2259:. I was brought here, like many others by Wiggins2, or as he wants to be called, "Wiggie". I think we shouldn't be so quick to shoot him down, as I, & probably many others, are grateful for his post to draw our attention to this subject. I wouldn't mind if the other "side" did the same. But we cannot ignore the fact that this is defintely going to open wikipedia into two halves; Those who want to keep. Those who don't. I.E. Christians, & others. However, this should not be about religion. I would be ashamed of the christians on here if they only voted to keep the articles because they were christian orientated. This should strictly be business as usual, even though it does seem strange an editor would nominate so many christian articles. Maybe a hidden agenda? If an article's crap, then it should be deleted. Being an inclusionist, I will probably keep the most mundane article. However, the list of notable people list is like many others, & should not be here. To do so would be obvious bias. I ask everyone to not be drawn in with a strict "You're wrong, I'm right" situation, but be open & find a way to keep peaceful....
48:. The final tally was 42 delete, 18 keep, 11 merge. I discounted 8 votes (7K/1D) for being either from newbies or not having real reasons (e.g., "it exists" -- my big toe exists but it doesn't deserve an article). Even if I had kept them, we'd have 43–25, or 63% delete. Also note that most merge votes were "merge or delete." This really should be a merge IMHO, which should satisfy the inclusionist bloc who don't want to see the content deleted. Really, we're talking 44Kb for a list of people? The vote stacking also really disturbs me. I noticed that a number of the people in the inclusionist bloc all voted on the same AfD discussions, all right in a row, which strongly implies they were here only because of their wikiphilosophy (still, I didn't discount their votes).
1523:. Yes, Gastrich, I'm an inclusionist. I also have absolutely no problem with alerting people to ongoing votes, and think that people who vote against simply because of that are being incredibly dense, but that doesn't mean I don't weigh the article's merits once alerted. I'm not going to pass judgment on whether LSU is a diploma mill or not, but don't think I'm just a tool to use for voting keep on every article on the deletion listings. I'm going to give each of the articles you sent to me careful consideration, and will vote accordingly. If you were expecting me to charge in and vote keep without reading anything, you don't know me very well.
1065:. Solicited a favourable vote from me via email because I am listed as an inclusionist. I would like to point out that the inclusionist motto is "with truth preserved."...not "with vanity preserved." Well established, accredited institutions usually do warrant a seperate list of notable graduates...Harvard, for example, is very likely to have a huge list of notable graduates which would be too long for the main article...but LBU's list (even if they are all truly notable) is short enough to fit fine into the main article. If this article is kept, then I vote to have an undeletable list of all people who have read the
312:, which had a rational about the notability of the school but suggested renaming it, which strongly suggests he thought he was voting on whether there should be any article about it at all. The other lists aren't relevant because if we take out the deadwood (i.e., the red links and the links that are going to go red and the people only marginally connected to the mill), there's hardly anything left. Plenty of schools have a lot of notable graduates. The mill you're wasting your time at? Not so much.
1692:- How many people are here because Gastrich emailed all the inclusionists on the vain hope that you automatically vote to keep articles? An argument for delete can be made that should be acceptable to inclusionists - put the valuable intellectual content where it belongs, in the LBU article, and no content is lost. I know that there are several such inclusionists here, although since Gastrich used email instead of talk pages, there's no Wiki trail of proof like there is for his wikichrist crowd. -
1657:, it is simply campaigning. Those of you opposed to this author or these entries will just have to trust that the people who are brought in can make up their own minds regardless of how they got here. Personally, I'm questioning the objectivity and neutrality of both sides here. This is an encyclopedia without page limits and in order to avoid charges of bias especially in these controversial areas, we should always err on the side of inclusiveness.
2332:
743:
1006:"...Several weeks ago, JCSM (Jesus Christ Saves Ministries) noticed this trend and created a new ministry called Wiki4Christ. It's an organization that exists to make sure Christians have a united and represented voice on Knowledge. As you may imagine, unbelievers also edit there and they actively try to silence Christian input and revert our contributions; especially Christian biographies! This is where we need you, now.
1741:, LBU is not as significant an institution of higher learning. Some schools warrant their own page of notable alumni simply because of the size of such a list. This page, on the other hand, can easily be included in the LBU article without any loss of content and therefore, by mergist principles, does not warrant a separate page. Will you try to hide your POV, like you say everyone but the two of us tries to do? -
1002:(strong) I don't see how this is necessary with the inclusion of notables on LBU's page. The discussion seems to be mostly reasonable peppered other than the personal attacks from the author. I would say that there would be vote stacking. I received notice of this from a email list headed by Jason Gastrich himself. If I could get a place to host I would be happy to post said email. To quote from that message:
1915:
1305:, which means they're in basic compliance with the standards. It's apparently a kind of probationary accreditation. IIRC, even before they were accredited BJU was considered to have one of the top accountancy programs in the country, which to my mind is enough to overcome the presumption that an unaccredited school is a mill. (Still wouldn't want to go there.)
2503:, but nonetheless there are a number of "graduates" who have articles on Knowledge. Assuming these articles themselves aren't vanity (or the association to the college isn't made up), I see no reason why it's different from any of the other university lists on Knowledge. I might agree to a policy to delete all of the "X university people" lists as
1644:
folks don't deserve to be here. The criteria for me here is, "is this article useful as a way to initiate research" and clearly it is. If I was interested in, say, the history of baptist thinking or wanted to make a wash list of baptist notable, I could use this as a start. A PERFECT WIKI ARTICLE in my opion.
1132:
notable enough to deserve its own page for alumini. The only thing more ridiculous is that there are vanity biographies made of these non-notable people featured on the alumini. Finally, Jason
Gastrich is making personal attacks and encouraging people who obviously do not know the entire situation to
1103:
with original article. This AfD appears to be in danger of going off-topic. This is suppose to be about whether or not the article is worth keeping, not about whether or not LBU is a "degree mill" or not, or the merits of accreditation, or other stuff this AfD is bringing up. Let's get back on topic,
1589:
This is a perfectly viable encyclopedia article on a public institution that could very well be the subject of someone's research in the future. In such an event, wikipedia would come in handy. That is what wikipedia is for. I haven't heard a single good argument to why this should be deleted. There
1178:
is unaccredited. Why shouldn't they have a list? The fact remains that there are many notable alumni and a list is a good thing to have, so they can be organized and, well, listed. The fact that they haven't sought government accreditation means little; especially in light of its alumni and academic
1643:
I don't know enough about this here yet so I'm abstaining for now. But it seems to me that alot of these articles here, the bio's I mean, pass into the notable stage and are verifiable. I'm not a christian by a long shot and I have issues with fundamentalism in a big way but that doesn't mean these
1013:
He goes on to give links to all of his articles that are noted for deletion. He also doesn't point out these articles are authored by himself. - I would say that this languaged is charged to skew voting. I have been a longtime fan and user of Wiki and this is the first time I've been interested
1009:
Yesterday, the entries below were nominated for deletion. This means there will be a vote on whether or not to keep them. Please come and let your voice be heard! This endeavor will only take 10-15 minutes and it will be something you can do with your online time that will further the kingdom of
1772:
I do hide my own POV. And comparing the LBU to
Harvard is nothing short of silly. They aren't even in the same league. The LBU is noteworthy in its own way. Its an american institution, which is why it listed on the english wikipedia. On the Swedish wikipedia, alot of small schools have their own
1773:
entries. None complains. So no, thats not a good reason. There are no other articles with these names, so there's no name conflict. There's no nothing, except silly notions about the standard of education on the school. This guy is by all accounts an important person, so he deserves a page.
1563:
We can't just throw out something related to something intellectual (in this case, a university) while other articles related to things like sport are kept. It is not of stub length, and is useful and informative. This could save someone a lot of searching. - 13:14, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
2426:
2293:
1825:
1802:
1025:
581:
450:
155:
110:
2129:
Your comments to those that oppose keeping this and your emails to those who will likely side with your views really shows your character. You are not right and thus only way you get people to support you is to a play the religious martyr role--- which many people don't buy.
2450:
I think the reason this has gotten so blown up is because Jason recruted help by emailing inclusionists. Deletionists did the same thing as well. Really, let's keep this between the two camps and not bring the gods into this! Factions are killing wikipedia.
1549:. As soon as this started turning into a Christian vs. everyone else debate I lost interest. Unfortunately, many of those voting keep are claiming that everyone else is anti-Christian. This wasn't so, but if it is repeated enough it may become truth. --
442:
787:, no need to merge non-notable people to parent article. JzG is right: that list of unaccrediteds is a handy place to find junk and too-fanatic-to-meet-standards when there's a question about an unknown institution supposedly of higher learning.
1935:
977:(strong) First of all, the nom uses very subjective language. Diploma mill is a pretty crappy spin to put on things. Second, there may be someone who wants to do research on the school and its associates, why not have a page?
2365:. Vote stacking, sock-puppetry, and general disruption has made it impossible to fairly evaluate this article, but it appears to be a list of non-notable people associated with a non-notable school. At the very least, merge.
1787:
Something very funny happened today. I got two identical emails from Jason
Gastrich through Knowledge. You can make up your own mind as to whether this qualifies for meat-puppetry or stacking the vote. Here's the email.
2269:
Dude, it's not a
Christians vs. the Detroit Lions situation. I'm an atheist (because I reject Christ's far-left socialist teachings)--I want to keep it because anything that actually exists is worthy of an article.
1233:
I don't see anything about them applying and being denied. Also, this link doesn't tell me that they are accredited, now. I've read that they have applied for TRACS accreditation and were waiting on their decision.
2611:
into
Louisiana Baptist University page. I believe this list has a place on wikipedia, but it would be a nearly empty list as most of the people are non-notable, and we don't need to have nearly empty lists.
1104:
does this article deserve to exist? I say yes, why not, otherwise, we should begin removing other school's lists. It could probably be paired down to be just notable alumni, but it still deserves to exist.--
1446:
As others have stated, these seems partially redundant with the notables list, and the author's arguments do not persuade me of this list's worthiness (or indeed, the worthiness of many of the list's items)
381:
per nomination. Are these types of lists even used for accredited universities? Knowledge is not an indiscriminate collection of unnotable people. If there are any notables put them on the university page.
504:. It is probably libellous to claim without clear references that people are "graduates" of a diploma mill. Whoever can be verified as actually themselves claiming a degree from LBU can be mentioned in the
1159:
rules take priority over everything. Lists of alumini on unaccredited universities and biographies on non-notable
Christian missionaries are unacceptable. If you have a dispute, create your own wiki site.
1954:
mention of lobbying and sock-puppet allegations is appropriate, but alleged vested interests are at best borderline arguments IMO. What should count is user contribution history, and the article itself.
2317:
Indeed they do. And the ones who are genuinely notable (and a few who are not) are already linked in the LBU article, which is certainly not overlarge. So this separate article is unnecessary. -
1931:
408:
Wow, you're right. That is a very impressive list of 60 universities. Is there are seperate category for non-accredited universities? Or will we have to create a new category for this list?
1674:
These articles aren't controversial in any way. The self-proclaimed "deletecrew" that haunts this site makes topics like this controversial by attacking them because of their own POV views.
1137:, but this method of vote stacking is inexplicably ludicrous. I am trying very hard to restraining myself from making stronger comments, but that may not be possible in the near future.
635:
This article was created by Jason
Gastrich to promote his school as a mainstream institution. This is only one of around 10 articles he created promoting his religion/degree/school.
222:. This article is vanity on its own, but the main article has an incomplete section on alumini. However, many sections, such as "General alumni," will be removed, as Knowledge is
1125:
721:
1938:
seems to have been abandonned rather than closed - pity, needs cleaning up when the dust settles.) The list of delete arguments above includes some valid ones but also many
369:
Non-notable school, school has an entry at
Knowledge, superficially padded list of persons, mostly of little or no notability. Not helpful or informative, a space waster -
2633:
2616:
2563:
2551:
2539:
2524:
2491:
2479:
2461:
2441:
2418:
2402:
2386:
2369:
2357:
2340:
2308:
2285:
2274:
2263:
2251:
2237:
2224:
2206:
2190:
2175:
2155:
2134:
2124:
2113:
2099:
2084:
2060:
2046:
2025:
2012:
1998:
1959:
1918:
1894:
1882:
1868:
1854:
1840:
1817:
1794:
1777:
1761:
1745:
1732:
1717:
1696:
1678:
1661:
1631:
1617:
1580:
1553:
1540:
1527:
1511:
1495:
1474:
1451:
1434:
1399:
1388:
1362:
1309:
1297:
1238:
1194:
1183:
1166:
1143:
1108:
1089:
1073:
1051:
1040:
1018:
992:
981:
965:
956:
945:
929:
913:
901:
890:
878:
866:
844:
832:
821:
803:
791:
779:
767:
751:
712:
685:
671:
627:
608:
596:
592:- mostly non-notable, a non-notable connection, and what few parts are worthy can be included on the LBU page. Constitutional rights? Gimme a break, this isn't a court. -
573:
561:
541:
529:
512:
496:
480:
465:
424:
415:
403:
389:
373:
361:
316:
303:
282:
273:
246:
232:
206:
187:
175:
147:
132:
119:
102:
77:
420:
I know. It's a good thing and par for the course on
Knowledge. There isn't an unaccredited category specifically for lists right now. You can create one if you like. --
952:
How do you know it's of interest to very few people? There are 59 lists like it. Do you happen to know how many of those are important to how many different people? --
1174:: Thanks for your comment. However, I disagree with you and I believe that some unaccredited universities deserve lists of people associated with them. For instance,
520:. Borderline libellous per Tups, borderline listcruft, borderline lack of notability, and Gastrich's vote recruiting tips my teetering vote over all three lines. --
2056:-- why not have an article for every unknown fringe person who graduated from South Succotash High School in an article. This is just ridiculous self-promotion.
2074:. Disagree with the idea, not the person. I am not using this statement to attack a specific side of the debate, as both sides are violating this policy. Also,
660:
Please login and sign your comments with four tildes. If you don't have a user account, register for one. Anonymous votes aren't really counted in AfDs. --
1902:
silensor says clearly what I was thinking... article establishes its reason for existing. It does appear it may have problems keeping focuses however.
2217:
You don't see why people are talking about keeping the names page? That's what this nomination is about! Furthermore, there are 68 other "names pages"
2518:
1972:
1265:
1213:
640:
840:
Funny, isn't it, that when an AfD concerns an article of yours that people never seen before come crawling out of the woodwork to vote with you?
2078:. This is the internet, which means that everybody should have the capability to give their points of view without directly offending others.
1360:
1278:
1226:
653:
100:
166:
per nomination. I thought we had categories for this list junk anyways (though I'd support this being deleted from categories as well). --
2037:
et al. are kept, then my vote can be for a weak keep instead. Including it (or not) should depend on the results of the related AfD's. --
1985:
1813:, solely based upon the merits of the article. The actions being taken here on either side are divisive and very, very troublesome.
1340:
take the little (if anything) that is left and merge it into its parent article, probably deleting the redirect as useless. We could
763:
into article on the "university", which already has a list of notable alumni. Not enough content here to merit a separate article. --
666:
622:
1379:
1045:
Care to back that up? This isn't a university. It's an unaccredited school that happens to use the word university in its name. --
1425:
1728:
try and hide your own POV like all the others do? Seriously, I'm asking again. Give me a good argument why this should be deleted.
1344:
have a bun-fight on the article's talk page about what is meaningful to keep, ending up with like four names. Or we could simply
1606:
83:
616:- The list of people isn't that long, and it appears like the more notable of them are already included in the LBU page anyway.
1155:
site, and its objectives, I have several comments to make. It is fine that you are creating this organization, but
Knowledge's
569:* It is our constitutual right to be able to speak on any subject that we choose and not to discriminate on basis of religion--
115:
List of mostly non-notable people connected (sometimes loosely) with a diploma mill attended by the originator of the article.
17:
2186:
page. I don't really see why people are talking about keeping the names page (they are already on the article page) or merge.
1375:
2021:
Regardless of people's opinion of the information, it is still good information. I actually found the article quite useful.
1942:
and other irrelevancies. (Let me pre-empt two others by saying that I am a Christian, and I have been emailed on this. See
1382:
only has 782. Bob Jones University is clearly more notable than Louisiana Baptist University, so that is a different case.
171:
1256:
1253:
2218:
2183:
2165:
1598:
1520:
1504:
505:
489:
397:
219:
141:
1288:
2514:
1333:
728:, and yes that does mean exactly what you think it does: a diploma mill. This is more Gastrichcruft, burn it now.
2648:
2327:
1946:.) For example, if we were to delete every article on a university contributed by any of its alumni, we'd lose a
1850:
Given it's current state, it should be weaned and merged into the main article under the Notable Alumni section.
1358:
1274:
1222:
738:
649:
525:
98:
36:
1878:. List of financial transactions, in effect, and not verifiable by reasonable means short of people's receipts.
2647:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
167:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
2042:
1981:
1469:
1653:
And just to be above board here, I was asked to come vote here by the author. This is not vote stacking or
2509:
1348:
this now, as its only purpose is to provide a list of articles that are AfD candidates as they don't meet
1270:
1218:
1066:
812:
645:
521:
473:
2038:
988:
There is a page for the school itself, which lists notable alums. This list is redundant to that page. -
2629:
2624:
Diploma mill, in other words, they can hand out diplomas to anyone. So this list doesn't mean anything.
1879:
1707:
1568:
1203:
from Transnational Association of Christian Colleges and Schools (TRACS), Accreditation Commission, see
799:
there is already a (short) section for notable grads in the school article. We don't need another list.
682:
268:
1409:
2146:. A few of these people are editors, and authors, and notable people. They belong on an encyclopedia.
961:
Apparently the 59 others are accredited and the schools are actually rather significant on their own.
937:
as a list of interest to very few people, apparently created just for the sake of having a list, i.e.
2574:
2382:
1550:
1537:
1491:
1353:
1175:
926:
800:
93:
1250:
2625:
2536:
2221:
2121:
1396:
1235:
1180:
953:
938:
875:
829:
421:
400:
353:
300:
144:
56:
2547:- while a diploma mill might have some notability, the people associated with it -- not so much.--
2336:
747:
2548:
2022:
1977:
1943:
1851:
1742:
1714:
1693:
1464:
989:
962:
593:
370:
71:
1413:
439:
2353:
2097:
2082:
1927:
1910:
1758:
1432:
1386:
1295:
1164:
1141:
819:
570:
244:
230:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
2560:
2415:
2331:
2281:
Exactly my point. This shouldn't be about religion, only about what's best for wikipedia...
2147:
1865:
1565:
1416:
scored 772,000. The margin of difference is simply too large to consider otherwise. From an
742:
257:
2613:
2452:
2438:
2379:
2172:
2009:
1654:
1590:
is no wikipedia article on "Diplomamill". User:Itake|Itake]] 14:58, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1487:
1448:
978:
922:
910:
841:
605:
412:
386:
203:
1336:. That would be the barest of minumums, and is absolutley beyond negotiation. We could
2533:
2282:
2260:
2075:
1891:
1577:
1156:
1015:
898:
493:
339:
1124:
a directory of vanity. I agree with the merge, but Louisiana Baptist University is an
2504:
2488:
2476:
2458:
2248:
2234:
2187:
2131:
2110:
2071:
2057:
1995:
1814:
1421:
1349:
1121:
887:
776:
550:
223:
63:
51:
2220:
like it for various universities. They haven't been merged with their university. --
1914:
2500:
2305:
2271:
2094:
2079:
2034:
1956:
1903:
1628:
1614:
1610:
1524:
1429:
1383:
1292:
1161:
1138:
1134:
1105:
1037:
816:
509:
462:
241:
227:
184:
2266:. BTW, I hope my vote isn't discounted, I count myself as a influencial editor...
1199:
Gastrich you made two errors: LBU did apply for accreditation and was denied. And
2411:
2395:
2366:
1837:
1508:
1371:
1329:
1306:
1191:
1086:
942:
709:
558:
477:
313:
279:
129:
116:
90:
Note - this page has been refactored. Comments have been moved to the talk page
2352:. Unencyclopedic list. Vote stacking attempt leaves a bad taste in my mouth. --
557:
the more notable names who already have WP articles into the main LBU article.
2399:
2203:
2169:
1939:
1774:
1729:
1675:
1658:
1070:
788:
764:
438:
This is a great list. LBU is a great university with many impressive grads.--
409:
383:
200:
92:
Please try to stay on-topic and focus on the article and the contributions. -
1789:
1046:
1010:
God. Wouldn't you like to vote to keep Christian entries on Knowledge?..."
700:
662:
618:
538:
702:
694:
828:
There's nothing vote stacking or wrong with encouraging people to vote. --
706:
2318:
1536:. Useful content, but doesn't need to stand in an article of its own. --
1245:
The LBU 1998 request by TRACS (the people who approved BJU) was denied--
729:
553:
an indiscriminate collection of information. I would not oppose merging
537:
could do with renaming "List of notable alumni" or something like that.
2164:
Which few are you talking about? One option is to merge them into the
2033:, since most of the people listed aren't notable in themselves, but if
1738:
1706:- If this page gets deleted, another obvious candidate for deletion is
862:
461:
please this list is informative and too big to put on the main article
1836:, This information is valuable and should be included. Salva veritate
874:. Vanity piece by Gastrich and co-agents of LBU diploma mill nonsense.
295:
This is irrelvant. As it has been shown, 60 universities have entries
2487:
Indicate they are LBU alumni on each person's biographical article.
1405:
1303:
724:. Yes, froends, this is a list of people who are graduates from an
704:
696:
698:
1417:
396:
Yes, they're used for many universities, institutes, and colleges.
2247:
I hope something is going to be done about this ballot stuffing.
2641:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1605:
been nominated for deletion. This is only about the list called
2595:
1291:
states that Bob Jones University has recieved accreditation.
2377:- Yes I was found this all by myself - Keep this per Kurt.--
1247:
this was explained once to you already on the LBU talk page.
1482:
any actual notables into the university article, otherwise
1081:
any actual notables into the university article, otherwise
1061:
any actual notables into the university article, otherwise
183:
List of notable people connected with a wonderful school.--
2575:
1152:
226:
a directory ("indiscriminate collection of information").
2089:
Finally, please sign all of your posts with four tildes,
2594:
1711:
1601:(which is not a public institution). That article has
1204:
1576:. Useful content is useful content; keep it around.
1133:
blindly support him via email. I am not criticizing
722:
List of unaccredited institutions of higher learning
2093:to ensure that others know who posted the comment.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
2233:How many times are you going to post you abstain.
1627:I think it can be notable and it is interesting.
1463:. I may be an inclusionist, but I'm not stupid. —
256:Notable school. But may I suggest renaming it? —
2651:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1395:Google isn't the only indicator of notablity. --
199:This is Heaven Helpers first edit in wikipedia.
2015:(The previous unsigned message was not from me)
2507:, but I see no reason to single this one out.
1287:The search isn't working on my computer, but
8:
2304:The subjects of the article clearly exist.
1607:List of Louisiana Baptist University people
1328:remove anything from this list that wasn't
1126:unaccredited institution of higher learning
726:unaccredited institution of higher learning
278:The school itself already has an article.
140:. This list is like other university lists
84:List of Louisiana Baptist University people
2109:article, non-notables list takes up room.
1864:I see no reason to delete this article. --
1116:The quoted phrase from your post above, "
143:on Knowledge. Helpful and informative. --
1302:To be exact, they have candidacy status
549:article as nn list of mostly nn people.
1710:which is only a redirect to this page.
1036:university-related topics are notable.
1255:and the denial of the approval in 2000
2437:Stop hating on anyone with religion.
7:
2457:Anti-factionalist fearmongering ;-)
2182:Actually they already appear on the
1249:A discussion about the inquiry with
720:And now I see the wisdom in keeping
2076:stay cool when the editing gets hot
1597:a discussion about the article on
24:
1932:vote to delete the parent article
2330:
1913:
741:
1424:has a ranking of 82,173, while
111:I - Puppetry and RfC discussion
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1994:User has a total of 14 edits.
1609:. BTW, there is an article on
1190:Actually, BJU is accredited.
1120:," is incorrect. Knowledge is
1118:or the merits of accreditation
811:Vote stacking accusation made
156:II - Accrediatation discussion
1:
2072:refrain from personal attacks
1428:dosen't even have a ranking.
1378:has 1,010,000 results, while
44:The result of the debate was
2634:18:12, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
2617:16:26, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
2564:08:27, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
2552:08:12, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
2540:03:46, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
2525:03:13, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
2492:03:07, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
2480:02:25, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
2462:03:06, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
2442:01:46, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
2419:22:16, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
2403:19:31, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
2387:18:34, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
2370:16:59, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
2358:15:48, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
2341:23:12, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
2309:15:43, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
2286:02:00, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
2275:15:46, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
2264:04:06, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
2252:02:59, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
2238:02:59, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
2225:06:02, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
2207:18:55, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
2191:02:59, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
2184:Louisiana Baptist University
2176:18:57, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
2166:Louisiana Baptist University
2156:18:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
2148:
2135:02:59, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
2125:07:54, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
2114:03:36, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
2100:03:34, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
2085:03:28, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
2061:02:01, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
2047:23:13, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
2026:21:30, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
2013:21:12, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1999:06:23, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
1960:19:52, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1919:18:56, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1895:17:42, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1883:17:39, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1869:17:33, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1855:17:23, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1841:17:13, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1818:16:37, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1795:16:32, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1778:18:01, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1762:16:16, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1746:16:25, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1733:16:05, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1718:15:58, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1697:15:55, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1679:14:58, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1662:14:43, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1632:22:42, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1618:15:00, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1599:Louisiana Baptist University
1581:13:17, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1554:20:30, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
1541:12:53, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1528:10:31, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1521:Louisiana Baptist University
1512:07:30, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1505:Louisiana Baptist University
1496:07:18, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1475:06:59, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1452:03:41, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1435:02:39, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1426:Louisiana Baptist University
1410:Louisiana Baptist University
1400:02:31, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1389:02:18, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1380:Louisiana Baptist University
1363:02:14, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1310:03:18, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1298:02:46, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1239:02:31, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1195:02:17, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1184:02:06, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1167:02:00, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1144:01:54, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
1109:23:15, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
1090:22:50, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
1074:21:49, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
1052:22:52, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
1041:21:48, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
1019:21:05, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
993:20:39, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
982:20:30, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
966:20:39, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
957:18:52, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
946:17:38, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
930:09:22, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
914:04:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
902:03:23, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
891:03:19, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
879:01:59, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
867:01:35, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
845:14:18, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
833:01:31, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
822:00:27, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
804:00:10, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
792:00:04, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
780:23:34, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
768:23:19, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
752:22:52, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
713:22:29, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
686:20:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
681:or Merge with main article.
672:20:00, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
628:19:45, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
609:18:32, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
597:17:13, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
574:17:11, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
562:13:24, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
542:11:40, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
530:09:19, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
513:08:27, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
497:07:54, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
490:Louisiana Baptist University
481:06:50, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
466:06:18, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
443:06:07, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
425:05:39, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
416:05:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
404:05:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
390:04:31, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
374:03:39, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
362:03:38, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
317:22:38, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
304:22:13, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
283:04:16, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
274:03:33, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
247:02:21, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
240:if merging is not possible.
233:03:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
220:Louisiana Baptist University
207:04:31, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
188:03:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
176:02:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
148:02:47, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
133:02:45, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
120:02:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
103:02:28, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
78:18:32, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
2151:
1404:Very true. However, from a
1201:BJU does have accreditation
474:An attempt at vote-stacking
2668:
1334:Knowledge:Reliable sources
2202:. deep breaths everyone!
451:III - User has nine edits
2644:Please do not modify it.
1412:scored 1,570 hits while
32:Please do not modify it.
1737:I already did. Unlike
1067:Invisible Pink Unicorn
2604:13:19, Jan. 23, 2006
2427:XV - Mote, beam, etc
1975:comment was added by
1422:Bob Jones University
1414:Bob Jones University
1376:Bob Jones University
1268:comment was added by
1216:comment was added by
1176:Bob Jones University
693:More vote-stacking:
643:comment was added by
299:a list of people. --
1950:of good content. A
1151:Upon reviewing the
168:Consumed Crustacean
1944:user:Andrewa/creed
1708:List of LBU people
856:categorize if you
2632:
2605:
2601:
2587:
2579:
2522:
2510:Crotalus horridus
1989:
1890:same as above. --
1569:lobster telephone
1282:
1230:
1014:in its process.
865:
657:
528:
308:It's relevant to
75:
2659:
2646:
2628:
2603:
2599:
2597:
2591:
2588:
2581:
2577:
2512:
2334:
2322:
2153:
2150:
1968:
1917:
1908:
1880:Charles Matthews
1792:
1690:Question Comment
1566:The Great Gavini
1467:
1356:
1261:
1209:
1179:requirements. --
1049:
861:
745:
733:
669:
636:
625:
524:
359:
356:
351:
348:
345:
342:
271:
266:
263:
260:
96:
76:
69:
66:
61:
54:
34:
2667:
2666:
2662:
2661:
2660:
2658:
2657:
2656:
2655:
2649:deletion review
2642:
2593:
2585:
2534:Walter Siegmund
2329:
2320:
2294:XIV - Wiggins 2
2120:Riiiiiiight. --
1934:was lost. (The
1904:
1790:
1655:Ballot stuffing
1551:StuffOfInterest
1538:StuffOfInterest
1465:
1370:According to a
1354:
1324:Well, we could
1271:207.200.116.196
1219:207.200.116.196
1047:
801:KillerChihuahua
740:
731:
667:
646:207.200.116.196
623:
604:if not delete.
357:
354:
349:
346:
343:
340:
269:
264:
261:
258:
94:
87:
64:
57:
52:
49:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2665:
2663:
2654:
2653:
2637:
2636:
2619:
2606:
2583:
2566:
2554:
2542:
2527:
2523:
2505:unencyclopedic
2494:
2482:
2469:
2468:
2467:
2466:
2465:
2464:
2445:
2444:
2430:
2422:
2421:
2405:
2389:
2372:
2360:
2346:
2345:
2344:
2343:
2326:
2312:
2311:
2297:
2289:
2288:
2279:
2278:
2277:
2254:
2241:
2240:
2231:
2230:
2229:
2228:
2227:
2222:Jason Gastrich
2210:
2209:
2200:strong abstain
2196:
2195:
2194:
2193:
2179:
2178:
2159:
2158:
2140:
2139:
2138:
2137:
2122:Jason Gastrich
2117:
2116:
2104:
2103:
2102:
2064:
2063:
2054:Strong DELETE;
2050:
2049:
2039:Idont Havaname
2028:
2016:
2002:
2001:
1991:
1990:
1971:The preceding
1962:
1921:
1897:
1885:
1872:
1871:
1858:
1857:
1844:
1843:
1829:
1821:
1820:
1806:
1798:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1765:
1764:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1721:
1720:
1700:
1699:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1635:
1634:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1584:
1571:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1530:
1514:
1498:
1477:
1454:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1397:Jason Gastrich
1392:
1391:
1365:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1264:The preceding
1259:
1251:Steve Levicoff
1236:Jason Gastrich
1212:The preceding
1207:
1187:
1186:
1181:Jason Gastrich
1169:
1146:
1111:
1093:
1092:
1076:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1029:
1004:
1003:
996:
995:
985:
984:
971:
970:
969:
968:
954:Jason Gastrich
949:
948:
932:
916:
904:
893:
881:
869:
850:
849:
848:
847:
830:Jason Gastrich
825:
824:
806:
794:
782:
770:
754:
737:
715:
688:
676:
675:
674:
639:The preceding
630:
611:
599:
585:
577:
576:
564:
544:
532:
515:
499:
483:
468:
454:
446:
445:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
422:Jason Gastrich
401:Jason Gastrich
393:
392:
376:
364:
333:as per Scythos
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
301:Jason Gastrich
288:
287:
286:
285:
251:
250:
249:
212:
211:
210:
209:
191:
190:
178:
159:
151:
150:
145:Jason Gastrich
135:
114:
105:
86:
81:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2664:
2652:
2650:
2645:
2639:
2638:
2635:
2631:
2627:
2623:
2620:
2618:
2615:
2610:
2607:
2602:
2598:
2590:
2589:
2571:, per nom. —
2570:
2567:
2565:
2562:
2558:
2555:
2553:
2550:
2549:SarekOfVulcan
2546:
2543:
2541:
2538:
2535:
2531:
2528:
2526:
2520:
2516:
2511:
2508:
2506:
2502:
2499:LBU may be a
2498:
2495:
2493:
2490:
2486:
2483:
2481:
2478:
2474:
2471:
2470:
2463:
2460:
2456:
2455:
2454:
2449:
2448:
2447:
2446:
2443:
2440:
2436:
2433:
2432:
2431:
2429:
2428:
2420:
2417:
2413:
2409:
2406:
2404:
2401:
2397:
2393:
2390:
2388:
2385:
2384:
2381:
2376:
2373:
2371:
2368:
2364:
2361:
2359:
2355:
2351:
2348:
2347:
2342:
2339:
2338:
2333:
2328:
2324:
2316:
2315:
2314:
2313:
2310:
2307:
2303:
2300:
2299:
2298:
2296:
2295:
2287:
2284:
2280:
2276:
2273:
2268:
2267:
2265:
2262:
2258:
2255:
2253:
2250:
2246:
2243:
2242:
2239:
2236:
2232:
2226:
2223:
2219:
2216:
2215:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2208:
2205:
2201:
2198:
2197:
2192:
2189:
2185:
2181:
2180:
2177:
2174:
2171:
2167:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2157:
2154:
2145:
2142:
2141:
2136:
2133:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2123:
2119:
2118:
2115:
2112:
2108:
2105:
2101:
2098:
2096:
2092:
2088:
2087:
2086:
2083:
2081:
2077:
2073:
2069:
2066:
2065:
2062:
2059:
2055:
2052:
2051:
2048:
2044:
2040:
2036:
2032:
2029:
2027:
2024:
2023:the1physicist
2020:
2017:
2014:
2011:
2007:
2004:
2003:
2000:
1997:
1993:
1992:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1978:Theologist101
1976:
1974:
1966:
1963:
1961:
1958:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1941:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1928:waste of time
1925:
1922:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1909:
1907:
1901:
1898:
1896:
1893:
1889:
1886:
1884:
1881:
1877:
1874:
1873:
1870:
1867:
1863:
1860:
1859:
1856:
1853:
1849:
1846:
1845:
1842:
1839:
1835:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1828:
1827:
1819:
1816:
1812:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1805:
1804:
1797:
1796:
1793:
1779:
1776:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1763:
1760:
1756:
1753:
1752:
1747:
1744:
1743:Harvestdancer
1740:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1731:
1727:
1723:
1722:
1719:
1716:
1715:Harvestdancer
1712:
1709:
1705:
1702:
1701:
1698:
1695:
1694:Harvestdancer
1691:
1688:
1687:
1680:
1677:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1663:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1642:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1633:
1630:
1626:
1623:
1619:
1616:
1615:u p p l a n d
1612:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1591:
1588:
1585:
1582:
1579:
1575:
1572:
1570:
1567:
1562:
1559:
1555:
1552:
1548:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1529:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1515:
1513:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1499:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1478:
1476:
1473:
1472:
1468:
1466:Nightstallion
1462:
1458:
1455:
1453:
1450:
1445:
1442:
1441:
1436:
1433:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1398:
1394:
1393:
1390:
1387:
1385:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1366:
1364:
1361:
1359:
1357:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1330:WP:Verifiable
1327:
1323:
1322:
1311:
1308:
1304:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1296:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1269:
1267:
1260:
1257:
1254:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1237:
1232:
1231:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1217:
1215:
1208:
1205:
1202:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1193:
1189:
1188:
1185:
1182:
1177:
1173:
1170:
1168:
1165:
1163:
1158:
1154:
1153:Wiki 4 Christ
1150:
1147:
1145:
1142:
1140:
1136:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1112:
1110:
1107:
1102:
1098:
1095:
1094:
1091:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1077:
1075:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1057:
1053:
1050:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1039:
1035:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1028:
1027:
1021:
1020:
1017:
1011:
1007:
1001:
998:
997:
994:
991:
990:Harvestdancer
987:
986:
983:
980:
976:
973:
972:
967:
964:
963:Harvestdancer
960:
959:
958:
955:
951:
950:
947:
944:
940:
936:
933:
931:
928:
924:
920:
917:
915:
912:
908:
905:
903:
900:
897:
894:
892:
889:
885:
882:
880:
877:
873:
870:
868:
864:
859:
855:
852:
851:
846:
843:
842:Mark K. Bilbo
839:
836:
835:
834:
831:
827:
826:
823:
820:
818:
814:
810:
807:
805:
802:
798:
795:
793:
790:
786:
783:
781:
778:
774:
771:
769:
766:
762:
758:
755:
753:
750:
749:
744:
739:
735:
727:
723:
719:
716:
714:
711:
707:
705:
703:
701:
699:
697:
695:
692:
689:
687:
684:
680:
677:
673:
670:
665:
664:
659:
658:
655:
651:
647:
644:
642:
634:
633:Strong Delete
631:
629:
626:
621:
620:
615:
612:
610:
607:
606:Mark K. Bilbo
603:
600:
598:
595:
594:Harvestdancer
591:
590:Strong Delete
588:
587:
586:
584:
583:
575:
572:
568:
565:
563:
560:
556:
552:
548:
545:
543:
540:
536:
533:
531:
527:
523:
519:
516:
514:
511:
510:u p p l a n d
507:
503:
500:
498:
495:
491:
487:
484:
482:
479:
475:
472:
469:
467:
464:
460:
457:
456:
455:
453:
452:
444:
441:
437:
434:
433:
426:
423:
419:
418:
417:
414:
411:
407:
406:
405:
402:
398:
395:
394:
391:
388:
385:
380:
377:
375:
372:
371:WarriorScribe
368:
367:Strong Delete
365:
363:
360:
352:
338:
334:
332:
328:
327:
318:
315:
311:
307:
306:
305:
302:
298:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
284:
281:
277:
276:
275:
272:
267:
255:
252:
248:
245:
243:
239:
236:
235:
234:
231:
229:
225:
221:
217:
214:
213:
208:
205:
202:
198:
195:
194:
193:
192:
189:
186:
182:
179:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
161:
160:
158:
157:
149:
146:
142:
139:
136:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:
122:
121:
118:
113:
112:
106:
104:
101:
99:
97:
91:
85:
82:
80:
79:
73:
68:
67:
62:
60:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
2643:
2640:
2622:Merge/Delete
2621:
2608:
2573:
2572:
2568:
2556:
2544:
2529:
2501:diploma mill
2496:
2484:
2472:
2434:
2424:
2423:
2407:
2391:
2378:
2374:
2362:
2354:Blu Aardvark
2349:
2335:
2301:
2291:
2290:
2256:
2244:
2199:
2143:
2106:
2090:
2067:
2053:
2035:Mike Randall
2030:
2018:
2005:
1970:
1964:
1951:
1947:
1923:
1905:
1899:
1887:
1875:
1861:
1847:
1833:
1826:XIII - Bias?
1823:
1822:
1810:
1800:
1799:
1786:
1759:Justin Eiler
1754:
1725:
1703:
1689:
1640:
1624:
1611:diploma mill
1602:
1594:
1586:
1573:
1560:
1546:
1533:
1532:
1516:
1500:
1483:
1479:
1470:
1460:
1456:
1443:
1367:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1325:
1289:this article
1263:
1246:
1211:
1200:
1171:
1148:
1135:Christianity
1129:
1117:
1113:
1100:
1096:
1082:
1078:
1062:
1058:
1033:
1026:V - Paranoia
1023:
1022:
1012:
1008:
1005:
999:
974:
934:
918:
906:
895:
883:
871:
857:
853:
837:
808:
796:
784:
772:
760:
756:
746:
725:
717:
690:
678:
661:
638:
632:
617:
613:
601:
589:
579:
578:
571:Michaelwmoss
566:
554:
546:
534:
517:
506:main article
501:
485:
470:
458:
448:
447:
435:
378:
366:
336:
330:
329:
309:
296:
253:
237:
215:
196:
180:
163:
153:
152:
137:
125:
108:
107:
89:
88:
58:
50:
45:
43:
31:
28:
2561:Gateman1997
2416:Dragonfiend
2031:Weak delete
2006:Strong keep
1965:Strong keep
1866:Shanedidona
1803:XII - Email
1587:Strong Keep
1561:Strong keep
1372:google test
1034:Strong Keep
582:IV - Rights
567:Strong Keep
440:God's child
436:Strong Keep
138:Strong keep
2614:Mangojuice
2559:, per nom.
2453:Brokenfrog
2439:Swatjester
2306:Kurt Weber
2272:Kurt Weber
1940:ad hominem
1936:first vote
1724:Could you
1449:KrazyCaley
979:Brokenfrog
886:per nom --
863:WhiteNight
522:Malthusian
128:per nom.
2532:per nom.
2323:you know?
2319:Just zis
2283:Spawn Man
2261:Spawn Man
1926:. What a
1892:Yonghokim
1791:Cyde Weys
1757:per nom.
1583:kerobaros
1578:Kerobaros
1459:, if not
1355:brenneman
1069:article.
1048:Cyde Weys
1016:Jazzscrub
939:listcruft
899:Guettarda
775:per nom.
734:you know?
730:Just zis
663:Cyde Weys
619:Cyde Weys
535:weak keep
494:Logophile
95:brenneman
2626:Ashibaka
2519:CONTRIBS
2477:Gamaliel
2249:Arbustoo
2235:Arbustoo
2188:Arbustoo
2170:David D.
2132:Arbustoo
2111:Arbustoo
2068:Comment:
2058:Jim62sch
1996:Arbustoo
1986:contribs
1973:unsigned
1815:Silensor
1593:This is
1368:Comment:
1279:contribs
1266:unsigned
1227:contribs
1214:unsigned
1149:Comment:
1114:Comment:
888:kingboyk
876:Blnguyen
809:Comment:
777:Eusebeus
654:contribs
641:unsigned
410:David D.
384:David D.
310:his vote
201:David D.
2578:REAK OF
2245:Comment
2095:Sycthos
2080:Sycthos
2070:Please
1957:Andrewa
1906:ALKIVAR
1755:Delete:
1739:Harvard
1726:atleast
1704:Comment
1641:abstain
1629:Gubbubu
1547:Abstain
1525:Rogue 9
1430:Sycthos
1384:Sycthos
1293:Sycthos
1172:Comment
1162:Sycthos
1139:Sycthos
1128:and is
1106:Azathar
1038:Cynical
838:Comment
817:Sycthos
691:Comment
668:2M-VOTE
624:2M-VOTE
471:Comment
463:Yuckfoo
242:Sycthos
228:Sycthos
185:Hvnhlpr
2569:Delete
2557:Delete
2545:Delete
2537:(talk)
2530:Delete
2485:Delete
2473:Delete
2412:Crunch
2408:Delete
2396:Crunch
2392:Delete
2380:God of
2367:Crunch
2363:Delete
2350:Delete
2173:(Talk)
2168:page.
2107:Delete
2010:Hayson
1930:. The
1876:Delete
1852:Wynler
1838:Lerner
1509:Alphax
1486:. ···
1484:delete
1461:delete
1444:Delete
1420:test,
1408:test,
1406:Yahoo!
1350:WP:BIO
1346:delete
1307:A.J.A.
1192:A.J.A.
1157:vanity
1122:WP:NOT
1087:Devein
1083:delete
1063:delete
1000:Delete
943:Stifle
935:Delete
919:Delete
907:Delete
896:Delete
884:Delete
872:Delete
854:Delete
797:Delete
785:Delete
773:Delete
757:Delete
718:Delete
710:A.J.A.
679:Delete
614:Delete
559:Zunaid
551:WP:NOT
547:Delete
526:(talk)
518:Delete
502:Delete
478:A.J.A.
413:(Talk)
387:(Talk)
379:Delete
337:Delete
314:A.J.A.
280:A.J.A.
238:Delete
224:WP:NOT
204:(Talk)
164:Delete
130:A.J.A.
126:Delete
117:A.J.A.
46:delete
2609:Merge
2425:See:
2400:rodii
2292:See:
2204:Ginar
2152:Кинни
2149:Эйрон
1952:brief
1848:Merge
1824:See:
1801:See:
1775:Itake
1730:Itake
1676:Itake
1659:Ginar
1625:keeep
1534:Merge
1519:with
1517:Merge
1503:into
1501:Merge
1480:Merge
1457:Merge
1418:Alexa
1332:from
1326:first
1101:merge
1079:Merge
1071:bcatt
1059:Merge
1024:See:
911:nixie
789:Barno
765:Thunk
761:merge
683:Grimm
602:Merge
580:See:
488:into
486:Merge
449:See:
331:Merge
218:into
216:Merge
197:note:
181:Keep.
154:See:
109:See:
53:howch
16:<
2630:tock
2596:TALK
2586:TURE
2515:TALK
2497:Keep
2489:Ruby
2459:Ruby
2435:Keep
2414:. --
2410:per
2394:per
2375:Keep
2337:AfD?
2321:Guy,
2302:Keep
2257:Keep
2144:Keep
2091:~~~~
2043:Talk
2019:Keep
2008:. --
1982:talk
1924:Keep
1900:Keep
1888:Keep
1862:Keep
1834:Keep
1811:Keep
1574:Keep
1494:···
1492:Talk
1352:. -
1342:then
1338:then
1275:talk
1223:talk
1097:Keep
1085:. --
975:Keep
923:Dunc
858:have
813:here
748:AfD?
732:Guy,
650:talk
555:only
539:Jcuk
459:keep
254:Keep
172:Talk
72:chat
2383:War
2356:|
1988:) .
1948:lot
1603:not
1595:not
1488:rWd
1471:(?)
1281:) .
1229:) .
1130:not
1099:or
860:to
759:or
708:.
656:) .
492:.
476:.
350:493
297:and
2582:UR
2517:•
2475:.
2398:.
2045:)
1984:•
1967:.
1788:--
1613:.
1507:.
1490:·
1374:,
1277:•
1234:--
1225:•
941:.
921:—
909:--
815:.
652:•
508:.
399:--
358:lk
355:Ta
347:ns
344:yo
341:Dl
174:|
170:|
65:ng
2600:)
2592:(
2584:x
2580:N
2576:F
2521:)
2513:(
2325:/
2041:(
1980:(
1969:—
1911:™
1713:-
1273:(
1262:—
1258:.
1221:(
1210:—
1206:.
927:☺
925:|
736:/
648:(
637:—
335:*
270:ε
265:e
262:o
259:M
74:}
70:{
59:e
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.