152:. I agree with Zunaid. I also think that a useful guideline for lists is that there should be at least a reasonable chance that they will be largely complete at some point. With this list, there is no chance whatever of that happening. That's why the term 'indiscriminate' is applicable in this case. --
93:. Many editors have been working on this for quite some time. They as well as others find it useful for research. Furthermore, why was there no preliminary discussion on talk page from nom prior to AfD? --
132:"Listcruft" is a neat way to summarise "an indiscriminate collection of information", in the same way you see the terms gamecruft, moviecruft and any other cruft being used. In this regard it
309:
there would be some connection between the artists' names and their songs. Needs a retitle if we decide to keep this and let it expand to suck up all available memory on the system....
136:
a reason for deletion. p.s. I'm not arguing from a standpoint of usefulness. Perhaps someone somewhere out there would find the potentially useful, I don't know. What I
321:. No no no. Knowledge is not an indiscriminate collection of information. This is also unmaintainable and guaranteed to never get anywhere near completion.
246:. I'd suggest limiting criteria to eponymous albums that have reached a position in an album chart in a definitive recording trade magazine, like
126:"Listcruft" is not a reason for deletion. One man's crap is another's life. Please be more specific as to why you don't think this is useful.
117:. Delete cos its listcruft, weak per JJay. I'm curious as to the nature of the research for which this article would be useful, though. --
325:
313:
297:
284:
237:
225:
213:
179:
156:
144:
121:
109:
97:
84:
61:
188:
172:) are notable, so I don't see why they shouldn't be listed. Categorization would kill the possibility to mention what they named. -
17:
233:. An absolutely staggering number of albums have an eponymous title track. There's no chance this list will ever be complete.
268:
as this would be very manageable (if memory serves me correctly, there are only about a dozen fitting this category from
67:
57:
340:
36:
339:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
203:
177:
265:
248:
192:
310:
260:
254:
173:
199:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
222:
106:
234:
280:). In both cases, the name of the act and the name of the recording must be identical.
53:
74:
196:
195:. No need for 2 lists with repetitive, overlapping information when one would do.
153:
118:
322:
281:
209:
206:
141:
81:
77:
an indiscriminate collection of information. When is this madness going to end?
294:
94:
49:
273:
169:
333:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
168:. Songs that lead to the naming of another entity (see
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
343:). No further edits should be made to this page.
189:List of songs with the same name as song artists
264:. In the same vein, I'd recommend a similar
8:
305:. per Regina (also, I thought that by
140:saying is that it isn't encyclopedic.
7:
68:List of eponymous albums (songwise)
276:chart and a relative handful from
24:
244:Modify to maintain manageability
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
326:01:36, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
314:22:18, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
298:21:25, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
285:18:56, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
238:18:01, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
226:17:59, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
214:15:07, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
180:11:07, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
157:11:38, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
145:11:25, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
122:10:44, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
110:09:55, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
98:09:33, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
85:09:24, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
44:The result of the debate was
62:20:27, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
360:
336:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
191:and consider rename to
46:no consensus to delete
266:Eponymous hit singles
261:New Musical Express
231:Delete (entrywise)
258:(now defunct) or
212:
351:
338:
202:
34:
359:
358:
354:
353:
352:
350:
349:
348:
347:
341:deletion review
334:
193:Eponymous music
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
357:
355:
346:
345:
329:
328:
316:
311:Carlossuarez46
300:
241:
240:
228:
216:
182:
163:
162:
161:
160:
159:
124:
112:
100:
73:nn listcruft.
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
356:
344:
342:
337:
331:
330:
327:
324:
320:
317:
315:
312:
308:
304:
301:
299:
296:
292:
289:
288:
287:
286:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
262:
257:
256:
251:
250:
245:
239:
236:
232:
229:
227:
224:
220:
217:
215:
211:
208:
205:
201:
198:
194:
190:
186:
183:
181:
178:
175:
171:
167:
164:
158:
155:
151:
148:
147:
146:
143:
139:
135:
131:
128:
127:
125:
123:
120:
116:
113:
111:
108:
104:
101:
99:
96:
92:
89:
88:
87:
86:
83:
80:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
335:
332:
318:
306:
302:
290:
277:
269:
259:
253:
247:
243:
242:
230:
218:
184:
165:
149:
137:
133:
129:
114:
102:
90:
78:
72:
45:
43:
31:
28:
223:Gateman1997
210:Eventualist
207:Darwikinian
204:Wishy Washy
115:Weak delete
107:Flyboy Will
270:Billboard'
235:Regina0613
105:per JJay.
307:eponymous
293:as above
249:Billboard
274:Hot 100
255:Cashbox
197:Zordrac
154:Squiddy
150:Comment
130:Comment
119:Squiddy
323:Stifle
319:Delete
303:Delete
282:B.Wind
219:Delete
200:(talk)
170:eponym
142:Zunaid
82:Zunaid
79:Delete
75:WP:NOT
187:with
185:Merge
16:<
295:Jcuk
291:keep
166:Keep
103:Keep
95:JJay
91:Keep
50:Angr
48:. --
278:NME
174:Mgm
272:s
252:,
138:am
134:is
60:)
221:.
176:|
58:c
56:·
54:t
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.