381:
302:". What difference does it make to the law school whether it's in one US Census Bureau-designated region of the United States or another? Does it affect the academic quality of the institution? Does it affect the philosophy of the institution? Well, no, but it's a convenient way to lump a set of schools together. Athletic conferences serve a similar function, and are similarly geography-based. —
362:: "Ivy League" is not just occasionally colloquially used to refer to the schools as a whole, that's the current common usage of the term. If we start going through the Oxford English Dictionary for original meanings, "worm" articles could only refer to dragons (the original meaning) and so on. A little different since this is a formal noun, but not much.
172:" is colloquially used to refer to the schools collectively, doing so to group individual parts of those institutions, especially graduate schools, does not have any significance or notability. You would not have a list of Pac-10 medical schools. At most, it could be a category, but a category, a template, and an article are unnecessary.
342:
The rationale that a "sports league" is a poor way of categorizing law schools is a very uninformed one. Colleges and universities are typically in sports leagues with institutions that share many similarities with them, making them natural groupings for many other purposes. However, whether this
379:
Regardless of whether it makes sense to refer to an "Ivy League" school when it comes to a prestigious degree or educational attainment, the fact is that prospective students, employers and business people find significance in an "Ivy League business school", and it's a reference to
Harvard, Yale,
50:
The use of the phrase is no longer limited to athletics, and now represents an educational philosophy inherent to the nation's oldest schools. In addition, Ivy League schools are often viewed by the public as some of the most prestigious universities worldwide and are often ranked amongst the best
320:
Great point. This is a reasonable analogy for what the question comes down to. Classification by geography is the standard, so you can do city, state, or country, or in this case, a grouping of states. But picking a non-geographical grouping is not useful unless it has some significance to the
248:
As I wrote, I am aware that is how the term is colloquially used. But the conflation of business schools and sports league has no significance. Are you saying you would support creating a Pac-10 medical schools category and template? How about an NCAA Division 1 law schools category?
451:
is proceeding very differently from this one and attracting different participants. (I'm the only person to weigh in on both cases so far, not counting the nominator.) If it's okay to use "Ivy League", it should be okay to use "Big Ten"; if it's
90:
229:
Nominator's assertions have no basis in reality. Contrary to the nominator's assertions, the Ivy League is far more than a sports league; its name is used to refer to these schools in a wide range of scholastic settings.
192:
I agree. Just because these are the "top 10" schools for sports in no way means that any other part of the school is necessarily of the same caliber. I feel that such a template is quite misleading.
493:
496:
84:
448:
57:
aside, it is not analogous to other such groupings based solely on athletic competition. As that argument is demonstrably flawed the argument to keep outweighs the argument to delete.
139:
134:
143:
126:
492:
It's not a matter of whether you think it's "okay", but rather whether the term is used by other people. Let's leave the Big Ten out of this. There's no comparison between
299:
397:
383:. I think the nominator is correct about there not being the same feeling about a "Big Ten business school", but the Ivy League as just an athletic conference?
321:
articles in the group. You would not want an article on
Nursing Schools in Red States, unless being a nursing school in a red state had some significance, right?
498:. Not surprising. I got a "Big Ten education", and it's not even a term that one would use, let alone hold in the same esteem as an "Ivy League education".
423:
206:
Huh? There are just six of them, not ten. Moreover, they're definitely not top sports schools, and they haven't been since the early twentieth century.
77:
It's somewhat moot now as it has been kept again, but it should probably have been mentioned that this is actually the third nomination of this article:
130:
168:
Grouping a set of mainly graduate business schools by their undergraduate sports league affiliation does not make sense. While the term "
122:
114:
502:
485:
469:
438:
412:
387:
371:
352:
330:
311:
284:
258:
239:
215:
201:
181:
107:
66:
17:
476:
Thanks for the pointer; I provided feedback there as well. I respectfully disagree that these articles are equivalent though.
481:
367:
272:
521:
36:
520:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
465:
307:
477:
363:
103:
62:
54:
343:
should should be a list or a category is a different issue altogether and I have no strong opinion.
280:
197:
461:
434:
408:
348:
326:
303:
254:
235:
211:
177:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
99:
58:
499:
384:
276:
193:
430:
404:
344:
322:
250:
231:
207:
173:
160:
169:
91:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Ivy League business schools (2nd nomination)
514:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
271:
Actually, I believe
Nyttend supports just that, Jadunne. See
85:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Ivy League business schools
449:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Big Ten business schools
156:
152:
148:
298:
This classification makes no less sense than, say, "
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
524:). No further edits should be made to this page.
51:universities in the United States and worldwide.
447:The discussion at the virtually identical case
8:
398:list of Schools-related deletion discussions
424:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
418:
392:
422:: This debate has been included in the
396:: This debate has been included in the
300:Law schools of the mid-Atlantic states
7:
123:List of Ivy League business schools
115:List of Ivy League business schools
24:
380:Columbia, Brown, Dartmouth, etc.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
460:be okay to use "Ivy League". —
1:
503:03:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
486:02:11, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
470:00:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
439:15:55, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
413:15:55, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
388:13:47, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
372:08:19, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
353:07:43, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
331:08:07, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
312:07:36, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
285:07:26, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
273:Template:Big Ten Law Schools
259:07:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
240:07:03, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
216:07:04, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
202:07:03, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
182:06:56, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
108:07:05, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
67:07:00, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
541:
456:okay to use "Big Ten", it
48:. From the main article "
517:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
441:
427:
415:
401:
532:
519:
478:RevelationDirect
428:
402:
364:RevelationDirect
164:
146:
34:
540:
539:
535:
534:
533:
531:
530:
529:
528:
522:deletion review
515:
137:
121:
118:
75:Procedural note
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
538:
536:
527:
526:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
473:
472:
442:
416:
390:
374:
356:
355:
336:
335:
334:
333:
315:
314:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
264:
263:
262:
261:
243:
242:
223:
222:
221:
220:
219:
218:
166:
165:
117:
112:
111:
110:
97:
96:
95:
94:
93:
88:
79:
78:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
537:
525:
523:
518:
512:
511:
504:
501:
497:
494:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
483:
479:
475:
474:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
450:
446:
443:
440:
436:
432:
425:
421:
417:
414:
410:
406:
399:
395:
391:
389:
386:
382:
378:
375:
373:
369:
365:
361:
358:
357:
354:
350:
346:
341:
338:
337:
332:
328:
324:
319:
318:
317:
316:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
294:
293:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
260:
256:
252:
247:
246:
245:
244:
241:
237:
233:
228:
225:
224:
217:
213:
209:
205:
204:
203:
199:
195:
191:
188:
187:
186:
185:
184:
183:
179:
175:
171:
162:
158:
154:
150:
145:
141:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
119:
116:
113:
109:
105:
101:
98:
92:
89:
86:
83:
82:
81:
80:
76:
73:
72:
71:
70:
69:
68:
64:
60:
56:
55:WP:OTHERSTUFF
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
516:
513:
457:
453:
444:
419:
393:
376:
359:
339:
295:
226:
189:
167:
74:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
462:Bill Price
304:Bill Price
170:Ivy League
100:Beeblebrox
59:Beeblebrox
500:Mandsford
458:shouldn't
431:• Gene93k
405:• Gene93k
385:Mandsford
277:Banaticus
194:Banaticus
445:Comment
345:ElKevbo
340:Comment
323:Jadunne
251:Jadunne
232:Nyttend
208:Nyttend
174:Jadunne
140:protect
135:history
190:delete
144:delete
161:views
153:watch
149:links
16:<
495:and
482:talk
435:talk
420:Note
409:talk
394:Note
377:Keep
368:talk
360:Keep
349:talk
327:talk
296:Keep
281:talk
255:talk
236:talk
227:Keep
212:talk
198:talk
178:talk
157:logs
131:talk
127:edit
104:talk
63:talk
46:keep
466:nyb
454:not
429:--
308:nyb
484:)
468:)
437:)
426:.
411:)
400:.
370:)
351:)
329:)
310:)
283:)
275:.
257:)
238:)
214:)
200:)
180:)
159:|
155:|
151:|
147:|
142:|
138:|
133:|
129:|
106:)
65:)
53:"
480:(
464:(
433:(
407:(
403:—
366:(
347:(
325:(
306:(
279:(
253:(
234:(
210:(
196:(
176:(
163:)
125:(
102:(
87:.
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.