Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/List of Steam titles (2nd nomination) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

292:. When I look at the list of people who have made constructive edits to this page in the past 500 edits, I see enough variety of editor names and few enough edit wars and reverts to conclude that the page is actively maintained. Esteemed edtior EeepEeep seems to have missed this. As to the question of whether it is "unwieldy", that would be a fair avenue of criticism, but you don't improve unwieldy by deleting the thing - you improve it by forking the page into multiple smaller pages that each address a portion of the information, restructuring its contents, or otherwise refactoring. 740:
can click on any of the games and read the Knowledge (XXG) article on it which (should be) a more balanced view of it than the marketing spiel Steam will have. I agree though, having the list out of date and incomplete reduces the usefulness, but I think that can be fixed. Regardless, correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think "it's available elsewhere on the internet" is a valid reason for deleting an article. Anyway, I'm not too choked up about this one, like I said you guys have some good points, I just don't think Knowledge (XXG) benefits from deleting this article.
823:- Pretty much per Marasmusine, Steam is churning out far too many games every year to maintain a list on Knowledge (XXG) which is accurate. The only source relates to the Steam website. If one wishes to find information about a game, they can look there for the name and then look up the specific article on Knowledge (XXG) should they so wish. A huge list of titles is not going to be of benefit to anyone. We are not a directory of information, we are an encyclopaedia. Regards, --— 802:- This is not like "List of games published by X"; Steam is a distribution method, and a rapidly expanding one. It wont be long before it is comparable to something like "List of games available for sale in ", or "List of games distributed on CD-ROM". Any titles that are noteworthy because they have been distributed via Steam should be mentioned at 271:- You miss the point. When Steam was a small service this list may have had a purpose by illustrating the types of games available on the service, but now it's a major service with hundreds of games. There is no encyclopedic benefit in listing every single one of them; anyone can just go to Steam and look for themselves. 569:
Oh, I'm referred to as an "esteemed editor". I like that! In any case, having made efforts since the last AfD to cleanup and maintain this article, I eventually gave up with it: trying to keep it up to date was basically a full time job and I had better things to do. No-one really took up the mantle
449:
No, I disagree that Xbox Live list is the similar nature. Again, there is a list of requirements that games have to go through to be put up through Xbox Live, and you just can't add them at will. It is a vetted list of games, not arbitrary as it is with Steam. As only one or two games are released
314:
Requiring occasional updating as time goes on doesn't mean its "barely maintainable". Some of the titles might not be notable, but most are - either way that factor is irrelevant. The analogy to a "list of DVDs available through Netflix" misses the mark considerably; its more comparable to the likes
739:
Well I can only answer for myself, but I would rather look through a Knowledge (XXG) list than the Steam site list for two main reasons: first it's all in one place so you don't have to click through dozens of screens, all taking some time to load because it's such a graphics heavy site. Second, I
398:
This is a sales directory. This is different from "List of Games for Windows" in that there, Microsoft has to approve of the title and that it meets certain specifications and requiremetns before it is added to the service; same with List of XBLA games or List of WiiWare games. Here, it's just the
574:
games, games specifically tied into the Steamworks system through proper business deals and deliberate programming and development in the same way a game might be linked into XBLA, etc, rather than listing every game regardless of the fact it can be acquired through other means. That sort of list
660:(several hundred page hits per day), which makes it different from most AfDs I've seen. Were this article to be deleted, I think quite a lot of people would miss it and the function it serves, and I think Knowledge (XXG) would be a little worse off because of it. 399:
business deals between the game owner and Steam; it is a non-distinction. Also, unlik the GfW/XBLA/WiiWare games, there are plenty of other download service companies like D2D and GOG that offer the same products, so there is nothing special about Steam here. --
327:
and other similar gaming lists, especially as the service has moved beyond mere distribution. A deficit in sources for release dates and the like is the list's only major drawback, though they are readily available online. -- Sabre (talk) 18:47, 31 July 2009
450:
per week on it, they get noticed in gaming journalism. Thus, it is hard pressed to call that list (or the Games for Windows, or the WiiWare games) as directories since there is a very selective measure for what actually gets released on those systems. --
250:. So what if it is popular?. Is it wrong to be popular?. The list is maintainable when they are user who maintains. Currently iam maintaining it by finding sources and updating the list. Anyone can maintain it if they wanted to. -- 570:
and as a result, what we have here is a bit shit, lets be honest. Count me neutral in the whole affair, regardless of what I said at the last AfD. If this article does stay, perhaps a better approach would be to go with Steam-
693:, if those don't classify as catalogs, why does this? Those lists are similarly sprawling and I suspect difficult to maintain, perhaps more so since some games may only be released in certain regions on those platforms. 73: 172: 431:, the analogy isn't very good. Valve is not the only (or even a) PC manufacturer, so they don't have anything like the official branding those stores have. But I think those should be deleted as well per 785:
There are many other online shops similar to steam, and indeed it got much more popular and features probably thousands of titles in the future. Whats next, List of titles sold at walmarkt?
652:, I agree with Lulu that the delete side has a strong case. I also think it's true that it is becoming increasingly difficult to keep the list more or less complete. But I still find it a 656:
article, and I think there should be a little leeway in the rules for list articles that are useful. Some may argue this shouldn't be a factor, but it also appears that this article is
632:
concern here. However, the large majority of items listed have their own WP articles, and this is a proper way of aggregating related items with some annotation (hence not just a cat).
68: 127: 607:
I don't personally have the time to do that at the moment, and its a process I think would probably be easier from the ground up rather than through pruning, to be honest. --
166: 132: 545: 519: 496:. There's nothing intrinsically common to the elements of this list except that they can be bought at the same place. And it's not even the only place they're sold. 767:. Although the above 'fix' would to have the list only include games that are only (or primarily) purchased through steam, which seams like a more maintainable list. 335:- I'm completely aware of the number of editors. But the question remains, what is the encyclopedic benefit of this list, even if broken down into smaller lists? 377: 467:
And to add to this: Steam is not a unique distribution platform - nearly all games on it can be/were purchasable from other vendors. On the other hand, XBLA
100: 95: 104: 87: 312:
I'll also repeat esteemed editor Sabre's comments from the last AfD, which have not been materially changed by six months of time passing.
419:. User:Masem made a convincing argument. This is a list of software sold through a particular distribution channel. Are we going to have a 885: 866: 839: 815: 794: 777: 749: 726: 702: 669: 644: 616: 602: 584: 560: 534: 505: 483: 462: 444: 411: 389: 367: 344: 305: 280: 259: 242: 216: 52: 639: 593:
and maintenance wise. If you know what to prune to get just the Steam-only titles, you should fork the list while it's still around.
17: 857:. If the eventual outcome of this discussion is deletion, then a category for games sold via Steam should be created in it's place. 187: 316: 154: 428: 324: 471:
a unique platform for most of the games on that list. It is thus comparable to our lists of games for various consoles. --
633: 721: 597: 555: 529: 439: 900: 36: 493: 148: 489: 358:. The individual game articles dont appear to think Steam is notable as it is not mentioned on the few I looked at. 301: 144: 49: 420: 899:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
803: 355: 204: 91: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
718: 594: 552: 526: 436: 194: 876:
It's completely unusable. If anyone wants to find a list of games available they can go to steam's website
432: 854: 690: 83: 58: 811: 488:
I agree - Steam is a general distribution channel for all types of games. Equivalent articles would be
424: 363: 320: 297: 832: 745: 698: 665: 255: 236: 180: 850: 764: 629: 590: 293: 226: 160: 775: 680: 501: 340: 276: 212: 881: 790: 686: 385: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
807: 359: 826: 741: 694: 661: 612: 580: 479: 458: 407: 862: 251: 230: 657: 225:. This is a catalog. What's another word for catalog listing? Directory? Oh yeah, 768: 497: 336: 272: 208: 877: 786: 381: 121: 853:
might apply, but as has also been mentioned, this is very similar to pages like
608: 576: 472: 451: 400: 575:
would be far more useful, less directory-like and much more maintainable. --
354:
not really encyclopedic and any really notable content could be mentioned on
858: 717:
when anyone can go check out the list of titles from Steam's own site?
893:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
207:
is so popular it's become an unwieldy and unmaintainable list.
203:
At one point htis list might have been useful, but now that
74:
Articles for deletion/List of Steam titles (2nd nomination)
685:
I also don't really see the difference between this and
117: 113: 109: 179: 713:
How is an out of date list based on a single source
193: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 903:). No further edits should be made to this page. 849:as per Lulu and TastyCakes. yes, I can see that 378:list of video game related deletion discussions 546:list of Business-related deletion discussions 520:list of Software-related deletion discussions 8: 540: 514: 69:Articles for deletion/List of Steam titles 544:: This debate has been included in the 518:: This debate has been included in the 376:: This debate has been included in the 66: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 65: 24: 763:I'm not convinced this is under 589:That would be a good idea, both 494:List of games sold on Amazon.com 317:List of Games for Windows titles 806:with an appropriate citation. 490:List of games sold at Gamestop 429:List of Xbox Live Arcade games 325:List of Xbox Live Arcade games 1: 886:05:25, 6 February 2010 (UTC) 867:10:24, 1 February 2010 (UTC) 840:16:41, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 816:10:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 795:08:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 778:07:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 750:06:47, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 727:06:33, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 703:06:39, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 670:06:30, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 645:23:05, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 617:23:22, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 603:23:09, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 585:23:04, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 561:16:41, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 535:16:40, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 506:18:18, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 484:17:14, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 463:17:07, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 445:16:40, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 412:16:08, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 390:15:58, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 368:11:22, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 345:07:57, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 306:06:04, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 281:07:57, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 260:05:35, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 243:01:48, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 217:01:40, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 53:17:25, 6 February 2010 (UTC) 920: 421:List of iTunes Store songs 896:Please do not modify it. 804:Steam (content delivery) 628:. I can sort-of see the 356:Steam (content delivery) 32:Please do not modify it. 855:List of Xbox 360 games 691:List of Xbox 360 games 64:AfDs for this article: 425:List of WiiWare games 321:List of WiiWare games 84:List of Steam titles 59:List of Steam titles 658:quite well traveled 44:The result was 838: 724: 687:List of Wii games 684: 600: 563: 558: 549: 537: 532: 523: 442: 392: 911: 898: 837: 835: 824: 773: 722: 678: 642: 636: 598: 556: 550: 530: 524: 476: 455: 440: 404: 372: 298:Edward Vielmetti 239: 233: 198: 197: 183: 135: 125: 107: 34: 919: 918: 914: 913: 912: 910: 909: 908: 907: 901:deletion review 894: 833: 825: 769: 640: 634: 474: 453: 402: 237: 231: 140: 131: 98: 82: 79: 62: 50:Scott Mac (Doc) 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 917: 915: 906: 905: 889: 888: 870: 869: 843: 842: 818: 797: 780: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 732: 731: 730: 729: 708: 707: 706: 705: 673: 672: 647: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 564: 538: 512: 511: 510: 509: 508: 465: 414: 393: 370: 348: 347: 330: 309: 308: 286: 285: 284: 283: 263: 262: 245: 201: 200: 137: 133:AfD statistics 78: 77: 76: 71: 63: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 916: 904: 902: 897: 891: 890: 887: 883: 879: 875: 872: 871: 868: 864: 860: 856: 852: 848: 845: 844: 841: 836: 830: 829: 822: 819: 817: 813: 809: 805: 801: 798: 796: 792: 788: 784: 781: 779: 776: 774: 772: 766: 762: 759: 758: 751: 747: 743: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 728: 725: 720: 716: 712: 711: 710: 709: 704: 700: 696: 692: 688: 682: 681:edit conflict 677: 676: 675: 674: 671: 667: 663: 659: 655: 651: 648: 646: 643: 637: 631: 627: 624: 618: 614: 610: 606: 605: 604: 601: 596: 592: 588: 587: 586: 582: 578: 573: 568: 565: 562: 559: 554: 547: 543: 539: 536: 533: 528: 521: 517: 513: 507: 503: 499: 495: 491: 487: 486: 485: 481: 477: 470: 466: 464: 460: 456: 448: 447: 446: 443: 438: 434: 433:WP:NOTCATALOG 430: 426: 422: 418: 415: 413: 409: 405: 397: 394: 391: 387: 383: 379: 375: 371: 369: 365: 361: 357: 353: 350: 349: 346: 342: 338: 334: 331: 329: 326: 322: 318: 311: 310: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 288: 287: 282: 278: 274: 270: 267: 266: 265: 264: 261: 257: 253: 249: 246: 244: 240: 234: 228: 224: 221: 220: 219: 218: 214: 210: 206: 196: 192: 189: 186: 182: 178: 174: 171: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 146: 143: 142:Find sources: 138: 134: 129: 123: 119: 115: 111: 106: 102: 97: 93: 89: 85: 81: 80: 75: 72: 70: 67: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 895: 892: 873: 846: 827: 820: 799: 782: 770: 760: 714: 653: 649: 625: 571: 566: 541: 515: 468: 416: 395: 373: 351: 332: 313: 289: 268: 247: 222: 202: 190: 184: 176: 169: 163: 157: 151: 141: 46:no consensus 45: 43: 31: 28: 808:Marasmusine 360:MilborneOne 290:Strong Keep 167:free images 828:Cyclonenim 742:TastyCakes 695:TastyCakes 662:TastyCakes 851:WP:NOTDIR 765:WP:NOTDIR 630:WP:NOTDIR 591:WP:NOTDIR 423:? As for 294:WP:BETTER 252:SkyWalker 232:JBsupreme 227:WP:NOTDIR 771:MrMacMan 498:EeepEeep 337:EeepEeep 273:EeepEeep 209:EeepEeep 128:View log 878:Mike409 787:GBK2010 567:Comment 382:MrKIA11 333:Comment 269:Comment 173:WP refs 161:scholar 101:protect 96:history 874:Delete 821:Delete 800:Delete 783:Delete 715:useful 654:useful 417:Delete 396:Delete 352:Delete 223:Delete 145:Google 105:delete 834:Chat 635:LotLE 609:Sabre 577:Sabre 328:(UTC) 205:Steam 188:JSTOR 149:books 122:views 114:watch 110:links 16:< 882:talk 863:talk 859:RWJP 847:Keep 812:talk 791:talk 761:Keep 746:talk 723:ping 719:Pcap 699:talk 689:and 666:talk 650:Keep 641:talk 626:Keep 613:talk 599:ping 595:Pcap 581:talk 572:only 557:ping 553:Pcap 542:Note 531:ping 527:Pcap 516:Note 502:talk 475:ASEM 454:ASEM 441:ping 437:Pcap 427:and 403:ASEM 386:talk 374:Note 364:talk 341:talk 302:talk 277:talk 256:talk 248:Keep 238:talk 213:talk 181:FENS 155:news 118:logs 92:talk 88:edit 551:-- 525:-- 492:or 315:of 296:. 229:. 195:TWL 130:• 126:– ( 884:) 865:) 814:) 793:) 748:) 701:) 668:) 615:) 583:) 548:. 522:. 504:) 482:) 469:is 461:) 435:. 410:) 388:) 380:. 366:) 343:) 323:, 319:, 304:) 279:) 258:) 241:) 215:) 175:) 120:| 116:| 112:| 108:| 103:| 99:| 94:| 90:| 48:. 880:( 861:( 831:| 810:( 789:( 744:( 697:( 683:) 679:( 664:( 638:× 611:( 579:( 500:( 480:t 478:( 473:M 459:t 457:( 452:M 408:t 406:( 401:M 384:( 362:( 339:( 300:( 275:( 254:( 235:( 211:( 199:) 191:· 185:· 177:· 170:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 147:( 139:( 136:) 124:) 86:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Scott Mac (Doc)
17:25, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
List of Steam titles
Articles for deletion/List of Steam titles
Articles for deletion/List of Steam titles (2nd nomination)
List of Steam titles
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
AfD statistics
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Steam
EeepEeep

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.