449:
most of her work does seem to be published in conferences,m which is not unusual in engineering. . And there can be problems in small specialties like hers, because its harder to tell what the standards are. Looking in Scopus, I see 12 papers, none of them cited more than 9 times. they are in good journals, thugh, and most of the similar papers she cites have similarly low citation frequency. She is additionally that member of several formal standards committees, which is normally a recognition of at least some stature of an authority. But I';m going to tentatively make a value judgement here: her work is concerned with the design and testing of specific wheelchair components, not the design of wheel chair and other assistive systems in any broader sense. Her web page, too, fills in the content with student projects. On balance, I do not think she is notable yet. Perhaps she will be, but not now.
448:
As a rule assistant professors are not yet at the stage of notability. Some are, but it has to be strongly shown by the published work. There can be problems of judging the published work of people in applied subjects, because the important work can be elsewhere than in peer reviewed journals,and
378:
Your GScholar search does not really give more hits than already found and the most cited article still has only 12 cites. I have no time at the moment to see whether the other Ghits perhaps contain sources to show notability according to
151:
197:
All academics publish, so the fact that she has published papers alone does not make her notable (my grad student has published papers, too...) To know whether a paper is cited or not, you can use
209:. Knowing David, he has checked this and I see no reason to doubt his statement that her papers are not highly cited. She's still young, may become notable later, but Knowledge (XXG) is not a
427:
120:
255:(cannot give a direct link as it is a subscription service) lists 12 articles that together have been cited 26 times, highest score 7. David, therefore, is correct. --
231:
I forgot what page it was, but there is a specific page that says you should always double check before voting and do your own research to avoid any sheeping. -
248:
472:. There is no evidence that she has published highly cited papers. She also hasn't receive any major awards. I don't think this bio meets WP standard.
87:
82:
91:
74:
304:
350:
17:
354:
501:-notability in the future, as the topics of research are the type that tend to attract media interest, but not yet there.--
497:. In addition to the points already made above, news coverage of the subject is pretty much nonexistent. Has potential for
550:
36:
535:
510:
481:
460:
439:
413:
396:
366:
337:
316:
295:
264:
238:
222:
189:
166:
140:
56:
404:- some of these are different van Roosmalens - there is an M.L. van R and a Lieke van R, as well as Linda van R.
549:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
162:
136:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
78:
236:
279:
70:
62:
506:
477:
435:
210:
158:
132:
531:
232:
182:
127:
No evidence (in the form of highly cited papers, major awards, popular press, etc) of passing
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
519:
490:
469:
384:
346:
325:
283:
128:
502:
473:
409:
392:
362:
333:
312:
291:
260:
218:
523:
498:
494:
380:
431:
252:
206:
198:
303:- Even if we were to regard her CV as if it were a 3rd party source she does not pass
527:
456:
178:
50:
108:
405:
388:
358:
329:
308:
287:
256:
214:
349:. Search as "van Roosmalen, L", in addition to "Linda van Roosmalen". Check
451:
175:. Has published papers, how can you know they are not "highly cited"? --
202:
543:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
152:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
383:, but this certainly does not show notability according to
115:
104:
100:
96:
278:- assistant professor, has published papers - but no
251:
indicates that her highest cited paper got 11 cites.
428:list of Living people-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
553:). No further edits should be made to this page.
282:sources, no evidence of meeting the standard of
8:
146:
324:per Crusio and Eppstein: not notable as
150:: This debate has been included in the
426:: This debate has been included in the
305:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (academics)
179:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
518:. Not important enough to pass
1:
353:with 320 additional hits and
570:
57:01:46, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
536:00:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
511:18:31, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
482:20:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
461:09:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
440:00:01, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
414:10:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
397:23:08, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
367:23:00, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
338:20:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
317:11:59, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
296:10:13, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
265:12:08, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
239:10:15, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
223:08:43, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
190:05:30, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
167:04:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
141:04:49, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
546:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
468:- Doesn't seem to pass
526:. See comments above.
357:with 80 more hits.
71:Linda van Roosmalen
63:Linda van Roosmalen
44:The result was
489:. Passes neither
442:
169:
155:
561:
548:
422:
187:
185:
156:
118:
112:
94:
53:
34:
569:
568:
564:
563:
562:
560:
559:
558:
557:
551:deletion review
544:
188:
183:
177:
114:
85:
69:
66:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
567:
565:
556:
555:
539:
538:
513:
484:
463:
443:
419:
418:
417:
416:
399:
370:
369:
355:Google Scholar
345:- Notable per
340:
319:
298:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
253:Web of Science
249:Google Scholar
242:
241:
226:
225:
207:Web of Science
199:Google Scholar
192:
176:
170:
159:David Eppstein
133:David Eppstein
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
566:
554:
552:
547:
541:
540:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
514:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
488:
485:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
464:
462:
458:
454:
453:
447:
444:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
420:
415:
411:
407:
403:
400:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
377:
374:
373:
372:
371:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
341:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
320:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
299:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
274:
273:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
247:As you wish:
246:
245:
244:
243:
240:
237:
234:
230:
229:
228:
227:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
193:
191:
186:
180:
174:
171:
168:
164:
160:
153:
149:
145:
144:
143:
142:
138:
134:
130:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
545:
542:
515:
486:
465:
450:
445:
423:
401:
375:
342:
321:
300:
275:
211:crystal ball
194:
172:
147:
126:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
503:Eric Yurken
474:AdjustShift
446:Weak Delete
432:Erwin85Bot
280:secondary
173:Weak keep
528:Demophon
121:View log
520:WP:PROF
491:WP:PROF
470:WP:PROF
402:Comment
385:WP:PROF
376:Comment
347:WP:PROF
326:WP:PROF
284:WP:PROF
129:WP:PROF
88:protect
83:history
52:MBisanz
524:WP:BIO
516:Delete
499:WP:BIO
495:WP:BIO
487:Delete
466:Delete
406:JohnCD
389:Crusio
381:WP:BIO
359:Esasus
351:Google
330:Drmies
322:Delete
309:Boston
301:Delete
288:JohnCD
276:Delete
257:Crusio
215:Crusio
203:Scopus
195:Delete
116:delete
92:delete
46:delete
205:, or
184:talk
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
532:talk
522:nor
507:talk
493:nor
478:talk
457:talk
436:talk
430:. --
424:Note
410:talk
393:talk
387:. --
363:talk
343:Keep
334:talk
313:talk
307:. --
292:talk
261:talk
219:talk
213:. --
163:talk
148:Note
137:talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
452:DGG
233:Mgm
131:. —
534:)
509:)
480:)
459:)
438:)
412:)
395:)
365:)
336:)
328:.
315:)
294:)
286:.
263:)
221:)
201:,
165:)
154:.
139:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
530:(
505:(
476:(
455:(
434:(
408:(
391:(
361:(
332:(
311:(
290:(
259:(
235:|
217:(
181:|
161:(
157:—
135:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.