Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/List of unusual units of measurement - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

666:
that see real use, and should be considered reasonably scientific. Humorous units is meant to list those units written with the specific intent of making a joke. As such, it is not scientific at all. But it does document a certain brand of humour, and articles that document humour certainly do have a place in wikipedia.
665:
When I split out the humorous units from the original strange units (as it was then called) article, it was because the article was much too long, so re-merging the two would be a bad idea. There is a definite conceptual difference between the two articles though. Unusual units is meant to list those
473:
well be arbitary, but that doesn't change teh fact that they exist and are in real use. I concede that "unusual" may be POV, but I am at a loss for a concise term that would catch the essence of such a list (non-Imperial non-SI doesn't work - too long, and ignores traditional units from country xyz).
375:
Like I said, I nominated it for deletion because "unusual" is inherently subjective (as is "humorous"; which is why I nominated them together). How would you define an objective criteria for what to include? And, as I said, everything here that is referenced and notable already has a separate article
472:
While some of the units noted do have their own article, this is far from the norm, and making individual articles would make every single one of them into a stub. I have previously done major editing to remove items that violate WP policies. As for teh arbitary wacky SI-imperial pairings, they may
411:
While it may not be possible to draw the precise line between what is unusual and what is not, most of the units in this interesting list are indeed unusual, in the sense that their use is limited to a narrow circle of people or to a particular moment in time. Others, such as "storeys" are in wide
456:
for the second nom ("List of humorous..."), not as much worthwhile material, but some entries are informative. Both articles need substantial cleanup and editing/cutting (more so for "List of humorous..."), but neither deserve deletion because they don't really violate WP policy.
603:
I have to resist the temptation to close this under the snowball clause. The article is far from perfect, but it cites many sources, and discusses items of real scientific interest. I'd read it before, and I was surprised to see it on this list.
633: 147:
that are not "unusual" at all except that nobody uses them anymore. Some aren't "unusual" at all: I've got a completely serious, boring software engineering metrics book on my desk that uses the
243: 238: 247: 92: 87: 96: 230: 79: 119: 527:
I guess I'll withdraw since there's an overwhelming consensus to keep, but "unusual" still has to go. Maybe it could be reformed into a list of "domain-specific" units?
629: 234: 196:
because an overwhelming consensus believes it can be salvaged and cleaned up, but please find a way to deal with the inherent POV issues and sourcing.
83: 322: 226: 656:"Humorous" units, but a few of them such as the "phon" have been in textbooks and journal articles and should be moved to "unusual" units. 452:. At least has some references and other meritable qualities, not the least of which is being interesting and informative. A much weaker 318: 75: 67: 670: 660: 640: 620: 608: 595: 576: 556: 540: 520: 516:
But within their field, some of those measurements are the standard unit in use. Scoville units for pepper hotness spring to mind here.
511: 477: 464: 444: 422: 403: 389: 366: 338: 310: 209: 61: 648:
Unusual units, but edit out thoise which are unreferenced, in-jokes, or "made up in school one day" but lacking sources which satisfy
536: 385: 205: 188: 17: 321:; it could possibly be made less unwieldy, but most is sourced, encyclopedic and often interesting, if not particulary useful. 590: 687: 36: 686:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
128: 552:, typical example of "not a paper encyclopedia", but please require sourcing for every entry in the list. -- 461: 501: 300: 335: 430:
Perhaps rename to "List of non-Imperial, non-metric units of measurement". It seems that the article's
489: 288: 605: 569: 553: 55: 458: 532: 439: 381: 354:- where it is explicit that there may not be the same amount of references as one expects for 327: 201: 184: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
152: 584:
very useful article, don't know that I like the second (humorous) one.. make that a sep afd
155:: what makes a unit "unusual?" And most important of all, almost none of these entries have 649: 278: 163:(and Usenet and webcomics are not notable sources); the few that do already have articles ( 156: 132: 416: 585: 50: 160: 667: 634:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of chemical compounds with unusual names
528: 517: 474: 400: 377: 197: 180: 176: 264: 113: 657: 573: 144: 136: 282: 179:, etc.) This article is just a dumping ground for units of dubious notability. 617: 413: 363: 325:
has less to recommend it, however - a major cleanup and more sources needed.
637: 359: 412:
public use, but have no formal status. This is a worthwhile reference.
350:
not deletion. It's interesting and it is obviously dealing with the
616:
A fascinating article that should be improved by better sources. --
355: 172: 168: 164: 140: 139:
with unconventional base units, and antiquated measures like the
680:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
362:. Please, for the other article, start another AFD nomination. 148: 171:, etc.) or are discussed in the proper context ("Gillettes" at 277:
as a pointless list - but if it must be kept, delete all the
215:
I am also nominating the following page for the same reason:
260: 256: 252: 109: 105: 101: 434:
is subjective but to be honest I don't see that the
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 151:extensively. The very definition of "unusual" is 690:). No further edits should be made to this page. 630:List of chemical compounds with unusual names 8: 486:"Non-standard units of measurement" maybe? 399:per nom. Subjective and unsubstantiable. 376:or is mentioned in the proper context. 346:It's a classic case of an article that 133:measurements made up in school one day 323:List of humorous units of measurement 227:List of humorous units of measurement 157:multiple independent reliable sources 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 319:List of unusual units of measurement 76:List of unusual units of measurement 68:List of unusual units of measurement 24: 283:Directory of Units of Measurement 281:units and keep only those in the 175:, Grace Hopper's comparisons at 131:, this article is a mishmash of 135:, arbitrary wacky pairings of 1: 191:) 02:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 707: 671:22:10, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 661:17:14, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 641:07:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 628:It's similar in spirit to 621:22:28, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 609:19:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 596:15:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 577:13:32, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 557:11:57, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 541:17:00, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 521:11:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 512:11:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 478:09:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 465:05:51, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 445:05:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 423:04:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 404:04:28, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 390:03:32, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 367:03:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 339:02:43, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 311:02:35, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 210:17:00, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 62:22:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 683:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 570:Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 554:Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 508: 419: 307: 279:made up in school 159:confirming their 698: 685: 593: 510: 507: 502: 499: 494: 442: 420: 418: 333: 330: 309: 306: 301: 298: 293: 268: 250: 117: 99: 60: 34: 706: 705: 701: 700: 699: 697: 696: 695: 694: 688:deletion review 681: 594: 589: 503: 495: 490: 487: 440: 417: 331: 328: 302: 294: 289: 286: 241: 225: 90: 74: 71: 49: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 704: 702: 693: 692: 676: 675: 674: 673: 643: 623: 611: 598: 588: 579: 559: 546: 545: 544: 543: 525: 524: 523: 481: 480: 467: 447: 425: 406: 394: 393: 392: 370: 369: 341: 313: 271: 270: 124: 123: 70: 65: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 703: 691: 689: 684: 678: 677: 672: 669: 664: 663: 662: 659: 655: 651: 647: 644: 642: 639: 635: 631: 627: 624: 622: 619: 615: 612: 610: 607: 602: 599: 597: 592: 587: 586:Nick Catalano 583: 580: 578: 575: 571: 567: 563: 560: 558: 555: 551: 548: 547: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 522: 519: 515: 514: 513: 509: 506: 505:(talk to me!) 500: 498: 493: 485: 484: 483: 482: 479: 476: 471: 468: 466: 463: 460: 459:Seattle Skier 455: 451: 448: 446: 443: 437: 433: 429: 426: 424: 421: 415: 410: 407: 405: 402: 398: 395: 391: 387: 383: 379: 374: 373: 372: 371: 368: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 348:needs editing 345: 342: 340: 337: 336: 334: 324: 320: 317: 314: 312: 308: 305: 304:(talk to me!) 299: 297: 292: 284: 280: 276: 273: 272: 269: 266: 262: 258: 254: 249: 245: 240: 236: 232: 228: 223: 222: 220: 219: 217: 216: 212: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 192: 190: 186: 182: 178: 174: 170: 166: 162: 158: 154: 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 58: 54: 53: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 682: 679: 653: 645: 625: 613: 600: 581: 565: 561: 549: 504: 496: 491: 469: 453: 449: 435: 431: 427: 408: 396: 351: 347: 343: 326: 315: 303: 295: 290: 274: 224: 221: 218: 214: 213: 193: 177:Grace Hopper 126: 125: 56: 51: 45: 43: 31: 28: 582:Strong keep 470:Strong Keep 397:Delete both 194:Withdrawing 145:metric inch 137:SI prefixes 129:interesting 606:YechielMan 329:Eliminator 161:notability 566:Clean-up 441:Charlene 360:kilogram 120:View log 668:Rhialto 591:contrib 529:Krimpet 518:Rhialto 475:Rhialto 436:content 401:Valrith 378:Krimpet 352:unusual 244:protect 239:history 198:Krimpet 181:Krimpet 93:protect 88:history 658:Edison 654:Delete 650:WP:ATT 574:Mhking 568:; per 537:review 492:Irides 462:(talk) 438:is. -- 386:review 291:Irides 275:Delete 248:delete 206:review 189:review 127:While 97:delete 57:scribe 632:(see 618:Bduke 614:Keep. 601:Keep. 497:centi 432:title 414:Denni 364:patsw 356:meter 296:centi 265:views 257:watch 253:links 173:Laser 169:jiffy 165:smoot 141:grave 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 646:Keep 626:Keep 564:and 562:Keep 550:Keep 533:talk 454:keep 450:Keep 428:Keep 409:Keep 382:talk 358:and 344:Keep 316:Keep 261:logs 235:talk 231:edit 202:talk 185:talk 149:KLOC 143:and 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 46:keep 652:. " 638:Fg2 636:). 488:- 287:- 153:POV 118:– ( 52:WjB 572:-- 539:) 457:-- 388:) 332:JR 263:| 259:| 255:| 251:| 246:| 242:| 237:| 233:| 208:) 167:, 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 48:. 535:/ 531:( 384:/ 380:( 285:. 267:) 229:( 204:/ 200:( 187:/ 183:( 122:) 116:) 78:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
WjB
scribe
22:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
List of unusual units of measurement
List of unusual units of measurement
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
interesting
measurements made up in school one day
SI prefixes
grave
metric inch
KLOC
POV
multiple independent reliable sources
notability
smoot
jiffy
Laser
Grace Hopper

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.