272:"Knowledge is not a directory of people" doesn't apply here. As the sources point out, these particular YouTube persons have attained media attention, out of the thousands of videos on there. YouTube is notable, and some features on it are more notable than others. No matter how one feels about YouTube, one can't deny its existence.
516:
than a "list", and allow some things of fringe notability a passing mention. (Surely better than needing an ugly stub article for those things, or ignoring them.) Then again it may prompt people to want it deleted with even greater vigour. It's just an idea; take it as you will. •
502:. Ah now that is a good point. Some people aren't notable enough for articles, but are worthy of a mention to any rounded article on the subject of YouTube celebritism , which for better or for worse, seems to gather media attention. Perhaps I was wrong to suggest
247:. I disagree with the above comment: this article does have the potential to grow out of control. Youtube celebrities change from day to day and if we are just including anyone who someone considers a Youtube celebrity, this becomes ridiculous and void of
476:
I'm not sure that's the best option. Michael
Buckley and Daxflame both have huge followings, but each is the subject of only one mainstream news profile - not enough to support a Knowledge article. This is the only way for us to cover them.
226:
girls are one entity recently removed from the list for example. Rather than celebrities that was more of a viral video popular in one month of last year. Maybe there are other reasons why people should/should not be on the list also. •
87:
82:
77:
458:
I would be happy to go with Anakin's decision with deleting all the 'celebrities' that don't have articles. I think this list would is here instead of there being a category for it, which is probably the better
172:. It is not too out of control that it's unsalvageable, but it needs a bit of trimming. Entries without their own articles should probably be removed, whether there's an outside reference or not. Keep it to
72:
289:. If the items on the list are notable, the list itself can be notable, as well. Those entries who are not notable enough to warrant their own articles should probably be removed.
142:
115:
110:
119:
102:
624:
603:
586:
544:
523:
486:
468:
448:
430:
409:
382:
358:
335:
310:
293:
281:
264:
233:
208:
191:
162:
55:
619:
404:
353:
106:
17:
178:, and then it becomes a simple list for navigation on Knowledge. Then it won't be a directory, based on my understanding of
98:
61:
642:
426:
371:
52:
36:
641:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
464:
444:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
251:. I would not be opposed to a category for celebrities who are notable enough for their own article, such as
540:
482:
378:
331:
202:. If this is the case, would you be willing to trim down the list, or would anybody as a matter of fact?
613:
611:. Well-sourced and encyclopedic enough, but I wouldn't object to making this into a category instead...-
422:
400:
391:
349:
49:
599:
506:
was a good policy for this page. Perhaps a sentence/very short paragraph on each entry in the list
460:
440:
436:
277:
260:
536:
478:
374:
327:
306:
204:
158:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
301:. I agree, it should be limited to only those people who have established notability also. --
222:
578:
561:
395:
344:
595:
518:
390:
Sorry, I was referring to the nom's argument. I don't believe YouTube celebrities pass
319:
273:
256:
228:
183:
565:
512:(separate article or not), would be better. It would make for a fuller article, more
367:
323:
302:
252:
153:
136:
569:
248:
326:; but if you have any suggestions for improvement, feel free to voice them.
421:
I don't think there are too many people who care about YouTube celebrities.
220:. I would. Some people even if they have articles are not celebrities. The
290:
322:
and my arguments from the last AfD. I'm pretty sure it abides by
88:
Articles for deletion/List of YouTube celebrities (4th nomination)
83:
Articles for deletion/List of YouTube celebrities (3rd nomination)
78:
Articles for deletion/List of YouTube celebrities (2nd nomination)
635:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
370:
state we shouldn't have dynamic lists? Should we delete
132:
128:
124:
564:, it does have good references and notability. See:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
175:only people who have actual articles on Knowledge
73:Articles for deletion/List of YouTube celebrities
645:). No further edits should be made to this page.
343:per WP:NOT, this list will never be completed.
8:
509:establishing notability, with references
70:
180:Knowledge is not a directory of people
154:Knowledge is not a directory of people
7:
156:, therefore this should be deleted.
68:
24:
535:. I think that's a great idea.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
625:23:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
604:19:41, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
587:20:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
545:16:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
524:13:36, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
487:03:43, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
469:14:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
449:14:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
431:10:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
410:18:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
383:08:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
359:06:55, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
336:03:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
311:01:43, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
294:00:35, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
282:23:47, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
265:21:28, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
234:13:05, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
209:12:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
192:20:50, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
163:20:35, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
56:01:14, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
99:List of YouTube celebrities
62:List of YouTube celebrities
662:
504:"write the article first"
638:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
67:AfDs for this article:
392:Knowledge:Notability
560:While it does need
584:
408:
357:
653:
640:
581:
576:
572:
521:
398:
347:
231:
186:
140:
122:
34:
661:
660:
656:
655:
654:
652:
651:
650:
649:
643:deletion review
636:
623:
620:r e s e a r c h
579:
570:
519:
423:Masterpiece2000
396:Lord Sesshomaru
345:Lord Sesshomaru
229:
205:The Helpful One
184:
159:The Helpful One
113:
97:
94:
92:
65:
50:Yamamoto Ichiro
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
659:
657:
648:
647:
630:
628:
627:
617:
606:
589:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
527:
526:
492:
491:
490:
489:
461:Seriousspender
453:
452:
451:
441:Seriousspender
435:Sounds like a
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
338:
313:
296:
284:
267:
241:
240:
239:
238:
237:
236:
212:
211:
189:
188:
166:
165:
147:
146:
93:
91:
90:
85:
80:
75:
69:
66:
64:
59:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
658:
646:
644:
639:
633:
632:
631:
626:
622:
621:
616:
615:
610:
607:
605:
601:
597:
593:
590:
588:
585:
582:
574:
573:
567:
563:
559:
556:
555:
546:
542:
538:
537:Ichormosquito
534:
531:
530:
529:
528:
525:
522:
515:
511:
510:
505:
501:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
488:
484:
480:
479:Ichormosquito
475:
472:
471:
470:
466:
462:
457:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
433:
432:
428:
424:
420:
417:
411:
406:
402:
397:
393:
389:
386:
385:
384:
380:
376:
375:Ichormosquito
373:
372:all of these?
369:
365:
362:
361:
360:
355:
351:
346:
342:
339:
337:
333:
329:
328:Ichormosquito
325:
321:
317:
314:
312:
308:
304:
300:
297:
295:
292:
288:
285:
283:
279:
275:
271:
268:
266:
262:
258:
254:
253:Chris Crocker
250:
246:
243:
242:
235:
232:
225:
224:
219:
216:
215:
214:
213:
210:
207:
206:
201:
198:
197:
196:
195:
194:
193:
187:
181:
177:
176:
171:
168:
167:
164:
161:
160:
155:
152:
149:
148:
144:
138:
134:
130:
126:
121:
117:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
95:
89:
86:
84:
81:
79:
76:
74:
71:
63:
60:
58:
57:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
637:
634:
629:
618:
612:
608:
591:
575:
568:
557:
532:
513:
508:
507:
503:
499:
473:
455:
437:WP:IDONTCARE
418:
387:
363:
340:
315:
298:
286:
269:
244:
221:
217:
203:
199:
190:
179:
174:
173:
169:
157:
150:
45:
43:
31:
28:
366:Where does
249:notability
596:Dillio411
459:option.--
320:Mandsford
274:Mandsford
257:Redfarmer
562:clean-up
514:valuable
303:Revanche
143:View log
533:Comment
500:Comment
474:Comment
388:Comment
364:Comment
223:Whogasm
218:Comment
200:Comment
116:protect
111:history
571:Noah¢s
566:WP:ATD
520:Anakin
419:Delete
368:WP:NOT
341:Delete
324:WP:SAL
318:. Per
245:Delete
230:Anakin
185:Anakin
151:Delete
120:delete
614:h i s
405:edits
354:edits
182:. •
137:views
129:watch
125:links
16:<
609:Keep
600:talk
592:Keep
580:Talk
558:Keep
541:talk
483:talk
465:talk
456:Keep
445:talk
427:talk
401:talk
379:talk
350:talk
332:talk
316:Keep
307:talk
299:Keep
287:Keep
278:talk
270:Keep
261:talk
170:Keep
133:logs
107:talk
103:edit
46:keep
439:.--
291:RJC
141:– (
602:)
594:--
543:)
485:)
467:)
447:)
429:)
403:•
394:.
381:)
352:•
334:)
309:)
280:)
263:)
255:.
135:|
131:|
127:|
123:|
118:|
114:|
109:|
105:|
53:会話
48:.
598:(
583:)
577:(
539:(
481:(
463:(
443:(
425:(
407:)
399:(
377:(
356:)
348:(
330:(
305:(
276:(
259:(
145:)
139:)
101:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.