Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Liseuse - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

604:: Not sure what the content is supposed to be; it seems to be an article about a word in another language. We already have an article for e-books and it links to a French version if people want to learn the French terminology. If you put Liseuse in the the French WP you get a disambiguation page that doesn't list the e-book use, so apparently the meaning given in the article is not the primary one. Even if it were, should we have articles on every possible translation of English terms into another language? It's hard to see how this would pass 71: 546:. Basically, this is supposed to be a forum for rational arguments either for or against keeping the article. You've stated your argument and you're welcome to comment on other people's arguments. Instead, you're trying recruit people who don't know anything about this process to come in and influence the "vote".-- 574:
If I'm misrepresenting your actions then I apologize. People can follow the links above and judge for themselves. I was trying to point out that the discussion created on that external forum seems, at least to me, inappropriate and not particularly helpful to your
268: 229: 78: 357:) which I already mentioned in my nomination. A forum does not qualify as a reliable source. Take a look at the Knowledge (XXG) guidelines about reliable sources - 262: 560:
That is a misrepresentation. I am not recruiting anyone. And I think you are belittling Knowledge (XXG) users. I merely raised an issue, somewhere else.
335:- I was just about to update the page with some relevant refences and a rewrite, the text is now posted on the article's discussion page. -- 87: 477: 117: 665: 543: 17: 368: 322: 354: 312: 103: 689: 36: 283: 202: 197: 250: 206: 439:. Like I said above, I would happily endorse a redirect if sources can be found. Forums are not reliable sources. 76:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
644: 510:
It looks like someone didn't read the "This is not an election" policy. The responses are pretty funny though.--
149: 688:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
189: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
481: 669: 661: 473: 413:
This word is not a neologism in the sense it has not been 'coined' - merely coopted from another language.
133: 107: 636: 393: 361:. If you can find multiple reliable sources that use the term, I would happily endorse a redirect/merge. 244: 92: 640: 467:. Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictionary. This word might belong to French version of Knowledge (XXG) - 561: 529: 414: 240: 565: 533: 418: 276: 49: 673: 648: 621: 584: 569: 555: 537: 519: 501: 485: 451: 436: 422: 405: 372: 344: 326: 304: 193: 54: 139: 70: 605: 290: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
185: 60: 617: 580: 551: 515: 443: 401: 363: 317: 525: 494: 432: 358: 340: 609: 300: 256: 389: 167: 155: 123: 223: 102:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
613: 576: 547: 511: 397: 498: 336: 353:
The only source I see that have you referenced is the mobileread forums (
658:
Would be best being deleted since it's all a bunch of nonsense.
431:
Can you provide evidence of that claim? Knowledge (XXG) requires
682:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
65: 96:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, 86:
among Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has
544:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion#AfD Wikietiquette
526:
http://www.mobileread.com/forums/showthread.php?t=56418
495:
http://www.mobileread.com/forums/showthread.php?t=56360
219: 215: 211: 307:). No evidence that this term has widespread usage in 275: 468: 289: 299:Originally prodded. Term is a French synonym for 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 692:). No further edits should be made to this page. 116:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected 8: 493:hmmm looks like we may get some canvasing 90:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and 110:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. 542:This is not a democracy. Please read 524:That wasn't an election!... this is: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 69: 674:21:52, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 649:12:10, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 622:05:33, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 585:02:29, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 570:12:41, 15 September 2009 (UTC) 556:11:08, 15 September 2009 (UTC) 538:12:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 520:05:39, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 502:22:37, 13 September 2009 (UTC) 486:12:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC) 469:http://fr.wikipedia.org/Livrel 452:04:35, 13 September 2009 (UTC) 423:23:14, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 406:18:10, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 373:17:45, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 345:15:10, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 327:15:01, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 55:00:29, 20 September 2009 (UTC) 1: 106:on the part of others and to 709: 305:french e-book reader page 685:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 148:; accounts blocked for 118:single-purpose accounts 88:policies and guidelines 637:List of e-book readers 100:by counting votes. 79:not a majority vote 44:The result was 664:comment added by 476:comment added by 450: 181: 180: 177: 104:assume good faith 700: 687: 676: 641:AWriterWandering 488: 449: 446: 440: 433:reliable sources 366: 320: 294: 293: 279: 227: 209: 175: 163: 147: 131: 112: 82:, but instead a 73: 66: 52: 34: 708: 707: 703: 702: 701: 699: 698: 697: 696: 690:deletion review 683: 659: 471: 444: 441: 371: 362: 325: 316: 236: 200: 184: 165: 153: 137: 121: 108:sign your posts 64: 50: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 706: 704: 695: 694: 678: 677: 652: 651: 625: 624: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 587: 505: 504: 490: 489: 457: 456: 455: 454: 426: 425: 408: 378: 377: 376: 375: 367: 348: 347: 321: 297: 296: 233: 179: 178: 74: 63: 58: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 705: 693: 691: 686: 680: 679: 675: 671: 667: 663: 657: 654: 653: 650: 646: 642: 638: 634: 630: 627: 626: 623: 619: 615: 611: 607: 603: 600: 599: 586: 582: 578: 573: 572: 571: 567: 563: 559: 558: 557: 553: 549: 545: 541: 540: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 522: 521: 517: 513: 509: 508: 507: 506: 503: 500: 496: 492: 491: 487: 483: 479: 478:195.98.17.195 475: 470: 466: 462: 459: 458: 453: 448: 447: 438: 434: 430: 429: 428: 427: 424: 420: 416: 412: 409: 407: 403: 399: 395: 391: 387: 383: 380: 379: 374: 370: 365: 360: 356: 352: 351: 350: 349: 346: 342: 338: 334: 331: 330: 329: 328: 324: 319: 314: 310: 306: 302: 301:E-book reader 292: 288: 285: 282: 278: 274: 270: 267: 264: 261: 258: 255: 252: 249: 246: 242: 239: 238:Find sources: 234: 231: 225: 221: 217: 213: 208: 204: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 182: 173: 169: 161: 157: 151: 145: 141: 135: 129: 125: 119: 115: 111: 109: 105: 99: 95: 94: 89: 85: 81: 80: 75: 72: 68: 67: 62: 59: 57: 56: 53: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 684: 681: 666:76.19.107.84 655: 632: 628: 601: 464: 460: 442: 437:verification 410: 394:WP:NEOLOGISM 390:Liseuse desk 385: 381: 332: 308: 298: 286: 280: 272: 265: 259: 253: 247: 237: 171: 159: 150:sockpuppetry 143: 132:; suspected 127: 113: 101: 97: 91: 83: 77: 45: 43: 31: 28: 660:—Preceding 472:—Preceding 445:JUJUTACULAR 364:Jujutacular 318:Jujutacular 263:free images 313:this forum 84:discussion 51:Skomorokh 562:AprilHare 530:AprilHare 415:AprilHare 140:canvassed 134:canvassed 93:consensus 662:unsigned 633:Redirect 606:WP:IINFO 474:unsigned 465:Redirect 386:Redirect 369:contribs 323:contribs 230:View log 172:username 166:{{subst: 160:username 154:{{subst: 144:username 138:{{subst: 128:username 122:{{subst: 575:case.-- 309:English 269:WP refs 257:scholar 203:protect 198:history 186:Liseuse 136:users: 61:Liseuse 656:Delete 629:Delete 614:RDBury 602:Delete 577:RDBury 548:RDBury 512:RDBury 461:Delete 398:Pburka 382:Delete 311:. See 241:Google 207:delete 46:delete 639:. -- 359:WP:RS 303:(See 284:JSTOR 245:books 224:views 216:watch 212:links 114:Note: 16:< 670:talk 645:talk 618:talk 610:WP:N 581:talk 566:talk 552:talk 534:talk 516:talk 499:Geni 482:talk 435:for 419:talk 411:Keep 402:talk 355:here 341:talk 337:Xero 333:Keep 277:FENS 251:news 220:logs 194:talk 190:edit 635:to 631:or 612:.-- 608:or 528::D 463:or 388:to 384:or 291:TWL 228:– ( 168:csp 164:or 156:csm 124:spa 98:not 672:) 647:) 620:) 583:) 568:) 554:) 536:) 518:) 484:) 421:) 404:) 396:. 392:. 343:) 315:. 271:) 222:| 218:| 214:| 210:| 205:| 201:| 196:| 192:| 174:}} 162:}} 152:: 146:}} 130:}} 120:: 48:. 668:( 643:( 616:( 579:( 564:( 550:( 532:( 514:( 497:© 480:( 417:( 400:( 339:( 295:) 287:· 281:· 273:· 266:· 260:· 254:· 248:· 243:( 235:( 232:) 226:) 188:( 176:. 170:| 158:| 142:| 126:|

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
 Skomorokh 
00:29, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Liseuse
Not a vote
not a majority vote
policies and guidelines
consensus
assume good faith
sign your posts
single-purpose accounts
spa
canvassed
canvassed
sockpuppetry
csm
csp
Liseuse
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑