251:
This list looks like what I view as reverse annotations; that a cultural work uses a term is a reason to wikilink that term in an article on that cultural work, not necessary a reason to list that use, unless it's more substantial than a mere mention. Which these don't appear to be. So normally I'd
149:
83:
78:
87:
70:
143:
281:- A list of "mentions" is, by definition, an extended "in popular culture" or "trivia" list, both of which are frowned upon. Moreover, it does not appear from the list as if there are ANY
204:
419:. That said, it's still a meaningless list. Normally I'd suggest a merger and redirection to the parent article, but there's nothing worth merging and value as a redirect is unlikely.
110:
327:
I wasn't aware of the guns versus butter model before coming onto this article so I was going to say that that subject is pretty random, but...actually, the references are
371:
164:
131:
470:
455:
438:
407:
386:
361:
344:
319:
302:
273:
245:
230:
219:
193:
52:
289:, which would allow space to explain how they contribute to an encyclopaedic understanding of the topic. NOTE: If the list is kept it should be renamed to
125:
121:
74:
290:
171:
66:
58:
137:
17:
431:
485:
36:
260:. If anyone wants to add anything to the parent article, I wouldn't bother, but go nuts and see if anything sticks.
484:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
416:
298:
286:
253:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
451:
332:
429:
285:
mentions, and, if any were to be demonstrated, there is no good reason that they can't be dealt with at
467:
415:: nonsense, really. At first, I thought it was a pun based on a trivial intersection, but then found
402:
185:
396:
181:
294:
157:
315:
447:
268:
241:
215:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
421:
382:
357:
340:
464:
49:
311:
262:
237:
211:
104:
378:
353:
256:, but it doesn't look to me that there is anything worth merging, so
478:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
310:
No secondaries for notability or extent of cultural impact.
291:
List of references to guns versus butter in popular culture
67:
List of references to guns and butter in popular culture
59:
List of references to guns and butter in popular culture
100:
96:
92:
156:
205:
list of
Popular culture-related deletion discussions
170:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
488:). No further edits should be made to this page.
372:list of Military-related deletion discussions
8:
366:
231:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
225:
199:
370:: This debate has been included in the
229:: This debate has been included in the
203:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
335:of mentions of guns and/or butter.
24:
293:to reflect its parent article. -
1:
471:08:57, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
456:05:20, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
53:00:10, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
439:22:34, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
408:15:48, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
387:07:37, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
362:07:37, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
345:07:27, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
320:04:33, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
303:04:24, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
274:03:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
246:02:48, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
220:02:48, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
194:01:25, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
505:
333:incoherent, arbitrary list
481:Please do not modify it.
417:Guns versus butter model
287:Guns versus butter model
254:Guns versus butter model
32:Please do not modify it.
180:Miscellaneous trivia.
341:(let's talk about it)
331:random. It's just an
446:- per nomination.
44:The result was
436:
389:
375:
343:
248:
234:
222:
208:
496:
483:
437:
428:
424:
376:
339:
235:
209:
191:
188:
175:
174:
160:
108:
90:
34:
504:
503:
499:
498:
497:
495:
494:
493:
492:
486:deletion review
479:
434:
427:
422:
403:DARTH SIDIOUS 2
189:
186:
117:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
502:
500:
491:
490:
474:
473:
458:
441:
432:
410:
390:
364:
347:
322:
305:
295:DustFormsWords
276:
249:
223:
178:
177:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
501:
489:
487:
482:
476:
475:
472:
469:
466:
462:
459:
457:
453:
449:
445:
442:
440:
435:
430:
426:
425:
418:
414:
411:
409:
406:
405:
404:
398:
394:
391:
388:
384:
380:
373:
369:
365:
363:
359:
355:
351:
348:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
323:
321:
317:
313:
309:
306:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
277:
275:
271:
270:
265:
264:
259:
255:
252:say merge to
250:
247:
243:
239:
232:
228:
224:
221:
217:
213:
206:
202:
198:
197:
196:
195:
192:
183:
173:
169:
166:
163:
159:
155:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
127:
123:
120:
119:Find sources:
115:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
480:
477:
460:
448:Anotherclown
443:
420:
412:
401:
400:
392:
367:
349:
336:
328:
324:
307:
282:
278:
267:
261:
257:
226:
200:
179:
167:
161:
153:
146:
140:
134:
128:
118:
45:
43:
31:
28:
463:- per nom.
423:bahamut0013
395:per above,
144:free images
465:Buckshot06
397:WP:NOTADIR
182:WP:NOTADIR
50:Courcelles
238:• Gene93k
212:• Gene93k
352:per nom
312:Fifelfoo
111:View log
325:Delete.
283:notable
263:postdlf
150:WP refs
138:scholar
84:protect
79:history
468:(talk)
461:Delete
444:Delete
413:Delete
393:Delete
379:Nick-D
354:Nick-D
350:Delete
337:Erpert
308:Delete
279:Delete
258:delete
190:dog123
122:Google
88:delete
46:delete
433:deeds
329:still
165:JSTOR
126:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
452:talk
383:talk
368:Note
358:talk
316:talk
299:talk
269:talk
242:talk
227:Note
216:talk
201:Note
187:Bull
158:FENS
132:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
236:--
210:--
172:TWL
109:– (
454:)
399:.
385:)
374:.
360:)
318:)
301:)
272:)
244:)
233:.
218:)
207:.
184:.
152:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
450:(
381:(
377:—
356:(
314:(
297:(
266:(
240:(
214:(
176:)
168:·
162:·
154:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
129:·
124:(
116:(
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.