530:, thats still no reason to shove them in a list. I would have gone with merge, but Farix has already restored the deleted material. My "vote" boils down to if the article is a likely search term or not, if so, then a redirect is necessary. If not, then delete. Either way, all the content worth keeping has already been kept.
600:, but on the standards of verifiability, notability, and neutral point of view. Verifiability is trivial for a voice actor/staff list, but notability is incredibly difficult to illustrate (NPOV doesn't apply in this case so much). Third, if the list has information which can't be found anywhere else, that information is
604:
and should be removed anyways. And even a keep closure would see some information being removed, in the course of cleaning up and expanding the list. Of course, I'm not sure why I'm bothering to explain all this to you; you've had it explained to you already way too many times for you to be ignorant
563:
There are a lot of articles out there which most don't consider useful. But someone does, or it wouldn't have been created. The information is all worth preserving to some, it all a matter of personal opinion. The list makes the information easier to sort through, and this article has information
476:
WP:Preserve requires information worth retaining, this differs from case to case just as "unimportant" information depends on a case by case basis. In this case, the relevant information was already in another article, and more importantly, belongs in that other article and not this one (and has now
477:
been restored). Additionally, whatever your personal view on merge=delete, there is one noticeable difference you can't ignore - delete removes the page entirely, merge leaves a redirect to a more appropriate page (in this case it would be the character list, where the info originated and belongs)
403:
What about all those listed at the end? Also, showing what episodes the voice actors worked in, might be useful for anyone trying to find that information. I see no reason to not have it in both places, this article having more than what is listed elsewhere. I have no idea why anyone would ever
150:
Lists of voice actors have been discouraged for anime series for several years now as redundant to the character lists, and this list in particular was previously deleted as a result of AfD. I'm not seeing anything in its current iteration that would justify keeping it over its predecessor.
521:
as redundant to the character list. I'm unable to think of a legitimate reason for having a dedicated list of voice actors, especially when the information exists on a much more detailed character page. I don't see how you can assert that a list of voice actors meets
708:
Dream Focus has point, however, the page could have still been removed (since the template was still there), so there for, the page has been redirected to Anime
Characters (which has been merged with the actor page to show more detail). Check Out Here:
83:
679:
Not only that, just because something can be reliably sourced, doesn't mean it has sufficient notability for its own article. As I said above, it's trivial to source a cast/staff/voice actor list; no one is arguing that.
710:
78:
180:
564:
which isn't found anywhere else, such as the additional voices section. Anything other than Keep, would result in some information being deleted, no matter what you call it.
110:
105:
114:
662:
321:
289:
215:
47:
143:
97:
547:
I don't think this is a useful list, as readers will not be interested in an list of voice actors of different characters, and no sources discuss this as a topic.
391:'s edits is a vain try to give that list more legitimacy but all it did was to reinforce my conviction that there should not be separate list for voices actors. --
362:
I've restored the voice actors to the character page. But judging from MegaHL90 edit history, he has never discussed anything with other editors on a talkpage. --
432:
If it should not be listed separately, it should be in a character list (not individual articles, or sub-sub-lists no one can find. This should go through a
698:
674:
654:
623:
587:
558:
539:
509:
486:
469:
443:
427:
395:
373:
357:
342:
298:
280:
259:
241:
201:
169:
62:
404:
want to look at a list of all the voice actors from a long running popular series, but having them in one place, would make that easier to accomplish.
639:
this can be sourced somewhere. As a list I don't see a need for out-of-universe commentary. This is a one-down-list from the series page.
327:
The editor stripped the voice actors from the character list in order to create this list. This is entirely inappropriate and contrary to
101:
17:
691:
616:
502:
491:
All relevant information has already been added back to the character list. I don't see what you're complaining about in this case.
461:
194:
162:
93:
68:
650:
452:
Yes, except we've all seen how well THOSE go: The information is deemed "unimportant" and is then discarded in violation of
317:
526:, the notability of the series can't be inherited here, and although a few of the voice actors may be notable due to their
729:
593:
36:
211:
387:
That kind of information should be inside the characters list or section and not separate or redundant from it.
728:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
250:
A spot check shows that the voice actors are listed in individual character articles and character sub-lists. —
210:
Your argument would only make sense if the information was listed elsewhere already. I don't see it listed at
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
441:
713:. I also do apologize for editing in vain, sometimes I don't remember to chat before I change anything. -
686:
670:
611:
535:
497:
482:
465:
255:
189:
157:
453:
288:: Perhaps adding the voice actors (4Kids, Pokémon USA, and Japanese) to their characters' sections in
56:
276:
597:
328:
644:
437:
369:
338:
311:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
683:
666:
608:
565:
553:
531:
494:
478:
405:
251:
219:
186:
154:
601:
352:
293:
53:
392:
272:
523:
714:
640:
364:
333:
307:
351:
I thought I remembered the voice actors in the character page... So I'm not crazy! -
131:
548:
592:
And there are a lot of problems with your arguments. Firstly, keep in mind
84:
Articles for deletion/List of Pokémon voice actors (2nd nomination)
711:
List of Pokémon characters & voice actors in the anime series
596:. Second, Knowledge (XXG) articles are not judged based on their
722:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
388:
661:
No obvious parent list? It's been discussed many times!
325:
138:
127:
123:
119:
181:
list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions
79:Articles for deletion/List of Pokémon voice actors
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
732:). No further edits should be made to this page.
663:List of characters in the Pokémon anime series
456:. In other words, merge = delete. I'd !vote
322:List of characters in the Pokémon anime series
290:List of characters in the Pokémon anime series
216:List of characters in the Pokémon anime series
48:List_of_characters_in_the_Pokémon_anime_series
635:per Dream Focus. No obvious parent list, and
8:
460:if I thought it would do a lick of good.
175:
179:: This debate has been included in the
76:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
75:
24:
1:
94:List of Pokémon voice actors
69:List of Pokémon voice actors
749:
212:List of Pokemon characters
292:would solve this issue? -
725:Please do not modify it.
63:23:28, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
699:18:08, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
675:04:00, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
655:00:32, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
624:20:48, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
588:20:30, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
559:10:37, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
540:16:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
510:01:13, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
487:16:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
470:14:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
444:13:18, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
428:11:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
396:07:42, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
374:00:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
358:00:20, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
343:00:14, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
299:23:25, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
281:23:07, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
260:23:28, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
242:22:56, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
202:22:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
170:22:41, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
74:AfDs for this article:
528:entire body of works
594:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS
519:Delete or redirect
44:The result was
602:original research
204:
740:
727:
697:
694:
689:
622:
619:
614:
584:
581:
578:
575:
572:
569:
508:
505:
500:
434:merge discussion
424:
421:
418:
415:
412:
409:
238:
235:
232:
229:
226:
223:
200:
197:
192:
168:
165:
160:
141:
135:
117:
59:
34:
748:
747:
743:
742:
741:
739:
738:
737:
736:
730:deletion review
723:
692:
687:
681:
617:
612:
606:
582:
579:
576:
573:
570:
567:
503:
498:
492:
422:
419:
416:
413:
410:
407:
236:
233:
230:
227:
224:
221:
195:
190:
184:
163:
158:
152:
137:
108:
92:
89:
72:
57:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
746:
744:
735:
734:
718:
717:
702:
701:
677:
658:
657:
629:
628:
627:
626:
605:of it by now.
561:
542:
515:
514:
513:
512:
489:
473:
472:
447:
446:
430:
398:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
346:
345:
301:
283:
265:
264:
263:
262:
245:
244:
205:
148:
147:
88:
87:
86:
81:
73:
71:
66:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
745:
733:
731:
726:
720:
719:
716:
715:User:MegaHL90
712:
707:
704:
703:
700:
695:
690:
685:
678:
676:
672:
668:
664:
660:
659:
656:
652:
649:
646:
642:
638:
634:
631:
630:
625:
620:
615:
610:
603:
599:
595:
591:
590:
589:
586:
585:
562:
560:
557:
556:
552:
551:
546:
543:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
520:
517:
516:
511:
506:
501:
496:
490:
488:
484:
480:
475:
474:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
450:
449:
448:
445:
442:
439:
435:
431:
429:
426:
425:
402:
399:
397:
394:
390:
386:
383:
382:
375:
371:
367:
366:
361:
360:
359:
356:
355:
350:
349:
348:
347:
344:
340:
336:
335:
330:
326:
323:
319:
316:
313:
309:
305:
302:
300:
297:
296:
291:
287:
284:
282:
278:
274:
270:
267:
266:
261:
257:
253:
249:
248:
247:
246:
243:
240:
239:
217:
213:
209:
206:
203:
198:
193:
188:
182:
178:
174:
173:
172:
171:
166:
161:
156:
145:
140:
133:
129:
125:
121:
116:
112:
107:
103:
99:
95:
91:
90:
85:
82:
80:
77:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
60:
55:
50:
49:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
724:
721:
705:
647:
636:
632:
566:
554:
549:
544:
527:
518:
457:
433:
406:
400:
384:
363:
353:
332:
314:
303:
294:
285:
268:
220:
207:
176:
149:
52:
46:redirect to
45:
43:
31:
28:
667:Dandy Sephy
532:Dandy Sephy
479:Dandy Sephy
462:159.182.1.4
454:WP:PRESERVE
320:) edits to
306:and revert
252:Quasirandom
598:usefulness
271:per nom.
436:first. -
393:KrebMarkt
354:sesuPRIME
329:WP:MOS-AM
295:sesuPRIME
273:JBsupreme
651:contribs
641:Casliber
389:MegaHL90
318:contribs
308:MegaHL90
144:View log
401:Comment
214:nor at
111:protect
106:history
706:Merged
637:surely
545:Delete
385:Delete
304:Delete
286:Delete
269:Delete
139:delete
115:delete
583:Focus
458:merge
423:Focus
365:Farix
334:Farix
237:Focus
142:) – (
132:views
124:watch
120:links
16:<
671:talk
645:talk
633:Keep
536:talk
524:WP:N
483:talk
466:talk
370:Talk
339:Talk
331:. --
312:talk
277:talk
256:talk
208:Keep
183:. —
177:Note
128:logs
102:talk
98:edit
696:？！」
684:ダイノ
621:？！」
609:ダイノ
555:Mod
550:Yob
507:？！」
495:ダイノ
438:Mgm
199:？！」
187:ダイノ
167:？！」
155:ダイノ
688:ガイ
673:)
665:.
653:)
613:ガイ
538:)
499:ガイ
485:)
468:)
372:)
341:)
279:)
258:)
218:.
191:ガイ
159:ガイ
130:|
126:|
122:|
118:|
113:|
109:|
104:|
100:|
54:ff
51:.
693:千
682:「
669:(
648:·
643:(
618:千
607:「
580:m
577:a
574:e
571:r
568:D
534:(
504:千
493:「
481:(
464:(
440:|
420:m
417:a
414:e
411:r
408:D
368:(
337:(
324:.
315:·
310:(
275:(
254:(
234:m
231:a
228:e
225:r
222:D
196:千
185:「
164:千
153:「
146:)
136:(
134:)
96:(
58:m
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.