335:
Clearly, I disagree that this article is anything even approaching marginal. If you don't care to defend your opinion (and you might want to learn what "non sequitur" actually means) then maybe you shouldn't express one. But if you do and I disagree with it, I have no intention of not challenging it.
289:
It could use some cleaning, but it is verifiable from the fiction referenced (in most cases). It is in the gray area between secondary and primary research, but it does no harm and could be valuable when linked-to from other articles. This does not violate the spirit of WP and could be valuable to
307:
there was something called "Burpsi-Cola"? What could our hypothetical researcher possibly be studying that would make that valuable knowledge? There is no way to know from the article if this cola played any significant role in the episode, hell, there isn't even any way to know if it came in a can
173:
The previous AfD was for a list of fictional mixed drinks, not for this list. Links to the
Knowledge (XXG) articles for the things these drinks came from are not reliable third-party sources for the things themselves. As just one of dozens of examples, can you tell me where in the
321:
I said that it could use some cleaning. My selection stands at face value; I don't want to debate your non sequitur at every AfD; it gets tiresome. If you don't want people to express their opinions don't make marginal AfD nominations.
138:
information that provides absolutely no context for any of its entries' importance to their points of origin with the exception of links to those very rare fictional beverages that are notable enough in themselves to have
187:
Look again, the previous afd was for a substantial amount of the material in this list. And I actually agree with you on the David
Letterman ones. If they're your main objection to the article by all means excise them.
143:. We do not need a list of every single fake drink from every single Letterman Top Ten List, Simpsons episode, one-time sight gag or passing background billboard ad from every random TV show, magazine, book or movie.
157:
116:
89:
84:
93:
76:
431:
Knowledge (XXG) articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis...not solely a summary of that work's plot.
433:
This is a collection of plot summaries revolving around objects of little fictional significance, let alone real-world significance. --
402:. Reasonable topic, plus a number of entries have Knowledge (XXG) articles. Could perhaps do with a more detailed introduction, though.
17:
277:
Already covers any fictional beverages that may be notable, and everything else is just listcruft. Also impossible to be complete.--
80:
303:
How exactly would it be valuable to a researcher that, to pick one semi-random example, in one unidentified episode of the show
175:
462:
450:
418:
406:
394:
366:
353:
340:
326:
312:
294:
281:
265:
253:
233:
209:
192:
182:
164:
147:
58:
477:
49:
36:
72:
64:
261:
Could probably use some division; as Pavel said, not including soma or ambrosia in this kind of list in inexcusable.
274:
140:
476:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
445:
246:
250:
160:
and the fact that it IS sourced. Nearly every one of these links to the fiction that inspired it.
53:
225:. It may not be necessary, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't be on wikipedia. There are lots of
434:
387:
350:
323:
291:
56:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
430:
459:
426:
127:
278:
131:
230:
135:
403:
363:
337:
309:
206:
189:
179:
161:
144:
110:
308:
or a bottle or who drank it or if someone drank it or poured it over their head.
415:
391:
262:
362:
In other words, you can't defend your opinion so you resort to name-calling.
242:
178:
article it references "McBourbon" and explains the notability of it?
470:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
205:
My main objections to this list are laid out in the nomination.
458:. This is an indiscriminate collection of information. --
106:
102:
98:
241:. Useless popular culture listcruft. Does not include
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
480:). No further edits should be made to this page.
249:or anything culturally or historically notable.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
176:Late Night with David Letterman
1:
463:15:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
451:10:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
419:17:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
407:14:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
395:06:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
367:16:59, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
354:16:50, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
341:06:07, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
327:05:15, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
313:04:17, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
295:01:53, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
282:00:31, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
266:23:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
254:22:16, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
234:21:59, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
210:23:17, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
193:22:16, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
183:22:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
165:21:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
148:21:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
59:01:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
275:Category:Fictional beverages
73:List of fictional beverages
65:List of fictional beverages
497:
128:indiscriminate collection
473:Please do not modify it.
349:Won't feed the Trolls --
32:Please do not modify it.
229:articles on wikipedia.
290:some researchers. --
156:. Per previous afd
50:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS
414:per nom. Trivia.
488:
475:
448:
444:
440:
437:
259:Keep and cleanup
114:
96:
34:
496:
495:
491:
490:
489:
487:
486:
485:
484:
478:deletion review
471:
446:
442:
438:
435:
251:Pavel Vozenilek
87:
71:
68:
48:, ignoring the
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
494:
492:
483:
482:
466:
465:
453:
427:Indiscriminate
421:
409:
397:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
357:
356:
344:
343:
330:
329:
316:
315:
298:
297:
284:
268:
256:
236:
219:
218:
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
212:
198:
197:
196:
195:
168:
167:
121:
120:
67:
62:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
493:
481:
479:
474:
468:
467:
464:
461:
457:
454:
452:
449:
441:
432:
428:
425:
422:
420:
417:
413:
410:
408:
405:
401:
398:
396:
393:
389:
385:
382:
381:
368:
365:
361:
360:
359:
358:
355:
352:
348:
347:
346:
345:
342:
339:
334:
333:
332:
331:
328:
325:
320:
319:
318:
317:
314:
311:
306:
302:
301:
300:
299:
296:
293:
288:
285:
283:
280:
276:
272:
269:
267:
264:
260:
257:
255:
252:
248:
244:
240:
237:
235:
232:
228:
224:
221:
220:
211:
208:
204:
203:
202:
201:
200:
199:
194:
191:
186:
185:
184:
181:
177:
172:
171:
170:
169:
166:
163:
159:
155:
152:
151:
150:
149:
146:
142:
137:
133:
129:
126:- Thoroughly
125:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
472:
469:
455:
423:
411:
399:
388:Kevin Murray
383:
351:Kevin Murray
324:Kevin Murray
304:
292:Kevin Murray
286:
270:
258:
238:
226:
222:
153:
123:
122:
52:agruements.
45:
43:
31:
28:
460:Alan McBeth
429:listcruft.
305:Home Movies
227:unnecessary
279:SeizureDog
136:unverified
231:Quadparty
132:unsourced
404:23skidoo
364:Otto4711
338:Otto4711
310:Otto4711
243:ambrosia
207:Otto4711
190:Nardman1
180:Otto4711
162:Nardman1
145:Otto4711
141:articles
117:View log
439:Solomon
90:protect
85:history
54:Jaranda
456:Delete
424:Delete
416:Recury
412:Delete
392:Mathmo
271:Delete
263:JuJube
239:Delete
124:Delete
94:delete
46:delete
436:Islay
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
447:talk
400:Keep
386:per
384:Keep
287:Keep
247:soma
223:Keep
158:here
154:Keep
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
390:.
245:or
130:of
115:– (
322:--
273::
134:,
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
443:|
119:)
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.