300:(but should probably go, with sourcing, on the separate articles for each type of prime instead of here). There's a difference between those entries of the form "primes in sequence X" (with no significant mathematical study relating to the intersection of the primes with that sequence, though "primes" and "sequence X" are individually notable) and those entries where there has been actual study of primes with the given property or of the given form. (OEIS now discourages submission of the former because it's too easy for people to make up such definitions, but there are an awful lot already in the database that wouldn't be notable here.) I think there are enough notable entries which have been genuinely studied to make a worthwhile list (possibly renamed to
230:
mathematicians, computer scientists or cryptographers. References tend to be to other
Knowledge articles or to some website like Planetmath.org, which apparently anyone can edit anonymously, likw Knowledge, hence not a reliable source. Prime numbers in general are obviously notable (hey, more than 1 million Google hits, mentioned in every low level math book) so it seems appropriate and encyclopedic to list some examples.
335:
No, I don't think the first section should be split out; I'd rather delete the first section from the article. WP articles are not supposed to be tables of numbers; those go at
Wikibooks or somewhere. For each of the other sections, five or so examples should be sufficient as well (an exception might
322:
explained, excellent organizational tool. Contains summaries of definitions, and links to articles on many types of primes. If there is anything unencyclopedic about it, it's the criteria for listing so many primes of each type , but clearly, it could not be a reason for deleting the article! The
394:. Gives a great overview of 72 types of primes we have articles or article sections about. All 72 are wikilinked. Sources belong in the linked articles and are usually there. Some of the prime lists could be shorter but that is easy to change and no reason to delete. The deletion discussion on
229:
and likewise there are no sources in most of the articles about various quaint types of primes classified according to cute terminology someone dreamed up one day in school. Some of the subclassifications could be put up for AFD if they are O.R. rather than the product of scholarly analysis by
190:. I lean towards keep. The collection is not indiscriminant. It is sorted according to the various types of primes, so I side with Doctormatt on this one. I'm neutral about eliminating the lists under each type. It might possibly be useful for cross-referencing, or something like that.
380:. I might also mention that a change of title and some editing could help. If we called this "Types of primes" or something like that, and then listed some examples of each (rather than huge tables), that would perhaps change the way this debate is being framed.
150:. I like having this list of the prime types. I think this is an excellent organizational tool, and I find it very encyclopedic. I wouldn't mind the removal of some of the primes under each type, since they are available on each type's article.
224:
I would not call it "indiscriminate" because IT HAS TO BE PRIME to be on the list. It bothers me a little that, while I know primes are a valid subject in math, there are no references in this article to sources satisfying
457:
The page presents a superficial appearance of just being a bunch of numerical tables; that seems to be why it got nominated for deletion. It should be reorganized so that it superficially looks like what it really is.
125:
I fail to see the reason why we need a huge list of prime numbers. Totally unencyclopedic. The first few primes of each type are already listed in the relevant articles, and a huge list like this one is unnecessary.
476:
is probably appropriate. There are some even some notable prime numbers missing from this article (like the largest discovered one that you'll find in the latest
Guinness Book of Records or whatever)
352:. Just a quick glance for me was enough to see that this is utterly encyclopedic content, indeed much better than many lists on Knowledge (which is not to say that it could not be improved!).
366:. I was quite happy to click on this page and learn some stuff about primes I didn't know before. Very useful and, I think one could argue, encyclopedic as well.
118:
256:. "List of prime numbers" really applies only to the first section (and that section is not particularly encyclopedic). A more accurate name might be
91:
86:
95:
278:
per rabbit, good cross-referencing list for the prime related article. The initial 1000 primes is the only thing that seems indiscriminate to me.--
78:
336:
be if, say, only seven or so are known; then there might be a reasonable case for listing all seven). But this is all cleanup, not AfD. --
17:
261:
462:
447:
429:
402:
384:
370:
356:
340:
327:
308:
282:
268:
248:
234:
209:
194:
178:
154:
141:
60:
53:
395:
293:
257:
82:
489:
301:
36:
488:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
304:
or similar to reflect that it's a list of important types of primes rather than just a list of primes).
74:
66:
425:
421:
473:
459:
206:
444:
353:
305:
191:
173:
136:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
399:
381:
367:
279:
57:
319:
151:
412:, wikipedia is not for reference data, such as mere lists of numbers, but should instead
417:
337:
265:
49:
160:
398:
is from early 2004 where it was only one huge list of prime numbers with no types.
165:
128:
112:
324:
245:
231:
226:
443:
or withdrawal of nomination?). Lets not waste more time on this one!
482:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
416:
what these types of primes are, instead of merely listing them.
297:
264:. Anyway we don't have to decide that in this discussion. --
108:
104:
100:
323:
first section may be moved out to a separate article.
439:
This seems to be a clear case for a quick closure (
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
492:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
296:. I expect the lists can be sourced to
292:. For previous deletion discussion, see
205:(Presumably you meant "indiscriminate".
161:indiscriminate collection of information
7:
262:list of properties of prime numbers
24:
52:. But if anyone tries to create
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
54:Complete list of prime numbers
1:
258:list of kinds of prime number
302:list of prime number topics
159:It seems very much like an
509:
396:Talk:List of prime numbers
294:Talk:List of prime numbers
485:Please do not modify it.
463:23:47, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
455:Keep, perhaps reorganize
448:23:41, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
430:23:37, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
403:23:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
385:22:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
371:21:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
357:21:30, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
341:21:33, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
328:21:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
309:21:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
283:20:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
269:20:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
249:20:44, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
235:20:35, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
210:23:44, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
195:20:28, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
179:20:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
155:20:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
142:20:06, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
61:23:58, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
254:Keep but maybe rename
75:List of prime numbers
67:List of prime numbers
56:be sure to warn us.
169:
132:
500:
487:
410:Move and refocus
177:
167:
140:
130:
116:
98:
34:
508:
507:
503:
502:
501:
499:
498:
497:
496:
490:deletion review
483:
244:per the Rabbit
164:
127:
89:
73:
70:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
506:
504:
495:
494:
478:
477:
466:
465:
451:
450:
433:
432:
406:
405:
388:
387:
374:
373:
360:
359:
346:
345:
344:
343:
312:
311:
286:
285:
272:
271:
251:
238:
237:
218:
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
198:
197:
184:
183:
182:
181:
123:
122:
69:
64:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
505:
493:
491:
486:
480:
479:
475:
471:
468:
467:
464:
461:
460:Michael Hardy
456:
453:
452:
449:
446:
442:
438:
435:
434:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
408:
407:
404:
401:
397:
393:
390:
389:
386:
383:
379:
376:
375:
372:
369:
365:
362:
361:
358:
355:
351:
348:
347:
342:
339:
334:
331:
330:
329:
326:
321:
317:
314:
313:
310:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
288:
287:
284:
281:
277:
274:
273:
270:
267:
263:
259:
255:
252:
250:
247:
243:
240:
239:
236:
233:
228:
223:
220:
219:
211:
208:
207:Michael Hardy
204:
203:
202:
201:
200:
199:
196:
193:
189:
186:
185:
180:
175:
171:
162:
158:
157:
156:
153:
149:
146:
145:
144:
143:
138:
134:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
484:
481:
469:
454:
445:Geometry guy
440:
436:
413:
409:
391:
377:
363:
354:Geometry guy
349:
332:
315:
306:Joseph Myers
289:
275:
253:
241:
221:
192:Silly rabbit
187:
147:
124:
45:
43:
31:
28:
474:WP:SNOWBALL
441:speedy keep
400:PrimeHunter
392:Strong keep
382:VectorPosse
368:VectorPosse
280:Cronholm144
148:Strong keep
58:Newyorkbrad
46:Speedy Keep
320:Doctormatt
152:Doctormatt
418:Night Gyr
338:Trovatore
266:Trovatore
222:Weak keep
414:describe
163:to me. —
119:View log
437:Comment
378:Comment
333:Comment
92:protect
87:history
50:WP:SNOW
325:Arcfrk
246:Jheald
232:Edison
96:delete
318:. As
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
470:Keep
422:talk
364:Keep
350:Keep
316:Keep
298:OEIS
290:Keep
276:Keep
242:Keep
227:WP:A
188:Keep
174:talk
137:talk
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
48:per
260:or
170:501
168:ETS
133:501
131:ETS
117:– (
472:-
428:)
426:Oy
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
424:/
420:(
212:)
176:)
172:(
166:M
139:)
135:(
129:M
126:—
121:)
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.