217:(which this article deals with) has NOT received "significant coverage" as required by GNG; there are no in-depth articles or books or TV shows about it. Even if we found 100 news articles stating " qualifies from group round of undefeated", it would not be enough to satisfy GNG. As for the SYNTH element, what I meant by that is the part which states "do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources" which is precisely what has been done e.g. using the table format, combining the qualifying tournament data with the final tournament data etc. Overall, I do not feel this topic is notable at all. It might be
96:
91:
100:
83:
170:
164:
130:
261:, primarily as a result of its GNG failure. Were there significant reliable sources then this would probably not be a problem, but, as the cumbersome nature of the article title would indicate, there are not.
410:
390:
370:
349:
326:
306:
290:
270:
246:
228:
65:
213:- to expand upon that, and to answer a few points raised in the PROD challenge - while a team being undefeated in the group stage of this tournament might get a one-off throwaway piece in the media, the
185:
152:
146:
142:
87:
192:
79:
71:
123:
358:
158:
378:
311:
There is a full length documentary in New
Zealand, called Undefeated, documenting their undefeated 2010 campaign, which is significant coverage.
318:
257:- completely agree with the statements above regarding SYNTH and GNG. As well as these, this stat dump of an article also contravenes
17:
236:
429:
40:
322:
218:
314:
303:
243:
225:
425:
36:
258:
266:
340:
178:
210:
406:
386:
366:
300:
240:
222:
60:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
424:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
206:
287:
262:
80:
List of teams that went undefeated through a FIFA World Cup final or qualifying tournament
72:
List of teams that went undefeated through a FIFA World Cup final or qualifying tournament
402:
382:
362:
344:
54:
117:
286:. A reversion to something similar is an alternative to total deletion.
278:
as I stated in my PROD objection, the article was originally called
418:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
205:. My original PROD rationale was that this article fails
283:
202:
113:
109:
105:
177:
299:I still don't think that is notable either, sorry.
239:'s list of association football-related deletions.
191:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
432:). No further edits should be made to this page.
282:and had a simpler structure and rationale; see
280:List of teams undefeated in the FIFA World Cup
359:list of Football-related deletion discussions
201:PROD contested by article creator, rationale
8:
377:Note: This debate has been included in the
357:Note: This debate has been included in the
235:Note: This discussion has been included in
379:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
376:
356:
221:to some, but that is not good enough.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
341:stand-alone list notability criteria
24:
401:as per SYNTH, GNG and NOTSTATS.
1:
449:
411:21:24, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
391:23:20, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
371:23:20, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
350:14:05, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
327:05:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
307:12:20, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
291:12:11, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
271:11:47, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
247:11:32, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
229:11:31, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
421:Please do not modify it.
66:15:32, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
237:WikiProject Football
48:The result was
393:
373:
317:comment added by
284:this old revision
249:
440:
423:
347:
329:
234:
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
34:
448:
447:
443:
442:
441:
439:
438:
437:
436:
430:deletion review
419:
345:
312:
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
446:
444:
435:
434:
414:
413:
395:
394:
374:
353:
352:
333:
332:
331:
330:
319:101.98.215.142
309:
294:
293:
273:
251:
250:
199:
198:
135:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
445:
433:
431:
427:
422:
416:
415:
412:
408:
404:
400:
397:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
375:
372:
368:
364:
360:
355:
354:
351:
348:
342:
338:
335:
334:
328:
324:
320:
316:
310:
308:
305:
302:
298:
297:
296:
295:
292:
289:
285:
281:
277:
274:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
253:
252:
248:
245:
242:
238:
233:
232:
231:
230:
227:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
62:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
420:
417:
398:
336:
313:— Preceding
279:
275:
254:
215:larger topic
214:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
59:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
259:WP:NOTSTATS
219:interesting
165:free images
288:jnestorius
263:Fenix down
426:talk page
383:• Gene93k
363:• Gene93k
37:talk page
428:or in a
346:Philg88
339:. Fails
315:unsigned
211:WP:SYNTH
124:View log
39:or in a
403:Eldumpo
304:Snowman
276:Comment
244:Snowman
226:Snowman
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
55:postdlf
399:Delete
337:Delete
255:Delete
207:WP:GNG
143:Google
101:delete
50:delete
301:Giant
241:Giant
223:Giant
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
407:talk
387:talk
367:talk
323:talk
267:talk
209:and
203:here
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
61:talk
193:TWL
122:– (
409:)
389:)
381:.
369:)
361:.
343:.
325:)
269:)
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
52:.
405:(
385:(
365:(
321:(
265:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.