248:
which is likely the closest thing to reliable sourcing as we are likely to get. It is a news article which explicitly states "There is no official index for ranking the country's richest as very few individuals are keen to publicly declare their assets or overall wealth." And furthermore, their
266:, per Mazca & the rest. Yes, Robert Mugabe would likely make the list, but the other 4 names are based on the Answers.com Q & A forum which anyone can respond to without providing any proof. --
188:. God Emperor makes an excellent point - the current sources, as well as being very dodgy forum/wiki sources to start with, actively undermine the reliability of the information themselves. ~
139:
The two references are two forums in which the editor asked whether the information he put in the article was right, as if he had made them up. Most people disagreed with the information.
159:
99:
94:
103:
132:
86:
249:
methodology is "premised on available information gleaned from known investments on the stock market and elsewhere in the economy and public opinion." --
62:
17:
292:
275:
258:
229:
204:
175:
148:
68:
90:
244:. I've no objection tot he topic if verifiable informatin can be found, but I rather doubt it. My own search turns up
310:
36:
82:
74:
171:
309:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
213:
144:
288:
167:
52:
49:
271:
225:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
140:
284:
217:
254:
241:
185:
267:
221:
120:
245:
189:
250:
303:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
184:
unless better references can be found to comply with the
127:
116:
112:
108:
160:
list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
313:). No further edits should be made to this page.
283:per above, specifically lack of verifiability;
8:
154:
158:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
83:List of Zimbabweans by net worth
75:List of Zimbabweans by net worth
1:
330:
293:22:33, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
276:18:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
69:00:30, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
259:22:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
230:22:06, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
205:18:50, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
176:18:35, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
149:17:39, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
306:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
216:and not even close to
186:verifiability policy
44:The result was
218:reliable sourcing
178:
163:
321:
308:
202:
164:
130:
124:
106:
65:
60:
55:
34:
329:
328:
324:
323:
322:
320:
319:
318:
317:
311:deletion review
304:
190:
168:LinguistAtLarge
126:
97:
81:
78:
63:
58:
53:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
327:
325:
316:
315:
298:
296:
295:
278:
261:
240:- for failing
234:
233:
207:
179:
137:
136:
77:
72:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
326:
314:
312:
307:
301:
300:
299:
294:
290:
286:
282:
279:
277:
273:
269:
265:
262:
260:
256:
252:
247:
243:
242:verifiability
239:
236:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
212:Questionable
211:
208:
206:
203:
201:
197:
193:
187:
183:
180:
177:
174:
173:
169:
161:
157:
153:
152:
151:
150:
146:
142:
134:
129:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
66:
61:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
305:
302:
297:
280:
263:
246:this article
237:
209:
199:
195:
191:
181:
166:
155:
138:
45:
43:
31:
28:
141:God Emperor
285:Matt Deres
214:notability
133:View log
268:llywrch
232:wperdue
222:Wperdue
100:protect
95:history
50:King of
281:Delete
264:Delete
238:Delete
210:Delete
182:Delete
128:delete
104:delete
46:delete
131:) – (
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
289:talk
272:talk
255:talk
251:Whpq
226:talk
172:Talk
165:-- —
156:Note
145:talk
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
291:)
274:)
257:)
228:)
220:.
170:•
162:.
147:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
67:♠
48:.
287:(
270:(
253:(
224:(
200:a
198:c
196:z
194:a
192:m
143:(
135:)
125:(
123:)
85:(
64:♣
59:♦
54:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.