215:
List of
Telecaster players is an excellent list, beyond being guitar related lists they have nothing in common. I've also split off bare lists from main articles and am happy to see them deleted if no-one cares to improve them. Is it possible to make a good list out of this? Sure.. clear inclusion
241:
Yes, like I said earlier, I'm not too familiar with AfD arguments, hence the hamfisted "prod removal" edit comment :-) But my alternative was to do nothing and lose the list, which as it turns out as the potential to become something like the featured list. There are about 7 or 8 of these
282:. List of Telecaster players is extensively sourced, has descriptions for every player and is well organized. This list has none of those characteristics- it's indiscriminate, unorganized, scantily detailed, and doesn't even have the model of guitars played by each player.
158:- List appears to have been brought in line with list guidelines and the Telecaster featured list. I would not have nominated the list in its revised form, suggest disgregarding opinions voiced prior to 7 September.
298:
page and lists only those players that are notable and definitely associated by Ibanez (they all play signature models carrying their name) citing their notability and association to Ibanez.
344:
I think it might be viable. In any case, I see no reason to pick on this one article and leave the rest, IMO they should all be considered for deletion together as a group or not at all.
370:
126:
389:
now it's been pruned, sourced and formatted like the similar lists. I would urge users who have previously !voted to delete to take another look at the article.
340:
Update: On reflection, I note there is indeed a number of other articles of this type and if this list had more selective inclusion criteria such as that at
99:
94:
103:
133:
Contested prod. Zero context or verification, permanently incomplete, inclusion criteria vague. Just another "intersection by location" bare list.
86:
271:
17:
356:
3 days ago I would have said delete as it was simply a POV favorites list. But the new format has change my vote to keep.
216:
criteria, intro, sources, context for each entry.. if your prod removal had alluded to any of that we might not be here.
187:
398:
380:
360:
348:
315:
302:
286:
274:
250:
232:
206:
174:
149:
90:
68:
295:
199:
191:
413:
36:
412:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
334:. There must surely be countless professionals who play Ibanez guitars so I think a list such as this violates
326:- the difference between "list of telecaster players" and "list of Ibanez players" is that the telecaster is a
195:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
341:
82:
74:
283:
186:
article so – if only technically – I am the author. There is an entire category of these pages
393:
243:
64:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
357:
310:
I really think its over categorization to have list of people who played <instrument: -->
299:
266:
247:
203:
55:
345:
228:
170:
145:
335:
390:
59:
120:
198:. Should this list's content and intro only be improved to a similar standard as
377:
312:
246:? put a "major edit" notice on top and hack it into shape like the Tele list?
294:. Okay, the page has been completely revamped. It now looks exactly like the
218:
160:
135:
48:. Changes to the article following the deletion nomination (particularly
183:
406:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
182:- I created the page merely to remove clutter from the original
242:
player/brand lists, half good like the Tele one and half bad.
116:
112:
108:
52:
49:
54:) largely address the reasons for deletion. Kudos to
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
264:List is completely unsourced / original research.
416:). No further edits should be made to this page.
338:. Also, the topic smacks somewhat of promotion.
8:
371:list of Lists of people-related deletions
369:: This debate has been included in the
202:as it well can be, instead of deleted?
190:(players of brand x or y), including
7:
330:of guitar whereas the Ibanez is a
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
399:11:22, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
69:17:38, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
381:23:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
361:02:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
349:02:21, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
316:22:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
303:20:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
287:17:26, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
275:11:03, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
251:14:49, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
233:10:05, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
207:09:53, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
175:03:09, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
150:09:26, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
188:Category:Lists of guitarists
433:
296:List of Telecaster players
200:List of Telecaster players
192:List of Telecaster players
409:Please do not modify it.
196:Knowledge:Featured lists
32:Please do not modify it.
342:List of Gibson players
311:. Maybe categorize?
83:List of Ibanez players
75:List of Ibanez players
156:Note to closing admin
62:for their efforts. –
383:
374:
244:How now brown cow
231:
173:
148:
424:
411:
396:
375:
365:
269:
227:
224:
221:
169:
166:
163:
144:
141:
138:
124:
106:
34:
432:
431:
427:
426:
425:
423:
422:
421:
420:
414:deletion review
407:
394:
378:John Vandenberg
265:
222:
219:
164:
161:
139:
136:
97:
81:
78:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
430:
428:
419:
418:
402:
401:
384:
363:
351:
319:
318:
305:
289:
277:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
236:
235:
210:
209:
177:
131:
130:
77:
72:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
429:
417:
415:
410:
404:
403:
400:
397:
392:
388:
385:
382:
379:
372:
368:
364:
362:
359:
355:
352:
350:
347:
343:
339:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
320:
317:
314:
309:
306:
304:
301:
297:
293:
290:
288:
285:
281:
278:
276:
273:
268:
263:
260:
259:
252:
249:
245:
240:
239:
238:
237:
234:
230:
226:
225:
214:
213:
212:
211:
208:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
178:
176:
172:
168:
167:
157:
154:
153:
152:
151:
147:
143:
142:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
67:
66:
61:
57:
53:
50:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
408:
405:
386:
366:
353:
331:
327:
323:
322:
307:
291:
279:
261:
217:
194:which was a
179:
159:
155:
134:
132:
65:Black Falcon
63:
45:
43:
31:
28:
358:Peter Fleet
336:WP:NOT#DIR
300:Deon Steyn
284:TheLetterM
272:Review me!
267:Lilac Soul
248:Deon Steyn
204:Deon Steyn
56:Deon Steyn
346:Gatoclass
127:View log
391:the wub
292:Comment
100:protect
95:history
60:The wub
324:Delete
308:Delete
280:Delete
262:Delete
184:Ibanez
104:delete
332:brand
328:model
313:Corpx
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
395:"?!"
387:Keep
367:Note
354:Keep
229:talk
180:Keep
171:talk
146:talk
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
58:and
51:and
46:keep
376:--
373:.
220:Dei
162:Dei
137:Dei
125:– (
270:-
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
223:z
165:z
140:z
129:)
123:)
85:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.