707:, the list is indiscriminate and of almost unlimited extent and thus not suitable. There is nothing to prevent this list going on for thousands and thousands of papers. If it is going to be kept in some form it should be into narrowly defined subtopics that at least puts some limitations on size (the most interested person can do this splitting).
728:
I didn't consider the notion of these lists being expanded when formulating my !vote above, which would make navigation more difficult. Perhaps other means to organize the data by sections and transfer it all onto one page is possible. However, if these articles are to be deleted, it would be a waste
517:
NOTEVERYTHING: "In any encyclopedia, information cannot be included solely for being true or useful. An encyclopedia article should not be a complete exposition of all possible details. Rather, an article is a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject. Verifiable and sourced statements
670:. The topic of geoengineering is very broad and its boundaries are ill-defined. Criteria for inclusion in this list will therefore always be unclear and subject to editor's subjective assessments. Note also that this is a very hot (no pun intended) area of research so we're likely to need
631:
Point one of WP:NOTDIR (Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics) also doesn't apply because these aren't loosely associated papers within these list article. Rather, the entries are discriminate and focused upon papers about the specific topic of
284:
164:
518:
should be treated with appropriate weight. Although there are debates about the encyclopedic merits of several classes of entries, consensus is that the following are good examples of what
Knowledge is not.
212:
207:
92:
87:
216:
96:
278:
158:
199:
79:
682:) and we should send point our readers there rather than offering a very poor substitute split in half and therefore unsearchable, lacking keyword search, lacking abstracts.
557:, which is why you can fit all of the relevant papers on a couple of WP pages. I agree that the two lists should be merged, but the reference template breaks when you do it.
350:
239:
119:
575:
I can't help but think that this is a sign that
Knowledge is not meant to include these large directories of links. Broken in half, this is really close to useless.
372:
416:
244:
124:
394:
463:. This list has obviously taken a long time to collect and it is almost certainly useful to many people. However, that place is not here. Replace the word
678:
down the road further lowering the odds of finding relevant information. As IRWolfie points out there are excellent online repositories (most notably the
641:
546:
729:
of time to organize it all just to see it vanish. I slightly modified my !vote above, and it may change further after further consideration.
709:
The article is also pointless; article databases like google scholar etc already exist and do a much better job than these very large lists.
299:
179:
266:
146:
636:. Rather than blanket deletion of this significant work, perhaps these articles could be merged into one article as a reasonable
203:
83:
775:
750:
737:
719:
691:
657:
602:
584:
566:
531:
508:
480:
451:
427:
408:
386:
364:
342:
260:
140:
61:
17:
329:
675:
671:
195:
75:
256:
136:
306:
186:
67:
794:
40:
598:
562:
527:
476:
272:
152:
790:
745:
732:
652:
503:
497:
422:
57:
36:
496:
is an entire guideline page. These articles certainly cannot fail the entire guideline page! See also:
715:
594:
558:
523:
472:
292:
172:
687:
679:
645:
580:
447:
325:
771:
637:
404:
382:
360:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
789:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
624:
337:
316:
53:
704:
667:
711:
633:
550:
442:. If kept, the two lists should be merged since the split seems to be entirely random.
333:
666:
I think point 1 clearly applies, especially if you read the clarification provided by
763:
683:
593:
papers on geoengineering are you planning on adding to this growing list of papers? -
590:
576:
493:
460:
443:
439:
321:
767:
400:
378:
356:
233:
113:
629:
Points two to seven of WP:NOTDIR aren't applicable to these two articles at all.
554:
415:
Note: This debate has been included in the
Article Rescue Squadron's
471:, and the reason that this should not be on Knowledge is evident. -
520:
The examples under each section are not intended to be exhaustive.
492:
regarding the two above !votes – Not to be overly critical, but
783:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
619:
Contrary to the nomination, these list articles are actually
229:
225:
221:
109:
105:
101:
291:
171:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
797:). No further edits should be made to this page.
467:with a more mature academic discipline, such as
351:list of Environment-related deletion discussions
305:
185:
8:
393:Note: This debate has been included in the
373:list of Science-related deletion discussions
371:Note: This debate has been included in the
349:Note: This debate has been included in the
414:
395:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
392:
370:
348:
417:list of content for rescue consideration
642:List of proposed geoengineering schemes
547:List of proposed geoengineering schemes
196:List of geoengineering papers (part 2)
676:List of geoengineering papers (part 4)
672:List of geoengineering papers (part 3)
76:List of geoengineering papers (part 1)
52:. I'm willing to userfy upon request.
7:
24:
701:userify, or possibly transwikify
644:article. Importantly, see also
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
553:is a FAR narrower field than
68:List of geoengineering papers
545:because it usefully extends
776:04:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
751:11:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
738:05:17, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
720:12:14, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
692:13:15, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
658:11:38, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
603:16:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
589:Which of the approximately
585:19:44, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
567:19:40, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
532:16:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
509:11:38, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
481:04:05, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
452:18:26, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
438:I agree that this violates
428:11:46, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
409:17:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
387:17:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
365:17:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
343:16:48, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
62:15:08, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
814:
742:Withdraw my above !vote.
786:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
549:. Re: comment above,
48:The result was
749:
736:
710:
656:
507:
430:
426:
411:
398:
389:
376:
367:
354:
315:Textbook case of
805:
788:
748:
746:Northamerica1000
743:
735:
733:Northamerica1000
730:
708:
655:
653:Northamerica1000
650:
506:
504:Northamerica1000
501:
425:
423:Northamerica1000
420:
399:
377:
355:
341:
310:
309:
295:
247:
237:
219:
190:
189:
175:
127:
117:
99:
34:
813:
812:
808:
807:
806:
804:
803:
802:
801:
795:deletion review
784:
744:
731:
680:Oxford database
651:
623:a violation of
502:
421:
320:
252:
243:
210:
194:
132:
123:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
811:
809:
800:
799:
779:
778:
756:
755:
754:
753:
740:
723:
722:
697:
696:
695:
694:
661:
660:
634:geoengineering
621:not whatsoever
608:
607:
606:
605:
595:Nathan Johnson
587:
570:
569:
559:Andrewjlockley
551:geoengineering
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
524:Nathan Johnson
512:
511:
498:WP:JUSTAPOLICY
484:
483:
473:Nathan Johnson
465:geoengineering
454:
432:
431:
412:
390:
368:
313:
312:
249:
192:
129:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
810:
798:
796:
792:
787:
781:
780:
777:
773:
769:
765:
761:
758:
757:
752:
747:
741:
739:
734:
727:
726:
725:
724:
721:
717:
713:
706:
702:
699:
698:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
664:
663:
662:
659:
654:
649:
647:
643:
639:
635:
628:
626:
622:
616:
613:
610:
609:
604:
600:
596:
592:
588:
586:
582:
578:
574:
573:
572:
571:
568:
564:
560:
556:
552:
548:
544:
541:
540:
533:
529:
525:
521:
516:
515:
514:
513:
510:
505:
499:
495:
491:
488:
487:
486:
485:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
455:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
434:
433:
429:
424:
418:
413:
410:
406:
402:
396:
391:
388:
384:
380:
374:
369:
366:
362:
358:
352:
347:
346:
345:
344:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
318:
308:
304:
301:
298:
294:
290:
286:
283:
280:
277:
274:
271:
268:
265:
262:
258:
255:
254:Find sources:
250:
246:
241:
235:
231:
227:
223:
218:
214:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
130:
126:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
785:
782:
759:
700:
630:
620:
618:
615:Leaning Keep
614:
611:
542:
519:
489:
468:
464:
456:
435:
314:
302:
296:
288:
281:
275:
269:
263:
253:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
49:
47:
31:
28:
646:WP:PRESERVE
279:free images
159:free images
54:Mark Arsten
638:WP:SPINOFF
791:talk page
712:IRWolfie-
625:WP:NOTDIR
401:• Gene93k
379:• Gene93k
357:• Gene93k
317:WP:NOTDIR
37:talk page
793:or in a
705:WP:SALAT
684:Pichpich
668:WP:SALAT
577:Pichpich
444:Pichpich
330:contribs
322:Headbomb
240:View log
120:View log
39:or in a
768:Johnfos
640:of the
555:physics
490:Comment
469:physics
334:physics
285:WP refs
273:scholar
213:protect
208:history
165:WP refs
153:scholar
93:protect
88:history
764:WP:NOT
760:Delete
612:Strong
494:WP:NOT
461:WP:NOT
457:Delete
440:WP:NOT
436:Delete
257:Google
217:delete
137:Google
97:delete
50:delete
591:16000
338:books
300:JSTOR
261:books
245:Stats
234:views
226:watch
222:links
180:JSTOR
141:books
125:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
772:talk
762:per
716:talk
703:Per
688:talk
599:talk
581:talk
563:talk
543:Keep
528:talk
522:" -
477:talk
459:per
448:talk
405:talk
383:talk
361:talk
326:talk
293:FENS
267:news
230:logs
204:talk
200:edit
173:FENS
147:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
674:or
617:–
307:TWL
242:•
238:– (
187:TWL
122:•
118:– (
774:)
766:.
718:)
690:)
601:)
583:)
565:)
530:)
500:.
479:)
450:)
419:.
407:)
397:.
385:)
375:.
363:)
353:.
336:/
332:/
328:/
319:.
287:)
232:|
228:|
224:|
220:|
215:|
211:|
206:|
202:|
167:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
770:(
714:(
686:(
648:.
627:.
597:(
579:(
561:(
526:(
475:(
446:(
403:(
381:(
359:(
340:}
324:{
311:)
303:·
297:·
289:·
282:·
276:·
270:·
264:·
259:(
251:(
248:)
236:)
198:(
191:)
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
131:(
128:)
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.