350:
List on a notable subject with substantial references. Criteria for inclusion does not seem as squishy as the nom suggests. I disagree that calling someone a "genius" and calling someone a "polymath" is comparable. Most people don't throw the latter term around like they do with the former. I support
205:
is broad and subjective. Quote: “... A polymath may simply be someone who is very knowledgeable. Most ancient scientists were polymaths by today's standards”. I can't see the added value of listing all these people, not to mention all the bias and objectivity problems additions and changes have. It
365:
I agree that in practice Genius is different, but in essence it is exactly the same: a subjective term to describe a persons abilities. I don't think you or I can decide that a subjective term is used wisely and coherently enough (i.e. not using the squishy definition from
Knowledge itself)
240:- this list details individuals who have had been referred to as polymaths by reliable sources, and hence there are few problems with inclusion. If it gets too large, we can break it up alphabetically or chronologically. Being a polymath is subjective, but being "called" one is not. --
170:
77:
297:
is notable and no doubt we can find a lot of people who were called that by a reliable source, but does that make a long list of
Geniuses of any value? The reasons for inclusion may be objective, but that does not add any value to the list imo.
104:
99:
108:
164:
91:
366:
throughout the world by reliable sources to give this list value. The list theoretically cannot stop including non-polymaths who were named as such (I know, verifiability not truth). If we want that, okay...
401:
The rules state that favoring category is not a valid reason to eliminate a list. No reason not to have both. A list also offers more information than just a name and is thus more useful by far.
318:
185:
131:
152:
219:
146:
206:
has become over 110 people long and the end is not in sight, as many want their favourite polymath on it. I am by far the first to question this article (see its
142:
457:
424:
394:
375:
360:
340:
307:
280:
249:
231:
61:
192:
207:
95:
158:
87:
67:
385:
It's much easier to maintain categories than lists like this, particularly with tools like HotCat that seems to be getting lots of use.
17:
49:
472:
36:
471:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
276:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
356:
390:
258:
272:
268:
245:
178:
371:
352:
303:
227:
215:
434:
Listing all the famous polymaths throughout history is notable, and notice all the blue links?
386:
57:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
435:
402:
336:
267:. Dealing with disputed cases is just a matter of ordinary editing not deletion, per our
241:
367:
299:
223:
211:
53:
125:
263:
332:
257:
I can't see the added value of deleting this list. The topic is notable as
290:
202:
294:
78:
Articles for deletion/List of people who have been called "polymaths"
465:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
289:
of polymaths". Thank you for supporting my point ;-) That the
261:, for example, has studdied thousands of polymaths — see
121:
117:
113:
177:
319:
list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions
264:
Multiple
Giftedness in Adults: The Case of Polymaths
220:Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_polymaths
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
475:). No further edits should be made to this page.
88:List of people who have been called "polymaths"
68:List of people who have been called "polymaths"
191:
8:
317:Note: This debate has been included in the
328:
325:
316:
218:) 13:11, 4 September 2011 (UTC) (add. see
75:
222:for a discussion of its predecessor).
201:Problematic list. The definition of a
7:
74:
351:the reasons for KEEP given above.
24:
293:is notable, is not being denied.
285:"Robert Root-Bernstein studied
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
458:18:21, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
425:18:21, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
62:13:21, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
1:
395:10:19, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
376:22:16, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
361:07:35, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
341:19:30, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
308:20:22, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
281:18:36, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
250:15:54, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
232:13:17, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
492:
468:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
73:AfDs for this article:
383:Transform to Category
259:Robert Root-Bernstein
44:The result was
343:
329:
326:
322:
50:non-admin closure
483:
470:
454:
451:
448:
445:
442:
439:
421:
418:
415:
412:
409:
406:
330:
196:
195:
181:
129:
111:
34:
491:
490:
486:
485:
484:
482:
481:
480:
479:
473:deletion review
466:
452:
449:
446:
443:
440:
437:
419:
416:
413:
410:
407:
404:
339:
138:
102:
86:
83:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
489:
487:
478:
477:
461:
460:
428:
427:
398:
397:
380:
379:
378:
335:
324:
323:
313:
312:
311:
310:
269:editing policy
252:
199:
198:
135:
82:
81:
80:
72:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
488:
476:
474:
469:
463:
462:
459:
456:
455:
433:
430:
429:
426:
423:
422:
400:
399:
396:
392:
388:
384:
381:
377:
373:
369:
364:
363:
362:
358:
354:
353:Osubuckeyeguy
349:
346:
345:
344:
342:
338:
334:
320:
315:
314:
309:
305:
301:
296:
292:
288:
284:
283:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
265:
260:
256:
253:
251:
247:
243:
239:
236:
235:
234:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
204:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
133:
127:
123:
119:
115:
110:
106:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
84:
79:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
467:
464:
436:
431:
403:
387:Stuartyeates
382:
347:
327:
286:
262:
254:
237:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
45:
43:
31:
28:
165:free images
287:thousands
242:S Larctia
208:talk page
368:Joost 99
300:Joost 99
224:Joost 99
212:Joost 99
203:polymath
132:View log
171:WPÂ refs
159:scholar
105:protect
100:history
54:BusterD
295:Genius
273:Warden
143:Google
109:delete
453:Focus
420:Focus
333:Logan
291:topic
186:JSTOR
147:books
126:views
118:watch
114:links
16:<
432:Keep
391:talk
372:talk
357:talk
348:Keep
337:Talk
304:talk
277:talk
255:Keep
246:talk
238:Keep
228:talk
216:talk
179:FENS
153:news
122:logs
96:talk
92:edit
58:talk
46:keep
193:TWL
130:– (
48:. (
393:)
374:)
359:)
331:—
306:)
279:)
271:.
248:)
230:)
210:)
173:)
124:|
120:|
116:|
112:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
60:)
52:)
450:m
447:a
444:e
441:r
438:D
417:m
414:a
411:e
408:r
405:D
389:(
370:(
355:(
321:.
302:(
275:(
244:(
226:(
214:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
128:)
90:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.