1203:
laws based on them, then the article would be valid for
Knowledge. The one entry that stands out now is the one that states there were 130,000 people signing a petition. But the reference links to a totally unrelated article about a cat. Also, was it groups signing a petition, or sending in their signature, or just internet voting, and can you be certain it was accurate? If someone were to find a list of all the laws passed about animal cruelty in Canada throughout history, and see if any actual cases sparked them, then that'd certainly be encyclopedic.
233:. While this in theory covers the BLP1E issues raised in the AfD, it is entirely against the consensus and conclusions decided. The cases listed in these articles are not notable cases, but rather simply attempts to include potentially BLP violating information previously ruled unfit for the encyclopedia. Now, if this were to be revamped to consist only of cases that would be considered more notable/significant it would be a different story, but for all I know those don't even exist (maybe they do). As of now, this is equivalent of
944:- This is exactly what has been done here: even better, instead of having single event articles of dubious individual notability, a stronger list has been made. Therefore it is absolutely misleading and improper to refer of the deletion of the individual entries: information which is not suited to its own article can be instead be destinated to a comprehensive, larger article (per
426:
earlier discussions still applies (and thanks to nom for the citation!): no matter how appalling these people's actions may be, Knowledge does not exist as the public shaming wall for every last dumbass who happens to commit a crime, and no evidence has been presented that any of these people, or their acts of animal cruelty, have attained sufficient
763:- which is pretty clear wording that it is about the suitability of a stand-alone bio: no more, no less. And in fact many BLP1E articles have been preserved, by converting them in articles about the event, trimming the biographical information that is not related to the event, and so on: exactly what BLP1E
1202:
Since there are thousands of cases of animal cruelty that are mentioned in the news each year, I don't think you can possibly list all of them. If someone could find cases that were notable based on them resulting in sufficiently large protest or petitions, or having elected officials pass stronger
425:
living people in the article and not just naming them in the context of a narrative depiction of an overall story — Iists of smooshed-together biographies of non-notable people are still biographies of non-notable people no matter what the article's title is or isn't. That said, my argument in the
636:
satisfy the specific conditions under which you are allowed to include information about BLP1E's in
Knowledge. (You might want, for starters, to think very carefully about the rather big difference between "article about an event" and "list of (unrelated) events".) Any information at all about a
225:"As sad as acts of animal cruelty may be, they're not in and of themselves sufficient to make a person notable enough to be permanently included in an encyclopedia, except in extraordinary circumstances which I don't see being claimed here. Public shaming of criminals is not what we're here for."
683:
I disagree that BLP1E applies to something else than independent biographical articles, and also I disagree a list of events is akin to a list of BLPs. You are conflating "BLP, broadly meaning, applies to every part of WP" (true) with the fact that there is a section of BLPs that talks about a
564:
article, regardless of its title, that contains information about living people at all. It doesn't matter whether the information is sitting in a standalone bio or a subsection of a list — if it contains any information about a living person at all, it's still subject to all the BLP rules.
1454:
Yep. Nobody is defending the morally bankrupt jackasses that abuse animals, but this is not the village stocks, it is an encyclopedia and IAR is not applicable as what you propose does not improve the encyclopedia, which is the one and only reason for ignoring a rule.
1493:: Per other arguments above and, too many to list everything significant, by nature, must cherry-pick. Bummer though, and I vote this was as a member of wikiproject animals, but would be like "list of rapists in the United States" or something.
178:
1041:
Yes, they are still subject to BLP1E. This is not an article about a single event in which these people played properly sourced roles within a narrative depiction of that single event — it's just a list of discrete, unrelated events whose
256:. NOTNEWS discusses the encylopedia as a whole and how to distinguish between minor and noteworthy news stories. The principle is still violated by an article whose purpose seems to be to collect NOTNEWS failing stories into one place.--
358:
only three days earlier. This is basically a matter of G4 via different means and is pretty poor form. The handful of minor cases added since to make this article more substantive isn't convincing. This is just a way to sidestep
1124:"Note that this list consists largely of two articles previously deleted by overwhelming consensus on grounds of non-notability and WP:BLP violations. Knowledge is not a platform for advocacy and 'righting great wrongs'"
1234:, per the COATRACK and BLP issues identified above. It seems to me to not be particularly encyclopedic, as it bundles together a bunch of events of unclear notability. Anything of significance could instead be added to
1396:
I'm voting keep on IAR grounds. Any low-life that beats an animal needs to have their name put into cyberspace for eternity, same is true for any low-life that beats a child. I say name 'em and shame 'em
104:
99:
108:
631:
an article about a specific event in which these six people all had defined, verifiable roles; it's just a list of non-notable BLPs made over in unconvincing "but it's a list of events!" drag that does
172:
91:
1024:
Surely they are, but they are not subject to BLP1E. This is an article about the events. I understand this is going to be a snow delete, but I'm perplexed about the way policy is twisted here. --
761:
Being in the news does not in itself mean that someone should be the subject of a
Knowledge article. We should generally avoid having an article on a person when each of three conditions is met:
594:
is the subsection of that policy that specifically applies to the existence of an independent article for people of low notability and known only for one event. That's what it forbids. It
1469:
Agreed. Even if I'm the lonely keep !vote above, for sure name-and-shame is not the reason I feel this should be kept, and it should not be actually the reason for any decision here.--
701:
Nothing in BLP1E states or even implies that it only applies to one particular type of article; rather, it governs what we can and cannot write about people who fall under BLP1E in
1046:
substantive content is formerly four, now suddenly six smooshed-together BLPs. If, say, instead of animal cruelty charges these people were being discussed for their roles in the
138:
885:
64:. I can't see any benefit in keeping info that several have argued violates BLP, something we must take seriously, for even a few more days just to be sure we reach 7 days.
1440:
If you wanted to start your own separate "name and shame the lowlifes" website somewhere else, I wouldn't stop you. But that is not, and will not become, Knowledge's role.
131:
214:
287:
989:
violations by themselves, but BLP1E applies to the existence of a separate, individual article. There is just some trimming to be made here and there in the text. --
884:
Note: given the WP:BLP policy issues raised during discussions at the previous AfD's for the
Whitlock and Lucas articles, I have asked for input on this article at
969:
But a list article where all 4 entries would not be considered noteworthy enough to remain cannot be trimmed, simply cleared, which doesn't really get anywhere.--
210:
1157:
332:
272:
302:
193:
460:
317:
160:
602:. Regardless of the destiny of this specific article, it would be nice if policies are quoted and understood correctly and not merely handwaved. See
1499:
1477:
1464:
1449:
1431:
1388:
1371:
1346:
1325:
1299:
1276:
1251:
1226:
1194:
1146:
1095:
1032:
1015:
997:
976:
960:
916:
897:
875:
834:
813:
787:
750:
692:
674:
614:
574:
547:
526:
510:
480:
451:
404:
380:
339:
324:
309:
294:
279:
263:
244:
73:
1059:
796:
That quote certainly precludes standalone articles about BLP1Es, I won't (and didn't) argue with that. But it doesn't contain even one word which
60:
concerns (which have not been rebutted and in fact were reinforced by some comments), and the fact that at least part of the article falls under
229:
The user who created these articles and strongest advocate for their existence during the AfD stated he would keep them on the encyclopedia by
154:
637:
living person still has to pass BLP1E conditions: you cannot, for instance, get around them just by merging the exact same information into a
948:
as well). I agree entries should be trimmed, but this is a mere editing issue. So far everything seems fairly sourced, so I see no serious
150:
539:
of the articles violated BLP1E, but most material is germane and well sourced, and therefore suitable to a more general parent article.--
1359:
866:, as recreation of WP:BLP-violating material already deleted at previous AfD's. Knowledge is not a platform for animal rights activism.
95:
1289:
a
Knowledge article that ostensibly discusses the nominal subject, but in reality is a cover for a tangentially related biased subject.
1259:
I am pretty much opposed to any "list of every incident of a very common type ever" on general principle, and this one is obviously a
200:
1066:
the fact that you could neither add personal information to the main article nor spin off separate standalone biographies. It's the
1354:. As per Giant Snowman. It is a BLP nightmare of non-notable people that are listed in a hall of shame tabloid article here at WP.
87:
79:
1176:
1379:
Name-and-shame is not
Knowledge's role. Campaigns against animal cruelty are great, but they must not be conducted at Knowledge.
725:
on the grounds that that's the type of animal he was convicted of cruelty toward, BLP1E would suddenly be applicable directly to
17:
1047:
166:
1342:
234:
1070:, not the title, that constitutes the difference between whether an article is about "events" or "people" — and the
600:" In such cases, it is usually better to merge the information and redirect the person's name to the event article."
1135:
1518:
942:
In such cases, it is usually better to merge the information and redirect the person's name to the event article.
493:
and this "article" is just the result of you not liking those results. Take your list-of-deleted-content idea to
40:
1338:
1054:
article — but you would still be violating BLP1E if you added personal information about their private lives
721:
with the information. For instance, even if you tried to add information about Jordan Dale Lucas directly to
1140:
913:
893:
871:
519:
A list is not simply a collection of material found too BLP-violating to be included in its own article.--
1514:
1189:
1172:
1167:
for ridiculous BLP concerns and the article's fundamental nature as, as
Laurent puts it, a coatrack for
1130:
503:
373:
336:
321:
306:
291:
276:
36:
1460:
1272:
1247:
464:
237:
including only local bank heists, grocery store robberies, and carjackings to shame specific people.
1367:
490:
355:
186:
1475:
1384:
1309:
1297:
1284:
1264:
1239:
1235:
1030:
995:
958:
945:
886:
Knowledge:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#List of cruelty to animal incidents in Canada
832:
823:
785:
776:
690:
665:
covers what type of content the event's article is or isn't allowed to contain about the person.
612:
545:
389:
69:
367:'ing unrelated cases together to form an article. Delete this and trout/reprimand the creator.
1445:
1321:
1168:
1091:
1011:
910:
889:
867:
809:
746:
670:
641:
of unrelated non-notable incidents instead of six separate unrelated non-notable biographies.
570:
468:
447:
393:
253:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1513:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1204:
1180:
973:
729:
as long as that information was present in the article — and even if you give the article a
603:
523:
498:
368:
260:
241:
1337:- Grouping together a list of unencyclopedic incidents does not make an encyclopedic list.
1456:
1399:
1355:
1313:
1268:
1243:
986:
937:
929:
775:, mostly, certainly not because of BLP1E. If there are further doubts, I suggest BLP/N or
772:
591:
476:
414:
364:
360:
657:
1E, no matter what article it's in — even where mentioning a person in an event article
1494:
1363:
53:
1470:
1380:
1292:
1260:
1025:
990:
953:
949:
827:
780:
685:
650:
607:
587:
557:
540:
494:
65:
61:
57:
1441:
1317:
1087:
1007:
805:
742:
666:
566:
443:
398:
218:
417:
issues that pertained to the separate articles. Rather, BLP rules including BLP1E
125:
970:
520:
427:
257:
238:
489:
Your "list" is just a compilation of material previously deleted by community
472:
684:
certain type of articles. However thank you for clarifying your position. --
1312:, given that it's serving to present negative information about a bunch of
354:
which was basically a cut-paste combination of the two articles deleted by
1156:
Note: This discussion has been included in the
Article Rescue Squadron's
767:
advices to do. About your example: the information would not be added to
463:
or annotated list is allowed at
Knowledge. Each item on the list is
471:. This article should be kept and expanded not deleted. Thank you
467:
with several citations from internationally recognized third-party
1507:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1058:
of the event itself, or if you created a separate non-narrative
733:
that calls it a list of events instead of a list of people, the
924:- Yes, previous deletions of the individual articles about the
768:
726:
722:
1060:
List of people involved in the 2012 Burlington VIA derailment
1358:
is fine but if we keep this article then next we will have
705:
article to which any content at all about a BLP1E could
421:
still applicable here, because we're giving information
1078:
who are still not notable enough for
Knowledge to have
1074:
here is still six distinct BLP1E sketches of unrelated
709:
be added. No matter what the article's title is, BLP1E
560:
and all of its subclauses, including BLP1E, applies to
409:
Actually, just one minor quibble; this format actually
351:
230:
121:
117:
113:
1316:
under the guise of being a list of notable incidents.
185:
936:
is instead perfectly allowed and allowable. In fact,
645:
information about a living person still has to meet
350:- the nominator's statement rings true based on the
1050:, their names could be mentioned in context within
217:were closed overwhelmingly as delete. As stated by
1360:People who have been seen kicking a dog in Spuzzum
231:copying and pasting them into this current article
717:places specific limits on what you can or cannot
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1521:). No further edits should be made to this page.
223:
288:list of Organisms-related deletion discussions
598:merging the information in a parent article:
199:
88:List of cruelty to animal incidents in Canada
80:List of cruelty to animal incidents in Canada
8:
1177:List of things some seriously evil jerks did
627:only apply to independent articles. This is
331:Note: This debate has been included in the
316:Note: This debate has been included in the
301:Note: This debate has been included in the
286:Note: This debate has been included in the
271:Note: This debate has been included in the
459:- Hello, I am the author of the article. A
434:encyclopedia for what could potentially be
333:list of Events-related deletion discussions
273:list of Canada-related deletion discussions
1155:
1006:Lists of people are still subject to BLP.
330:
315:
303:list of Crime-related deletion discussions
300:
285:
270:
1304:I would argue, for the record, that this
1240:Cruelty to animals#In theory and practice
985:They seem well cited. They would just be
318:list of News-related deletion discussions
252:Additionally, I should probably point to
1308:fall under the "Attack Page" subtype of
1158:list of content for rescue consideration
1288:
1115:per Andy's comment at the rescue list:
941:
760:
599:
497:is see what people have to say there.
932:made sense. Conversely an article on
804:being applicable to standalone bios.
7:
590:as a whole applies everywhere. But
430:to warrant being highlighted in an
779:as venues, instead of this AfD. --
52:. I am closing this early per the
24:
1291:- doesn't seem the case here. --
822:Well, I asked clarification on
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1048:2012 Burlington VIA derailment
1:
1263:hornet's nest and an obvious
235:List of Australian criminals
1500:18:54, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
1478:18:05, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
1465:18:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
1450:17:07, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
1432:17:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
1389:09:34, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
1372:04:55, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
1347:00:10, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
1326:01:20, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
1300:18:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
1277:18:45, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
1252:18:42, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
1227:16:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
1195:16:02, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
1147:14:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
1096:15:57, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
1033:07:52, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
1016:05:39, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
998:14:52, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
977:14:26, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
961:14:23, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
917:14:13, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
898:14:10, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
876:13:42, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
835:18:47, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
814:18:35, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
788:18:32, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
751:18:21, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
693:18:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
675:16:31, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
661:satisfy BLP1E, that policy
615:16:10, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
575:05:36, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
548:14:53, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
527:14:39, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
511:12:45, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
481:11:30, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
452:17:17, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
405:06:21, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
381:04:26, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
340:04:22, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
325:04:22, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
310:04:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
295:04:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
280:04:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
264:14:42, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
245:03:23, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
74:22:20, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
1538:
1179:. Or wait no just delete.
1236:Cruelty to animals#Canada
392:for a lot of non-notable
215:AFD for Jordan Dale Lucas
1510:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
1283:Just for the record, a
759:Nothing? BLP1E states:
352:genesis of this article
227:
211:AFD for Brian Whitlock
1082:information about at
596:explicitly encourages
56:results, the serious
1171:. Or maybe merge to
1339:NorthBySouthBaranof
909:- a BLP nightmare.
737:is still about the
356:community consensus
1173:List of bad people
209:Back in June, the
48:The result was
1161:
940:explicitly says:
342:
327:
312:
297:
282:
1529:
1512:
1497:
1473:
1430:
1429:
1409:
1394:KEEP - BIG TIME
1295:
1223:
1220:
1217:
1214:
1211:
1208:
1192:
1187:
1145:
1143:
1138:
1133:
1028:
993:
956:
830:
783:
688:
610:
543:
507:
469:reliable sources
401:
377:
337:Northamerica1000
322:Northamerica1000
307:Northamerica1000
292:Northamerica1000
277:Northamerica1000
204:
203:
189:
141:
129:
111:
34:
1537:
1536:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1519:deletion review
1508:
1495:
1471:
1412:
1400:
1398:
1356:Political gaffe
1293:
1221:
1218:
1215:
1212:
1209:
1206:
1190:
1181:
1141:
1136:
1131:
1129:
1026:
991:
954:
828:
781:
686:
608:
541:
505:
399:
388:This is just a
375:
146:
137:
102:
86:
83:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1535:
1533:
1524:
1523:
1503:
1502:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1435:
1434:
1391:
1374:
1349:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1280:
1279:
1254:
1229:
1197:
1162:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1117:
1116:
1113:Speedy delete:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1036:
1035:
1019:
1018:
1001:
1000:
980:
979:
964:
963:
952:issue here. --
919:
903:
902:
901:
900:
879:
878:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
817:
816:
791:
790:
754:
753:
696:
695:
678:
677:
618:
617:
578:
577:
551:
550:
530:
529:
514:
513:
484:
483:
454:
407:
383:
344:
343:
328:
313:
298:
283:
268:
267:
266:
207:
206:
143:
82:
77:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1534:
1522:
1520:
1516:
1511:
1505:
1504:
1501:
1498:
1492:
1489:
1488:
1479:
1476:
1474:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1433:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1410:
1407:
1403:
1395:
1392:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1375:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1350:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1333:
1332:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1298:
1296:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1281:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1255:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1230:
1228:
1225:
1224:
1201:
1198:
1196:
1193:
1188:
1186:
1185:
1178:
1175:, or perhaps
1174:
1170:
1166:
1163:
1159:
1154:
1153:
1148:
1144:
1139:
1134:
1128:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1114:
1111:
1110:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1034:
1031:
1029:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
999:
996:
994:
988:
984:
983:
982:
981:
978:
975:
972:
968:
967:
966:
965:
962:
959:
957:
951:
947:
943:
939:
935:
931:
927:
923:
920:
918:
915:
912:
908:
905:
904:
899:
895:
891:
887:
883:
882:
881:
880:
877:
873:
869:
865:
864:Speedy delete
862:
861:
836:
833:
831:
825:
821:
820:
819:
818:
815:
811:
807:
803:
799:
795:
794:
793:
792:
789:
786:
784:
778:
774:
770:
766:
762:
758:
757:
756:
755:
752:
748:
744:
740:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
716:
712:
708:
704:
700:
699:
698:
697:
694:
691:
689:
682:
681:
680:
679:
676:
672:
668:
664:
660:
656:
652:
648:
644:
640:
635:
630:
626:
622:
621:
620:
619:
616:
613:
611:
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
582:
581:
580:
579:
576:
572:
568:
563:
559:
555:
554:
553:
552:
549:
546:
544:
538:
534:
533:
532:
531:
528:
525:
522:
518:
517:
516:
515:
512:
509:
508:
502:
501:
496:
492:
488:
487:
486:
485:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
455:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
432:international
429:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
406:
403:
402:
395:
391:
387:
384:
382:
379:
378:
372:
371:
366:
362:
357:
353:
349:
346:
345:
341:
338:
334:
329:
326:
323:
319:
314:
311:
308:
304:
299:
296:
293:
289:
284:
281:
278:
274:
269:
265:
262:
259:
255:
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
246:
243:
240:
236:
232:
226:
222:
220:
219:User: Bearcat
216:
212:
202:
198:
195:
192:
188:
184:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
152:
149:
148:Find sources:
144:
140:
136:
133:
127:
123:
119:
115:
110:
106:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
84:
81:
78:
76:
75:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1509:
1506:
1490:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1405:
1401:
1393:
1376:
1351:
1334:
1305:
1287:actually is
1256:
1231:
1205:
1199:
1183:
1182:
1169:news stories
1164:
1112:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1055:
1051:
1043:
974:(let's chat)
933:
925:
921:
906:
890:AndyTheGrump
868:AndyTheGrump
863:
801:
797:
764:
738:
734:
730:
718:
714:
710:
706:
702:
662:
658:
654:
646:
642:
638:
633:
628:
624:
595:
583:
561:
536:
524:(let's chat)
504:
499:
456:
439:
435:
431:
422:
418:
413:resolve the
410:
397:
394:news stories
385:
374:
369:
347:
261:(let's chat)
242:(let's chat)
228:
224:
208:
196:
190:
182:
175:
169:
163:
157:
147:
134:
49:
47:
31:
28:
1352:Snow Delete
1310:WP:COATRACK
1285:WP:COATRACK
1265:WP:COATRACK
946:WP:PRESERVE
771:because of
623:BLP1E does
390:WP:COATRACK
173:free images
1457:Beeblebrox
1269:Beeblebrox
1244:Tryptofish
934:the events
428:notability
254:WP:NOTNEWS
1515:talk page
1496:Montanabw
1364:Canoe1967
1314:WP:BLP1Es
800:BLP1E as
713:applies,
655:including
604:WP:CRYBLP
537:existence
491:consensus
62:WP:CSD#G4
37:talk page
1517:or in a
1472:cyclopia
1428:osh ...
1381:Johnuniq
1294:cyclopia
1184:ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ
1027:cyclopia
992:cyclopia
987:WP:BLP1E
955:cyclopia
938:WP:BLP1E
930:WP:BLP1E
829:cyclopia
782:cyclopia
773:WP:UNDUE
707:possibly
687:cyclopia
609:cyclopia
592:WP:BLP1E
542:cyclopia
500:Stalwart
415:WP:BLP1E
370:Stalwart
365:WP:SYNTH
361:WP:BLP1E
213:and the
132:View log
66:Qwyrxian
39:or in a
1442:Bearcat
1318:Bearcat
1200:Comment
1088:Bearcat
1072:content
1068:content
1062:to get
1056:outside
1008:Bearcat
926:persons
914:Snowman
806:Bearcat
743:Bearcat
735:content
667:Bearcat
567:Bearcat
465:notable
444:Bearcat
436:forever
411:doesn't
400:Lugnuts
179:WP refs
167:scholar
105:protect
100:history
54:WP:SNOW
1491:Delete
1377:Delete
1335:Delete
1261:WP:BLP
1257:Delete
1232:Delete
1165:Delete
1076:people
1064:around
971:Yaksar
950:WP:BLP
907:Delete
824:WT:BLP
798:limits
777:WT:BLP
765:itself
739:people
651:WP:BLP
588:WP:BLP
584:*sigh*
558:WP:BLP
556:Nope.
521:Yaksar
495:WP:DRV
440:Delete
386:Delete
348:Delete
258:Yaksar
239:Yaksar
151:Google
109:delete
58:WP:BLP
50:delete
1408:orlon
1222:Focus
911:Giant
731:title
715:still
711:still
663:still
586:Yes,
473:IQ125
423:about
194:JSTOR
155:books
139:Stats
126:views
118:watch
114:links
16:<
1461:talk
1446:talk
1385:talk
1368:talk
1343:talk
1322:talk
1306:does
1273:talk
1248:talk
1242:. --
1191:bomb
1092:talk
1052:that
1044:only
1012:talk
928:per
922:Keep
894:talk
872:talk
826:. --
810:talk
802:only
747:talk
671:talk
659:does
639:list
571:talk
535:The
477:talk
461:list
457:Keep
448:talk
187:FENS
161:news
122:logs
96:talk
92:edit
70:talk
1424:ll
1420:re
1404:osh
1362:.--
1238:or
1084:all
1080:any
769:cat
727:cat
723:cat
703:any
649:of
647:all
643:Any
634:not
629:not
625:not
606:.--
562:any
506:111
419:are
376:111
363:by
221:,
201:TWL
130:– (
1463:)
1448:)
1416:e
1387:)
1370:)
1345:)
1324:)
1275:)
1267:.
1250:)
1160:.
1094:)
1086:.
1014:)
896:)
888:.
874:)
812:)
749:)
741:.
719:do
673:)
653:,
573:)
479:)
450:)
442:.
438:.
396:.
335:.
320:.
305:.
290:.
275:.
181:)
124:|
120:|
116:|
112:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
72:)
1459:(
1444:(
1426:K
1422:a
1418:a
1414:W
1411:.
1406:V
1402:K
1383:(
1366:(
1341:(
1320:(
1271:(
1246:(
1219:m
1216:a
1213:e
1210:r
1207:D
1142:p
1137:b
1132:p
1090:(
1010:(
892:(
870:(
808:(
745:(
669:(
569:(
475:(
446:(
205:)
197:·
191:·
183:·
176:·
170:·
164:·
158:·
153:(
145:(
142:)
135:·
128:)
90:(
68:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.