279:
193:
Tagged for notability over three months ago with no sourcing improvements since then. The article's references consist of an MLB rulebook which is a primary source and baseball-reference.com which is a stats database; neither count towards notability. At present, this article topic fails
92:
87:
162:
96:
446:
for this particular topic. It has a table with a collection of random outfielder double play stats (not secondary or SIGCOV), and then a "Fast Facts" section at the bottom with secondary prose about three random factoids, but nothing about this list topic specifically.
351:
Well can you please provide more specific usable links (the
Baseball Almanac link you supplied comes up as an error without rendering anything meaningful) or quotes of the source material so they can be judged and examined by the community? I'm afraid your argument is
79:
83:
325:
I'm not advocating for a !keep. Just merely pointing out the references that are to be pointed here. Baseball
Almanac is considered reliable and covers the statistical aspect. Beyond that, I'd say each record is likely to house some
156:
75:
27:
357:
549:
per Reywas92. I think top 10 by position is too narrow (I'd favor top 20 or 25 at each position), but the precise number can be sorted out in a talk page discussion (need not be resolved here).
558:
539:
515:
470:
456:
426:
412:
387:
373:
339:
320:
295:
269:
235:
219:
177:
119:
144:
231:
311:
for this topic though? Mere statistical database entries don't count towards notability; the sources need to provide fleshed out prose and context directly about this list topic.
138:
400:
283:
239:
134:
243:
184:
51:
66:
150:
198:, which requires in-depth significant coverage from independent reliable secondary sources that collate and discuss this list topic's entries together
227:
573:
528:
494:: Forgot to mention in the nom that the content within the article's two sources don't discuss this list topic at all. They're being used in
356:
as of the present moment. Notability is demonstrated via evidence of sufficient source material, not the belief or assertion of such.
46:
39:
17:
264:
353:
60:
56:
123:
531:
that had just the top 10 at each position may be reasonable and notable. Otherwise this is data cruft that should be
280:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of Major League
Baseball career double plays as a right fielder leaders
399:
Yes, I was already aware of the bundled right-fielder AfD as someone who participated there. I was referring to
506:
in the external links section is not secondary or SIGCOV; raw stats tables don't count towards notability.
259:
578:
511:
452:
408:
369:
316:
215:
170:
327:
308:
203:
503:
499:
443:
361:
195:
466:
422:
383:
335:
291:
35:
248:
554:
507:
448:
404:
365:
312:
211:
495:
567:
536:
462:
433:
418:
394:
379:
346:
331:
302:
287:
113:
439:
550:
330:
from the player article. However, the grouping may not suffice for deletion.
286:
and I'd imagine baseball-reference though I haven't seen a direct source.
76:
List of Major League
Baseball career double plays as an outfielder leaders
28:
List of Major League
Baseball career double plays as an outfielder leaders
364:
notability being demonstrated in a similar context (sports stats list).
378:
Oh it did, let me fix the link. My argument is more like, "watch out".
358:
WP:Articles for deletion/List of NBA career ejections leaders
529:
List of Major League
Baseball career double plays leaders
440:
this the
Baseball Almanac source you've been alluding to?
109:
105:
101:
169:
442:If so, it unfortunately doesn't contribute towards
183:
226:Note: This discussion has been included in the
403:you provided, which incurs a 404-type error.
8:
523:Why do all these lists need to have the top
67:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
502:fashion to verify tangential details. And
225:
360:is a current example of evidence-based
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
401:this Baseball Almanac external link
24:
417:One thing at a time, Left guide.
307:Are those sources secondary and
230:lists for the following topics:
52:Introduction to deletion process
559:22:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
540:02:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
516:07:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
471:22:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
457:20:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
427:19:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
413:18:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
388:18:07, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
374:07:08, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
340:06:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
321:05:08, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
296:03:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
270:10:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
220:10:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
574:AfD debates (Games or sports)
206:search came up empty; hence,
282:. Also, this is covered by
202:to establish notability. A
42:(AfD)? Read these primers!
595:
278:Similar discussion at
124:edits since nomination
354:WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES
40:Articles for deletion
527:players? I think a
272:
200:as a group or set
57:Guide to deletion
47:How to contribute
586:
521:Merge all in set
437:
398:
350:
306:
284:Baseball Almanac
267:
262:
255:
251:
228:deletion sorting
188:
187:
173:
117:
99:
37:
594:
593:
589:
588:
587:
585:
584:
583:
564:
563:
431:
392:
344:
300:
265:
260:
253:
249:
236:Lists of people
130:
90:
74:
71:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
592:
590:
582:
581:
576:
566:
565:
562:
561:
543:
542:
518:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
273:
191:
190:
127:
70:
69:
64:
54:
49:
32:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
591:
580:
577:
575:
572:
571:
569:
560:
556:
552:
548:
545:
544:
541:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
519:
517:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
490:
472:
468:
464:
460:
459:
458:
454:
450:
445:
441:
435:
430:
429:
428:
424:
420:
416:
415:
414:
410:
406:
402:
396:
391:
390:
389:
385:
381:
377:
376:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
348:
343:
342:
341:
337:
333:
329:
324:
323:
322:
318:
314:
310:
304:
299:
298:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
274:
271:
268:
263:
258:
257:
256:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
224:
223:
222:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
186:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
132:Find sources:
128:
125:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
68:
65:
62:
58:
55:
53:
50:
48:
45:
44:
43:
41:
36:
29:
26:
19:
546:
532:
524:
520:
491:
275:
252:
247:
232:Sportspeople
207:
199:
192:
180:
174:
166:
159:
153:
147:
141:
131:
33:
579:AfD debates
157:free images
568:Categories
535:outright.
508:Left guide
449:Left guide
405:Left guide
366:Left guide
313:Left guide
212:Left guide
328:WP:SIGCOV
309:WP:SIGCOV
254:Quidditch
204:WP:BEFORE
537:Reywas92
500:WP:SYNTH
444:WP:NLIST
362:WP:NLIST
240:Baseball
196:WP:NLIST
120:View log
61:glossary
533:deleted
492:Comment
463:Conyo14
434:Conyo14
419:Conyo14
395:Conyo14
380:Conyo14
347:Conyo14
332:Conyo14
303:Conyo14
288:Conyo14
276:Comment
242:, and
163:WP refs
151:scholar
93:protect
88:history
38:New to
208:delete
135:Google
97:delete
551:Cbl62
547:Merge
496:WP:OR
461:👍🏻
244:Lists
178:JSTOR
139:books
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
555:talk
512:talk
504:this
467:talk
453:talk
423:talk
409:talk
384:talk
370:talk
336:talk
317:talk
292:talk
216:talk
171:FENS
145:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
525:100
438:Is
185:TWL
118:– (
570::
557:)
514:)
469:)
455:)
425:)
411:)
386:)
372:)
338:)
319:)
294:)
250:WC
246:.
238:,
234:,
218:)
210:.
165:)
122:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
553:(
510:(
498:/
465:(
451:(
436::
432:@
421:(
407:(
397::
393:@
382:(
368:(
349::
345:@
334:(
315:(
305::
301:@
290:(
266:✎
261:☎
214:(
189:)
181:·
175:·
167:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
137:(
129:(
126:)
116:)
78:(
63:)
59:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.