233:. They are perfectly parallel: ideophones are a class of words just like nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs. These other articles don't exist because (I guess) everybody understands they would not belong here but in Wiktionary (if anywhere). If this list stays as haphazard as it (necessarily) is, it is redundant, incomplete, and useless. If it were to be more systematically done, it would be a dictionary in itself and therefore belong in Wiktionary not Knowledge.
260:
on it, arbitrarily chosen. For instance, it should be relatively easy to list several hundred Korean ideophones, so why are these particular four items selected. If we put ideophones from all languages, it would run into thousands of items, and the page would resemble a jumbled heap of trivial data."
259:
on the talk page 2 years ago (the article has seen little meaningful edits since then): "This "list" seems ill conceived. It cannot succeed in listing even a tiny fraction of the items which could theoretically be included. It's similar to having a page called "list of words," with six or seven words
178:
356:
as indiscriminate. If, as the lead suggests, the intention is to list every ideophone in every language except
English, then it can never hope to be complete. I can't imagine discriminating criteria for a
77:
172:
287:
131:
104:
99:
108:
313:
91:
333:
138:
193:
160:
388:
374:
345:
325:
303:
269:
242:
154:
61:
17:
150:
214:
95:
341:
321:
200:
226:
87:
67:
358:
57:
407:
222:
40:
265:
238:
230:
218:
166:
337:
317:
403:
53:
36:
362:
295:
279:
261:
234:
186:
283:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
402:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
370:
291:
217:
by a different user. To see the problem in a nutshell, consider the non-extant articles
383:
252:
125:
366:
210:
209:
Seems to meet AfD criteria A1/A7. This is redundant with the main article
396:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
213:
and seems highly questionable listcruft, as also noted on
256:
121:
117:
113:
185:
78:
Articles for deletion/List of ideophones by language
288:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 January 14
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
410:). No further edits should be made to this page.
314:list of Language-related deletion discussions
199:
8:
332:Note: This debate has been included in the
312:Note: This debate has been included in the
334:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
331:
311:
75:
7:
215:Talk:List_of_ideophones_by_language
74:
24:
361:on this topic that would satisfy
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
382:- Knowledge is not Wiktionary
227:List of adjectives by language
88:List_of_ideophones_by_language
68:List_of_ideophones_by_language
1:
286:). I have transcluded it to
389:20:49, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
375:01:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
346:20:04, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
326:20:04, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
304:13:52, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
270:13:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
243:13:26, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
62:14:21, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
278:This AfD was not correctly
223:List of adverbs by language
427:
231:List of verbs by language
219:List of nouns by language
399:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
73:AfDs for this article:
359:WP:Stand-alone list
276:Automated comment:
348:
338:Shawn in Montreal
328:
318:Shawn in Montreal
306:
302:
418:
401:
386:
298:
297:Talk to my owner
293:
274:
204:
203:
189:
141:
129:
111:
34:
426:
425:
421:
420:
419:
417:
416:
415:
414:
408:deletion review
397:
384:
301:
296:
146:
137:
102:
86:
83:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
424:
422:
413:
412:
392:
391:
377:
350:
349:
329:
308:
307:
294:
272:
262:Janice Patrick
253:User:Zadignose
235:Janice Patrick
207:
206:
143:
82:
81:
80:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
423:
411:
409:
405:
400:
394:
393:
390:
387:
381:
378:
376:
372:
368:
364:
363:WP:Notability
360:
355:
352:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
330:
327:
323:
319:
315:
310:
309:
305:
299:
292:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
271:
267:
263:
258:
254:
251:according to
250:
247:
246:
245:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
202:
198:
195:
192:
188:
184:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
152:
149:
148:Find sources:
144:
140:
136:
133:
127:
123:
119:
115:
110:
106:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
84:
79:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
398:
395:
379:
353:
282:to the log (
275:
248:
208:
196:
190:
182:
175:
169:
163:
157:
147:
134:
49:
47:
31:
28:
280:transcluded
173:free images
211:Ideophones
404:talk page
385:Spiderone
54:T. Canens
37:talk page
406:or in a
132:View log
39:or in a
300::Online
257:posting
179:WP refs
167:scholar
105:protect
100:history
380:Delete
367:Cnilep
354:Delete
284:step 3
249:Delete
151:Google
109:delete
50:delete
194:JSTOR
155:books
139:Stats
126:views
118:watch
114:links
16:<
371:talk
342:talk
322:talk
290:. —
266:talk
239:talk
187:FENS
161:news
122:logs
96:talk
92:edit
58:talk
201:TWL
130:– (
52:.
373:)
365:.
344:)
336:.
324:)
316:.
268:)
255:,
241:)
229:,
225:,
221:,
181:)
124:|
120:|
116:|
112:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
60:)
369:(
340:(
320:(
264:(
237:(
205:)
197:·
191:·
183:·
176:·
170:·
164:·
158:·
153:(
145:(
142:)
135:·
128:)
90:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.