889:
for all. the justification of a list is that there is a distinct criterion and the subjects are notable and the list is useful. The first two can hardly be doubted; it is clear that at least some people find this useful; I am among them. Although this is the sort of thing which might be thought of
640:
This nomination, which includes three of the articles nominated in that debate and one additional one dealing with Welsh laureates, does not do that. My recommendation would be to bring each of these articles separately, so that the merits of one can be evaluated without the others complicating the
810:
because additional information, such as the introduction, categories, and columns in the list plus the fact that this list takes a lot less effort to drill thru for information on a particular individual. I wish someone would create such an individual list for all other countries and delete
281:
151:
216:
346:
21:
779:
has more detail than the list by country, making it a far more useful list. It would be a shame to lose that. I wouldn't mind seeing all of that detail merged into the larger list by country, however.
83:
97:,so,it's quiet unnecessary to create a new article of Nobel Laureates by a country.Give a proper reason why it should not be deleted.A previous nomination for deletion of the page can be found
275:
145:
210:
721:
547:
542:
340:
551:
403:
398:
534:
499:
494:
407:
503:
390:
378:
90:
597:
486:
451:
446:
455:
890:
as being above national categories, the prize committees and the literature do make a point of nationality. Obviously we should keep the main list also.
901:
879:
824:
802:
788:
763:
733:
712:
691:
673:
651:
628:
614:
582:
112:
69:
438:
538:
296:
263:
166:
231:
394:
133:
198:
780:
490:
638:" The nominator may want to examine the discussion to determine whether it might make more sense to nominate some of these separately."
361:
862:
842:
812:
661:
647:
530:
94:
328:
257:
636:. The previous debate ended on March 23rd, and the result was No Consensus. In closing the debate, Admin Sandstein commented thus:
127:
776:
386:
192:
75:
99:
482:
253:
17:
123:
188:
610:
442:
322:
303:
173:
238:
318:
920:
708:
687:
44:
368:
269:
784:
434:
848:
3)categories? it has nothing to retain an article, in fact, there is no problem in category creation if these
139:
204:
875:
820:
798:
669:
624:
578:
108:
916:
793:
What kind of extra information is there can you please tell?Then I will be happy to merge the article!--
759:
40:
334:
704:
683:
703:: Just make the subject-wise lists sortable for country and then we dont need all separate lists. §§
354:
289:
224:
159:
593:
871:
816:
794:
729:
665:
642:
620:
606:
574:
104:
64:
33:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
915:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
755:
744:
657:
897:
838:
1)Introduction just introduces a subject,it's not a good reason to keep an article.
725:
601:
58:
568:
520:
472:
424:
747:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
892:
660:,since for every nomination,the criteria is same,viz.,there is already a
656:
Unlike the previous nomination,this nomination is strongly supported by
909:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
870:
Now, tell me, is there any good reason to retain these lists?--
855:
4)columns!Is it at all reasons for keeping an article?I doubt!
84:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of Muslim Nobel
Laureates
865:.why? will we not lose much information? what's your say!
93:) There is already a list of Nobel Laureates by Country-
682:
Yeah! This should be good. All based on nationality. §§
564:
560:
556:
516:
512:
508:
468:
464:
460:
420:
416:
412:
353:
288:
223:
158:
722:
list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions
381:) I am nominating the following pages for deletion-
754:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
592:
This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (
858:5)Your ‘less effort’ point does not add anything!
47:). No further edits should be made to this page.
923:). No further edits should be made to this page.
841:2)all the information can be merged in the main
598:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 April 4
367:
302:
237:
172:
8:
720:Note: This debate has been included in the
719:
7:
82:
813:List of Nobel laureates by country
775:. Personally I like the fact that
662:List of Nobel laureates by country
531:Welsh Nobel laureates and nominees
95:List of Nobel laureates by country
28:
777:List of Japanese Nobel laureates
387:List of Japanese Nobel laureates
76:List of Japanese Nobel laureates
22:List of Japanese Nobel laureates
483:List of Chinese Nobel laureates
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
596:). I have transcluded it to
861:6)You are telling to delete
940:
902:01:08, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
880:11:11, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
825:22:36, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
803:10:23, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
789:18:47, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
764:00:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
70:14:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
734:17:51, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
713:23:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
692:22:59, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
674:21:27, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
652:20:15, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
629:07:56, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
615:07:54, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
583:07:32, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
113:07:21, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
912:Please do not modify it.
829:Your logic is very poor:
435:Nobel laureates of India
36:Please do not modify it.
81:AfDs for this article:
852:are deleted.Isn't it?
619:Thank you very much.
590:Automated comment:
766:
736:
650:
931:
914:
753:
749:
646:
604:
572:
554:
524:
506:
476:
458:
428:
410:
372:
371:
357:
307:
306:
292:
242:
241:
227:
177:
176:
162:
52:The result was
38:
939:
938:
934:
933:
932:
930:
929:
928:
927:
921:deletion review
910:
742:
705:AnimeshKulkarni
684:AnimeshKulkarni
634:Procedural Keep
602:
545:
529:
497:
481:
449:
433:
401:
385:
314:
249:
184:
119:
87:
79:
45:deletion review
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
937:
935:
926:
925:
905:
904:
883:
882:
868:
867:
866:
859:
856:
853:
846:
839:
833:
832:
831:
830:
805:
791:
781:66.159.220.134
769:
768:
767:
751:
750:
739:
738:
737:
716:
715:
697:
696:
695:
694:
677:
676:
654:
631:
617:
586:
585:
526:
525:
478:
477:
430:
429:
375:
374:
310:
309:
245:
244:
180:
179:
86:
80:
78:
73:
50:
49:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
936:
924:
922:
918:
913:
907:
906:
903:
899:
895:
894:
888:
885:
884:
881:
877:
873:
869:
864:
863:the main list
860:
857:
854:
851:
847:
844:
840:
837:
836:
835:
834:
828:
827:
826:
822:
818:
814:
809:
806:
804:
800:
796:
792:
790:
786:
782:
778:
774:
773:Keep or merge
771:
770:
765:
761:
757:
752:
748:
746:
741:
740:
735:
731:
727:
723:
718:
717:
714:
710:
706:
702:
699:
698:
693:
689:
685:
681:
680:
679:
678:
675:
671:
667:
663:
659:
655:
653:
649:
644:
639:
635:
632:
630:
626:
622:
618:
616:
612:
608:
605:
599:
595:
591:
588:
587:
584:
580:
576:
570:
566:
562:
558:
553:
549:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
527:
522:
518:
514:
510:
505:
501:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
479:
474:
470:
466:
462:
457:
453:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
431:
426:
422:
418:
414:
409:
405:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
383:
382:
380:
370:
366:
363:
360:
356:
352:
348:
345:
342:
339:
336:
333:
330:
327:
324:
320:
317:
316:Find sources:
312:
311:
305:
301:
298:
295:
291:
287:
283:
280:
277:
274:
271:
268:
265:
262:
259:
255:
252:
251:Find sources:
247:
246:
240:
236:
233:
230:
226:
222:
218:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
190:
187:
186:Find sources:
182:
181:
175:
171:
168:
165:
161:
157:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
129:
125:
122:
121:Find sources:
117:
116:
115:
114:
110:
106:
103:.Thank You.--
102:
101:
96:
92:
85:
77:
74:
72:
71:
67:
66:
61:
60:
55:
48:
46:
42:
37:
31:
30:
23:
19:
911:
908:
891:
886:
872:Skashifakram
849:
817:Ottawahitech
807:
795:Skashifakram
772:
743:
700:
666:Skashifakram
643:UltraExactZZ
637:
633:
621:Skashifakram
589:
575:Skashifakram
376:
364:
358:
350:
343:
337:
331:
325:
315:
299:
293:
285:
278:
272:
266:
260:
250:
234:
228:
220:
213:
207:
201:
195:
185:
169:
163:
155:
148:
142:
136:
130:
120:
105:Skashifakram
98:
88:
63:
57:
53:
51:
35:
32:
756:Ron Ritzman
664:,Thank you!
341:free images
276:free images
211:free images
146:free images
917:talk page
815:instead.
726:• Gene93k
658:WP:BUNDLE
41:talk page
919:or in a
745:Relisted
641:debate.
379:View log
91:View log
43:or in a
20: |
603:Snotbot
548:protect
543:history
500:protect
495:history
452:protect
447:history
404:protect
399:history
347:WP refs
335:scholar
282:WP refs
270:scholar
217:WP refs
205:scholar
152:WP refs
140:scholar
59:postdlf
701:Delete
594:step 3
552:delete
504:delete
456:delete
408:delete
319:Google
254:Google
189:Google
124:Google
898:talk
850:lists
569:views
561:watch
557:links
521:views
513:watch
509:links
473:views
465:watch
461:links
425:views
417:watch
413:links
362:JSTOR
323:books
297:JSTOR
258:books
232:JSTOR
193:books
167:JSTOR
128:books
16:<
887:Keep
876:talk
843:list
821:talk
808:Keep
799:talk
785:talk
760:talk
730:talk
709:talk
688:talk
670:talk
625:talk
579:talk
565:logs
539:talk
535:edit
517:logs
491:talk
487:edit
469:logs
443:talk
439:edit
421:logs
395:talk
391:edit
355:FENS
329:news
290:FENS
264:news
225:FENS
199:news
160:FENS
134:news
109:talk
100:here
65:talk
54:KEEP
893:DGG
711:)
690:)
648:Did
613:»
600:.
369:TWL
304:TWL
239:TWL
174:TWL
900:)
878:)
823:)
801:)
787:)
762:)
732:)
724:.
672:)
627:)
609:•
581:)
573:--
567:|
563:|
559:|
555:|
550:|
546:|
541:|
537:|
519:|
515:|
511:|
507:|
502:|
498:|
493:|
489:|
471:|
467:|
463:|
459:|
454:|
450:|
445:|
441:|
423:|
419:|
415:|
411:|
406:|
402:|
397:|
393:|
349:)
284:)
219:)
154:)
111:)
68:)
56:.
896:(
874:(
845:.
819:(
811:-
797:(
783:(
758:(
728:(
707:(
686:(
668:(
645:~
623:(
611:c
607:t
577:(
571:)
533:(
523:)
485:(
475:)
437:(
427:)
389:(
377:(
373:)
365:·
359:·
351:·
344:·
338:·
332:·
326:·
321:(
313:(
308:)
300:·
294:·
286:·
279:·
273:·
267:·
261:·
256:(
248:(
243:)
235:·
229:·
221:·
214:·
208:·
202:·
196:·
191:(
183:(
178:)
170:·
164:·
156:·
149:·
143:·
137:·
131:·
126:(
118:(
107:(
89:(
62:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.