325:
in order to reduce the size of those articles. Knowledge has articles on Hebrew or
Christian beliefs, creeds, prayers, etc. Although I grew up in the Christian Science church, I now belong to a main line Christian church and am not an apologist for Christian Science, nor am I an opponent of it. Most
265:: OR based solely on primary sources. There is no way to judge the significance of individual list items without reliable secondary sources, and I doubt that any exist on which a list like this can be constructed. Also, a not very useful content fork of the main article on
378:
I have to agree with
Clariosophic on this one. At the very least, the article can be merged or redirected back to the original Christian Science articles. Or an ambitious scholar on the subject can probably expand on the subject further. I am not seeing a case of
166:
92:
87:
96:
79:
160:
352:
are well sourced). There are ~100,000 Christian
Scientists. The situations aren't exactly comparable. You need to show that the topic is notable, with significant coverage in independent, secondary sources.
450:, what sort of weird article is this?!? Sorry but it is not acceptable a similar article here, this is an encyclopedia not a prayer book. Instead, this material could be successfully exported in
126:
222:
290:: I agree with the preceding comments. There is nothing here which were it properly supported by reliable secondary sources would not be better placed in the main article.
181:
119:
148:
326:
Wikipedians know absolutely nothing about
Christian Science. What is the big deal about primary sources? There are many secondary sources on Christian Science such as
488:
463:
436:
422:
396:
362:
339:
299:
282:
254:
234:
214:
61:
198:
142:
242:
138:
330:'s book of that title and many others, pro and con. If you want to quote a Bible text, you go to the Bible, not to a secondary source for a paraphrase.
188:
83:
75:
67:
154:
197:
Not covered in reliable sources. Original research from a primary source. not suitable for merger. It's just quotes from a primary source
471:-- No need for a reirect as the title is an improbable search term. There may be room for a factual article on the beliefs of
17:
432:
392:
479:, apart from the history of the movement and crticism of those beliefs, but this is not it -- Delete and start again.
322:
507:
278:
40:
428:
405:
You are proposing someone do original research. This article is simply someone copying and pasting bits of the
388:
380:
314:
270:
202:
484:
335:
503:
384:
36:
274:
57:
459:
418:
358:
230:
210:
174:
480:
472:
406:
331:
318:
295:
266:
250:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
502:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
476:
53:
349:
455:
414:
354:
226:
206:
410:
291:
246:
409:
source S&H into an article, there is nothing worthy of being merged anywhere.
113:
327:
273:, and amounts to little more than promotion. Nothing worth merging elsewhere.
427:
I proposed no such thing, as anyone who reads
English will clearly see.
317:
is applicable. The 3 main quotes in the article were copied from either
201:. It would be like having an article on bible quotes. Falls afoul of
496:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
348:
There are ~2 Billion main line
Christians (articles like the
76:
List of
Christian Science tenets, prayers, and statements
68:
List of
Christian Science tenets, prayers, and statements
109:
105:
101:
451:
173:
223:list of Christianity-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
510:). No further edits should be made to this page.
199:Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures
187:
8:
241:Note: This debate has been included in the
221:Note: This debate has been included in the
243:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
240:
220:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
475:, as promoted by its founder
489:15:45, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
464:09:28, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
437:02:46, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
423:09:22, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
397:00:03, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
363:16:23, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
340:15:59, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
300:21:22, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
283:17:42, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
255:17:35, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
62:18:09, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
323:Church of Christ, Scientist
235:22:05, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
215:22:02, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
527:
413:is what needs to be met.
499:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
313:: I fail to see how
429:And Adoil Descended
389:And Adoil Descended
48:The result was
473:Christian Science
383:here, but rather
381:WP:INDISCRIMINATE
319:Christian Science
315:WP:INDISCRIMINATE
271:WP:INDISCRIMINATE
269:. Falls afoul of
267:Christian Science
257:
237:
203:WP:INDISCRIMINATE
518:
501:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
526:
525:
521:
520:
519:
517:
516:
515:
514:
508:deletion review
497:
477:Mary Baker Eddy
275:Dominus Vobisdu
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
524:
522:
513:
512:
492:
491:
466:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
400:
399:
385:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
368:
367:
366:
365:
343:
342:
303:
302:
285:
259:
258:
238:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
523:
511:
509:
505:
500:
494:
493:
490:
486:
482:
481:Peterkingiron
478:
474:
470:
467:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
448:Strong Delete
446:
445:
438:
434:
430:
426:
425:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
403:
402:
401:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
377:
373:
370:
369:
364:
360:
356:
351:
350:Lord's Prayer
347:
346:
345:
344:
341:
337:
333:
329:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
305:
304:
301:
297:
293:
289:
286:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
261:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
239:
236:
232:
228:
224:
219:
218:
217:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
498:
495:
468:
447:
375:
371:
332:clariosophic
310:
306:
287:
262:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
161:free images
328:Mark Twain
54:Beeblebrox
504:talk page
456:Cavarrone
452:WikiQuote
415:IRWolfie-
355:IRWolfie-
247:• Gene93k
227:IRWolfie-
207:IRWolfie-
37:talk page
506:or in a
120:View log
39:or in a
407:primary
292:Jpacobb
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
469:Delete
411:WP:GNG
288:Delete
263:Delete
139:Google
97:delete
50:delete
376:Merge
311:Merge
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
485:talk
460:talk
454:. --
433:talk
419:talk
393:talk
372:Keep
359:talk
336:talk
307:Keep
296:talk
279:talk
251:talk
231:talk
211:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
374:or
321:or
309:or
189:TWL
118:– (
487:)
462:)
435:)
421:)
395:)
387:.
361:)
338:)
298:)
281:)
253:)
245:.
233:)
225:.
213:)
205:.
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
483:(
458:(
431:(
417:(
391:(
357:(
334:(
294:(
277:(
249:(
229:(
209:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.