205:. Sources 2, 6, and 9 are obvious press releases. Source 3 is a patent application. Sources 4, 7, and 8 are YouTube videos. Source 5 is a yellow pages directory. Source 10 is an interview which is okay to list but does do much as an independent source. Note that I have also checked Google News and did not find more.
426:
because they're blogs and industry publications. The guideline says "attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability." Clearly the sourcing in obscure industry publications fails this, and I could not find coverage in media with
355:
sources, is this company mentioned in the "significant detail" the GNG requires in the mainstream media? = reliable, published, third-party sources? Before any Keep proponent suggests this blog post or that suffices, what is the basis for their assertion that such sources have a reputation for
444:: I agree the article smacks of being promotional for the company. If it attains important patents then there might be a case for for inclusion on that basis, but currently it is difficult to see that the qualifications for notability are fulfilled.
298:
as well. Press releases don't count at all, and blogs count very little. Same with promotional interviews. Number 2 is such an obvious press release that it includes the company's phone number at the end--it says "Please call 415-796-6475"!
201:. "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." Source 1 is an okay reference in a specialist blog but not enough to pass
166:
119:
160:
242:
222:
126:
92:
87:
96:
79:
181:
17:
148:
142:
472:
40:
453:
436:
410:
391:
366:
339:
308:
278:
254:
234:
214:
61:
138:
83:
304:
210:
188:
75:
67:
419:
300:
291:
266:
206:
202:
198:
468:
335:
36:
383:
357:
57:
154:
174:
320:
274:
449:
432:
250:
230:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
467:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
331:
375:
53:
423:
295:
269:
seems proven by references #s 1, 2, and 10. Other sources seem available including and
406:
270:
445:
428:
246:
226:
113:
323:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
400:
290:
Celltech, thanks for your comments, but I think you are applying
461:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
109:
105:
101:
173:
356:
reliability and fact checking, as the GNG requires?
330:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
187:
351:The nom's argument is persuasive. In looking for
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
475:). No further edits should be made to this page.
243:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
223:list of Business-related deletion discussions
8:
241:Note: This debate has been included in the
221:Note: This debate has been included in the
240:
220:
422:. There are sources, but they are not
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
294:incorrectly. It's worth looking at
427:wider circulation and coverage. --
374:Just not enough reliable sources.
24:
197:Promotional article that fails
399:as per nom and Ravenswing. --
1:
454:11:49, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
437:09:48, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
411:20:02, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
392:02:02, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
367:09:19, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
340:23:53, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
62:19:06, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
309:18:42, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
279:18:18, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
255:17:01, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
235:17:01, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
215:17:03, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
492:
464:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
76:LightManufacturing LLC
68:LightManufacturing LLC
48:The result was
342:
257:
237:
483:
466:
387:
379:
363:
329:
325:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
491:
490:
486:
485:
484:
482:
481:
480:
479:
473:deletion review
462:
409:
385:
377:
359:
318:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
489:
487:
478:
477:
457:
456:
439:
413:
405:
394:
369:
345:
344:
343:
327:
326:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
301:Logical Cowboy
282:
281:
259:
258:
238:
207:Logical Cowboy
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
488:
476:
474:
470:
465:
459:
458:
455:
451:
447:
443:
440:
438:
434:
430:
425:
421:
417:
414:
412:
408:
404:
403:
398:
395:
393:
389:
388:
381:
380:
373:
370:
368:
365:
364:
362:
354:
350:
347:
346:
341:
337:
333:
328:
324:
322:
317:
316:
310:
306:
302:
297:
293:
289:
286:
285:
284:
283:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
261:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
239:
236:
232:
228:
224:
219:
218:
217:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
463:
460:
441:
420:WP:CORPDEPTH
415:
401:
396:
384:
376:
371:
360:
358:
352:
348:
319:
292:WP:CORPDEPTH
287:
267:WP:CORPDEPTH
262:
203:WP:CORPDEPTH
199:WP:CORPDEPTH
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
361:Ravenswing
332:Mark Arsten
161:free images
378:Miniapolis
353:legitimate
54:Beeblebrox
469:talk page
37:talk page
471:or in a
424:reliable
418:: fails
321:Relisted
271:Celtechm
120:View log
39:or in a
446:Fireflo
429:Batard0
402:P 1 9 9
349:Delete:
247:Frankie
227:Frankie
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
442:Delete
416:Delete
397:Delete
372:Delete
139:Google
97:delete
50:delete
296:WP:RS
288:Reply
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
450:talk
433:talk
386:talk
336:talk
305:talk
275:talk
265:Per
263:Keep
251:talk
245:. —
231:talk
225:. —
211:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
189:TWL
118:– (
452:)
435:)
390:)
338:)
307:)
277:)
253:)
233:)
213:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
448:(
431:(
407:✉
382:(
334:(
303:(
273:(
249:(
229:(
209:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.