210:
and improving this article. As a national network (even if a small one) with a fair amount of coverage, they're certainly going to merit an article, and their specific programs should be covered, but as such is likely to clutter up the main article, it's best to spin it off. Deletion, however, doesn't make sense, unless you care to apply the same standard to all other pages.
209:
would be the better precedent. As a broadcaster, with original programming, I see no difference here. Content problems such as poor sources can be fixed, including expected programming, or lack of dates. This network isn't Same with duplicating content in main article. I'd advocate removing that
227:
49:
223:
206:
124:
per many, many precedents for not posting articles listing shows on a specific network/channel when they can appear on many different channels. Also, this improperly sourced article states what is "expected" (see
190:
Article has been improved since my last vote, and the speculative content has now been removed. It now looks much better to me, and specials and regular programming are broken apart better than they had been.
87:
82:
91:
74:
114:
78:
70:
62:
234:
based on the wider consensus reached to keep such articles, a consensus which is also demonstrated by the existence of many more such lists in this
169:
article, so this is duplicating what's in the main article. That, and most of the specials cited within the list are pretty much the equivalent of
270:
254:
214:
195:
181:
133:
56:
165:
Usually I would be inclined to keep this list, but in this case the program history of the network is already within the body of the
17:
291:
36:
146:
243:
226:. I'm not sure to what "many, many precedents" the nominator is referring; the only "precedent" I am aware of is
177:, along with the network 'rebooting' this year and abandoning what they did last year (telenovelas etc.) fully.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
287:
211:
262:
the article now specifies "as of when". I really wish that people wouldn't cite reasons which could be
53:
52:, this is a reasonable article to keep. Also appears that original issue is fixed through editing. -
239:
126:
130:
242:
here, all future programming announcements have been published in reliable sources, including
235:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
286:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
247:
263:
143:
142:
per above. Or at least merge it somewhere. Just don't leave it as a standalone article! --
192:
178:
228:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of Sci Fi
Channel (United States) programs
50:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of Sci Fi
Channel (United States) programs
267:
251:
170:
150:
108:
166:
224:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Lists of programs broadcast by networks
129:
for why that's bad) and what's current without specifying as of when.
280:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
153:
231:
104:
100:
96:
250:, which I have added as references to the article.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
294:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
71:List of programs broadcast by MyNetworkTV
63:List of programs broadcast by MyNetworkTV
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
222:per prior wide consensus reached at
173:special episodes and something like
24:
271:21:54, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
255:21:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
215:02:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
196:21:25, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
182:20:44, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
134:09:18, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
57:14:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
311:
244:The Orange County Register
230:, which was restored by a
283:Please do not modify it.
175:Circus of the Stars 1986
32:Please do not modify it.
264:fixed by simple editing
266:to support deletion.
236:navigation template
302:
285:
248:The Futon Critic
207:prior discussion
112:
94:
34:
310:
309:
305:
304:
303:
301:
300:
299:
298:
292:deletion review
281:
240:crystal ballery
232:Deletion review
85:
69:
66:
54:Ta bu shi da yu
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
308:
306:
297:
296:
276:
275:
274:
273:
238:. There is no
217:
200:
199:
198:
157:
119:
118:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
307:
295:
293:
289:
284:
278:
277:
272:
269:
265:
261:
258:
257:
256:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
218:
216:
213:
212:68.101.18.250
208:
204:
201:
197:
194:
189:
186:
185:
184:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
136:
135:
132:
128:
123:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
282:
279:
259:
219:
202:
187:
174:
171:Dateline NBC
164:
160:
159:
151:23 September
139:
121:
120:
45:
43:
31:
28:
220:Strong keep
167:MyNetworkTV
147:(contribs)
127:WP:CRYSTAL
288:talk page
290:or in a
115:View log
268:DHowell
252:DHowell
88:protect
83:history
260:Update
161:Delete
149:20:01
140:Delete
131:Wryspy
122:Delete
92:delete
48:. Per
205:This
156:(GMT)
144:Gwern
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
246:and
203:Keep
193:Nate
188:Keep
179:Nate
154:2007
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
46:keep
113:– (
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
117:)
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.