156:- OR. One person's "teen idol" may be another's "teen idle" - I mean, Michael Jackson & Britney Spears are on there!? Who in their right mind would look up to Spears now unless you wanted to copy a road map to boozing, sex and umbrella fighting? There's undue weight given to the recent years; it's not as if teens have suddenly arrived, they've been around since the dawn of time. So why the shortage in the earlier years of the list? Basically, it's impossible for anyone to update this list without major major citation inclusions or by placing their own OR. It'll end up being "Oh, I look up to this person, I think I'll add them to the list..." and someone's bound to disagree. I don't think I need to say much else; this article is obviously one of those which get deleted without thinking too hard about why. Cheers,
270:
You know a list is unfocused when it features
Charlie Chaplin, Steve Urkel, and Kurt Cobain. The intro just states that any performer with an international or domestic teenage fan base qualifies. This would include nearly every musician, actor, sports star, and wrestler on the past century.
307:
According to the intro text, just being liked by teens is good enough. Quite a lot of those listed were well out of their teens at their time of popularity: Henry
Winkler played the Fonz in his mid-30s, Hulk Hogan was about 35 at his height, etc.
121:
182:- practically any young person who has made a record in the last 60 years could arguably be called a "teen idol". This list appears to be totally random and open-ended.
94:
89:
98:
81:
17:
214:- When I was a teen I looked up to myself and I'm not on that list... Seriously as per nomination a perfect case for
396:
36:
381:
369:
345:
327:
302:
290:
262:
229:
206:
186:
172:
160:
148:
135:
63:
395:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
85:
77:
69:
378:
252:
169:
168:
What kind of list is this? This list is a complete joke. How can you call someone a "teen idol"?
60:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
132:
299:
337:
A snowball is rolling here... my grandfather had a pinup of Alice
Roosevelt on his wall.
355:
342:
309:
272:
183:
157:
298:- Who decides if it's an "idol" idolised by teens, or an "idol" who is a teenager? --
242:
238:
215:
195:
128:
53:
49:
354:
for being a indiscriminate list without clear inclusion criteria. And break out the
359:
219:
115:
203:
145:
389:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
144:
per WP:OR - Did the article creator label them "teen idols" ?
111:
107:
103:
241:. Also the article is full of OR and POV statements.
198:. I'm not even convinced that it would belong if it
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
399:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
7:
24:
131:and unsourced original research.
202:sourced (or indeed sourceable).
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
382:03:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
370:22:49, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
346:22:41, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
328:14:09, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
303:13:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
291:13:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
263:12:36, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
230:11:20, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
207:10:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
187:05:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
173:05:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
161:05:26, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
149:05:05, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
136:03:52, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
64:10:32, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
377:by using verifiable sources.
416:
194:lack of sources indicates
392:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
78:List of teen idols
70:List of teen idols
261:
196:original research
62:
407:
394:
367:
364:
325:
322:
319:
316:
288:
285:
282:
279:
259:
256:Its over 9000!!!
251:
249:
226:
223:
119:
101:
59:
56:
34:
415:
414:
410:
409:
408:
406:
405:
404:
403:
397:deletion review
390:
365:
360:
323:
320:
317:
314:
286:
283:
280:
277:
253:
243:
224:
221:
92:
76:
73:
54:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
413:
411:
402:
401:
385:
384:
372:
339:
338:
332:
331:
330:
310:Andrew Lenahan
293:
273:Andrew Lenahan
265:
232:
209:
189:
176:
175:
163:
151:
126:
125:
72:
67:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
412:
400:
398:
393:
387:
386:
383:
380:
376:
373:
371:
368:
363:
357:
353:
350:
349:
348:
347:
344:
336:
333:
329:
326:
311:
306:
305:
304:
301:
297:
294:
292:
289:
274:
269:
266:
264:
260:
258:
257:
250:
248:
247:
240:
236:
233:
231:
228:
227:
217:
213:
210:
208:
205:
201:
197:
193:
190:
188:
185:
181:
178:
177:
174:
171:
167:
166:Strong Delete
164:
162:
159:
155:
152:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:
138:
137:
134:
130:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
57:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
391:
388:
374:
361:
351:
340:
334:
313:
295:
276:
267:
255:
254:
245:
244:
239:WP:NOT#IINFO
234:
220:
216:WP:NOT#IINFO
211:
199:
191:
179:
165:
153:
141:
129:WP:NOT#IINFO
127:
50:WP:NOT#IINFO
45:
43:
31:
28:
379:71.92.70.77
356:snow shovel
133:Masaruemoto
300:WebHamster
343:Mandsford
184:Gatoclass
158:Spawn Man
246:DBZROCKS
122:View log
55:FayssalF
375:Improve
237:As per
95:protect
90:history
48:as per
366:figura
352:Delete
335:Delete
296:Delete
268:Delete
235:Delete
225:redrun
212:Delete
192:Delete
180:Delete
170:RS1900
154:Delete
142:Delete
99:delete
46:Delete
341:NOT!
204:Jakew
146:Corpx
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
358:. --
200:were
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
321:bli
284:bli
120:– (
324:nd
318:ar
315:St
312:-
287:nd
281:ar
278:St
275:-
218:.
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
58:-
52:.
362:B
222:1
124:)
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.