538:
176:- one time characters are not notable in any show, regardless of how popular the show may be. If we're not keeping reality show contestants, or recurring game-show contestants, both of whom would have had more screen time than a one time character in a 22 minute show, then this really should not be kept. I don't care how many Simpsons cruftateers there are.
482:. The Simpsons is a long running series and by that very nature will generate a large number of one-time characters. This article is a useful way to keep this information together. I am sure that Lucius Sweet cannot be considered a one-time character. He has been featured in many episodes. --
78:
in a TV series (in other words, 99 percent of all characters on all TV shows) are inherently non-notable. Massive fancruft like this unsourced list of every non-notable one-time
Simpsons character opens the doors to all kinds of obsessively fannish lists. Similar lists could be made for
48:
for trivia, the fact that "notable" elements existed within the list, or a certain undefinable "extra" something. I've also disregarded recomendations to keep from *cough* very new editors, or that were borderline nonsensical.
124:
it has so many one-time minor characters. There are lists of these for many other series also, but they're drastically shorter due to the series' shorter length. Still, it seems somewhat crufty, so I'll stay neutral.
333:
429:. Sets a precedent that might result in similar articles being credited for Star Trek, Gunsmoke, Doctor Who or even My Mother the Car. You can't just pick-and-choose what shows deserve a little "extra".
352:
is a red flag. However, for me this list is saved by the impressive parade of famous people who voice the characters. Also a good way to contain the trivia (as opposed to individual articles...)
470:. i would add, however that Mary Bailey is not a one time character - she also appeared in the episode where Homer gets put in that designer prison Marge has built as a concert hall.
104:
per nom. I'm sure this list is notable in the eyes of many strong fans of the show. But ultimately, this is not notable to causal fans (or those unfamiliar with the program).
336:
and was kept by a wide margin. It's really unfair to renominate articles after such a short period of time, especially when there was a strong consensus the last time. --
44:
The result was delete. Several arguments for keeping failed to adress the article and instead focus on the errors of renomination, on the article serving as a
364:
because I agree with the above, it's just containing unencyclopaedic minutiae about a television show. This belongs on a
Simpsons fan site, not Knowledge.
509:
as above. Entirely not notable, and characters can have their information in the articles on the specific episodes in which they appeared - in example,
541:
521:
501:
486:
474:
462:
450:
433:
421:
389:
368:
356:
340:
320:
299:
272:
260:
248:
227:
204:
192:
168:
148:
108:
95:
62:
235:, any character notable enough for a mention can be mentioned in the article for the episode in which they appeared without loss of information.
513:
has more information on Otto's near-wife than this article, making her inclusion here redundant. Same applies for all characters, with the
411:
397:
per last AfD, and a useful article. The
Simpsons is one of the most notable TV shows, so it deserves a little "extra" more than others. --
68:
510:
416:
164:
etc - Simpsons gets so many celebrity guest appearances and none of them are documented in what is already a very lengthy list.
84:
17:
458:-- Half of Knowledge is unencyclopaedic minutiae. If that were a reason to delete that would set a very bad precedent.
556:
494:- there are two semi-notable people there, one of which already has his own article. This is not encyclopedic.
105:
51:
36:
555:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
406:
385:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
446:
285:
442:
498:
401:
398:
381:
295:
244:
240:
201:
533:
483:
223:
92:
88:
471:
126:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
308:
495:
459:
353:
337:
186:
290:
282:
236:
213:
441:
per before. They should have individual articles, but this is a decent compromise. --
530:
518:
430:
365:
218:
161:
257:
376:
per
Weregerbil, and per last AfD, and per Kicking222's views on the validity of
269:
157:
537:
332:
fan, I don't like this article- in fact, I voted delete on it the first time,
317:
316:, no point punishing users who don't know if characters are recurring or not.
177:
45:
517:
exceptions of Birch Barlow, who already has an article, and
Terwilliger. --
165:
549:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
212:, the list it a textbook example of an article that conforms to
57:
120:is a long-running, highly notable series, which is
58:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
559:). No further edits should be made to this page.
69:List of one-time characters from The Simpsons
8:
334:when it was nominated for AfD two months ago
268:as per nom and others above. Simpsonscruft
85:List of one-time characters from Gunsmoke
256:as per Carlossuarez46 and Night Gyr.
7:
529:There are notable characters here.-
24:
536:
511:It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad Marge
83:TV program - can you imagine a
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
417:
412:
74:Characters who only appeared
576:
542:15:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
522:11:13, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
502:14:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
487:09:15, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
91:13:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
63:06:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
475:18:38, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
463:15:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
451:15:55, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
434:23:49, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
422:22:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
390:21:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
369:20:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
357:20:31, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
341:18:23, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
321:11:40, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
300:01:28, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
273:00:31, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
261:21:11, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
249:19:54, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
228:19:30, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
205:17:47, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
193:14:58, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
169:14:35, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
149:14:30, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
109:13:59, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
96:13:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
552:Please do not modify it.
280:, excessive fancruft. --
32:Please do not modify it.
328:Despite being a huge
116:. Its hard to say.
200:very bad precedent.
106:Scorpiondollprincess
350:One-time characters
449:
388:
298:
191:
567:
554:
540:
445:
419:
414:
409:
404:
384:
294:
288:
189:
185:
180:
146:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
61:
59:
54:
34:
575:
574:
570:
569:
568:
566:
565:
564:
563:
557:deletion review
550:
407:
402:
286:
187:
178:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
128:
127:
72:
56:
52:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
573:
571:
562:
561:
545:
544:
524:
504:
489:
477:
465:
453:
443:badlydrawnjeff
436:
424:
392:
382:CanadianCaesar
371:
359:
343:
323:
311:
302:
275:
263:
251:
230:
207:
202:Carlossuarez46
195:
171:
151:
111:
71:
66:
50:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
572:
560:
558:
553:
547:
546:
543:
539:
535:
532:
528:
525:
523:
520:
516:
512:
508:
505:
503:
500:
497:
493:
490:
488:
485:
481:
478:
476:
473:
469:
466:
464:
461:
457:
454:
452:
448:
444:
440:
437:
435:
432:
428:
425:
423:
420:
415:
410:
405:
400:
396:
393:
391:
387:
386:Et tu, Brute?
383:
379:
375:
372:
370:
367:
363:
360:
358:
355:
351:
347:
344:
342:
339:
335:
331:
327:
324:
322:
319:
315:
312:
310:
307:. Strewth --
306:
303:
301:
297:
293:
292:
289:
284:
279:
276:
274:
271:
267:
264:
262:
259:
255:
252:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
231:
229:
225:
221:
220:
215:
211:
208:
206:
203:
199:
196:
194:
190:
184:
181:
175:
172:
170:
167:
163:
162:Ricky Gervais
159:
155:
152:
150:
147:
123:
119:
115:
112:
110:
107:
103:
100:
99:
98:
97:
94:
93:wikipediatrix
90:
89:wikipediatrix
86:
82:
77:
70:
67:
65:
64:
60:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
551:
548:
526:
514:
506:
491:
479:
472:Magic Pickle
467:
455:
438:
426:
394:
377:
373:
361:
349:
345:
329:
325:
313:
304:
281:
277:
265:
253:
232:
217:
209:
197:
182:
173:
153:
121:
118:The Simpsons
117:
113:
101:
80:
75:
73:
43:
31:
28:
496:violet/riga
326:Speedy keep
158:Gerald Ford
102:Weak Delete
460:Orangehead
354:Weregerbil
338:Kicking222
46:honey trap
296:talk. ^_^
237:Night Gyr
76:only once
53:brenneman
515:possible
431:23skidoo
366:GassyGuy
330:Simpsons
219:TheFarix
156:where's
399:King of
258:Lazybum
214:WP:FICT
114:Neutral
519:Switch
507:Delete
492:Delete
484:Tomvox
427:Delete
362:Delete
305:Delete
278:Delete
270:Bwithh
266:Delete
254:Delete
233:Delete
198:Delete
174:Delete
154:Delete
380:AfD.
318:Kappa
179:Proto
16:<
534:Phil
531:Just
527:Keep
480:Keep
468:Keep
456:Keep
447:talk
439:Keep
395:Keep
378:this
374:Keep
346:Keep
314:Keep
283:Core
241:talk
224:Talk
216:. --
210:Keep
188:type
499:(t)
309:GWO
287:des
166:MLA
122:why
81:any
348:.
291:at
247:)
245:Oy
226:)
183:::
160:,
141:ar
138:ik
135:Sh
132:rk
129:Da
87:?
418:♠
413:♣
408:♦
403:♥
243:/
239:(
222:(
144:i
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.