280:
he created his own style of those arts then that would be different and would not confer notability at all. IF independent sources are provided that show he really introduced those arts to Russia then the article should be kept. This seems unlikely, but I want to give the article's authors a chance to prove the claims. Otherwise there's nothing else that shows notability and the article should be deleted. The copyright issue is also a concern, but is irrelevant if the article is deemed not notable.
279:
We've had articles on other people that have been the first to introduce a particular martial art to a country and those people have generally been considered notable--with good documentation. That's how I interpreted that statement, but it currently lacks the needed sources. Of course, if it means
235:
If he really is the "Founder of jujitsu and kobudo in the USSR" as the article claims, then he's probably notable. The problem is that there are no independent reliable sources to support those claims. Another problem is that the article appears to be a machine translation of this non-independent
194:
I do not know how to deal with this one. The claims and titles especially in the
Japanese context are contrary to the normal way of things and bring into question the validity of all claims. I have no idea what a Juice mentor is but it probably has to do with a very bad machine translation.
163:
157:
320:
212:
116:
300:
89:
84:
93:
123:
265:
Both
Jujutsu and Kobudo are not monolithic - certainly not in their country of origin. That statement alone has red flags popping up all over the place.
76:
178:
145:
17:
139:
356:
332:
312:
289:
274:
256:
224:
204:
58:
135:
80:
375:
40:
185:
72:
64:
195:
Currently I would class this in the same category as the Super Soke's from the west which are not notable.
371:
36:
151:
56:
171:
285:
252:
328:
308:
240:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
370:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
352:
344:
270:
244:
220:
200:
53:
281:
248:
324:
304:
110:
348:
266:
216:
196:
247:
since high ranks alone have never been considered enough to show notability.
243:. If the founder claim is untrue, then there's nothing to show he meets
237:
364:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
106:
102:
98:
170:
321:list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions
213:list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
378:). No further edits should be made to this page.
347:and I agree it looks like a copyright violation.
343:Right now the article fails to show he meets
184:
8:
319:Note: This debate has been included in the
299:Note: This debate has been included in the
211:Note: This debate has been included in the
301:list of Russia-related deletion discussions
318:
298:
210:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
395:
367:Please do not modify it.
357:23:23, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
333:05:28, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
313:05:28, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
290:20:11, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
275:19:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
257:19:28, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
225:09:37, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
205:09:37, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
73:Linder Joseph Borysovych
65:Linder Joseph Borysovych
59:16:49, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
239:, so it may well be a
48:The result was
335:
315:
227:
386:
369:
189:
188:
174:
126:
114:
96:
34:
394:
393:
389:
388:
387:
385:
384:
383:
382:
376:deletion review
365:
131:
122:
87:
71:
68:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
392:
390:
381:
380:
360:
359:
337:
336:
316:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
260:
259:
229:
228:
192:
191:
128:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
391:
379:
377:
373:
368:
362:
361:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
339:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
317:
314:
310:
306:
302:
297:
291:
287:
283:
278:
277:
276:
272:
268:
264:
263:
262:
261:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
231:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
209:
208:
207:
206:
202:
198:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
366:
363:
340:
232:
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
119:
49:
47:
31:
28:
267:Peter Rehse
217:Peter Rehse
197:Peter Rehse
158:free images
241:WP:COPYVIO
54:j⚛e decker
372:talk page
345:WP:MANOTE
325:• Gene93k
305:• Gene93k
245:WP:MANOTE
37:talk page
374:or in a
282:Papaursa
249:Papaursa
117:View log
39:or in a
236:source
233:Comment
164:WP refs
152:scholar
90:protect
85:history
349:Jakejr
341:Delete
136:Google
94:delete
50:delete
179:JSTOR
140:books
124:Stats
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
353:talk
329:talk
309:talk
286:talk
271:talk
253:talk
221:talk
201:talk
172:FENS
146:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
186:TWL
115:– (
355:)
331:)
323:.
311:)
303:.
288:)
273:)
255:)
223:)
215:.
203:)
166:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
52:.
351:(
327:(
307:(
284:(
269:(
251:(
219:(
199:(
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
120:·
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.