1986:. To me that section of that article is an excessive listings of statistics. The games however are not as this information can be found all over Knowledge such as team articles, NFL season articles, etc. This is just another way to present that same information and from what I've seen in Knowledge there are multiple articles that contain the same information but different ways to present them. I'm not a big sports fan however when I talk with others about a particular game they always tend to reference if it was a Monday night game or a Thursday night game. The dates that a game plays on is very notable in the United States. Also these lists are similar to a notable TV show which has multiple articles detailing/listing the episodes. Essentially the game is an episode of Monday Night Football for example. What would improve these articles would be more prose interjected into them and expand on the viewership of each game if the number of people that watched a game is available. Some of the Monday Night Football articles have a list of the game's viewership which is beneficial and encyclopedic.
730:
broadcasts for the
Belgian soccer league, don't even have their own individual, comprehensive Knowledge articles to immediately refer to. And if the Jets play the Giants, then at least on possible significance is that they're pretty much guaranteed to play in a game that has the widely reach in viewers for the respective week. You're seriously entering a major slippery slope by saying that in your country the pro sports over their function like this (or the way that you consume live sporting events in Europe when compared to America) or that so it's not fair to just focus on America (or something to that extent or along those lines)
2592:, be it on ESPN, TNT or NBC). You're making it sound like there isn't a stark difference. These articles aren't just about the New England Patriots or any other individual team for an entire season. If you're going to go that route, then we might as well list which networks and what time and day of the week they played their 16 game season in their respective yearly articles. Again, that isn't the main point! It would kind of be like going through a needle in a haystack if you had to go further to look or guess which TV networks/day of the week/time any individual team played week in and week out during the reason.
2761:
game by saying referencing a game by the night they played. Every team participates in the Sunday afternoon games except for when they receive a bye that week. So a lot of discussion and notability about the games come down to the night (Sunday, Monday, Thursday) they played. So to the point I have not seen a clear reason as to why these articles should be completely deleted. There are opportunities for merging them to deemphasize the specific broadcaster and to enhance the articles by providing information about the viewership of the games but no clear reason to completely delete them.
1256:"Directories, directory entries, electronic program guide, or a resource for conducting business." This page is none of those either. The National Football League nor any of the broadcasting companies are involved here so far as I can tell, and I don't believe that anyone would come to this page as a resource for conducting business. The relevance comes because those are the episodes of the long-running television series and notability arises because of third party media coverage in reliable sources thus passing the
2431:
that I am wrong because of a perceived lack of experience, even though I am obviously experienced enough to actually read and interpret the policies instead of just linking them. There have been people who expressed agreement with you, but there have been also been experienced
Wikipedians who agreed with me. You think that you can disregard my comments because you have been around longer, but I have made a much stronger effort than you to actually examine the policies in question.
2135:(and by extension, daytime soap operas) air in a weekday strip and don't have a clear cut episode identification outside of the day that they were first broadcast, it's much harder to keep track of than a once a week program. And bringing in tournaments like the FIFA World Cup or tennis majors is much broader in scale. I guess by that logic, there should be a list for every single Olympic event such as basketball broadcast by said network also.
2178:
serialized (in theory, the season itself is the storyline albeit in real life) program. You on the other hand, make it sound like that "well, why doesn't daily stripped game shows" get its own list of episodes and what not. You're list if broad in my eyes because you're mentioning other "special" events within a shorter time frame like tournaments (with is pretty much the same as articles for postseason event broadcasters for the NFL).
1947:
interest), televised nationally throughout the United State, drive local fan interest and ticket sales differently, and inherently subject to national media coverage rather than just the local media of the associated teams of a typical Sunday game. Each is a distinct type of game, with specific game times, and different allowed days of game preparation including player return from injury. They are different
1802:
1378:
875:
didn't even invent that practice. I regularly watch my favorite soccer team play sunday afternoon or even friday evening matches instead of the usual sunday evening matches and the team certainly does not play much closer attention/give it much more scrutiny when they play on friday on sunday. On a side note, please do not sign your posts with incorrect timestamps.
668:
that they are
American centric/based/produced broadcasts (unlike say, the Olympic Games for example) and games first and foremost. How is that any different than say, an American's point of view on NBC's telecasts of the European Premiere Soccer League. My point is that the majority of the viewers are American and vice versa, so shouldn't they count first.
2032:
timeslot or because of the identity of their US broadcaster. The Monday Night games' results list aren't even presented as TV show episodes but are merely the results of monday night games irrespective of the TV coverage. The "TV Show episodes" argument doesn't even carry much weight because there are clear examples of very notable TV shows like say
863:
attention/give it much more scrutiny by default than any other game (outside of prime time of course) during the season? You seem to make it sound like that we shouldn't treat this as a more special occasion or give these particular games more precedence since "well, everybody takes turns anyway, so why is it such a big deal!?"
643:
coverage. Nothing in your reply does even attempt to address how in any away the result of thursday, sunday and monday night football games have any exceptional historical significance over all the other football games that justifies tabulating the result and US only broadcast (reminders that those games are also broadcasted
1236:, so why do you single out just one irrelevant one. I'm referring to point 4. But please do explain to me how thursday, sunday and monday night football games have such a historical significance by default just by virtue of being played in those time slots that they merit dedicated articles on their dates and results.
2697:
Overall after reading all of the comments I still don't see a valid reason for deleting every single article present here. Each are notable in their own right the only issue I've seen is the Sunday/Thursday night articles are also labeled by broadcaster instead of years like the Monday Night
Football
2543:
are technically, not really "episodes" since they mostly deal with results (once you get right down to it) also. And exactly what do you mean, they aren't "presented as episodes" (you can't have it both ways)? What else can be done outside of presenting a detailed summary of the games individually.
2149:
It's just as much "apples and oranges" as your comparison of the football games to scripted TV shows. I don't see how my list topics are broad either. I deliberately chose very specific aspects of very specific events within those sports. I have no interest in creating these list, because contrary to
1437:
television series. Bare in mind, that the schedules aren't simply beholden to the individual teams (hence why their nationally televised appearances are being singled out above all else) but the entire history of the
National Football League. This is not something that can easily be marginalized or
697:
schedules the majority of their matches on saturday nights. Yet for the benefit of live TV broadcasts there are always is a friday night game, an early evening saturday game and some sunday afternoon and evening games. Do we have dedicated articles on the results of these differently scheduled games?
2898:
How exactly is comparing weather daily results (which is much harder to remember/keep track off/keep a yearly record off and are strictly regional and therefore, varies from place to place) the same as a weekly nationally televised sporting event that is essential to a team's regular season record?
2353:
with nearly 20 posts, appears to have basic confusion about both the sport and its terminology, and now has evolving reasoning for supporting deletion when opposed by those familiar with the content. Would like to see the discussion extended to hear additional views from those who might be avoiding
1828:
I too believe the articles should be kept. Discussing it is part of the process here at
Knowledge. The discussion will likely close within 7 days of it being opened. I'm in favor of closing it sooner but it doesn't look like that will happen. I understand, please be patient. Contact me if you'd
1759:
my first involvement with an AfD. I'm not sure how that can be obvious when it is false. I don't care how much prior AfD experience you have; in the three AfDs where we have interacted, you have never been able to provide a rebuttal when I point out that the policies or guidelines you cite are being
724:
But
Thursday, Sunday, and Monday night NFL games aren't rescheduled (well, technically, later on in the season, NBC can "flex" in a Sunday night game in they can replace one game w/ what's a more desirable match-up) just at random. And as I said before, there's only one game played in said timeslot
2760:
might not find any significant reasoning for these articles to be broken out based on day however to an
American football fan the days are very important and the games are often referenced by the night they play. Even a non-sports fan like myself in the United States and in Canada would recognize a
2514:
They are not presented as episodes of a TV show though. They are simply presented as the results of all NFL games that were ever played on monday. This is essentially an endless subject and we already had to split them into four lists to be able to house them. Doing a search in the sources does not
2495:
results from 1970 to 2005 differently than the others. I could see those results beting treated like episode lists of other heavily watched prime time network TV shows. And in the days when there was generally one prime time game each week, that game did get disproportionate attention relative to
2430:
False. Not once, after I pointed out that a policy/guideline did not apply, have you done anything beyond telling me not to make conclusions or telling me that it is just my opinion, even though I, unlike you, am quoting the actual wording of the policy/guideline in question. Now you are telling me
2170:
I'm using the "my country" attack as you put it because you're the one you who first brought up the notion that NFL television results aren't aren't that important from your point of view when other sports that you're more accustomed to are perceived as bigger. I would be like me complaining about
2031:
on
Knowledge. That is more than enough to house all the encyclopedic information on the subject. These additional articles on the results of non-sundae-afternoon games are overkill. There is no evidence that they have any greater impact on the outcomes of NFL seasons just because of their allocated
874:
No. Why would I pay much closer attention/give it much more scrutiny because it's not played on sunday afternoon? It's just another football game. As I have stated before. Playing sports games on different timeslots than the bulk of the games is not by any means a NFL specific/unique practice. They
683:
is not and we write wikipedia for our readers. Not solely or even primarily for the US TV viewers. But this is all of the point. The discussed articles are supplementary results articles. They are not the main articles on
Thursday/Sunday/Monday night football games' coverage and those articles will
642:
and remember that wikipedia is not only written for US football fans but for a worldwide readership. The nominated articles are not the articles on the US broadcasts dedicated to these matches, but the supplementary and utterly unnecessary lists of the results of all the games broadcast during that
667:
They're more significant than any other football game during regular season, because they're the only ones that are being literally being played during said time (prime time) and day (well, Thursday and Monday). Just because you prefer the articles to have a more worldview doesn't negate the fact
2558:
The content in the "Monday Night Football" results articles is not formatted as episode lists. Those articles aren't even tied to TV Networks at all. They are simple lists of the results of all football games which were ever played on monday. They are no appropriate for wikipedia in either format
2118:
There's nobody stopping you from starting an article of for those televised sporting events that you listed. You're really engaging in a slippery slope in that sports that you personally view/perceive to have much greater "worldwide importance" should have an similar article. Your main argument
612:
I think that it's apparent that being a Knowledge user who hails from Belgium, you don't seem to totally resonate or have much grasp of the history or legacy of the National Football League (which is the biggest professional sports organization in North America). I could sense this when you said
2192:
Just because one football game every season is a "worldwide event" it doesn't mean that every regular season game is as well and that it's appropriate to have lists on the results of every non-sunday-afternoon football game. Others have supported deletion as well. There is a reason why they did.
1920:
Don't worry, I'm confident I mis-read it! That's why I asked. However, the second part I have to disagree on the idea that if the games were notable they would already be mentioned in one article or have their own. They are mentioned in this article already, and Knowledge is far from complete.
799:
team gets to play in a non-Sunday afternoon timeslot, hence why it's a more unique situation to track their "results". Of course we could just look at the respected teams' results for that particular season, but this is concentrated really, on the television medium, not the NFL and its teams in
2246:
And if you paid closer attention, there have been others you have supported keeping the lists on the contrary. And if the NFL isn't a "worldwide sport" besides the Super Bowl, then please explain their annual regular season games in London, England? But trying to exactly measure the worldwide
1336:
games are distinct from other games, as they are nationally televised. These games tend to match two very worthy adversaries, emphasizing the significance of these games as opposed to average games. Teams also have to deal with the pressure of having shorter weeks (since the games are typically
729:
as if its checkered) at once games like in the morning (if you live on the West coast) and afternoon. Just because say, the Premier League has primetime games on their own, doesn't necessarily mean that their business practices are remotely similar to the NFL's. Plus, the dedicated live weekly
1946:
Generalizing due to the decades of time involved and the newer broadcasting partners/dates, these games were picked as a/the league's marquee game of the week (1 of 13 ~ 1 of 16) including for rivalries, rematches of meaningful games from the prior season, marquee player matchups (ie, ratings
1734:
up to me. It's very obvious you have not been on Knowledge and that this is your first involvement with an AFD. I have been involved in quite a few, both as contributor and nominator, and I can assure you that many of this discussion initiated with comparable short statements have resulted in
2177:
within itself. I find it funny and ironic that you talk about there being "zero chances", when you're the one who started this whole discussion in the very first place. And my point in comparing football games to scripted TV shows is that just like a scripted TV show, they're an on-going,
1145:
of football games played on thursday, sunday and monday nights over the vast majority of games which are played on sunday afternoon that makes these games merit standalone articles for their results and broadcast times? By the way snow keep is not possible with already one delete support.
758:
And I guess that if there's going to be articles for prime time games then there should be articles for Sunday afternoon games to make it even!? Why is it important!? Well for one reason to say the least, only two teams at a time can play in the selected prime time slot (hence, why it's
862:
I think that you kind of misinterpreted/misunderstood the main point that I was trying to make. If you're team plays on Thursday nights for example, wouldn't you regardless (of the knowledge of the NFL's rules that mandate that every team has to play on Thursday night) play much closer
2171:
list of games/matches for tennis or soccer/association football from outside of America, since it isn't as big of a deal as the National Football League or Major League Baseball. The Super Bowl is one of the biggest sporting events in the world, not just America, so therefore, it's a
2807:
The main articles detail the difference between the two however the three Sunday Night Football results pages can be restructured down to two and given a generic name would be the only changes. We don't need the name of the broadcaster in the title they can be listed similar to
2103:
has a "schedule list" (is that within itself "trivia" also) for the dates that they performed. I guess that's "different" than listing schedules for network television broadcasts of a major professional sports league since that's the "whole or main point" of those articles!?
1955:("Excessive listings of statistics") argument is utterly lacking, though possibly appealing to those unfamiliar with the content. The supporting text and citations can be improved to provide this context to the casual reader as is true of many articles. Please adhere to
1579:
Such statements are valid contributions to discussions. If you'd like clarification or details from the participating editor, you're welcome to ask for those. Attempting to prevent someone from taking a position does not belong here. We're working to make Knowledge
2610:
was a network institution for many years and received much coverage on its own, separate from the coverage of the individual teams playing on any given week. And so a relevant list that serves a similar purpose to a typical episode list makes sense to retain.
161:
778:
No there should not be articles for sunday games to even it out. There shouldn't be any articles on the results for sports games based on when they are broadcast. Results should be tied to the teams who achieved them and to the leagues those games affected.
1305:
The articles don't establish notability and googling I can't find that the topic of "lists of games on X network" is notable. Articles on the "History of MNF" or "History of NFL football on TNT" are probably notable, but not lists of individual games. —
209:
204:
3046:
the lists related to Monday Night Football; delete the others. Monday Night Football records may not receive the same level of attention they did when it was "destination" TV, but they still receive disproportionate attention from the US sports press.
1691:
No it's not my sole job. And when somebody makes a claim they are required to substantiate that. Regardless of which action they are in favor. Not doing so will likely result in said contribution not to carry much wait upon closure of the discussion.
213:
1905:
No, I was saying if the individual games listed were notable in their own right, they would either have an article, or a mention on the league season/team page. As a list however this is not encyclopedic. I think you may have mis-read my comment.
638:. The fact that I refer to the sport as football and not "American Football" like my fellow Europeans should have given that away. And your comments actually demonstrate that you have no idea whatsoever what is being nominated and why. Again read
393:
388:
2676:
It appears that these IP users are coming here because they see a deletion notice while reading an article. This was the reason for my earlier observation that we have readers who do not want these pages deleted. We are here to serve the reader.
1115:
to close immediately as a keep. While some enthusiastic editors seem to agree with me, it's only because they are right. These lists are clear keepers and have been around to stand the test of notability discussions for a significant period of
633:
Think twice before you decide to accuse someone from outside the US of not being familiar with football and the US way of promoting it. I have been a big fan of the NFL for a considerable number of years now and haven't missed a Super Bowl since
196:
397:
2587:
What do you mean, they aren't even "tied to the TV networks"? Only one network at a time (ABC and later, ESPN) has broadcast NFL games on Monday nights so by default, they are tied to said networks (especially with the various incarnations of
598:
officially became a regular television series (back when it was considered rare and a novelty). And of course, not every single NFL game is televised in a weekly prime time slot (let alone what it considers its premiere television so-case).
380:
2354:
due to the environment that has been created. Lastly, if deletion is supported, the content should be merged to the corresponding base articles -which is yet another good reason to keep the content in the existing stand-alone articles.
688:
soccer schedules most of its games on 15:00 local time. However every weekend some matches are played on 13:30 and 17:30 local time on saturday and some on sunday afternoon and even on monday evening. This is all for the benefit of TV
1432:
You're not looking at the whole picture in that regard. It isn't simply about the Cleveland Browns or San Diego Chargers that particular night of the year as if it's a minor footnote in history, encompasses the entire history of the
1438:
not taken in for account of having heightened importance or significance. Just because you personally don't understand why it isn't important doesn't necessarily or automatically mean that you single-handily speak for the majority.
347:
342:
3028:
meet all of our sourcing requirements, are reasonable lists and reasonable breakout articles. If we are going to delete these, we should also go and delete all the lists of episodes for TV series. This is exactly the same thing.
351:
1848:
ALL per the nom. There's nothing significant about these games as a whole at all. Individual games that would qualify for their own notability should either have their own article, or a mention in that season's article or team's
767:) and not virtually the entire NFL. It's basically much easier to keep track of non-Sunday afternoon (since they naturally, are meant to have a higher sense of prestige and concentrated focus) games than the other way around.
334:
301:
296:
87:
82:
847:
team gets to play in a non-Sunday afternoon timeslot" is no longer the case, as the NFL has made it a rule that every team needs to play on Thursday Night Football throughout the season (as to keep a "competitive balance").
531:
526:
305:
91:
535:
255:
250:
439:
434:
288:
259:
74:
518:
485:
480:
443:
617:" instead of "football games". Therefore, you don't seem to understand why something like that is justifiable in part because it doesn't immediately confirm to your worldview or most immediate knowledge of sports.
155:
489:
242:
1057:
I don't buy that. It is perfectly appropriate to point to the existence of a category designated specifically for sports stats articles in countering the apparent claim that we should not have any stats articles.
426:
384:
472:
1869:
Maybe that aren't in most cases, but at the base value of the fact that they were the only games to be played and nationally televised in prime time, that's not easy to overlook or bypass. And the fact that
1413:
is this important. It's not important just because you claim so. Please educate me on why it is important to tabulate that the Cleveland Browns beat the San Diego Chargers by 21-17 on some 1972 monday night.
698:
No. Not even on the dutch language wiki. And you know why? Because the results of these games have no exceptional historical significance just because of their scheduling. And the same applies to NFL. If the
1449:
Perhaps you could explain why it is necessary to delete these articles. You claim above that "we write wikipedia for our readers", and several readers are chiming in here in favor of keeping the articles.
741:
Nothing of your last reply has any relevance to this deletion inclusion. Why it's important to maintain comprehensive list of results in non-sunday afternoon games, connected to particular broadcasters?
1672:
job, as the initiator of the AfD, to demonstrate why the article should be deleted. Besides, why are you making conclusions about Jclemens' !vote? Shouldn't you leave that to the discussion's reviewer?
2809:
2699:
2312:
A closing admin should come along sometime today and make a decision. Your comments requesting closing are starting to become disruptive (and I agree with you it should be kept). Please be patient.--
1978:
The articles are notable and several of them do include key notes about the games that were shown like the page for NFL Network's Thursday Night Football. The only issue I have where a page would fail
376:
1214:
Neither are any of the articles in question here. We would not use any of these articles to find the location or contact information of the Chicago Bears... that doesn't even come close to applying.--
2247:
importance (or how many people all over the world watch non-Sunday afternoon games) of the NFL when compared to the other sports that you mentioned, is really a highly debatable topic within itself.
338:
2946:"Any statistics should be accompanied by explanatory text providing context" and "Where large quantities of statistics are appropriate ... consider placing them in tables to enhance readability" --
2040:
with wikipedia articles but without excessive lists of all their episodes. The is information is pure trivia and fancruft. There are sports with have a much greater worldwide importance like e.g.
2839:
2646:
2455:
2328:
2298:
2275:
2220:
1818:
1789:
1394:
1365:
1289:
897:
Notability is not determined by whether or not any single user on Knowledge pays attention to anything. What matters is that there is significant coverage of it. Otherwise, this turns into
292:
78:
2544:
There's a subtle difference between a game within itself (at least from the personal point of view of the players and coaches) and the manner in which said game was covered by the media.
522:
1480:
That is no longer true. The !vote counter indicates a deadlock and numerous IPs have chimed in expressing their desire for a 'keep' outcome. There is currently no consensus for deletion.
330:
246:
2876:. The data is essentially trivia, like a list of IIN numbers or weather reports. The participants in the list are generally notable, but such lists as these do not meet the same bar.
1080:
430:
121:
476:
284:
70:
62:
114:
2627:
In any case, if the issue with these particular items is the formatting of the lists, that is an editing concern and not a valid reason for deletion. 19:07, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
1983:
568:
games just because they were broadcast on a particular time slot by a particular broadcaster. Results belong on team and season articles. Can't see the historical significance.
514:
3064:
into existing NFL seasons as well as any significant games into te main Monday Night Football article. It's said best above on the comments regarding avoiding endless trivia.
238:
422:
176:
468:
143:
2606:
I don't think the formatting is a determining factor. The lists in question are not formatted as episode guides because that format would not make sense for this. But
923:
2150:
you, I know they have zero chance of being kept as they are utterly inappropriate for Knowledge. And why do you go on the "my country" attack again? I used the word
3096:
3073:
3056:
3038:
3014:
2997:
2973:
2955:
2926:
2912:
2889:
2862:
2847:
2843:
2830:
2802:
2779:
2686:
2671:
2654:
2650:
2620:
2601:
2578:
2553:
2526:
2505:
2482:
2463:
2459:
2440:
2421:
2401:
2392:
There is a difference between bludgeoning and rebutting bogus applications of policy. I do find it telling that you have not once been able to refute my rebuttals.
2383:
2363:
2336:
2332:
2321:
2306:
2302:
2283:
2279:
2256:
2228:
2224:
2204:
2187:
2165:
2144:
2113:
2090:
2004:
1968:
1930:
1915:
1900:
1861:
1838:
1814:
1797:
1793:
1769:
1746:
1721:
1703:
1682:
1655:
1644:
Haven't seen any evidence that the results of non-sunday afternoon games passing GNG as a subject. If you claim something passed GNG you HAVE to substantiate that.
1636:
1613:
1589:
1574:
1555:
1538:
1515:
1489:
1475:
1459:
1425:
1390:
1373:
1369:
1315:
1297:
1293:
1269:
1247:
1223:
1205:
1182:
1157:
1125:
1092:
1067:
1052:
1011:
987:
951:
910:
892:
857:
790:
753:
717:
658:
579:
56:
2706:
as each listing notes who was the broadcaster. All the Sunday Night Football articles can be merged/resturctured similar to the Monday Night Football articles.
684:
remain regardless. This phenomenon of rescheduling some games for the benefit of TV isn't at all a NFL exclusive or even US exclusive. For instance, the English
1337:
played on Sundays), also makes the stakes of these games even higher, as teams have one less day to prepare for their next game. There's plenty of media about
137:
2410:
It's only your opinion I haven't. There are number of people, all much more wikipedia-experienced than you, who have agreed with me. Wanna guess why that is?
1712:
Yes, it is your job. If you propose that the article be deleted, you must demonstrate why you hold that opinion. I don't know how you can disagree with that.
959:
200:
133:
2049:
192:
183:
2053:
2745:
52:. As there isn't any consensus as to whether the delete rationale applies at all to these articles, there can be no consensus to delete them.
2917:
It's the same in that it is indiscriminate. This page and the others like it list the complete proceedings, important or no, for all time.
2985:
Indiscriminate collection of information (statistics); we do not exist to aggregate sporting results merely because the matches took place.
2060:
149:
2057:
2274:
This has been going on for 5 days and there is no end in sight stop talking about this article for deletion and get it over with now.
2037:
981:
945:
2824:
2773:
2564:
1998:
1364:
I hope you do not delete this article because this is important and needs to stay as it as and it's also the end of the message.
1874:
has been on the air now for over 40 years, there are likely going to be more "significant games" as a whole than insignificant.
1810:
1386:
3052:
17:
2064:
2068:
2559:
though. As you say the difference is subtle. To subtle to warrant dedicated wikipedia articles. Moreover, the results of
2327:
Yes Paul McDonald I Agree With That and I'm sorry and I aplogise for being disruptive I Won't do it again God Bless You.
800:
general or in a vague/broad-scale manner. It would be kind of counterproductive and undercutting to have an article on
2127:) merit so many articles for this television coverage! And your argument for game shows is apples and oranges. Since
1604:
For the sake of consistency, I suppose you will strike all of the conclusions that you have posted in this discussion.
3092:
2724:
would consequently have an impact on other categories and smililar articles because lots of other editors could claim
1788:
Please stop talking about deleting this article it needs to end now and stop this debate about deleting this article.
1088:
2469:
Please a third party should close this. Do not relist it as discussion (and those discussing) have been exhausted.
3024:
This is not indiscriminate--there is an extremely bright line for what we take and don't take in these pages. They
3048:
2786:
2667:
2574:
2522:
2417:
2379:
2200:
2161:
2086:
2018:
1742:
1699:
1651:
1570:
1471:
1421:
1243:
1201:
1153:
1048:
888:
786:
749:
713:
706:
it just has no exceptional significance to the league whether one beats the other on a thursday, sunday or monday.
654:
575:
3115:
2969:
2922:
2885:
2790:
2470:
2297:
What This has been in place for 7 Days and still not over and the ducssion needs to end now and stop being lazy.
2025:
1911:
1857:
853:
40:
2858:
2798:
694:
3081:, NOTSTATS, and most of these articles are poorly sourced (if at all) so there's no indication that they meet
1546:
I have not seen a convincing reason for deletion. These articles do not, in my view, qualify as directories.
693:). Yet do we have articles dedicated to these specially scheduled soccer games? No, of course not. Similarly
2014:
1288:
Why Are you deleting this article don't do this please save this article From being deleted please save it.
2880:
should exist, but we do not need a dozen articles for its proceedings; the same goes for the other shows.
3086:
3069:
3010:
2951:
2740:
was mentioned after the nomination seems like a stretch to me. To bring my point forward using the reason
2478:
2345:
We've had some of these articles for more than decade because they utterly non-controversial. The nom is
2317:
1926:
1896:
1834:
1585:
1534:
1511:
1265:
1233:
1219:
1178:
1121:
1084:
906:
2720:
This would eliminate the need to have the network in the title. However to claim that these articles are
808:
and yet not try to give some insight on whom ever had the opportunity to play in that coveted timeslot.
3111:
2908:
2877:
2682:
2597:
2549:
2491:
2436:
2397:
2252:
2183:
2140:
2109:
2028:
1879:
1765:
1717:
1678:
1609:
1551:
1485:
1455:
1443:
1354:
1063:
1032:
976:
940:
898:
868:
813:
772:
735:
673:
622:
604:
36:
2071:. Lists, like all articles, have to meet guidelines and policies. The ones discussed here fail to meet
2904:
2593:
2545:
2248:
2179:
2136:
2105:
1875:
1439:
1350:
1028:
864:
809:
768:
731:
669:
618:
600:
2965:
2918:
2881:
2819:
2768:
2041:
1993:
1907:
1853:
849:
53:
2854:
2794:
2729:
1038:
169:
2943:
2873:
2359:
2350:
2290:
1979:
1964:
1956:
1952:
1632:
1311:
2942:
there is a good amount of commentary throughout the list, thereby exceeding the requirements of
1025:
2732:
this is a serious reason for concern. The initial nomination hinges on all eight articles fail
3065:
3006:
2947:
2748:
and similar categories and articles because someone can tag every article in this category as
2616:
2501:
2474:
2313:
1922:
1892:
1891:
Huh? If an individual game were notable, you would have us delete the article on it anyway?--
1830:
1581:
1530:
1507:
1261:
1215:
1174:
1117:
902:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
3110:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
2496:
other games. So I could see keeping those, but deleting the rest due to lack of notability.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
2678:
2432:
2393:
1761:
1713:
1674:
1605:
1547:
1481:
1451:
1059:
1007:
964:
928:
3082:
3049:
The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.
3034:
2814:
2763:
2072:
1988:
1108:
881:
was posted today and not on september, 20th like your signature wants to make us believe.
703:
635:
1627:
They're not NOT, pass the GNG, and no convincing reason for deletion has been advanced.
1529:
per nom. Singling out games just because they're not played on Sunday is a non-starter.
2988:
2664:
2571:
2519:
2414:
2376:
2197:
2158:
2083:
1739:
1696:
1648:
1567:
1499:
1468:
1418:
1240:
1198:
1150:
1112:
1045:
885:
783:
746:
710:
685:
651:
572:
2100:
2753:
2749:
2741:
2737:
2733:
2725:
2721:
2355:
1960:
1628:
1503:
1307:
1257:
1170:
1138:
1104:
999:
699:
639:
561:
2123:
in my country when compared to other sports like soccer or tennis so it doesn't (or
2612:
2497:
552:
506:
460:
414:
368:
322:
276:
230:
108:
2812:
with the broadcaster of that game listed in the table (either ESPN, NBC or TNT).
1464:
Yet even more are in favor of deleting. Maybe you should read their reasons too.
2033:
1003:
2785:
The reason the Sunday Night Football results articles are like that is because
1024:
website as you claim then please explain all of the articles in this category:
3030:
2535:
I guess while you're or we're at it, competitive weekly reality programs like
2021:
690:
1498:
Also, I'd argue that "importance" isn't much of a measure. See reasoning at
2661:
2568:
2516:
2411:
2373:
2194:
2155:
2080:
1736:
1693:
1645:
1564:
1465:
1415:
1237:
1195:
1147:
1042:
882:
780:
743:
707:
648:
569:
2567:. Why should we list the non-sunday-afternoons again grouped by timeslot?
2079:
thursday/sunday/monday night football games") of them lacks notability.
2810:
NFL Network Thursday Night Football results (2006–present)#2014 season
2757:
2045:
1173:
do you think the articles fail? Just saying it doesn't make it so.--
564:. Can't see why we would have to dedicate pages to certain football
2050:
List of the results of football matches shown on Match of the Day 2
2752:
and cite this as a precedent. Now granted someone outside of the
2372:
The "bludgeoning" can really said to be happening on both sides.
193:
List of Monday night National Football League games prior to 1970
3104:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
2853:
When an admin comes along and makes a decision or re-lists it.
1984:
NBC Sunday Night Football results (2006–present)#SNF statistics
1026:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Sports_records_and_statistics
2660:
There are eight articles being discussed here. Not just one.
2172:
2054:
List of the results of FIFA World Cup matches shown on BBC1
2700:
NFL Network Thursday Night Football results (2006–present)
2454:
Looks Like This Article is going to end I don't think so.
647:
the US) time and channel of every such game every played.
377:
NFL Network Thursday Night Football results (2006–present)
1141:. What's so much more historically significant about the
2645:
Yes I Agree with that so save this article if you can.
1563:
Please leave conclusions to the discussion's reviewer.
877:
548:
544:
540:
502:
498:
494:
456:
452:
448:
410:
406:
402:
364:
360:
356:
318:
314:
310:
272:
268:
264:
226:
222:
218:
104:
100:
96:
2293:, discussions such as these typically last for 7 days.
1081:
list of American football-related deletion discussions
168:
2061:
List of the results of first monday Wimbledon matches
2728:
and reference this debate as precedent. This is not
1324:
This is a novel enough of an addition to Knowledge.
331:
List of Monday Night Football results (2010–present)
2058:List of the results of FA Cup matches shown on ITV
285:List of Monday Night Football results (1990–2009)
71:List of Monday Night Football results (1990–2009)
63:List of Monday Night Football results (1990–2009)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
3118:). No further edits should be made to this page.
2075:, for a start, because the subject (this being "
515:NBC Sunday Night Football results (2006–present)
2099:Just about any article on a popular musician's
924:list of Television-related deletion discussions
843:Not to argue the point, but the idea that "not
239:List of Monday Night Football results (1970–89)
2704:Thursday Night Football results (2006–present)
1111:with a multitude of sources. I would support
423:ESPN Sunday Night Football results (1987–2005)
2515:yield evidence that this is notable subject.
2119:seems to be in that regard of "The NFL isn't
469:TNT Sunday Night Football results (1990–1997)
182:
8:
2716:Sunday Night Football results (2006–present)
1079:Note: This debate has been included in the
958:Note: This debate has been included in the
922:Note: This debate has been included in the
1078:
960:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
957:
921:
2713:Sunday Night Football results (1987–2005)
2065:List of Wimbledon matches shown on BBC2
2048:. Yet we don't have list articles like
2746:Category:Sports records and statistics
1735:deletion of the discussed article(s).
2872:. This really, really clearly fails
2840:2600:8803:7A00:19:4089:9E6B:E460:AFF8
2647:2600:8803:7A00:19:90D3:876A:C38A:6C10
2456:2600:8803:7A00:19:90D3:876A:C38A:6C10
2329:2600:8803:7A00:19:90D3:876A:C38A:6C10
2299:2600:8803:7A00:19:90D3:876A:C38A:6C10
2276:2600:8803:7A00:19:90D3:876A:C38A:6C10
2221:2600:8803:7A00:19:90D3:876A:C38A:6C10
1811:2600:8803:7A00:19:305B:692B:6CCF:46DA
1790:2600:8803:7A00:19:305B:692B:6CCF:46DA
1387:2600:8803:7A00:19:305B:692B:6CCF:46DA
1366:2600:8803:7A00:19:305B:692B:6CCF:46DA
1290:2600:8803:7A00:19:305B:692B:6CCF:46DA
7:
2069:List of US Open matches shown on CBS
1194:That wikipedia is not a directory.
1002:. We are not a statistics website.
2899:Not every statistical data is the
1821:) has already cast a !vote above.
1397:) has already cast a !vote above.
695:my country's premier soccer league
24:
1502:- notability is the measure, and
725:not, multiple (or as you put it,
594:in the games prior to 1970, when
1800:
1376:
1829:like some help understanding.--
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
2863:22:15, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
2848:21:41, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
2831:05:18, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
2803:01:22, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
2780:01:18, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
2687:17:09, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
2672:17:13, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
2655:16:06, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
2602:14:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
2579:20:10, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
2554:12:40, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
2527:17:13, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
2506:14:54, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
2483:12:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
2464:03:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
2441:17:05, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
2422:16:47, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
2402:14:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
2384:20:15, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
2364:03:29, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
2337:15:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
2322:13:30, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
2307:13:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
2284:17:14, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
2257:14:18, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
2229:13:06, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
2205:20:15, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
2188:09:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
2166:23:04, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
2145:10:21, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
2114:10:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
2091:15:00, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
2005:10:58, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
1969:01:23, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
1951:except the playing rules. The
1931:21:13, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
1916:19:31, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
1901:19:16, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
1862:17:18, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
1839:14:45, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
1798:13:24, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
1770:14:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
1747:15:10, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
1730:You misread. I meant it's not
1722:20:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
1704:17:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
1683:14:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
1656:09:54, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
1637:04:05, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
1614:14:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
1590:14:49, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
1575:09:54, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
1556:23:30, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1539:23:11, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1516:03:15, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
1490:17:12, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
1476:09:54, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
1460:23:30, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1426:21:33, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1374:20:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1316:18:45, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1298:14:21, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1270:03:19, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
1248:21:49, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1224:21:07, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1206:20:32, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1183:18:39, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1158:18:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1126:16:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1093:16:07, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1068:23:20, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1053:18:07, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1012:15:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
988:14:16, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
952:14:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
911:14:41, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
893:14:17, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
858:19:42, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
791:15:52, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
754:21:33, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
718:20:32, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
659:18:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
580:12:57, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1:
2736:and the fact that item #4 on
2563:NFL games are already listed
1258:general notability guideline
878:The post this reply is aimed
3097:08:46, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
3074:03:09, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
3057:03:05, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
3039:23:53, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
3015:19:30, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
3005:how is it indiscriminate?--
2998:19:26, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
2974:08:54, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
2956:14:12, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
2927:22:08, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
2913:22:50, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
2890:05:40, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
2838:When is this going to end.
2621:19:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
2022:US TV broadcast incarnation
1446:) 21:42, 20 September 2016
1035:) 08:54, 19 September 2016
871:) 12:56, 20 September 2016
775:) 23:14, 19 September 2016
738:) 13:46, 19 September 2016
676:) 12:54, 19 September 2016
625:) 09:00, 19 September 2016
57:18:43, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
3135:
2787:ESPN Sunday Night Football
1882:) 12:39, 20 September 2016
1506:pretty much covers that.--
1357:) 12:34, 20 September 2016
1169:what specific measures of
816:) 10:14, 20 September 2016
607:) 08:51, 19 September 2016
2791:NBC Sunday Night Football
2489:I could see treating the
3107:Please do not modify it.
2702:could be easily renamed
679:However the majority of
32:Please do not modify it.
1921:There is no deadline.--
1347:Thursday Night Football
1334:Thursday Night Football
691:Sky Sports in this case
592:historical significance
2541:Dancing with the Stars
2125:I don't understand why
1232:There are 7 points in
1103:articles clearly pass
681:wikipedia's readership
2878:Monday Night Football
2608:Monday Night Football
2590:Sunday Night Football
2492:Monday Night Football
1872:Monday Night Football
1435:Monday Night Football
1343:Sunday Night Football
1339:Monday Night Football
1330:Sunday Night Football
1326:Monday Night Football
1020:If Knowledge isn't a
806:Sunday Night Football
765:Sunday Night Football
596:Monday Night Football
2042:Association football
2026:non-sunday afternoon
2709:Examples could be:
2565:per team per season
2960:The commentary is
2471:WP:RELISTINGISEVIL
590:There's obviously
2996:
1822:
1398:
1095:
1085:Shawn in Montreal
990:
954:
795:The point is not
54:Black Kite (talk)
3126:
3109:
3089:
2995:
2993:
2986:
2827:
2822:
2817:
2776:
2771:
2766:
2133:Wheel or Fortune
2038:Wheel of Fortune
2001:
1996:
1991:
1808:Duplicate !vote:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1405:What matters is
1384:Duplicate !vote:
1381:
1380:
1379:
984:
979:
971:
967:
948:
943:
935:
931:
880:
556:
538:
510:
492:
464:
446:
418:
400:
372:
354:
326:
308:
280:
262:
234:
216:
187:
186:
172:
124:
112:
94:
34:
3134:
3133:
3129:
3128:
3127:
3125:
3124:
3123:
3122:
3116:deletion review
3105:
3087:
2989:
2987:
2825:
2820:
2815:
2793:are different.
2774:
2769:
2764:
2174:worldwide event
1999:
1994:
1989:
1908:RickinBaltimore
1854:RickinBaltimore
1801:
1377:
1234:WP:NOTDIRECTORY
986:
982:
977:
969:
965:
950:
946:
941:
933:
929:
876:
850:RickinBaltimore
636:Super Bowl XLII
529:
513:
483:
467:
437:
421:
391:
375:
345:
329:
299:
283:
253:
237:
207:
191:
129:
120:
85:
69:
66:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3132:
3130:
3121:
3120:
3100:
3099:
3076:
3059:
3041:
3019:
3018:
3017:
2980:
2979:
2978:
2977:
2976:
2934:
2933:
2932:
2931:
2930:
2929:
2893:
2892:
2866:
2865:
2855:WikiOriginal-9
2836:
2835:
2834:
2833:
2795:WikiOriginal-9
2718:
2717:
2714:
2692:
2691:
2690:
2689:
2643:
2642:
2641:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2636:
2635:
2634:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2629:
2628:
2582:
2581:
2530:
2529:
2509:
2508:
2486:
2485:
2452:
2451:
2450:
2449:
2448:
2447:
2446:
2445:
2444:
2443:
2425:
2424:
2405:
2404:
2387:
2386:
2367:
2366:
2325:
2324:
2295:
2294:
2272:
2271:
2270:
2269:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2262:
2261:
2260:
2259:
2218:
2217:
2216:
2215:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2154:for a reason.
2116:
2094:
2093:
2008:
2007:
1972:
1971:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1851:
1850:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1750:
1749:
1725:
1724:
1707:
1706:
1686:
1685:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1541:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1429:
1428:
1400:
1399:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1319:
1318:
1300:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1251:
1250:
1227:
1226:
1209:
1208:
1186:
1185:
1161:
1160:
1137:However fails
1129:
1128:
1097:
1096:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1015:
1014:
992:
991:
975:
955:
939:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
899:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
828:
827:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
686:Premier League
662:
661:
609:
608:
560:Appears to be
558:
557:
511:
465:
419:
373:
327:
281:
235:
189:
126:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3131:
3119:
3117:
3113:
3108:
3102:
3101:
3098:
3094:
3090:
3084:
3080:
3077:
3075:
3071:
3067:
3063:
3060:
3058:
3054:
3050:
3045:
3042:
3040:
3036:
3032:
3027:
3023:
3020:
3016:
3012:
3008:
3007:Paul McDonald
3004:
3001:
3000:
2999:
2994:
2992:
2984:
2981:
2975:
2971:
2967:
2963:
2959:
2958:
2957:
2953:
2949:
2948:Paul McDonald
2945:
2941:
2938:
2937:
2936:
2935:
2928:
2924:
2920:
2916:
2915:
2914:
2910:
2906:
2902:
2897:
2896:
2895:
2894:
2891:
2887:
2883:
2879:
2875:
2871:
2868:
2867:
2864:
2860:
2856:
2852:
2851:
2850:
2849:
2845:
2841:
2832:
2829:
2828:
2823:
2818:
2811:
2806:
2805:
2804:
2800:
2796:
2792:
2788:
2784:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2778:
2777:
2772:
2767:
2759:
2755:
2754:United States
2751:
2747:
2744:would impact
2743:
2739:
2735:
2731:
2727:
2723:
2715:
2712:
2711:
2710:
2707:
2705:
2701:
2696:
2688:
2684:
2680:
2675:
2674:
2673:
2669:
2666:
2663:
2659:
2658:
2657:
2656:
2652:
2648:
2626:
2625:
2624:
2623:
2622:
2618:
2614:
2609:
2605:
2604:
2603:
2599:
2595:
2591:
2586:
2585:
2584:
2583:
2580:
2576:
2573:
2570:
2566:
2562:
2557:
2556:
2555:
2551:
2547:
2542:
2538:
2537:American Idol
2534:
2533:
2532:
2531:
2528:
2524:
2521:
2518:
2513:
2512:
2511:
2510:
2507:
2503:
2499:
2494:
2493:
2488:
2487:
2484:
2480:
2476:
2475:Paul McDonald
2472:
2468:
2467:
2466:
2465:
2461:
2457:
2442:
2438:
2434:
2429:
2428:
2427:
2426:
2423:
2419:
2416:
2413:
2409:
2408:
2407:
2406:
2403:
2399:
2395:
2391:
2390:
2389:
2388:
2385:
2381:
2378:
2375:
2371:
2370:
2369:
2368:
2365:
2361:
2357:
2352:
2348:
2344:
2341:
2340:
2339:
2338:
2334:
2330:
2323:
2319:
2315:
2314:Paul McDonald
2311:
2310:
2309:
2308:
2304:
2300:
2292:
2288:
2287:
2286:
2285:
2281:
2277:
2258:
2254:
2250:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2233:
2232:
2231:
2230:
2226:
2222:
2206:
2202:
2199:
2196:
2191:
2190:
2189:
2185:
2181:
2176:
2175:
2169:
2168:
2167:
2163:
2160:
2157:
2153:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2142:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2126:
2122:
2117:
2115:
2111:
2107:
2102:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2095:
2092:
2088:
2085:
2082:
2078:
2074:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2035:
2030:
2027:
2023:
2020:
2016:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2006:
2003:
2002:
1997:
1992:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1974:
1973:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1945:
1942:
1941:
1932:
1928:
1924:
1923:Paul McDonald
1919:
1918:
1917:
1913:
1909:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1893:Paul McDonald
1890:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1881:
1877:
1873:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1847:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1832:
1831:Paul McDonald
1827:
1824:
1823:
1820:
1816:
1812:
1809:
1799:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1786:
1771:
1767:
1763:
1758:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1748:
1744:
1741:
1738:
1733:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1705:
1701:
1698:
1695:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1671:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1657:
1653:
1650:
1647:
1643:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1623:
1622:
1615:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1582:Paul McDonald
1578:
1577:
1576:
1572:
1569:
1566:
1562:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1542:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1525:
1524:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1508:Paul McDonald
1505:
1501:
1497:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1473:
1470:
1467:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1448:
1447:
1445:
1441:
1436:
1431:
1430:
1427:
1423:
1420:
1417:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1385:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1362:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1304:
1301:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1286:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1262:Paul McDonald
1259:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1249:
1245:
1242:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1216:Paul McDonald
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1207:
1203:
1200:
1197:
1193:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1175:Paul McDonald
1172:
1168:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1159:
1155:
1152:
1149:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1118:Paul McDonald
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1099:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1077:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1050:
1047:
1044:
1040:
1037:
1036:
1034:
1030:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
994:
993:
989:
985:
980:
974:
973:
972:
961:
956:
953:
949:
944:
938:
937:
936:
925:
920:
912:
908:
904:
903:Paul McDonald
900:
896:
895:
894:
890:
887:
884:
879:
873:
872:
870:
866:
861:
860:
859:
855:
851:
846:
842:
841:
815:
811:
807:
803:
798:
794:
793:
792:
788:
785:
782:
777:
776:
774:
770:
766:
762:
757:
756:
755:
751:
748:
745:
740:
739:
737:
733:
728:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
715:
712:
709:
705:
701:
696:
692:
687:
682:
678:
677:
675:
671:
666:
665:
664:
663:
660:
656:
653:
650:
646:
641:
637:
632:
629:
628:
627:
626:
624:
620:
616:
611:
610:
606:
602:
597:
593:
589:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
577:
574:
571:
567:
563:
554:
550:
546:
542:
537:
533:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
491:
487:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
445:
441:
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
399:
395:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
353:
349:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
307:
303:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
261:
257:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
215:
211:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
185:
181:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
135:
132:
131:Find sources:
127:
123:
119:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
3106:
3103:
3078:
3066:South Nashua
3061:
3043:
3025:
3021:
3002:
2990:
2982:
2961:
2939:
2900:
2869:
2837:
2813:
2762:
2750:WP:NOT#STATS
2742:WP:NOT#STATS
2730:WP:OTHERCRAP
2719:
2708:
2703:
2694:
2693:
2644:
2607:
2589:
2560:
2540:
2536:
2490:
2453:
2346:
2342:
2326:
2296:
2273:
2219:
2173:
2151:
2132:
2128:
2124:
2120:
2101:concert tour
2076:
1987:
1975:
1949:in every way
1948:
1943:
1871:
1852:
1845:
1825:
1807:
1760:misapplied.
1756:
1731:
1669:
1641:
1624:
1560:
1543:
1531:Clarityfiend
1526:
1434:
1410:
1406:
1383:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1302:
1191:
1166:
1142:
1134:
1100:
1039:WP:OTHERCRAP
1021:
1000:WP:NOT#STATS
995:
968:
963:
932:
927:
844:
805:
802:Monday Night
801:
796:
764:
760:
726:
680:
644:
630:
614:
595:
591:
587:
565:
559:
179:
173:
165:
158:
152:
146:
140:
130:
117:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
2944:WP:NOTSTATS
2905:BornonJune8
2874:WP:NOTSTATS
2679:Lepricavark
2594:BornonJune8
2546:BornonJune8
2433:Lepricavark
2394:Lepricavark
2351:WP:BLUDGEON
2349:engaged in
2291:WP:CLOSEAFD
2249:BornonJune8
2180:BornonJune8
2137:BornonJune8
2129:Family Feud
2106:BornonJune8
2034:Family Feud
1980:WP:NOTSTATS
1957:WP:BLUDGEON
1953:WP:NOTSTATS
1876:BornonJune8
1762:Lepricavark
1714:Lepricavark
1675:Lepricavark
1606:Lepricavark
1548:Lepricavark
1482:Lepricavark
1452:Lepricavark
1440:BornonJune8
1351:BornonJune8
1060:Lepricavark
1029:BornonJune8
865:BornonJune8
810:BornonJune8
769:BornonJune8
732:BornonJune8
670:BornonJune8
619:BornonJune8
601:BornonJune8
156:free images
2991:Sandstein
2698:articles.
2077:results of
2013:There are
1668:No, it is
1022:statistics
613:"football
3112:talk page
2964:trivia.
2152:worldwide
1580:better.--
998:violates
970:Quidditch
934:Quidditch
702:meet the
37:talk page
3114:or in a
3083:WP:LISTN
2940:Response
2695:Comment:
2356:UW Dawgs
2121:that big
2073:WP:LISTN
2029:football
2015:articles
1961:UW Dawgs
1849:article.
1819:contribs
1755:This is
1629:Jclemens
1395:contribs
1308:X96lee15
1109:WP:LISTN
115:View log
39:or in a
2983:Delete.
2966:FalconK
2919:FalconK
2882:FalconK
2613:Rlendog
2498:Rlendog
2347:clearly
2343:Comment
1826:Comment
1642:Comment
1561:Comment
1500:WP:NEED
1143:results
1135:Comment
1116:time.--
1113:WP:SNOW
645:outside
631:Comment
615:matches
588:Comment
566:matches
532:protect
527:history
486:protect
481:history
440:protect
435:history
394:protect
389:history
348:protect
343:history
302:protect
297:history
256:protect
251:history
210:protect
205:history
162:WP refs
150:scholar
88:protect
83:history
3088:Lizard
3079:Delete
3026:easily
2870:Delete
2758:Canada
2738:WP:NOT
2734:WP:NOT
2726:WP:NOT
2722:WP:NOT
2046:Tennis
1846:Delete
1527:Delete
1504:WP:GNG
1303:Delete
1171:WP:NOT
1139:WP:NOT
1105:WP:GNG
1004:Prevan
996:Delete
761:Monday
704:Giants
640:WP:NOT
562:WP:NOT
536:delete
490:delete
444:delete
398:delete
352:delete
306:delete
260:delete
214:delete
134:Google
92:delete
3062:Merge
3031:Hobit
3003:Query
2821:ucard
2770:ucard
2019:every
1995:ucard
1192:Reply
1167:Query
845:every
797:every
553:views
545:watch
541:links
507:views
499:watch
495:links
461:views
453:watch
449:links
415:views
407:watch
403:links
369:views
361:watch
357:links
323:views
315:watch
311:links
277:views
269:watch
265:links
231:views
223:watch
219:links
177:JSTOR
138:books
122:Stats
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
3093:talk
3070:talk
3053:talk
3044:Keep
3035:talk
3022:Keep
3011:talk
2970:talk
2962:also
2952:talk
2923:talk
2909:talk
2901:same
2886:talk
2859:talk
2844:talk
2826:16♫♪
2816:♪♫Al
2799:talk
2789:and
2775:16♫♪
2765:♪♫Al
2756:and
2683:talk
2651:talk
2617:talk
2598:talk
2550:talk
2502:talk
2479:talk
2460:talk
2437:talk
2398:talk
2360:talk
2333:talk
2318:talk
2303:talk
2289:Per
2280:talk
2253:talk
2225:talk
2184:talk
2141:talk
2131:and
2110:talk
2000:16♫♪
1990:♪♫Al
1976:Keep
1965:talk
1944:Keep
1927:talk
1912:talk
1897:talk
1880:talk
1858:talk
1835:talk
1815:talk
1794:talk
1766:talk
1732:only
1718:talk
1679:talk
1670:your
1633:talk
1625:Keep
1610:talk
1586:talk
1552:talk
1544:Keep
1535:talk
1512:talk
1486:talk
1456:talk
1444:talk
1409:and
1391:talk
1370:talk
1355:talk
1312:talk
1294:talk
1266:talk
1220:talk
1179:talk
1122:talk
1107:and
1101:Keep
1089:talk
1064:talk
1033:talk
1008:talk
907:talk
869:talk
854:talk
814:talk
804:and
773:talk
736:talk
727:some
700:Jets
674:talk
623:talk
605:talk
549:logs
523:talk
519:edit
503:logs
477:talk
473:edit
457:logs
431:talk
427:edit
411:logs
385:talk
381:edit
365:logs
339:talk
335:edit
319:logs
293:talk
289:edit
273:logs
247:talk
243:edit
227:logs
201:talk
197:edit
170:FENS
144:news
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
2903:!
2561:all
2539:or
2067:or
2044:or
2036:of
2024:of
2017:on
1982:is
1757:not
1411:how
1407:why
1260:.--
901:.--
763:or
184:TWL
113:– (
3095:)
3085:.
3072:)
3055:)
3037:)
3013:)
2972:)
2954:)
2925:)
2911:)
2888:)
2861:)
2846:)
2801:)
2685:)
2670:1
2653:)
2619:)
2600:)
2577:1
2552:)
2525:1
2504:)
2481:)
2473:--
2462:)
2439:)
2420:1
2400:)
2382:1
2362:)
2335:)
2320:)
2305:)
2282:)
2255:)
2227:)
2203:1
2186:)
2164:1
2143:)
2112:)
2089:1
2063:,
2056:,
2052:,
1967:)
1959:.
1929:)
1914:)
1899:)
1860:)
1837:)
1817:•
1806:—
1796:)
1768:)
1745:1
1720:)
1702:1
1681:)
1654:1
1635:)
1612:)
1588:)
1573:1
1554:)
1537:)
1514:)
1488:)
1474:1
1458:)
1424:1
1393:•
1382:—
1372:)
1349:.
1314:)
1296:)
1268:)
1246:1
1222:)
1204:1
1181:)
1156:1
1124:)
1091:)
1083:.
1066:)
1051:1
1041:.
1010:)
966:WC
962:.
930:WC
926:.
909:)
891:1
856:)
789:1
752:1
716:1
657:1
578:1
551:|
547:|
543:|
539:|
534:|
530:|
525:|
521:|
505:|
501:|
497:|
493:|
488:|
484:|
479:|
475:|
459:|
455:|
451:|
447:|
442:|
438:|
433:|
429:|
413:|
409:|
405:|
401:|
396:|
392:|
387:|
383:|
367:|
363:|
359:|
355:|
350:|
346:|
341:|
337:|
321:|
317:|
313:|
309:|
304:|
300:|
295:|
291:|
275:|
271:|
267:|
263:|
258:|
254:|
249:|
245:|
229:|
225:|
221:|
217:|
212:|
208:|
203:|
199:|
164:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
3091:(
3068:(
3051:(
3033:(
3009:(
2968:(
2950:(
2921:(
2907:(
2884:(
2857:(
2842:(
2797:(
2681:(
2668:x
2665:v
2662:T
2649:(
2615:(
2596:(
2575:x
2572:v
2569:T
2548:(
2523:x
2520:v
2517:T
2500:(
2477:(
2458:(
2435:(
2418:x
2415:v
2412:T
2396:(
2380:x
2377:v
2374:T
2358:(
2331:(
2316:(
2301:(
2278:(
2251:(
2223:(
2201:x
2198:v
2195:T
2182:(
2162:x
2159:v
2156:T
2139:(
2108:(
2087:x
2084:v
2081:T
1963:(
1925:(
1910:(
1895:(
1878:(
1856:(
1833:(
1813:(
1792:(
1764:(
1743:x
1740:v
1737:T
1716:(
1700:x
1697:v
1694:T
1677:(
1652:x
1649:v
1646:T
1631:(
1608:(
1584:(
1571:x
1568:v
1565:T
1550:(
1533:(
1510:(
1484:(
1472:x
1469:v
1466:T
1454:(
1442:(
1422:x
1419:v
1416:T
1389:(
1368:(
1353:(
1345:/
1341:/
1332:/
1328:/
1310:(
1292:(
1264:(
1244:x
1241:v
1238:T
1218:(
1202:x
1199:v
1196:T
1177:(
1154:x
1151:v
1148:T
1120:(
1087:(
1062:(
1049:x
1046:v
1043:T
1031:(
1006:(
983:✎
978:☎
947:✎
942:☎
905:(
889:x
886:v
883:T
867:(
852:(
812:(
787:x
784:v
781:T
771:(
750:x
747:v
744:T
734:(
714:x
711:v
708:T
689:(
672:(
655:x
652:v
649:T
621:(
603:(
576:x
573:v
570:T
555:)
517:(
509:)
471:(
463:)
425:(
417:)
379:(
371:)
333:(
325:)
287:(
279:)
241:(
233:)
195:(
188:)
180:·
174:·
166:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
136:(
128:(
125:)
118:·
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.