Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/List of fictional elements, materials, isotopes and atomic particles (3rd nomination) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

409:. Further, I think there needs to be some type of inclusion metric, otherwise the list is potentially boundless. One possible metric would be how important the fictional material is to the plot of the source work; something like Adamantium (within Marvel) or Unobtainium (within Avatar) are central plot elements; Xentronium, on the other hand, appears to be simply flavor text. Otherwise, as the nom suggests, this can easily be a dumping grounds for any cool sounding scientific term. -- 240:). However, this list page is a magnet for listing very marginal stuff that has probably never been commented on outside of the game/comic/film where it was invented. Because so few refs are provided it's also a hoax magnet. Basically, this page is a list of random, unsourced, unreferenced stuff, and looks set to remain so; it's had years to improve and hasn't, and it's time to get rid of it. 87: 82: 377:
change, the simple solution is for the editor who objects to any specific item to either challenge it or source it. Yes, this is a list of otherwise non-notable items, because non-notable items get merged appropriately if notability is their only problem. I am pretty confident that the class of
258:: This is a good list. There is a source column, and nearly everyone of those sources links back to an article, making checking for hoaxes easy. It may be lengthy, but that is due to the all inclusive title. Besides, isn't it better to have one big article than a hundred or so stubs? -- 94: 193: 121: 116: 125: 108: 187: 112: 153: 104: 72: 421: 387: 365: 353:- per Auric and Postdlf, and a strong-keep result from the prior afd in October, including many good points; plus no negative change in situation since then (Just some cleanup/additions/references/links 345: 312: 290: 267: 249: 66: 298: 397:
I'd lean towards keep because the concept of fictional materials has been around long enough. That said, the way the table is organized creates some odd connections, such as implying that
236:, which have their own articles; there are a few more which independently wouldn't meet the GNG but are appropriately covered in other articles (e.g. bazanium is covered in the article on 148: 208: 175: 169: 165: 276: 215: 181: 378:
fictional materials or elements has received appropriate RS coverage as a topic, regardless of whether such has been added to the article or not.
17: 405:
material between, say, the Marvel Universe and the Final Fantasy series (one may have inspired the other, of course), same with
373:
If there's any argument here which wasn't refuted in the last AfD 11 months ago, I'm simply not seeing it. While consensus
53: 440: 40: 329: 325: 88:
Articles for deletion/List of fictional elements, materials, isotopes and atomic particles (3rd nomination)
83:
Articles for deletion/List of fictional elements, materials, isotopes and atomic particles (2nd nomination)
59: 436: 36: 321: 320:
The deletion nom is basically a laundry list of arguments not to make in deletion discussions. See
201: 383: 361: 245: 237: 340: 308: 286: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
435:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
225: 417: 263: 379: 357: 241: 334: 304: 282: 142: 95:
Articles for deletion/Fictional elements, materials, isotopes and atomic particles
406: 410: 398: 259: 233: 229: 105:
List of fictional elements, materials, isotopes and atomic particles
73:
List of fictional elements, materials, isotopes and atomic particles
224:
This article is basically long list of things that don't meet the
429:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
354: 299:
list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions
138: 134: 130: 200: 214: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 443:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 297:Note: This debate has been included in the 275:Note: This debate has been included in the 296: 277:list of Lists-related deletion discussions 274: 92: 80: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 228:. There are a few exceptions, e.g. 79: 24: 422:18:27, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 388:01:40, 17 September 2012 (UTC) 366:00:36, 17 September 2012 (UTC) 346:23:51, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 313:23:40, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 291:23:39, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 268:22:22, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 250:20:37, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 67:00:10, 23 September 2012 (UTC) 1: 226:general notability guideline 460: 432:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 78:AfDs for this article: 238:Raise the Titanic! 48:The result was 315: 302: 293: 280: 54:non-admin closure 451: 434: 414: 303: 281: 219: 218: 204: 156: 146: 128: 62: 34: 459: 458: 454: 453: 452: 450: 449: 448: 447: 441:deletion review 430: 412: 161: 152: 119: 103: 100: 76: 60: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 457: 455: 446: 445: 425: 424: 391: 390: 368: 348: 330:WP:SUSCEPTIBLE 317: 316: 294: 271: 270: 222: 221: 158: 99: 98: 97: 91: 90: 85: 77: 75: 70: 61:TheSpecialUser 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 456: 444: 442: 438: 433: 427: 426: 423: 419: 415: 408: 404: 400: 396: 393: 392: 389: 385: 381: 376: 372: 369: 367: 363: 359: 355: 352: 349: 347: 343: 342: 337: 336: 331: 327: 326:WP:NOTCLEANUP 323: 319: 318: 314: 310: 306: 300: 295: 292: 288: 284: 278: 273: 272: 269: 265: 261: 257: 254: 253: 252: 251: 247: 243: 239: 235: 231: 227: 217: 213: 210: 207: 203: 199: 195: 192: 189: 186: 183: 180: 177: 174: 171: 167: 164: 163:Find sources: 159: 155: 150: 144: 140: 136: 132: 127: 123: 118: 114: 110: 106: 102: 101: 96: 93: 89: 86: 84: 81: 74: 71: 69: 68: 65: 64: 63: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 431: 428: 402: 394: 374: 370: 350: 339: 333: 255: 223: 211: 205: 197: 190: 184: 178: 172: 162: 58: 57: 49: 47: 31: 28: 407:Unobtainium 322:WP:NOEFFORT 188:free images 399:Adamantium 234:kryptonite 437:talk page 305:• Gene93k 283:• Gene93k 37:talk page 439:or in a 380:Jclemens 358:Quiddity 242:The Land 149:View log 39:or in a 401:is the 395:Comment 335:postdlf 230:adamant 194:WP refs 182:scholar 122:protect 117:history 166:Google 126:delete 260:Auric 209:JSTOR 170:books 154:Stats 143:views 135:watch 131:links 16:< 413:ASEM 403:same 384:talk 371:Keep 362:talk 356:). — 351:Keep 341:talk 309:talk 287:talk 264:talk 256:Keep 246:talk 202:FENS 176:news 139:logs 113:talk 109:edit 50:keep 375:can 232:or 216:TWL 151:• 147:– ( 52:. ( 420:) 386:) 364:) 344:) 332:. 328:, 324:, 311:) 301:. 289:) 279:. 266:) 248:) 196:) 141:| 137:| 133:| 129:| 124:| 120:| 115:| 111:| 56:) 418:t 416:( 411:M 382:( 360:( 338:( 307:( 285:( 262:( 244:( 220:) 212:· 206:· 198:· 191:· 185:· 179:· 173:· 168:( 160:( 157:) 145:) 107:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
non-admin closure
TheSpecialUser
00:10, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
List of fictional elements, materials, isotopes and atomic particles
Articles for deletion/List of fictional elements, materials, isotopes and atomic particles (2nd nomination)
Articles for deletion/List of fictional elements, materials, isotopes and atomic particles (3rd nomination)
Articles for deletion/Fictional elements, materials, isotopes and atomic particles
List of fictional elements, materials, isotopes and atomic particles
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.