232:. May as well be "list of billionaires" which, by the subject's limitation and the introduction to the list, may not be reliably sourced in its inclusions. I too was struck by the disclaimer that it is not exhaustive, suggesting that it is too vague to continue as a separate article. Moreover, do we really need lists of things that are defined by inclusion in one source but not another?
480:
I would think merge should default to keep, not delete. The information is encyclopedic, the consensus shows (to date). The delete rec certainly does not have consensus support above. The only issue is one of format -- whether to keep it as a stand-alone, or as a merge. I tend not to think the
406:
but rename of course. The Forbes list of billionaires articles dated from 2004 to 2011, with only 2010 missing. Those articles are for what is on a notable list. They do not include people who are heads of state or royalty in their list, and exclude others as well. A
463:
There are a lot of "Merge" recommendations here; however, as the nominator noted, this solution was previously proposed but never acted upon. It would be unfortunate to keep this unnecessary unencyclopedic article on the basis of yet another merge recommendation.
89:
294:. This proposed deletion is silly, in my mind. The last one closed as merge. Unless I'm missing something, that means the previous consensus saw value/potential here. Therefore, one would need to make an argument as to why we should
182:
213:
Admits to being non-exhaustive; given how many billionaires exist, this just lists a few and isn't a good representation of the subject. Appears to have previously have been voted to merge, but nothing happened.
84:
268:
176:
143:
116:
111:
120:
103:
481:
difference between the two very great; the difference between either of them and delete is much greater, however. And, of course, AfD is not the place for cleanup.--
306:
article. Maintaining the distinction between Forbes and non-Forbes billionaires may be a useful aid. Since when is "could be improved" a reason for deletion?
490:
473:
455:
434:
398:
378:
361:
336:
315:
283:
259:
241:
223:
68:
451:
411:
should exist for all billionaires, not just those on any one list. Don't merge, just rename this one, and copy information over that is valid.
197:
164:
62:
17:
158:
442:
per others. There's just no reason to have a list citing one reliable source, and another list citing other reliable sources.--
154:
107:
448:
503:
204:
36:
387:
345:
299:
99:
74:
332:
357:
502:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
170:
445:
328:
302:
article is simple and therefore easy to maintain. I'm not sure how to successfully structure a merged
486:
408:
391:
374:
353:
349:
327:(lists of people guidelines), per many references in the article that verify content in the article.
303:
190:
52:
49:
469:
237:
324:
279:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
412:
311:
255:
219:
482:
395:
370:
298:
this information off of
Knowledge (XXG), but I don't see a rationale given for this. The
465:
233:
275:
323:- A discriminate and narrowly focused list that is notable and verifiable. Passes
137:
307:
251:
215:
90:
Articles for deletion/List of non-Forbes billionaires (2nd nomination)
48:. Editors may discuss the possibility of merging on the talk page.
496:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
250:
Since when is a list being incomplete a reason to delete?
133:
129:
125:
189:
85:
Articles for deletion/List of non-Forbes billionaires
269:
list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions
203:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
506:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
267:Note: This debate has been included in the
266:
82:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
369:. Per above keeps, and wp:NLIST.--
81:
24:
100:List of non-Forbes billionaires
75:List of non-Forbes billionaires
260:22:57, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
242:22:55, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
224:22:27, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
1:
352:(currently a redirect page).
491:18:36, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
474:17:41, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
456:12:00, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
435:08:58, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
399:18:10, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
388:Forbes list of billionaires
379:04:32, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
362:23:00, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
346:Forbes list of billionaires
337:14:08, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
316:18:19, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
300:Forbes list of billionaires
284:17:46, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
69:21:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
523:
499:Please do not modify it.
386:both this list, and the
342:Keep and discuss merging
32:Please do not modify it.
80:AfDs for this article:
348:. This should be one
409:list of billionaires
392:List of billionaires
350:List of billionaires
304:list of billionaires
44:The result was
286:
272:
514:
501:
431:
428:
425:
422:
419:
416:
390:, into a single
329:Northamerica1000
273:
208:
207:
193:
141:
123:
65:
60:
55:
34:
522:
521:
517:
516:
515:
513:
512:
511:
510:
504:deletion review
497:
429:
426:
423:
420:
417:
414:
150:
114:
98:
95:
78:
63:
58:
53:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
520:
518:
509:
508:
493:
477:
476:
458:
437:
401:
384:Merge/redirect
381:
364:
339:
318:
288:
287:
264:
263:
262:
245:
244:
211:
210:
147:
94:
93:
92:
87:
79:
77:
72:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
519:
507:
505:
500:
494:
492:
488:
484:
479:
478:
475:
471:
467:
462:
459:
457:
454:
453:
450:
447:
441:
438:
436:
433:
432:
410:
405:
402:
400:
397:
393:
389:
385:
382:
380:
376:
372:
368:
365:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
340:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
319:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
290:
289:
285:
281:
277:
270:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
248:
247:
246:
243:
239:
235:
231:
228:
227:
226:
225:
221:
217:
206:
202:
199:
196:
192:
188:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
156:
153:
152:Find sources:
148:
145:
139:
135:
131:
127:
122:
118:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
96:
91:
88:
86:
83:
76:
73:
71:
70:
66:
61:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
498:
495:
460:
443:
439:
413:
403:
383:
366:
341:
320:
295:
291:
229:
212:
200:
194:
186:
179:
173:
167:
161:
151:
45:
43:
31:
28:
177:free images
483:Epeefleche
396:Neutrality
371:Epeefleche
276:• Gene93k
466:Agent 86
325:WP:NLIST
234:Agent 86
144:View log
461:Comment
354:Biophys
183:WP refs
171:scholar
117:protect
112:history
50:King of
308:Jesanj
296:delete
252:Jesanj
230:Delete
216:Kansan
155:Google
121:delete
440:Merge
430:Focus
344:with
198:JSTOR
159:books
138:views
130:watch
126:links
16:<
487:talk
470:talk
404:Keep
375:talk
367:Keep
358:talk
333:talk
321:Keep
312:talk
292:Keep
280:talk
256:talk
238:talk
220:talk
191:FENS
165:news
134:logs
108:talk
104:edit
46:keep
205:TWL
142:– (
489:)
472:)
394:.
377:)
360:)
335:)
314:)
282:)
274:—
271:.
258:)
240:)
222:)
185:)
136:|
132:|
128:|
124:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
67:♠
485:(
468:(
452:W
449:P
446:T
444:~
427:m
424:a
421:e
418:r
415:D
373:(
356:(
331:(
310:(
278:(
254:(
236:(
218:(
209:)
201:·
195:·
187:·
180:·
174:·
168:·
162:·
157:(
149:(
146:)
140:)
102:(
64:♣
59:♦
54:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.