52:. Absolutely no sources have been provided in this discussion to prove the subject's notability; even though requests for that information were made over and over again. Instead those requesting the article's retention merely stated things like "I ", in response to such questions. This type of behavior is honestly not acceptable at AFD, so I'd like to remind everyone that
715:
To me the issue is still that there is a difference between being able to show that the job is notable and being able to show that a list of people who previously did that job are notable, even if in-and-of-themselves those people are not otherwise notable. That seems to me to be an admission that
697:. I have expressed on other pages for deletion discussions (with no response from the nominator as yet) that the case for deletion is easily removed by simply moving the page to a name that focuses on the consulate itself rather than the office-holders, and the content should reflect that also.
553:
I'm sure both the country's most prominent broadsheet newspaper and premier financial newspaper would be surprised to learn that a
Wikipedian thinks they're not an "independent secondary source", as would one of our national broadcasters. You're adopting some interesting definitions there.
841:, and nothing posited in this discussion to augment my searches. I understand Siegfried Nugent's point, but not sure that the consulate itself is notable, and there is no inherent notability for a consulate, if there is, please ping me with the appropriate guideline.
364:
is notable, as this is the highest status diplomatic representative between the countries, but I'm struggling to believe Consul-Gemerals are. Hence it seems to follow that members of the list are not either. I see very few independent secondary
221:
189:
576:
Maybe you're looking at a different page to me, but I see three references. First two are press release from the AUS government, third is from DNA (Diligent Media
Corporation Ltd). Please explain to me what you're talking about.
605:
It's a joint nomination of the
Houston and Mumbai articles, you'd better do better than claiming the sources I mentioned aren't "independent secondary sources" unless you've decided to at least change to a keep on Houston.
305:
273:
643:
615:
563:
115:
110:
119:
102:
183:
648:
I disagree with having joint AfDs like this. Hence I'm talking about the page which is actually under discussion and am not discussing the additional page, which should have its own AfD. The issues
387:
404:
62:
Therefore, as the required notability was not established during the course of this month long discussion, the article's subject is found to not be suitable for inclusion at this time.
675:
661:
629:
421:
322:
291:
224:. the office of the consul general would fail WP:ORG (considering that even embassies are not granted inherent notability) so I don't see how a list of consuls general is notable.
149:
438:
142:
236:
455:
361:
204:
171:
852:
827:
798:
779:
755:
725:
706:
600:
586:
548:
530:
509:
484:
464:
447:
430:
413:
396:
378:
343:
251:
84:
334:
I asked you on 20 April to supply actual sources, your lack of response for over 2 weeks just demonstrates the subject has no significant coverage.
165:
716:
this list isn't notable and so moving it to another page so it can exist (probably without much other useful information) on a notable page.
161:
620:
I'm not talking about
Houston, which should not be included in the AfD, I'm (correctly) discussing the named page in this AfD discussion.
634:
They are both named in the AfD discussion, as the nomination makes very clear. If you're a keep vote on
Houston, please make that clear.
106:
211:
17:
98:
90:
177:
807:
764:
639:
611:
559:
301:
269:
77:
871:
40:
702:
310:
360:
suggests that the members of a list need to show a minimum amount of notability to be on it. I can believe that
750:
635:
607:
555:
297:
265:
867:
775:
698:
460:
443:
426:
409:
392:
36:
738:
197:
591:
You're talking about the
Houston page. I'm discussing the subject of this AfD, the Mumbai page.
357:
794:
339:
318:
287:
247:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
866:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
526:
480:
71:
838:
353:
261:
536:
366:
475:
Significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the consul suggests notability.
356:
does not seem to suggest to me that all diplomatic positions are inherently notable and
820:
721:
671:
657:
625:
596:
582:
544:
505:
374:
842:
222:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of
Consuls-General of Australia in Chengdu
790:
335:
314:
283:
243:
666:
The
Houston page now has its own AfD. Let's stick to talking about one at a time.
136:
652:
indeed be different. I'm not making any statement at this stage about
Houston.
522:
495:
476:
65:
717:
667:
653:
621:
592:
578:
540:
516:
501:
370:
369:
that even mention the role, never mind suggest that it is worthy of note.
539:. Even if they were, the coverage within them is not significant.
860:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
282:
please explain how. I see no significant coverage of the topic.
810:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
767:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
56:
by whomever is arguing for the retention of the article.
388:
list of
Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions
789:
as still questionable for better improvements overall.
737:
as still questionable for better improvements overall.
535:
None of those are independent secondary sources as per
132:
128:
124:
196:
500:
where? I don't see any. Links would be appreciated.
405:
list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions
816:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
773:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
210:
422:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
874:). No further edits should be made to this page.
237:List of Consuls-General of Australia in Houston
439:list of Australia-related deletion discussions
362:List of Australian High Commissioners to India
99:List of Consuls-General of Australia in Mumbai
91:List of Consuls-General of Australia in Mumbai
837:- Nothing in searches to show that it passes
8:
454:Note: This debate has been included in the
437:Note: This debate has been included in the
420:Note: This debate has been included in the
403:Note: This debate has been included in the
386:Note: This debate has been included in the
220:fails WP:GNG. a related discussion is here
456:list of India-related deletion discussions
453:
436:
419:
402:
385:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
695:Australian Consulate-General, Mumbai
521:There are links within the articles.
693:on the proviso that it be moved to
24:
313:. please actually show sources.
352:- although it isn't specific,
1:
891:
799:17:14, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
780:16:53, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
756:04:25, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
726:13:43, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
707:05:36, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
676:11:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
662:11:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
644:11:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
630:10:52, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
616:10:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
601:10:36, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
587:10:34, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
564:10:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
549:10:27, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
531:10:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
510:10:13, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
485:09:54, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
465:08:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
448:08:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
431:08:56, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
414:08:56, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
397:08:56, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
379:08:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
323:07:04, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
306:06:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
292:06:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
274:06:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
252:06:16, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
863:Please do not modify it.
853:13:48, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
85:18:42, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
54:sources must be provided
32:Please do not modify it.
828:21:42, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
344:08:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
58:This is not a vote.
830:
782:
636:The Drover's Wife
608:The Drover's Wife
556:The Drover's Wife
467:
450:
433:
416:
399:
298:The Drover's Wife
266:The Drover's Wife
226:Also nominating:
83:
882:
865:
849:
846:
826:
825:
823:
815:
813:
811:
778:
772:
770:
768:
753:
748:
699:Siegfried Nugent
520:
499:
463:
446:
429:
412:
395:
311:WP:MUSTBESOURCES
215:
214:
200:
152:
140:
122:
80:
74:
63:
34:
890:
889:
885:
884:
883:
881:
880:
879:
878:
872:deletion review
861:
847:
844:
831:
821:
819:
817:
806:
804:
783:
774:
763:
761:
751:
739:
514:
493:
459:
442:
425:
408:
391:
157:
148:
113:
97:
94:
78:
72:
68:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
888:
886:
877:
876:
856:
855:
814:
803:
802:
801:
771:
760:
759:
758:
731:
730:
729:
728:
710:
709:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
664:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
488:
487:
469:
468:
451:
434:
417:
400:
382:
381:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
277:
276:
241:
240:
218:
217:
154:
93:
88:
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
887:
875:
873:
869:
864:
858:
857:
854:
851:
850:
840:
836:
833:
832:
829:
824:
812:
809:
800:
796:
792:
788:
785:
784:
781:
777:
776:North America
769:
766:
757:
754:
749:
746:
742:
736:
733:
732:
727:
723:
719:
714:
713:
712:
711:
708:
704:
700:
696:
692:
689:
688:
677:
673:
669:
665:
663:
659:
655:
651:
647:
646:
645:
641:
637:
633:
632:
631:
627:
623:
619:
618:
617:
613:
609:
604:
603:
602:
598:
594:
590:
589:
588:
584:
580:
565:
561:
557:
552:
551:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
533:
532:
528:
524:
518:
513:
512:
511:
507:
503:
497:
492:
491:
490:
489:
486:
482:
478:
474:
471:
470:
466:
462:
461:North America
457:
452:
449:
445:
444:North America
440:
435:
432:
428:
427:North America
423:
418:
415:
411:
410:North America
406:
401:
398:
394:
393:North America
389:
384:
383:
380:
376:
372:
368:
363:
359:
355:
351:
348:
347:
346:
345:
341:
337:
324:
320:
316:
312:
309:
308:
307:
303:
299:
295:
294:
293:
289:
285:
281:
280:
279:
278:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
256:
255:
254:
253:
249:
245:
239:
238:
234:
233:
231:
230:
228:
227:
223:
213:
209:
206:
203:
199:
195:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
163:
160:
159:Find sources:
155:
151:
147:
144:
138:
134:
130:
126:
121:
117:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
95:
92:
89:
87:
86:
81:
75:
69:
60:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
862:
859:
843:
834:
805:
786:
762:
744:
740:
734:
694:
690:
649:
472:
349:
333:
264:in my book.
257:
242:
235:
232:
229:
225:
219:
207:
201:
193:
186:
180:
174:
168:
158:
145:
61:
57:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
184:free images
73:have a cup
868:talk page
822:Music1201
37:talk page
870:or in a
808:Relisted
765:Relisted
358:WP:NLIST
143:View log
39:or in a
791:Thincat
336:LibStar
315:LibStar
284:LibStar
260:Passes
244:LibStar
190:WP refs
178:scholar
116:protect
111:history
839:WP:GNG
835:Delete
747:wister
743:wister
735:Delete
523:Clare.
496:Clare.
477:Clare.
354:WP:ORG
350:Delete
296:I do.
262:WP:GNG
162:Google
120:delete
67:Coffee
50:delete
537:WP:RS
367:WP:RS
258:Keep.
205:JSTOR
166:books
150:Stats
137:views
129:watch
125:links
79:beans
16:<
848:5969
845:Onel
795:talk
787:Keep
752:talk
722:talk
718:JMWt
703:talk
691:Keep
672:talk
668:JMWt
658:talk
654:JMWt
640:talk
626:talk
622:JMWt
612:talk
597:talk
593:JMWt
583:talk
579:JMWt
560:talk
545:talk
541:JMWt
527:talk
517:JMWt
506:talk
502:JMWt
481:talk
473:Keep
375:talk
371:JMWt
340:talk
319:talk
302:talk
288:talk
270:talk
248:talk
198:FENS
172:news
133:logs
107:talk
103:edit
650:may
212:TWL
141:– (
82://
76://
70://
818:—
797:)
724:)
705:)
674:)
660:)
642:)
628:)
614:)
599:)
585:)
562:)
547:)
529:)
508:)
483:)
458:.
441:.
424:.
407:.
390:.
377:)
342:)
321:)
304:)
290:)
272:)
250:)
192:)
135:|
131:|
127:|
123:|
118:|
114:|
109:|
105:|
64:—
793:(
745:T
741:S
720:(
701:(
670:(
656:(
638:(
624:(
610:(
595:(
581:(
558:(
543:(
525:(
519::
515:@
504:(
498::
494:@
479:(
373:(
338:(
317:(
300:(
286:(
268:(
246:(
216:)
208:·
202:·
194:·
187:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
164:(
156:(
153:)
146:·
139:)
101:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.