481:
strokes), some discussion about who can compete (is this amateur or professional?), and a sentence about what sources were used to compile the list. A list of names and years by itself is not encyclopedic. The addition of the "lead" as of today is a slight improvement, but I think the items I mentioned should be minimum requirements for a List article.--
480:
with changes) When I first tagged this article the 2-sentence lead did not exist. I believe
Knowledge lists should have a lead paragraph telling the reader why the list is notable, explaining the categories (in this case perhaps a brief description of the strokes with wikilinks to articles about the
238:
The winners of national swimming titles are obviously notable sportsmen and women and this is linked to the article on the championships themselves. It's too large to be a part of that one though. The red links in a list allow editors to see which competitors currently lack an article, this is why
418:
The redlinks need to be 'pruned' by being turned into blue links by having articles written about them. Are you suggesting deleting random events from random years because no such article has been written yet? That seems to defeat the whole point of wikipedia, and indeed of an encyclopedia.
494:
You could always add such a lead yourself. Not everyone who starts an article on wikipedia knows as much about its norms as you. As the AfD page says, an attempt to research and fix an article should be made before asking it to be deleted.
147:
142:
151:
428:
Sorry Nick, let me make that clearer. Clearly where someone in this list is notable then the red-link should remain and an article created. My concern was that some of the red-links may be non-notable people - One can't assumme
193:
188:
197:
134:
180:
437:
the notability (although again it would seem likely) My take on this is that if a list is in
Knowledge because it is better than using a category then in general the fewer red links the better. Resolving this by adding
335:
WP:BIO says that sports people have to have competed at the highest level in their sport or in a fully professional league. I fail to see how being a national champion in a swimming event doesn't pass this hurdle.
82:
77:
86:
69:
433:
that being a
Swedish Swimming Champion makes you notable (or though it would seem to make it fairly certain) - this is why is said "possibly". In addition one can't assume that we would be able to
138:
184:
535:
Ugh. I'd rather see this broken down into individual articles on each
Championship, with a list of the winners in each article, but this is what we have. It's ugly, but it's encyclopedic.
130:
116:
Was prodded as "no context, encyclopedic". I felt it could use some discussion, so I carried it to AfD. There already appears to be relevant categories. Procedural nom, no opinion.
239:
they're better than categories. It also allows readers to see the years in which various people won, again something which categories can't do. If this goes we could always delete
176:
73:
109:
65:
57:
552:
562:
542:
530:
508:
499:
485:
462:
423:
409:
385:
361:
340:
326:
310:
292:
261:
247:
226:
120:
51:
322:, despite the list containing many notable names, national championships in individual sports are generally not notable, and not supported by WP:BIO.
393:
Serves as a guide for navigation and is to long and unwieldy to live elsewhere. Notability is ok, but possibly some redlinks may need to be pruned.
353:
Apart from which, this is not a WP:BIO article anyway, it's a list of national champions with links where appropriate to those who
17:
504:
I've added some, and some humor - plus fixed the dates. Please correct anything I said about swimming that is incorrect.--
240:
578:
36:
577:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
376:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
375:- seems like a notable enough subject to me. I find the lists encyclopedic and necessary. What is the problem?
522:. A valuable indexing page that provides both links to athletes, all of whom are presumptively notable by
323:
307:
289:
539:
496:
420:
337:
244:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
455:
402:
302:
298:
284:
280:
505:
482:
358:
258:
223:
117:
523:
125:
The page has been split off into two sub-pages, those pages are being listed here:
214:
168:
103:
559:
527:
434:
449:
396:
48:
526:. Redlinks are there to provide suggestions for future editors. -
571:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
446:
content is the best way to remove red-links, of course.
277:
List of
Swedish Swimming Championships champions (women)
131:
List of
Swedish Swimming Championships champions (women)
210:
206:
202:
164:
160:
156:
99:
95:
91:
273:
List of
Swedish Swimming Championships champions (men)
177:
List of
Swedish Swimming Championships champions (men)
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
581:). No further edits should be made to this page.
66:List of Swedish Swimming Championships champions
58:List of Swedish Swimming Championships champions
257:- seems like a notable enough subject to me.
8:
357:qualify for their own article under WP:BIO.
551:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
553:list of Sweden-related deletions
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
563:00:13, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
52:11:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
543:18:50, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
531:14:05, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
509:03:34, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
500:00:46, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
486:13:25, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
463:11:53, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
424:11:09, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
410:11:02, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
386:09:15, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
362:21:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
341:11:07, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
327:08:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
311:10:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
293:07:41, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
262:06:07, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
248:05:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
227:12:27, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
121:03:03, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
241:List of Super Bowl champions
537:Weak keep, holding my nose.
598:
574:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
565:
556:
461:
408:
305:
287:
589:
576:
557:
547:
460:
458:
447:
407:
405:
394:
383:
301:
283:
218:
200:
172:
154:
107:
89:
34:
597:
596:
592:
591:
590:
588:
587:
586:
585:
579:deletion review
572:
560:John Vandenberg
528:Smerdis of Tlön
456:
448:
403:
395:
380:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦
377:
191:
175:
145:
129:
80:
64:
61:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
595:
593:
584:
583:
567:
566:
545:
533:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
489:
488:
476:- (Could be a
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
413:
412:
388:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
346:
345:
344:
343:
330:
329:
316:
315:
314:
313:
265:
264:
251:
250:
231:
220:
219:
173:
114:
113:
60:
55:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
594:
582:
580:
575:
569:
568:
564:
561:
554:
550:
546:
544:
541:
540:Corvus cornix
538:
534:
532:
529:
525:
521:
518:
517:
510:
507:
503:
502:
501:
498:
493:
492:
491:
490:
487:
484:
479:
475:
472:
471:
464:
459:
453:
452:
445:
441:
436:
432:
427:
426:
425:
422:
417:
416:
415:
414:
411:
406:
400:
399:
392:
389:
387:
384:
382:
381:
374:
371:
370:
363:
360:
356:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
342:
339:
334:
333:
332:
331:
328:
325:
321:
318:
317:
312:
309:
304:
300:
296:
295:
294:
291:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
267:
266:
263:
260:
256:
253:
252:
249:
246:
242:
237:
234:
233:
232:
229:
228:
225:
216:
212:
208:
204:
199:
195:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
153:
149:
144:
140:
136:
132:
128:
127:
126:
123:
122:
119:
111:
105:
101:
97:
93:
88:
84:
79:
75:
71:
67:
63:
62:
59:
56:
54:
53:
50:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
573:
570:
548:
536:
519:
497:Nick mallory
477:
473:
450:
443:
439:
430:
421:Nick mallory
397:
390:
379:
378:
372:
354:
338:Nick mallory
319:
276:
272:
268:
254:
245:Nick mallory
235:
230:
221:
124:
115:
45:
43:
31:
28:
320:Weak delete
444:verifiable
324:Punkmorten
297:I did. //
271:- Move to
506:Appraiser
483:Appraiser
359:Gatoclass
303:MARTSKAFT
285:MARTSKAFT
259:Gatoclass
224:UsaSatsui
118:UsaSatsui
431:de facto
110:View log
474:Neutral
440:notable
243:next.
194:protect
189:history
148:protect
143:history
83:protect
78:history
524:WP:BIO
435:verify
198:delete
152:delete
87:delete
457:Chat
451:Pedro
404:Chat
398:Pedro
279:? //
269:Other
215:views
207:watch
203:links
169:views
161:watch
157:links
104:views
96:watch
92:links
16:<
549:Note
520:Keep
478:Keep
442:and
391:Keep
373:Keep
275:and
255:Keep
236:Keep
211:logs
185:talk
181:edit
165:logs
139:talk
135:edit
100:logs
74:talk
70:edit
49:Fram
46:Keep
558:--
555:.
108:– (
454:|
401:|
355:do
306:|
288:|
222:--
213:|
209:|
205:|
201:|
196:|
192:|
187:|
183:|
167:|
163:|
159:|
155:|
150:|
146:|
141:|
137:|
102:|
98:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
76:|
72:|
308:¿
299:S
290:¿
281:S
217:)
179:(
171:)
133:(
112:)
106:)
68:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.