364:
178:- Perhaps there are more civil words to use to label another's contributions besides "pointless" and "random". Perhaps one of the 6.5 billion people on Earth for some God-only-knows-reason at sometime will need to find out who the longest living Philippine president was, or needs to find out how long a certain president lived in relation to others. --
390:
546:
vote. I'm not saying I am swung by my fellow
Wikipedians votes, but this issue seems to have quite a heated basis. Or perhaps I'm just reading between the lines where there is nothing to read. Either way, I'm not giving a vote either way.
48:. Consensus seems to be that this list is unencyclopedic and redundant. Mere consistency and the precedent of other articles/lists aren't valid in the discussion of a specific article, nor is a "conditional delete" statement.
415:
I'm sorry if my 'pointless' comment offends, but this is trivia (IMHO). I can see no usefulness or any point to this organization of the presidents. As far as the US list (and many others), that seems more an example of
257:. There are many ways to rank things, those which have some sort of impact on the subject matter are justifiable, but since a president's longevity means nothing to the person's presidency, this is not one of those.
86:
81:
90:
73:
332:
113:
464:
Consistency and precedent matter. Presidents of the
Phillipines are no less important or encyclopedic than leaders of Austria, Canada, Germany, and the United states.
592:
499:
485:
611:
468:
is helpful for understanding why we should not delete articles that would be kept if they involved
English-speaking or European countries. Considering that
469:
648:
620:
599:
583:
571:
551:
534:
518:
506:
456:
407:
367:
305:
283:
266:
249:
222:
191:
170:
158:
146:
124:
55:
154:
There was a precent-establishing discussion about other lists of
Philippine presidents several months ago. I guess they missed this article.
637:
324:
328:
382:
316:
436:. Granted I have excerpted the shorter and more succinct !votes, but there are none that make a valid argument. The result of the AfD was
77:
477:
69:
61:
17:
473:
481:
320:
527:
489:
231:
377:. I am surprising myself with this !vote, I'm usually something of a strong opponent of random "List of" articles, but
216:
188:
454:
386:
663:
642:
292:
274:
per
Stephen. We already have the List of Philippine Presidents we dont need another one just sorted differently.
36:
662:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
335:. How is the current article any different from any of these other than the location of the people in power? --
182:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
503:
349:
449:
279:
167:
52:
405:
632:
492:, but only if someone first makes that list sortable by longevity. -Fagles 17:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
393:
along with a batch of other, similar lists. That makes it precedent, not just "other stuff exists".
155:
515:
261:
579:
The
Philippines is a fairly large and significant nation deserving the same treatment as others.--
378:
336:
142:
617:
300:
247:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
275:
210:
185:
49:
363:
580:
299:
to have an identical article about US presidents and not about any other world leaders. --
526:
as per Fagles. I agree that if the longevity information is added and made sortable on
596:
488:
survived deletion review, this should too. I would also support merging this list with
465:
417:
258:
205:
564:
531:
296:
139:
239:
121:
133:. I would see no point for this article even if it was titled "list of Philippine
107:
166:, I'm not a fan of lists but this is more pointless (less pointful?) than most.--
560:
548:
394:
200:
179:
434:
I came upon this page out of my own interest and would feel sad to see it go
199:
Don't we have something where you can sort a table by different fields?
120:
It's just a pointless and random article. I see no reason to have it. --
137:
by longevity." This is just something too specific and unecyclopedic.
389:
is not in and of itself a reason to keep an article, but the US list
385:, of which this list is essentially a clone for another country.
656:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
238:
class for creating tables that are sortable by anything. --
420:
or US-centricity of WP than any valid precedent. Read the
542:
I would lean towards keep, except for the overwhelming
103:
99:
95:
530:
then this can be deleted otherwise it should be kept.
329:
List of First Ladies of the United States by longevity
426:
Knowledge should be a place for masses of information
424:comments frome the AfD for the US Presidents list;
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
333:List of United States Presidents by date of death
666:). No further edits should be made to this page.
593:List of United States Presidents by longevity
500:List of United States Presidents by longevity
486:List of United States Presidents by longevity
478:List of Canadian Prime Ministers by longevity
8:
630:iff other similar articles are deleted. --
70:List of Philippine Presidents by longevity
62:List of Philippine Presidents by longevity
470:List of Austrian Chancellors by Longevity
610:: This debate has been included in the
474:List of Austrian Presidents by longevity
444:, in Scottish law. Again in my opinion,
482:List of German Chancellors by longevity
321:Earliest living United States president
591:. If this gets deleted I'm nominating
381:makes a very valid point that we have
325:Oldest living United States president
7:
383:List of U.S. Presidents by longevity
317:List of U.S. Presidents by longevity
595:out of spite. Just kidding, sorta.
24:
448:, and it too should be deleted.--
430:Very interesting collections all
362:
295:, but it does seem a failure of
612:list of Lists-related deletions
514:for consistency and precedent.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
528:List of Philippine Presidents
490:List of Philippine Presidents
232:List of Philippine Presidents
440:, equivalent to the verdict
315:Consider that we also have
683:
649:06:31, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
621:20:12, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
600:03:54, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
584:04:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
572:00:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
552:21:21, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
535:21:00, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
519:19:54, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
507:18:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
457:17:02, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
408:15:33, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
368:13:13, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
306:08:50, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
284:07:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
267:06:34, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
250:04:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
230:as a fork of the featured
223:02:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
192:01:39, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
171:01:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
159:01:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
147:00:50, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
125:00:48, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
56:03:51, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
563:. We must be consistent.
659:Please do not modify it.
504:--Duke of Duchess Street
32:Please do not modify it.
391:survived an AfD attempt
387:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
628:Conditional delete
446:other stuff exists
293:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS
236:Wikitable sortable
234:. And there is a
218:We are all Hokies!
615:
264:
221:
674:
661:
645:
640:
635:
606:
569:
452:
451:killing sparrows
401:
398:
366:
360:
359:
356:
353:
347:
346:
343:
340:
303:
262:
219:
215:
213:
208:
203:
168:killing sparrows
145:
111:
93:
34:
682:
681:
677:
676:
675:
673:
672:
671:
670:
664:deletion review
657:
643:
638:
633:
565:
540:Neutral/Comment
450:
399:
396:
357:
354:
351:
350:
344:
341:
338:
337:
301:
245:
217:
211:
206:
201:
138:
84:
68:
65:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
680:
678:
669:
668:
652:
651:
624:
623:
603:
602:
586:
574:
554:
537:
521:
516:Carlossuarez46
509:
493:
459:
410:
371:
370:
309:
308:
286:
269:
252:
243:
225:
194:
173:
161:
149:
118:
117:
64:
59:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
679:
667:
665:
660:
654:
653:
650:
647:
646:
641:
636:
629:
626:
625:
622:
619:
613:
609:
605:
604:
601:
598:
594:
590:
587:
585:
582:
578:
575:
573:
570:
568:
562:
558:
555:
553:
550:
545:
541:
538:
536:
533:
529:
525:
522:
520:
517:
513:
510:
508:
505:
501:
497:
494:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
460:
458:
455:
453:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
414:
411:
409:
406:
403:
402:
392:
388:
384:
380:
379:Cyrus Andiron
376:
373:
372:
369:
365:
361:
348:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
311:
310:
307:
304:
298:
294:
291:Yes, I know,
290:
287:
285:
281:
277:
273:
270:
268:
265:
260:
256:
253:
251:
248:
246:
242:
237:
233:
229:
226:
224:
220:
214:
209:
204:
198:
195:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
177:
174:
172:
169:
165:
162:
160:
157:
153:
150:
148:
144:
141:
136:
132:
129:
128:
127:
126:
123:
115:
109:
105:
101:
97:
92:
88:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
66:
63:
60:
58:
57:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
658:
655:
631:
627:
618:Pax:Vobiscum
607:
588:
576:
566:
556:
543:
539:
523:
511:
495:
461:
445:
441:
438:no consensus
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
412:
395:
374:
312:
288:
271:
254:
240:
235:
227:
197:Weak delete.
196:
175:
163:
151:
134:
130:
119:
45:
43:
31:
28:
404:•
276:GeorgeMoney
50:John Reaves
581:T. Anthony
442:not proven
244:(Stephen)
156:YechielMan
597:TheCoffee
259:Sjakkalle
567:Aquatics
532:Davewild
302:Charlene
263:(Check!)
114:View log
498:as per
466:WP:BIAS
418:WP:BIAS
413:Comment
313:Comment
289:Comment
176:Comment
122:Matjlav
87:protect
82:history
634:Howard
561:Fagles
549:Jmlk17
544:delete
484:, and
432:, and
428:, and
297:WP:CSB
272:Delete
255:Delete
228:Delete
164:Delete
152:Delete
135:people
131:Delete
91:delete
53:(talk)
46:delete
462:Keep.
241:Steve
108:views
100:watch
96:links
16:<
644:Duck
608:Note
589:Keep
577:Keep
559:per
557:Keep
524:Keep
512:Keep
496:Keep
422:keep
375:Keep
280:talk
143:khoi
140:Khoi
104:logs
78:talk
74:edit
639:the
616:--
614:.
400:yan
397:Ark
355:dir
212:g92
112:– (
502:.
480:,
476:,
472:,
358:on
352:An
342:ru
339:Cy
331:,
327:,
323:,
319:,
282:)
202:Ab
106:|
102:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
80:|
76:|
345:s
278:(
207:e
189:i
186:m
183:e
180:R
116:)
110:)
72:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.