139:
Completely unsourced list, rife with speculation, and likely so incomplete as to make any rankings demonstrably inaccurate. I'm not against the idea of such a page, but unfortunately this current version fails enough policies and guidelines as to make its existence in this form undesirable.
368:
Exact dollar amounts are not needed for this. It can be reliable enough. The limitations ofthe sourcing merely have to be given, since we are concerned with verifiability only, not truth. Collecting publicly available figures is not OR.
324:
222:
217:
226:
209:
99:
94:
305:
there are definately significant problems with the articles as it is, most obviously the almost complete lack of sourcing (The fact that all the information pertains to
103:
132:
176:
171:
86:
180:
163:
278:
352:- given the secrecy surrounding exact dollar amounts it is doubtful that proper sourcing is even possible. Also list serves very little purpose --
62:
167:
401:
380:
360:
344:
309:
making adequate sourcing all the more necessary). However the amount actors and directors are paid has probably been covered in
296:
268:
149:
68:
17:
319:
213:
259:
wikipedia is not a place for loosely associated lists. The information is also impossible to verify and changes constantly.
145:
90:
335:
I think they should be deleted with no prejudice against recreating once all the information has been reliably sourced.
205:
159:
82:
74:
419:
397:
36:
418:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
141:
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
314:
264:
256:
291:
393:
340:
327:) could probably be written. If no one can improve the articles so that they meet our standards of
52:
49:
260:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
388:
The problem is sources: there are none, and the information currently in these lists is not
285:
357:
336:
376:
306:
332:
310:
243:
197:
120:
389:
328:
353:
371:
154:
I am also nominating the following related pages on similar grounds:
412:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
325:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of highest-grossing films
239:
235:
231:
193:
189:
185:
127:
116:
112:
108:
317:) and I think acceptable articles in the vein of
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
422:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
279:list of Film-related deletion discussions
277:: This debate has been included in the
7:
206:List of highest-paid screenwriters
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
320:List of highest-grossing films
83:List of highest-paid directors
75:List of highest-paid directors
1:
48:; however, allow recreation.
160:List of highest-paid actors
439:
402:15:08, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
381:03:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
361:02:47, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
345:23:59, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
297:23:55, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
269:22:57, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
150:22:31, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
69:02:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
415:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
333:no original research
142:Girolamo Savonarola
44:The result was
299:
282:
430:
417:
311:reliable sources
294:
288:
283:
273:
247:
229:
201:
183:
130:
124:
106:
65:
60:
55:
34:
438:
437:
433:
432:
431:
429:
428:
427:
426:
420:deletion review
413:
394:UnitedStatesian
292:
286:
257:WP:NOTDIRECTORY
220:
204:
174:
158:
126:
97:
81:
78:
63:
58:
53:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
436:
434:
425:
424:
407:
405:
404:
383:
363:
347:
300:
271:
249:
248:
202:
137:
136:
77:
72:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
435:
423:
421:
416:
410:
409:
408:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
384:
382:
378:
374:
373:
367:
364:
362:
359:
355:
351:
348:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
329:verifiability
326:
322:
321:
316:
312:
308:
307:living people
304:
301:
298:
295:
289:
280:
276:
272:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
251:
250:
245:
241:
237:
233:
228:
224:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
182:
178:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
156:
155:
152:
151:
147:
143:
134:
129:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
66:
61:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
414:
411:
406:
386:Delete all 3
385:
370:
365:
349:
318:
302:
274:
261:AlbinoFerret
252:
153:
138:
45:
43:
31:
28:
287:Fabrictramp
390:verifiable
293:talk to me
46:delete all
337:Guest9999
315:this one
133:View log
303:Opinion
223:protect
218:history
177:protect
172:history
100:protect
95:history
50:King of
350:Delete
313:(like
253:Delete
227:delete
181:delete
128:delete
104:delete
323:(see
244:views
236:watch
232:links
198:views
190:watch
186:links
131:) – (
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
398:talk
377:talk
366:Keep
341:talk
331:and
275:Note
265:talk
255:per
240:logs
214:talk
210:edit
194:logs
168:talk
164:edit
146:talk
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
372:DGG
358:rex
284:--
281:.
400:)
392:.
379:)
343:)
290:|
267:)
242:|
238:|
234:|
230:|
225:|
221:|
216:|
212:|
196:|
192:|
188:|
184:|
179:|
175:|
170:|
166:|
148:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
67:♠
396:(
375:(
356:-
354:T
339:(
263:(
246:)
208:(
200:)
162:(
144:(
135:)
125:(
123:)
85:(
64:♣
59:♦
54:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.