Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/List of broken election promises (Canada) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

254:. Burn it with fire. "Broken campaign promises" is empty political rhetoric, and this is going to attract a pile of trivial complaints that someone, somewhere called a broken promise. This is a magnet for POV lint, and if any of these topics are worth mentioning, they're already mentioned in the articles on the party, campaign, politican, bill, etc. No, no, no. - 169:
of items such a list would contain, as it involves nearly every provincial and federal campaign promise and budget right back to Confederation and before into colonial times. Political articles are inherently POV to start with, as with history; but there are grounds to consider a line-cited list of
179:
be a straightforward list; Trudeau said "no wage and price controls" and wham bam we had wage and price controls in his next term; Mulroney said "no free trade" and what we got was the FTA. Chretien said "end the GST" and we got the GST". here in BC, Campbell said he wouldnt' seel BC Rail or BC
188:
history of them, not just the recent/modern ones. Another potential list of this kind is "List of XXX party donators who receieved government contracts", which again sounds POV in nature but is really a matter-of-fact assemblage of facts (also easily sourceable via
174:
POV, or have a POV effect. It's like any list of scandals, which are in the eye of the beholder; but when the beholder is the public, and the major media, theyr'e certifiable realities, POV or not. It's not a matter of partisanship, or doesn't have to be; it
131: 180:
Hydro, and that's exactly what he did. Listing facts which have negative impacts on the perceptions of those who committed them is not POV; it's partisan selection, or partisan commentary, that would be. I say
90: 85: 94: 184:, though I think separate lists shoudl be made for each province/territory and the federal government (omitting cities except maybe the biggest ones). And if an effort is made to encompass the 77: 224:
Entirely dependent on one's PoV in both editing and reading. As it stands, it seems to be entirely focused on transgressions of the Liberal party, and so should be considered suspect. --
123: 239: 423: 406: 387: 369: 354: 324: 307: 274: 246: 212: 203:
And not Original Research, either, as the journalistic sources have doen all the research; and the rest is on-line courtesy of disclosure laws.
198: 157: 140: 59: 269: 170:
particulars, and there's lots of sources for that (journalism as well as opposition/rival party analyses). Some facts just inherently
17: 81: 73: 65: 395:
unmaintainable, and any charge of "breaking promises" can always have alternate POVs explaining why it isn't a broken promise.
438: 36: 232: 437:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
265: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
367: 225: 345: 295: 255: 419: 363: 208: 194: 378: 303: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
291: 401: 336: 320: 136: 333: 287: 283: 154: 55: 132:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of broken election promises (United States)
415: 204: 190: 299: 315:
per nom - totally unencyclopedic for the reasons identified by the above editors.
111: 396: 316: 50: 362:
like the US variant. THis can't be verified without breaking policy. -
431:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
149:
per my reasoning with the United States version. (Never
118: 107: 103: 99: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 441:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 414:Hopelessly subjective and unmaintainable. 74:List of broken election promises (Canada) 66:List of broken election promises (Canada) 165:My main issue with this is the sheer 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 134:. Unencyclopedic, OR, POV, etc. 1: 458: 377:- unmaintainable and POV. 434:Please do not modify it. 60:20:55, 11 May 2009 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 424:23:14, 7 May 2009 (UTC) 407:08:50, 7 May 2009 (UTC) 388:06:53, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 370:12:32, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 355:00:21, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 325:23:30, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 308:22:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 275:21:28, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 247:21:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 213:20:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 199:20:08, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 158:18:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 141:18:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 44:The result was 386: 385: 273: 449: 436: 384: 383: 381: 351: 350: 342: 341: 263: 261: 244: 237: 230: 139: 121: 115: 97: 34: 457: 456: 452: 451: 450: 448: 447: 446: 445: 439:deletion review 432: 379: 348: 347: 339: 338: 257: 240: 233: 226: 135: 117: 88: 72: 69: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 455: 453: 444: 443: 427: 426: 409: 390: 372: 357: 327: 310: 277: 249: 219: 218: 217: 216: 215: 128: 127: 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 454: 442: 440: 435: 429: 428: 425: 421: 417: 413: 410: 408: 405: 404: 400: 399: 394: 391: 389: 382: 376: 375:Delete + salt 373: 371: 368: 365: 361: 358: 356: 353: 352: 344: 343: 335: 331: 328: 326: 322: 318: 314: 311: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 281: 278: 276: 271: 267: 262: 260: 253: 250: 248: 245: 243: 238: 236: 231: 229: 223: 220: 214: 210: 206: 202: 201: 200: 196: 192: 187: 183: 178: 173: 168: 164: 161: 160: 159: 156: 152: 148: 145: 144: 143: 142: 138: 133: 125: 120: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 61: 57: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 433: 430: 411: 402: 397: 392: 380:Exit2DOS2000 374: 359: 346: 337: 329: 312: 279: 258: 251: 241: 234: 227: 221: 189:journalism). 185: 181: 176: 171: 166: 162: 150: 146: 129: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 340:shirulashem 182:Strong Keep 296:WP:SOAPBOX 153:be NPOV)-- 137:KuyaBriBri 256:A Man In 155:Unionhawk 416:CJCurrie 270:past ops 266:conspire 235:Squadron 205:Skookum1 191:Skookum1 130:Compare 124:View log 300:Bearcat 292:WP:NPOV 163:Comment 91:protect 86:history 412:Delete 393:Delete 360:Delete 349:(talk) 330:Delete 317:Nick-D 313:Delete 280:Delete 252:Delete 222:Delete 167:volume 147:Delete 119:delete 95:delete 46:delete 334:WP:OR 288:WP:RS 284:WP:OR 259:Bl♟ck 242:Raven 186:whole 122:) – ( 112:views 104:watch 100:links 16:< 420:talk 332:per 321:talk 304:talk 228:Blue 209:talk 195:talk 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 56:talk 51:Cirt 403:Mod 398:Yob 364:Mgm 177:can 172:are 151:can 422:) 323:) 306:) 298:. 294:, 290:, 286:, 282:. 268:- 211:) 197:) 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 58:) 48:. 418:( 366:| 319:( 302:( 272:) 264:( 207:( 193:( 126:) 116:( 114:) 76:( 54:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Cirt
talk
20:55, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
List of broken election promises (Canada)
List of broken election promises (Canada)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of broken election promises (United States)
KuyaBriBri
18:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Unionhawk
18:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Skookum1
talk
20:08, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Skookum1
talk
20:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Blue

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.