Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Lintel (Linux) - Knowledge

Source 📝

197:
other than the fact it is commercially expedient and that one can coin a word, the term is not really significant, as majority of the Linux applications can be ported to non-Intel architectures without much trouble, in fact majority of those applications can be ported to non-Linux Unices without much
130:
I'm placing this up for nomination for AfD's secondary reasons, to force some discussion. I do believe in it's deletion but unfortunately with such little activity there was no chance of debate on it's talk page. While i'd love this term to see widespread use, the article as it stands is more of an
131:
attempt to bring about that notability than to represent it. There are no sources and I've been unable to find any non-trivial ones, or mentions that don't source back to wikipedia.
123: 167: 90: 85: 94: 77: 17: 247: 36: 246:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
231: 207: 185: 157: 140: 59: 81: 227: 180: 153: 203: 136: 73: 65: 149: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
223: 174: 199: 132: 53: 111: 217:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
193: 47: 240:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
118: 107: 103: 99: 222:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 250:). No further edits should be made to this page. 168:list of Computing-related deletion discussions 8: 166:: This debate has been included in the 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 232:02:48, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 60:18:08, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 1: 208:21:55, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 186:15:53, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 158:16:09, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 141:15:22, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 267: 243:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 44:The result was 234: 188: 171: 258: 245: 221: 219: 183: 177: 172: 162: 121: 115: 97: 56: 34: 266: 265: 261: 260: 259: 257: 256: 255: 254: 248:deletion review 241: 215: 181: 175: 117: 88: 72: 69: 54: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 264: 262: 253: 252: 236: 235: 220: 212: 211: 210: 189: 160: 128: 127: 74:Lintel (Linux) 68: 66:Lintel (Linux) 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 263: 251: 249: 244: 238: 237: 233: 229: 225: 218: 214: 213: 209: 205: 201: 196: 195: 190: 187: 184: 178: 169: 165: 161: 159: 155: 151: 148: 145: 144: 143: 142: 138: 134: 125: 120: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 61: 58: 57: 50: 49: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 242: 239: 216: 192:Redirect to 191: 163: 146: 129: 52: 46:redirect to 45: 43: 31: 28: 224:Ron Ritzman 198:trouble. -- 176:Fabrictramp 200:Voidvector 182:talk to me 133:Jimmi Hugh 150:FaceCook 124:View log 147:Neutral 91:protect 86:history 55:MBisanz 194:Wintel 119:delete 95:delete 48:Wintel 122:) – ( 112:views 104:watch 100:links 16:< 228:talk 204:talk 164:Note 154:talk 137:talk 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 173:-- 170:. 230:) 206:) 179:| 156:) 139:) 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 51:. 226:( 202:( 152:( 135:( 126:) 116:( 114:) 76:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Wintel
MBisanz
18:08, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Lintel (Linux)
Lintel (Linux)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Jimmi Hugh
talk
15:22, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
FaceCook
talk
16:09, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
list of Computing-related deletion discussions
Fabrictramp
talk to me
15:53, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Wintel
Voidvector

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.