331:- I withdraw my earlier 'keep vote'; a quick search for notable players to have played for this club does not bring up many more than the two internationals whose details are already mentioned on the main article page. Therefore, I doubt the club merits having a seperate article about its players.
265:
I would agree that it should be kept if there was more content, or recreated when there is more content, but I would suggest that with only two players on the list, that list should be in the main article, until such a time that it is expanded. I don't think it should be created in the expectation
205:
Stop being so pedantic. I explained why I was putting it in the article. It was not a major change and hardly controversial. If you agree that it was actually the right thing to do, why are you continuing to harp on about tiny details of how it should have been done? Rather than complaining in the
190:
has since given it a heading that provides inclusion/exclusion criteria, and references as to why the two players involved should be on it. So long as the list is complete, or there is the intention to make it so, I now think that delete and merge is entirely appropriate.
147:
section, which, when it has no clear inclusion or exclusion criteria, is POV, OR and unverifiable. Indeed, it was removed from the club article for precisely that reason on 15 March. If OTD's intention is to make a merge, then that is what he should have proposed.
185:
Nevertheless, the removal of this information from the club article was done with clear edit notes which cited several policies and preceding discussions, and the act of merging was essentially an unexplained reversion of that edit. However,
206:
first place, perhaps you could have made the changes that EA210269 made instead. Let's focus on getting stuff done rather than moaning about whether it follows the letter of whichever obscure code of conduct you think we should be following.
162:
This is a discussion suggestion deletion, the final consensus may be "merge" but this is not an
Articles for Merging discussion, and there is no need to wait for a "Merge" outcome before merging content.
143:
I am happy that it be deleted, unless anyone is willing to take on the task of making it what it claims to be. But it should not have been moved to the club article in this way. It is now a
121:
88:
83:
92:
75:
17:
230:
338:
323:
303:
275:
259:
242:
215:
200:
172:
157:
137:
57:
79:
128:
No need for this page, even as a redirect, as nobody will search for it. The content has been moved to the team's page.
353:
36:
71:
63:
352:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
271:
211:
168:
133:
335:
319:
301:
256:
238:
267:
207:
164:
129:
315:
53:
196:
153:
332:
294:
253:
234:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
49:
192:
149:
187:
252:
article needs expanding and improving, not deleting. Lists of players ARE notable.
109:
314:
as it stands with no prejudice of recreation if someone writes an actual list.
287:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
346:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
116:
105:
101:
97:
292:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
233:'s list of association football related deletions.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
356:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
229:Note: This discussion has been included in
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
72:List of Offenburger FV players
64:List of Offenburger FV players
1:
266:that it might be expanded.
373:
339:16:07, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
324:07:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
216:14:24, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
201:08:45, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
58:14:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
304:18:16, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
276:22:35, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
260:17:38, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
243:08:04, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
173:11:49, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
158:22:11, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
138:17:43, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
349:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
231:WikiProject Football
299:
44:The result was
306:
293:
245:
364:
351:
297:
291:
289:
228:
119:
113:
95:
34:
372:
371:
367:
366:
365:
363:
362:
361:
360:
354:deletion review
347:
295:
285:
145:Notable players
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
370:
368:
359:
358:
342:
341:
326:
308:
307:
290:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
246:
225:
224:
223:
222:
221:
220:
219:
218:
178:
177:
176:
175:
126:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
369:
357:
355:
350:
344:
343:
340:
337:
334:
330:
327:
325:
321:
317:
313:
310:
309:
305:
302:
298:
288:
284:
283:
277:
273:
269:
268:Over The Desk
264:
263:
262:
261:
258:
255:
251:
247:
244:
240:
236:
232:
227:
226:
217:
213:
209:
208:Over The Desk
204:
203:
202:
198:
194:
189:
188:User:EA210269
184:
183:
182:
181:
180:
179:
174:
170:
166:
165:Over The Desk
161:
160:
159:
155:
151:
146:
142:
141:
140:
139:
135:
131:
130:Over The Desk
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
348:
345:
328:
311:
296:Juliancolton
286:
249:
248:
235:ChrisTheDude
144:
127:
45:
43:
31:
28:
316:Punkmorten
50:Malcolmxl5
193:Kevin McE
150:Kevin McE
122:View log
336:Snowman
257:Snowman
89:protect
84:history
329:Delete
312:Delete
117:delete
93:delete
46:delete
333:Giant
254:Giant
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
320:talk
272:talk
250:Keep
239:talk
212:talk
197:talk
169:talk
154:talk
134:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
48:. --
322:)
300:|
274:)
241:)
214:)
199:)
171:)
156:)
136:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
318:(
270:(
237:(
210:(
195:(
167:(
152:(
132:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.