213:. The split is certainly not justified on size (the original article is under 6K, this is under 2.5K, and size splitting doesn't take place until 40K). The list does not overburden the original article (especially if formatted correctly, without a list of non-existant pictures). To discussants and the closer, please note that even though this is an AfD, the burden is actually reversed--Ahnoneemoos needs to justify the existence of this as a standalone article, with a no consensus result requiring a return to the original state (no split). Really, an AfD should never have been required, had Ahnoneemoos attempted to establish consensus in the first place.
547:
to merge back and redirect. A no consensus result would just throw this back to normal discussion and editing to hash out; it would not in any way prevent editors from keeping this split off. Here a split based on size issues is reasonable given the length of the formatted table, and the same as has been done for other articles on government offices. So
546:
There's no requirement to stage a discussion prior to splitting a section from an article. I also disagree that there's any kind of burdenshifting applicable here; if anything, AFDs should be harder when you are trying to delete split content because the normal solution, if one is needed, is simply
269:
on the main article. I will take responsibility and give my compromise to edit and clean the List as time goes by. Just because it doesn't have pictures today it doesn't mean that it won't have them tomorrow. I'm not an employee of
Knowledge and can't be on it 24/7 but it's obvious if you see the
373:
and splitting articles is OK as long as you leave substantial information on the main article. That's exactly what I did. I have provided you with a fantastic solution that satisifies both your concerns and mine, but you are still focused on your crusade for due process,
174:
100:
95:
104:
87:
572:
this is a list of people who have held a significant governmental role. I expect that the remaining entries will also be found to be notable. Both this and the page it was split from having sourcing issues, but googling suggests that sources exist.
340:
But that's the problem, you did not revert my edit: you simply speedy deleted it unilaterally even after I contested its deletion. You just can't speedy delete something as an
Administrator when it's contested. Remember, as an editor
425:
and established its
Director to lead it. This office is critical for Puerto Rico as it serves and the primary liaison between Puerto Rico and the United States. Naturally, the Director of this office is extremely important to
91:
168:
326:, I never would have taken the steps I did, and would have trusted whatever consensus resulted. You chose to forge your own path, thus I had to use a more drastic means to remedy to your refusal to start a discussion.
83:
75:
134:
239:
and it's important to detail its
Directors, but not on its main article. The main article already has a clean and concise list of its former Directors while this article has a detailed view.
506:
582:
564:
538:
518:
497:
482:
395:
335:
313:
222:
189:
69:
156:
127:
322:
is probably the most widely accepted essay on the site, and is generally held to be equivalent to a guideline at least. Had you simply opened up the discussion required by
526:
349:
cover your ass, but as an
Administrator things are different because you actually have the power to delete something. I advise you to re-read what you just wrote and
440:: we need to detail the Directors information and include: Ordinality, Picture, Name, Date they took office, Date they left office, Political party, and Affiliation.
150:
492:- a reasonable list. Work in progress. Nomination without merit. WP:SPLIT does not "require" anything. It is a guideline, and it merely "recommends". - Altenmann
146:
357:. Your goal is not doing what is best for Knowledge, your goal right now is: "DUE PROCESS WAS NOT FOLLOWED OHMAHGAWD MUST DELETE". Knowledge is flexible and
196:
422:
232:
206:
270:
list of articles that I have created and edited that I will eventually contribute to it to bring it up to standard. I also understand that I don't
418:
410:
162:
274:
and that this is not my article, but this is simply a normal thing to do on articles that have long tables that deviate from the main subject.
231:
I beleive that it's better if we have a clean and concise list on the main article with a separated and detailed list on this List. The
386:, and have a blunt and you will realize how petty this is. We could be spending all this time and effort on creating new articles. —
17:
53:
369:
that you want to vanish all evil that doesn't follow what you believe to be due process. You need to remember that
601:
460:: keep concise and clean details of the Directors on the main article and split the details into its own article.
375:
258:
40:
236:
361:
stands above all. This is not a malicious edit, it's actually quite benefitial, but you are so caught up in
318:
Being bold is fine. When you are reverted after being bold, you must engage in a discussion on the matter.
578:
452:
the article becomes more about its
Director than about the office since the table would be extremely long.
362:
294:
409:. Puerto Rico is a territory of the United States subject to the plenary powers of Congres. About 25% of
597:
478:
391:
366:
354:
309:
286:
63:
36:
493:
278:
182:
370:
331:
218:
574:
559:
534:
514:
383:
290:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
596:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
421:($ 1 out of every $ 4 dollars!!). Because of this, the government of Puerto Rico created the
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
474:
387:
346:
305:
250:
58:
323:
210:
379:
350:
262:
464:
358:
342:
327:
319:
298:
282:
271:
254:
214:
553:
530:
510:
121:
427:
265:, split the article on its own, and tagged it with the proper cleanup templates
297:. I have clearly offered a solution that can satisfy both point of views but
209:. The splitter has not started a discussion on the split, as required by
414:
261:
doesn't require a discussion to take place to split the article. I was
242:
This is acceptable on
Knowledge and is not a violation of any rules.
84:
List of
Directors of the Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration
76:
List of
Directors of the Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration
590:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
289:. This is not about what's better for Knowledge, it's all about
463:
This is what this edit did. Unfortunately, as you can see,
117:
113:
109:
181:
467:
deleted it even when the speedy delete was contested.
353:. If you notice you are doing this simply becuase of
507:
list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions
301:
still wants to delete it. He is being intransigent.
267:while leaving concise and susbstantial information
448:: if we detail all that on the main article then
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
604:). No further edits should be made to this page.
527:list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions
195:
8:
525:Note: This debate has been included in the
505:Note: This debate has been included in the
524:
504:
423:Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration
233:Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration
207:Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration
419:federal government of the United States
229:Oppose. Keep as a standalone article.
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
565:22:02, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
539:18:24, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
519:18:24, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
498:12:16, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
483:23:26, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
396:23:18, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
336:23:03, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
314:22:40, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
223:22:28, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
583:03:58, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
277:Furthermore, this is just a
70:01:27, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
621:
205:This list is a split from
593:Please do not modify it.
237:foreign affairs ministry
32:Please do not modify it.
411:Puerto Rico's budget
378:bro. Seriously man,
376:WP:NOTABUREAUCRACY
285:as you can see on
259:WP:NOTABUREAUCRACY
48:The result was
541:
521:
54:non-admin closure
612:
595:
470:Hope this helps.
235:is similar to a
200:
199:
185:
137:
125:
107:
66:
61:
34:
620:
619:
615:
614:
613:
611:
610:
609:
608:
602:deletion review
591:
430:and its people.
363:WP:DISRUPTPOINT
295:WP:DISRUPTPOINT
142:
133:
98:
82:
79:
64:
59:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
618:
616:
607:
606:
586:
585:
567:
543:
542:
522:
501:
500:
486:
485:
471:
468:
461:
453:
441:
432:
431:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
367:WP:BUREAUCRACY
355:WP:BUREAUCRACY
302:
275:
246:
245:
203:
202:
139:
78:
73:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
617:
605:
603:
599:
594:
588:
587:
584:
580:
576:
571:
568:
566:
562:
561:
556:
555:
550:
545:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
523:
520:
516:
512:
508:
503:
502:
499:
496:
491:
488:
487:
484:
480:
476:
472:
469:
466:
465:User:Qwyrxian
462:
459:
458:
454:
451:
447:
446:
442:
439:
438:
434:
433:
429:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
405:
404:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
339:
338:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
316:
315:
311:
307:
303:
300:
299:User:Qwyrxian
296:
292:
288:
284:
283:User:Qwyrxian
280:
276:
273:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
249:In addition,
248:
247:
244:
243:
238:
234:
230:
227:
226:
225:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
198:
194:
191:
188:
184:
180:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:Find sources:
140:
136:
132:
129:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
77:
74:
72:
71:
68:
67:
62:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
592:
589:
575:Stuartyeates
569:
558:
552:
548:
489:
456:
455:
449:
444:
443:
436:
435:
406:
287:my talk page
279:WP:WITCHHUNT
266:
241:
240:
228:
204:
192:
186:
178:
171:
165:
159:
153:
143:
130:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
475:Ahnoneemoos
428:Puerto Rico
413:comes from
388:Ahnoneemoos
371:WP:NOTPAPER
306:Ahnoneemoos
169:free images
407:Background
384:WP:LETITGO
291:WP:WINNING
598:talk page
417:from the
415:subsidies
347:WP:BEBOLD
251:WP:BEBOLD
37:talk page
600:or in a
457:Solution
450:visually
328:Qwyrxian
324:WP:SPLIT
215:Qwyrxian
211:WP:SPLIT
128:View log
39:or in a
554:postdlf
531:Frankie
511:Frankie
445:Problem
380:WP:CALM
351:WP:CALM
263:WP:BOLD
175:WP refs
163:scholar
101:protect
96:history
65:polisme
359:WP:IAR
343:WP:IAR
320:WP:BRD
272:WP:OWN
257:, and
255:WP:IAR
147:Google
105:delete
494:: -->
190:JSTOR
151:books
135:Stats
122:views
114:watch
110:links
16:<
579:talk
570:Keep
560:talk
549:keep
535:talk
529:. —
515:talk
509:. —
490:Keep
479:talk
437:Task
392:talk
365:and
345:and
332:talk
310:talk
293:and
219:talk
183:FENS
157:news
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
60:Theo
50:keep
281:on
197:TWL
126:– (
56:) —
52:. (
581:)
563:)
551:.
537:)
517:)
481:)
394:)
382:,
334:)
312:)
253:,
221:)
177:)
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
577:(
557:(
533:(
513:(
495:t
477:(
473:—
390:(
330:(
308:(
304:—
217:(
201:)
193:·
187:·
179:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
149:(
141:(
138:)
131:·
124:)
86:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.