hits, excluding BBC yielded 279 hits. Looking through these hits, they appear to be one of the best sources for international media on ISIS in Libya. Notability seems clearly apparent. (Note: Also have received profiles of them and their journalists in
688:
NewsBank has 2,600 hits for "Libya Herald". I checked and the Libya Herald itself is not indexed in NewsBank, but they are a frequent source for the BBC Monitored
International Reports which makes up 1,500 of their hits. Thus, only about 1000 of those are actual cites as opposed to just reprinting of
391:: My delete will remain the same because those sources above just show reporting done by the newspaper and isn't about the newspaper. Per that page that was mentioned, it is presumed to be notable, but there really isn't a threshold for what is considered significant citations.
611:, Knowledge should also encourage free press outlets like the Libya Herald since many countries have excessive control of the press. Even in developed countries governments have gone to great lengths the distort the reporting of the news. In the United States
689:
their reports by the BBC. But still, just in April they've been cited as a news source by The
Citizen in South Africa, Global Data News, African Manager, and the Committee to Protect Journalists. It seems they pass
175:
405:
Also, that isn't even a guideline - "This page is intended to be an explanatory supplement to the
Knowledge:Notability guideline. It is not one of Knowledge's policies or guidelines.".
253:
128:
464:
Can you please cite the policy that supports your quote for "frequently cited by other reliable sources"? The ones you have cited so far do not mention that anywhere.
169:
227:
299:: The subject of this article has repeatedly and significantly been cited by other reliable sources which alone helps it meet encyclopedic criteria per
210:. References provided are of an employee promoting the subject matter rather than independent sources establishing the notability of the organization.
434:) as the subject came into being about half-a-decade ago and naturally, the first few searches would not support providing other sources talking
316:
335:
135:
562:
Sorry, I have no comment over your summation other than to say I'd have to respectfully disagree and this is what I'm referring to from
604:
438:
the subject per se on top of the results - given the fact that it's an online newspaper; ergo, I went with the point that referred to '
430:. In any case, I failed to provide with any links towards an 'about' of the subject (which is what I meant while indicating that the
310:
101:
96:
568:
objective evidence that the subject has received significant attention from independent sources to support a claim of notability
105:
17:
190:
88:
157:
694:
630:
600:
300:
710:
702:
657:
733:
500:
40:
151:
698:
706:
675:
264:
238:
147:
729:
714:
677:
646:
624:
612:
579:
550:
524:
473:
459:
414:
400:
383:
379:
362:
291:
271:
245:
219:
70:
36:
375:
197:
638:
575:
557:
542:
520:
496:
480:
465:
455:
358:
211:
183:
642:
546:
469:
215:
668:
620:
343:(everything highlighted in BOLD) should be able to provide with further claim of significance.
259:
233:
92:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
728:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
426:
I concur; my apologies in case my message seemed to indicate that I was referring to it as a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
57:
608:
326:
163:
513:
with which the subject of this article sufficiently provides base not to have it deleted.
505:
2. To address your query, you may further refer to other policy related guidelines over
571:
534:
516:
506:
451:
443:
410:
396:
371:
354:
331:
287:
68:
637:
one of
Knowledge's policies or guidelines." Why are you using it then as a rationale?
690:
563:
538:
510:
447:
346:
207:
53:
616:
84:
76:
122:
350:
322:
442:, providing sufficient base not to have the article deleted on the basis of
421:
406:
392:
283:
62:
345:
Undoubtedly, the article requires a lot of details but definitely passes
722:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
374:. Also numerous citations in Google Books and Google Scholar.
660:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
485:
Again, regret the confusion. Kindly allow me to classify -
605:
Google scholar listings Many citations in Google
Scholar
313:
as a source of news and not for advertising or publicity
305:
not be considered in any specific order of significance
118:
114:
110:
182:
666:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
736:). No further edits should be made to this page.
615:was a big effort to manipulate the news media.
254:list of News media-related deletion discussions
533:. One last question, what specific text from
531:no policy supports your claim in bold letters
339:...and so on! A Google search made via terms
196:
8:
282:: I found no reliable significant coverage.
252:Note: This debate has been included in the
226:Note: This debate has been included in the
60:reflects the on-going community consensus.
489:frequently cited by other reliable sources'
440:frequently cited by other reliable sources'
251:
228:list of Libya-related deletion discussions
225:
353:/credible sources to support the same.
7:
693:clearly as well as the consensus at
495:or policy per se; however, it is an
24:
633:says at the very top that "it is
432:article requires a lot of details
703:Committee to Protect Journalists
341:"Libya Herald" -libyaherald.com
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
609:Many citations in Google books
1:
695:Knowledge:Notability_(media)
631:Knowledge:Notability (media)
541:do you claim to apply here?
319:- again, as a source of news
497:how-to and information page
753:
715:02:09, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
678:02:18, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
647:20:41, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
625:20:28, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
601:media notability (point 4)
580:21:25, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
551:21:19, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
525:21:01, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
499:that I've cited to seek a
474:20:41, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
460:20:05, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
415:19:33, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
401:19:29, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
384:19:16, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
363:19:08, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
301:media notability (point 4)
292:18:15, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
272:17:52, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
246:17:52, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
220:16:48, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
71:21:54, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
56:has been demonstrated and
725:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
511:verifiability (WP:NRV)
448:verifiability (WP:NRV)
613:Operation Mockingbird
603:Other major factors:
629:The page you linked
507:notability (WP:ARTN)
503:among the community.
444:notability (WP:ARTN)
529:OK, so, to sum up,
349:and has sufficient
599:Main rationale is
501:level of consensus
707:AbstractIllusions
680:
274:
248:
744:
727:
671:
665:
663:
661:
561:
487:1. As assured, '
484:
425:
269:
267:
262:
243:
241:
236:
201:
200:
186:
138:
126:
108:
65:
34:
752:
751:
747:
746:
745:
743:
742:
741:
740:
734:deletion review
723:
681:
669:
656:
654:
555:
478:
419:
311:Huffington Post
265:
260:
258:
239:
234:
232:
143:
134:
99:
83:
80:
63:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
750:
748:
739:
738:
718:
717:
664:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
514:
504:
486:
386:
365:
344:
338:
332:Times of Malta
329:
320:
314:
308:
294:
276:
275:
249:
204:
203:
140:
79:
74:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
749:
737:
735:
731:
726:
720:
719:
716:
712:
708:
705:). So: Keep.
704:
700:
696:
692:
687:
683:
682:
679:
676:
673:
672:
662:
659:
648:
644:
640:
636:
632:
628:
627:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
606:
602:
598:
595:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
559:
554:
553:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
527:
526:
522:
518:
512:
508:
502:
498:
494:
490:
482:
477:
476:
475:
471:
467:
463:
462:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
423:
418:
417:
416:
412:
408:
404:
403:
402:
398:
394:
390:
387:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
366:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
342:
337:
333:
328:
324:
318:
312:
306:
302:
298:
295:
293:
289:
285:
281:
278:
277:
273:
270:
268:
263:
255:
250:
247:
244:
242:
237:
229:
224:
223:
222:
221:
217:
213:
209:
199:
195:
192:
189:
185:
181:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
149:
146:
145:Find sources:
141:
137:
133:
130:
124:
120:
116:
112:
107:
103:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
81:
78:
75:
73:
72:
69:
67:
66:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
724:
721:
685:
684:Very strong
670:Juliancolton
667:
655:
634:
596:
567:
530:
492:
488:
439:
435:
431:
427:
388:
367:
340:
304:
303:. Examples (
296:
279:
261:CAPTAIN RAJU
257:
235:CAPTAIN RAJU
231:
205:
193:
187:
179:
172:
166:
160:
154:
144:
131:
85:Libya Herald
77:Libya Herald
61:
49:
47:
31:
28:
376:Bad-patches
323:Malta Today
317:Metro.co.uk
170:free images
699:Al Jazeera
570:. Thanks.
450:. Thanks.
351:verifiable
730:talk page
572:TopCipher
517:TopCipher
491:is not a
452:TopCipher
372:TopCipher
370:: as per
355:TopCipher
58:WP:NMEDIA
37:talk page
732:or in a
658:Relisted
639:JadeBlue
558:JadeBlue
543:JadeBlue
515:Thanks.
493:set rule
481:JadeBlue
466:JadeBlue
428:set rule
212:JadeBlue
129:View log
39:or in a
617:Knox490
535:WP:ARTN
389:Comment
176:WP refs
164:scholar
102:protect
97:history
691:WP:GNG
564:WP:NRV
539:WP:NRV
347:WP:GNG
280:Delete
208:WP:GNG
206:fails
148:Google
106:delete
54:WP:GNG
597:Keep.
436:about
191:JSTOR
152:books
136:Stats
123:views
115:watch
111:links
16:<
711:talk
701:and
686:Keep
643:talk
621:talk
607:and
576:talk
547:talk
537:and
521:talk
470:talk
456:talk
422:SL93
411:talk
407:SL93
397:talk
393:SL93
380:talk
368:Keep
359:talk
336:link
327:link
297:Keep
288:talk
284:SL93
216:talk
184:FENS
158:news
119:logs
93:talk
89:edit
64:Mkdw
50:keep
635:not
509:or
446:or
330:4.
321:3.
315:2.
309:1.
307:) -
266:(✉)
240:(✉)
198:TWL
127:– (
713:)
674:|
645:)
623:)
578:)
566:-
549:)
523:)
472:)
458:)
413:)
399:)
382:)
361:)
334:-
325:-
290:)
256:.
230:.
218:)
178:)
121:|
117:|
113:|
109:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
52:.
709:(
641:(
619:(
574:(
560::
556:@
545:(
519:(
483::
479:@
468:(
454:(
424::
420:@
409:(
395:(
378:(
357:(
286:(
214:(
202:)
194:·
188:·
180:·
173:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
150:(
142:(
139:)
132:·
125:)
87:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.