Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/List of compositions by Franz Liszt (S.1 - S.350) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

425:- it's not a directory. A list of a composer's notable compositions, or an actor's film appearances, a sculptor's sculptures, etc. does not constitute a directory. Especially considering that the vast majority are links to Knowledge (XXG) articles. If a person has so many accomplishments that an expansion list is called for, then it's a legitimate list, and 217:
Nothing wrong with a Liszt list. One of the great composers, as anyone who's ever played 'Consolation' will attest. This information is obviously encyclopedic but equally can't go into his main biographical article, it seems an obvious thing to have and a strange thing to want to delete. Many of
356:
policy that you keep referring to, "Of course, there is nothing wrong with having lists if their entries are famous because they are associated with or significantly contributed to the list topic". Perhaps you should have another read of the guidelines (including
171:
says that "Of course, there is nothing wrong with having lists if their entries are famous because they are associated with or significantly contributed to the list topic, for example Nixon's Enemies List." Certainly as long as
87: 82: 91: 74: 78: 114: 70: 62: 155:
and certainly a list of his compositions, which are far too great in number to be included in the Franz Liszt main article, is both 100% encyclopedic and verifiable. --
173: 177: 477: 456: 417: 401: 385: 365: 307: 291: 275: 253: 234: 222: 205: 188: 159: 130: 56: 397:, there is absolutely nothing wrong with having lists of works in this encyclopedia of ours, especially when we're talking such famous artists as Liszt. 181: 374: 17: 218:
these individual pieces could have their own articles and this list might turn into a useful repository of red links still to do.
337: 121:
This article fails WP:NOT#DIR. Per policy it should be deleted. Rememeber Knowledge (XXG) is not a list. :) Thanks !
377:, not attempt to delete an article based only on standards you wish WP:NOT#DIR had. Otherwise this AfD appears a case of 248: 373:- Kosh Volrlon, if you want WP:NOT#DIR to mean that no lists are allowed, you have to make your case at the talk page of 492: 36: 491:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
413:
article, in the same way that many important writers or composers have a separate article to list their works.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
198: 325: 434: 287:: Sometimes I'm glad punnery is not a bannable offense. Even for megaton-warhead classes of puns. ARGH! — 167:- I'm less than certain about what procedure I'm supposed to use here, but I'd like to point out that 333: 185: 272: 378: 358: 144: 475: 243: 219: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
264: 147:, not to mention the text of WP:NOT#DIR that clearly states lists are permitted per policy. 288: 353: 168: 140: 465: 414: 329: 123: 152: 382: 304: 268: 156: 468: 242:
Liszt's contributions are prolific enough that this is not an unnecessary article.
202: 49: 108: 410: 362: 317:
WP is not a list - that's spelled out in WP:NOT#DIR. This item up for deletion
231: 148: 151:(no pun intended) was one of the most prolific and popular composers of the 398: 321:
a list. NO brainer - it fails WP:NOT#DIR. 17:33, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
184:'s are considered relevant information, Liszt's should be as well.-- 485:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
230:. Nominator seems to have misunderstood the guidelines.-- 104: 100: 96: 143:". Perhaps the nom should become acquainted with 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 263:, I will assume good faith but this easily passes 71:List of compositions by Franz Liszt (S.1 - S.350) 63:List of compositions by Franz Liszt (S.1 - S.350) 495:). No further edits should be made to this page. 139:- Just by being a list doesn't mean it "fails 471:Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! 8: 375:Knowledge (XXG):What Knowledge (XXG) is not 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 361:) and reconsider this nomination.-- 24: 303:not sure why this was nominated. 1: 478:04:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC) 457:06:32, 16 October 2007 (UTC) 418:21:26, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 402:20:23, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 386:18:40, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 366:17:47, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 308:17:11, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 292:19:17, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 276:15:28, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 254:14:49, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 235:12:57, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 223:12:48, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 206:12:40, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 189:15:18, 13 October 2007 (UTC) 160:05:43, 13 October 2007 (UTC) 131:19:24, 12 October 2007 (UTC) 57:01:26, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 512: 488:Please do not modify it. 197:This AfD nomination was 128:".. We are ALL Kosh..." 32:Please do not modify it. 409:- This complements the 201:. It is listed now. 176:'s compositions or 342: 328:comment added by 503: 490: 472: 452: 449: 446: 443: 440: 437: 341: 322: 251: 246: 126: 112: 94: 54: 34: 511: 510: 506: 505: 504: 502: 501: 500: 499: 493:deletion review 486: 470: 450: 447: 444: 441: 438: 435: 352:, to quote the 323: 249: 244: 122: 85: 69: 66: 50: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 509: 507: 498: 497: 481: 480: 459: 431:a directory. 420: 404: 391: 390: 389: 388: 368: 344: 343: 311: 310: 297: 296: 295: 294: 279: 278: 257: 256: 237: 225: 211: 210: 209: 208: 192: 191: 162: 119: 118: 65: 60: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 508: 496: 494: 489: 483: 482: 479: 476: 474: 473: 467: 463: 460: 458: 455: 454: 453: 430: 429: 424: 421: 419: 416: 412: 408: 405: 403: 400: 396: 393: 392: 387: 384: 380: 376: 372: 369: 367: 364: 360: 355: 351: 348: 347: 346: 345: 339: 335: 331: 327: 320: 316: 313: 312: 309: 306: 302: 299: 298: 293: 290: 286: 283: 282: 281: 280: 277: 274: 270: 266: 262: 259: 258: 255: 252: 247: 241: 240:Snowball keep 238: 236: 233: 229: 226: 224: 221: 216: 213: 212: 207: 204: 200: 196: 195: 194: 193: 190: 187: 183: 179: 175: 170: 166: 163: 161: 158: 154: 150: 146: 142: 138: 135: 134: 133: 132: 129: 125: 116: 110: 106: 102: 98: 93: 89: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 67: 64: 61: 59: 58: 55: 53: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 487: 484: 469: 461: 433: 432: 427: 426: 422: 406: 394: 370: 349: 324:— Preceding 318: 314: 300: 284: 260: 239: 227: 220:Nick mallory 214: 164: 153:Romantic era 136: 127: 120: 51: 45: 43: 31: 28: 411:Franz Liszt 407:Strong keep 395:Strong keep 289:Quasirandom 228:Speedy Keep 149:Franz Liszt 466:Goochelaar 415:Goochelaar 354:WP:NOT#DIR 330:KoshVorlon 199:incomplete 169:WP:NOT#DIR 141:WP:NOT#DIR 124:KoshVorlon 464:- as per 186:Sermesara 383:Oakshade 379:WP:POINT 359:WP:LISTS 338:contribs 326:unsigned 305:Ridernyc 269:Dhartung 265:WP:LISZT 157:Oakshade 145:WP:LISTS 115:View log 371:Comment 350:Comment 285:Comment 203:DumbBOT 182:Debussy 88:protect 83:history 52:JForget 363:Michig 315:Delete 232:Michig 180:'s or 178:Chopin 92:delete 109:views 101:watch 97:links 16:< 462:Keep 439:e Tr 423:Keep 381:. -- 334:talk 301:Keep 273:Talk 267:. -- 261:Keep 250:varr 215:Keep 174:Bach 165:Keep 137:Keep 105:logs 79:talk 75:edit 46:Keep 451:ist 448:man 442:ans 428:not 399:96T 245:Yng 113:– ( 445:hu 436:Th 340:) 336:• 319:is 271:| 107:| 103:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 81:| 77:| 48:-- 332:( 117:) 111:) 73:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
JForget
01:26, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
List of compositions by Franz Liszt (S.1 - S.350)
List of compositions by Franz Liszt (S.1 - S.350)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
KoshVorlon
19:24, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
WP:NOT#DIR
WP:LISTS
Franz Liszt
Romantic era
Oakshade
05:43, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
WP:NOT#DIR
Bach
Chopin
Debussy
Sermesara
15:18, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑