265:, is also pointless, as these characters would be excessive detail to such an article. The characters are in fact so unimportant, that even after having read the manga multiple times, I couldn't recognize most of the characters by their names. That of course only applies to characters who actually have names and aren't simply listed by their relation to more important characters like "Shampoo's Father" or "Saotome family ancestors", or even simply by what they are, as in "Cursed Bathing Suit" and "Shotgun bean plant". - In short: It's fancruft (
253:) with speculations such as "which indicates that Yohyo is wealthy" or "he seems to be of at least Ranma's level" and comparasions with other characters like "is personality and tendencies are very similar to Miroku the lecherous monk". As a whole the article's topic isn't notable by any measure. It passes neither the general notability guideline (
500:(save a copy and migrate the information to the Ranma wiki) - We really shouldn't have lists of minor anything, minor indicates that the topic is not notable. Knowledge is supposed to be written for the average reader; I highly doubt this information would be useful to anyone other than the avid Ranma fan. --
397:
Not every character in a series deserves an entry in a character list. Especially incidental or one-shot characters who have no role in the overall plot line—not that Ranma 1/2 has much of a plot line to begin with. If the primary characters aren't worthy for a list article, then the minor characters
294:
as per nom and my noms for the other lists (good catch). What this series needs is a list of the major characters, instead of a couple dozen dedicated character lists and 3 minor lists. Creating a list article for the main/notable recurring characters is no easy task given the state of the dedicated
334:
The only reason the "original" list was too long was because of the extremely excessive amounts of plot summary for this minor characters in ALL of the lists. And no, minor characters are not collectively important and per many other AfDs and mergers, they are particularly not notable enough in
316:. Btw: I should probably mention that the original article was split due to the original length, and that several of the characters such as Maomolin, Mint & Lime, Picolet and similar, are more relevant, but didn't have enough material for their own separate pages.
475:. I was involved with setting up this list as well as the other three minor character lists, but my interests and priorities both Wiki wise and in real life have since changed. Migrate the information over to the
339:
that no one has bothered making (despite apparently having time to make three lists for unimportant minor characters). South Park is not an ideal model for any thing, nor is it an anime/manga series. --
87:
82:
419:. Farix' summary says what I'd say. Too many unimportant characters, not needed for understanding the shallow plots of Ranma, which are 'character gets wet, character changes form, hilarity ensues.'
91:
362:
Comparing this list to an unassessed article tagged with an original research tag really isn't a compelling argument to keep the article, its more of an argument to get rid of the southpark list. (
74:
227:
But that's exactly what it is. "Minor" characters, only appearing in the manga and only in very small parts of it. I'll gladly go into more detail, if this gets even a single "keep". --
167:
120:
127:
List of self-admitted minor characters from the manga series, all primarily one-chapter or one-volume characters that are of little consequence to series plot. Fails
313:
559:
542:
519:
492:
467:
446:
428:
409:
385:
357:
325:
304:
278:
236:
222:
206:
189:
156:
56:
353:
185:
152:
335:
anime/manga series to have their own lists, much less three. Any that may have any minor relevance should be mentioned in the single
78:
17:
70:
62:
514:
380:
336:
262:
574:
36:
573:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
347:
220:
179:
146:
442:
300:
341:
173:
140:
312:. Minor characters are collectively important to the story, and no different from other articles such
215:
Fancruft is not a valid criterion for deletion, please be more specific and use objective criteria. -
363:
274:
232:
202:
555:
510:
405:
376:
266:
216:
480:
463:
424:
321:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
535:
438:
296:
257:) nor the previous or the currently proposed notability guideline for fictional topics (
270:
258:
242:
228:
198:
136:
551:
502:
400:
368:
254:
132:
459:
420:
317:
246:
50:
108:
139:. Absolutely no third party sourcing mentioning this minor characters at all. --
528:
250:
128:
241:
Elaborating as promised: 98% of the article is plot summary (violation of
567:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
398:
especially shouldn't have their own list article(s) either. --
550:
Delete article but merge appropriate info to main article. --
476:
115:
104:
100:
96:
168:
list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions
245:). The remaining 2% violate the original research (
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
577:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
437:You left out "one or more rivals show up". —
295:character articles, but needs to be done
166:: This debate has been included in the
71:List of minor Ranma ½ characters (manga)
63:List of minor Ranma ½ characters (manga)
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
249:) and verifiability policies (
1:
560:18:21, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
543:10:24, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
527:and migrate the information.
520:06:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
493:00:19, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
468:15:33, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
447:14:33, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
429:07:27, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
410:17:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
386:06:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
358:17:06, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
326:13:56, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
305:19:35, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
279:17:45, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
237:01:26, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
223:00:32, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
207:19:34, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
190:19:28, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
157:19:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
57:02:40, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
261:). A merge, for example to
594:
337:List of Ranma ½ characters
263:List of Ranma ½ characters
570:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
458:. Per above comments.
479:before deleting. --
44:The result was
364:see WP:OTHERSTUFF
171:
585:
572:
540:
539:
533:
532:
505:
490:
485:
371:
344:
197:as fancruft. --
176:
162:
143:
118:
112:
94:
53:
34:
593:
592:
588:
587:
586:
584:
583:
582:
581:
575:deletion review
568:
537:
536:
530:
529:
503:
486:
481:
369:
342:
174:
141:
114:
85:
69:
66:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
591:
589:
580:
579:
563:
562:
545:
522:
495:
470:
452:
451:
450:
449:
432:
431:
413:
412:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
329:
328:
307:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
210:
209:
192:
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
590:
578:
576:
571:
565:
564:
561:
557:
553:
549:
546:
544:
541:
534:
526:
523:
521:
518:
516:
512:
507:
506:
499:
496:
494:
491:
489:
484:
478:
474:
471:
469:
465:
461:
457:
454:
453:
448:
444:
440:
436:
435:
434:
433:
430:
426:
422:
418:
415:
414:
411:
407:
403:
402:
396:
393:
387:
384:
382:
378:
373:
372:
365:
361:
360:
359:
355:
352:
349:
345:
338:
333:
332:
331:
330:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
308:
306:
302:
298:
293:
290:
289:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
239:
238:
234:
230:
226:
225:
224:
221:
218:
214:
213:
212:
211:
208:
204:
200:
196:
193:
191:
187:
184:
181:
177:
169:
165:
161:
160:
159:
158:
154:
151:
148:
144:
138:
134:
130:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
569:
566:
548:Delete/Merge
547:
524:
508:
501:
497:
487:
482:
472:
455:
416:
399:
394:
374:
367:
350:
343:Collectonian
309:
291:
194:
182:
175:Collectonian
163:
149:
142:Collectonian
126:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
477:Ranma Wikia
439:Quasirandom
297:Dandy Sephy
267:WP:FANCRUFT
314:South Park
271:Goodraise
229:Goodraise
199:Goodraise
552:HighKing
504:Kraftlos
370:Kraftlos
354:contribs
186:contribs
153:contribs
121:View log
515:Contrib
473:Comment
460:Tintor2
421:ThuranX
381:Contrib
259:WP:FICT
243:WP:PLOT
137:WP:PLOT
88:protect
83:history
52:MBisanz
525:Delete
498:Delete
488:Sphere
483:Broken
456:Delete
417:Delete
395:Delete
292:Delete
269:). --
255:WP:GNG
195:Delete
172:-- --
135:, and
133:WP:WAF
116:delete
92:delete
46:delete
401:Farix
247:WP:OR
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
556:talk
511:Talk
464:talk
443:talk
425:talk
406:Talk
377:Talk
366:) --
348:talk
322:talk
318:Dave
310:Keep
301:talk
275:talk
251:WP:V
233:talk
203:talk
180:talk
164:Note
147:talk
129:WP:N
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
217:Mgm
170:.
558:)
538:ない
531:じん
513:|
466:)
445:)
427:)
408:)
379:|
356:)
324:)
303:)
277:)
235:)
205:)
188:)
155:)
131:,
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
554:(
517:)
509:(
462:(
441:(
423:(
404:(
383:)
375:(
351:·
346:(
320:(
299:(
273:(
231:(
219:|
201:(
183:·
178:(
150:·
145:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.