291:; this is hopeless. This list depends on the inherently subjective "significant" and "well-known". Also, what does "failure" mean? What happens when X is acquired by Y and re branded (is that a failure of the original brand?); what if the business was closed for non-financial reasons? What about a brand that was ended for business reasons unrelated to direct success (companies end product lines and subsidiaries all the time for numerous reasons). Any definition made generic enough to be objective, OTOH, would then be so inclusive as to include
398:. Note that this has the same premise as the nominated article, but it is way more organized, and offers explanations for why the films were not successful. We could transfer the same theory to this article. The problem with this article is that there is way too many examples listed, and no explanations to why they failed. It needs a good rewrite, but I think this article could be very well written.
502:
and spruce up the AFD'd article to be at or close to par with the list I linked, or should that be AFD'd as well? I know that OSE, but if this AFD'd article had the quality and worksmanship as the example article I linked (and possibly renamed to sound NPOV), would it not have been AFD'd in the first
276:"significant companies who met the eventual demise of their well-known brand"...that's far, far too vague to give any indication of what companies should go here. If there's consensus for a list similar to this, it should be reworked from scratch.
223:
89:
84:
416:, second you can't compare that article to box office bombs because the issue with this is a hopelessly vauge and NPOV problem with the word "failure" and the topic (a list of businesses) a rename won't help in this problem.
191:
79:
185:
144:
151:
458:
361:), "failures" is poorly defined, and the lead's mention of corporate crime implies certain things about the articles that might need to be better sourced. Listcruft.
226:
but that was closed as a keep for invalid rationales, as this list is a strongly subjective list without any potential for cleanup as "failures" is a word that fails
308:
117:
112:
121:
104:
525:
a copy and paste duplication of subject article and a copyright violation, if this article is kept then please consider using move function, thanks.
499:
534:
513:
490:
470:
449:
420:
407:
384:
372:
322:
299:
283:
267:
241:
62:
206:
173:
17:
167:
413:
436:
344:
553:
40:
358:
163:
510:
264:
108:
250:
213:
254:
522:
395:
100:
68:
381:
549:
530:
403:
36:
179:
399:
317:
199:
380:- Define "failure" in the context of this list? Pretty difficult. So is maintaining this article.
366:
486:
466:
280:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
548:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
227:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
526:
507:
431:
338:
261:
352:
231:
312:
53:
363:
482:
462:
277:
138:
504:
441:
417:
334:
258:
238:
224:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of business failures (2nd nomination)
348:
296:
430:- Pretty much per Howicus. The context of this list is much too vague.
295:(there are many closed corporations than there are extant ones). —
542:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
90:
Articles for deletion/List of business failures (3rd nomination)
85:
Articles for deletion/List of business failures (2nd nomination)
481:- Unmanageably overbroad topic with inherent inclusion issues.
249:: I would suppose it gets retitled to something NPOV, like
134:
130:
126:
198:
212:
234:, and businesses go out of business all the time
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
556:). No further edits should be made to this page.
80:Articles for deletion/List of business failures
459:list of Business-related deletion discussions
8:
457:Note: This debate has been included in the
307:Note: This debate has been included in the
456:
309:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
306:
500:List of defunct automobile manufacturers
77:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
75:
24:
511:Knowledge (XXG): Dusty Articles
265:Knowledge (XXG): Dusty Articles
1:
535:19:30, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
63:03:19, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
514:19:27, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
498:Could we take this example:
491:01:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
471:00:24, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
450:23:23, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
421:23:17, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
408:21:10, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
385:00:25, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
373:21:54, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
323:21:39, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
300:21:14, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
284:20:02, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
268:19:57, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
251:List of shuttered businesses
242:19:44, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
573:
255:List of former coporations
523:List of defunct companies
101:List of business failures
69:List of business failures
545:Please do not modify it.
396:List of box office bombs
32:Please do not modify it.
293:most corporations ever
74:AfDs for this article:
412:First thing of all,
257:. Just a thought. --
414:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
394:- Take the article
222:Same rationale as
48:The result was
473:
382:Narutolovehinata5
325:
232:original research
564:
547:
447:
444:
439:
434:
369:
333:As mentioned by
320:
315:
281:(Did I mess up?)
217:
216:
202:
154:
142:
124:
60:
34:
572:
571:
567:
566:
565:
563:
562:
561:
560:
554:deletion review
543:
445:
442:
437:
432:
367:
318:
313:
159:
150:
115:
99:
96:
94:
72:
54:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
570:
568:
559:
558:
538:
537:
516:
493:
475:
474:
453:
452:
425:
424:
423:
388:
387:
375:
327:
326:
303:
302:
286:
220:
219:
156:
95:
93:
92:
87:
82:
76:
73:
71:
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
569:
557:
555:
551:
546:
540:
539:
536:
532:
528:
524:
521:just deleted
520:
517:
515:
512:
509:
506:
501:
497:
494:
492:
488:
484:
480:
477:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
455:
454:
451:
448:
440:
435:
429:
426:
422:
419:
415:
411:
410:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
390:
389:
386:
383:
379:
376:
374:
371:
370:
365:
360:
357:
354:
350:
346:
343:
340:
336:
332:
329:
328:
324:
321:
316:
310:
305:
304:
301:
298:
294:
290:
287:
285:
282:
279:
275:
272:
271:
270:
269:
266:
263:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
243:
240:
237:
233:
229:
225:
215:
211:
208:
205:
201:
197:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
165:
162:
161:Find sources:
157:
153:
149:
146:
140:
136:
132:
128:
123:
119:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
97:
91:
88:
86:
83:
81:
78:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
544:
541:
518:
495:
478:
427:
391:
377:
362:
355:
341:
330:
292:
288:
273:
246:
245:
235:
221:
209:
203:
195:
188:
182:
176:
170:
160:
147:
56:
55:
49:
47:
31:
28:
527:MilborneOne
400:RomeEonBmbo
186:free images
319:talk to me
550:talk page
503:place? --
463:• Gene93k
314:Jinkinson
57:Wizardman
37:talk page
552:or in a
359:contribs
345:contribs
145:View log
39:or in a
519:Comment
496:Comment
483:Carrite
368:Faraone
278:Howicus
247:Comment
228:WP:NPOV
192:WP refs
180:scholar
118:protect
113:history
508:Update
505:Let Us
479:Delete
428:Delete
418:Secret
378:Delete
335:Secret
331:Delete
289:Delete
274:Delete
262:Update
259:Let Us
239:Secret
236:Delete
164:Google
122:delete
50:delete
349:Coren
297:Coren
207:JSTOR
168:books
152:Stats
139:views
131:watch
127:links
16:<
531:talk
487:talk
467:talk
404:Talk
392:Keep
353:talk
339:talk
230:and
200:FENS
174:news
135:logs
109:talk
105:edit
347:),
253:or
214:TWL
143:– (
533:)
489:)
469:)
461:.
446:JM
443:N7
406:)
311:.
194:)
137:|
133:|
129:|
125:|
120:|
116:|
111:|
107:|
52:.
529:(
485:(
465:(
438:C
433:T
402:(
364:L
356:·
351:(
342:·
337:(
218:)
210:·
204:·
196:·
189:·
183:·
177:·
171:·
166:(
158:(
155:)
148:·
141:)
103:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.