176:. Regarding some of the points given to delete. I do not agree that a long article is useless, length could incidentally be solved by splitting it (though I'm not sure that I would support that idea). Even though the article is long, the chronological ordering makes the list navigable. I see that most entries are not notable and are redlinks, and I think that most of them, being little more than a one-shot gathering of people, should be unlinked. There is in all likelihood very little to write about them. Even so, the fact that the Spanish government keeps registries over this and puts it online would indicate that at least a
180:
on
Knowledge can be warranted. Regarding the final point, presence of one article does not mean that another one cannot exist unless we are dealing with content forks (which this is not, the two lists serve different purposes). In the interests of complete coverage of the Spanish political system, I
408:, along with a description of the registration system). There is no "added value" in the list as it stands, and little prospect of any improvement given the non-notability of the vast majority of the entries.
103:
98:
107:
90:
289:
383:
has mentioned above, the fact that the
Spanish government keeps registries over this and puts it online would indicate that at least a mention on Knowledge can be warranted. Regards.--
94:
130:
283:
86:
78:
415:
392:
363:
347:
321:
296:
279:
273:
270:
261:
227:
190:
167:
72:
181:
think this list is OK. It tells something about the
Spanish political system, about how party registration works and has worked historically.
342:
405:
376:
372:
359:; A brief mention of the register of political parties and an external link on the main article to the reigster would be sufficient.
356:
199:
154:
375:
would result in loss of information. In fact, this list may be considered as a daughter list of "Registered parties" subsection of
292:) just opined "strong keep" in 27 AFD discussions over a period of 35 minutes, several times with clearly disruptive rationales.
17:
315:
141:
it is incomplete, ending with parties registered in 2001, and maintenance would only aggravate the length problem;
432:
269:, because Spain is a historically important country and political parties are also significant and noteworthy. --
36:
431:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
400:. No information would be "lost" as the up-to-date list is available from the Spanish government (this fact
217:
144:
most entries are non-notable, eg local groupings established for a single, unsuccessful municipal election;
338:
150:
the information is available in a complete and up-to-date form from the
Spanish Ministry of the Interior;
259:
205:
412:
388:
164:
185:
312:
66:
334:
331:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
409:
384:
161:
61:
380:
182:
360:
308:
60:
ers; even so, if anyone wants to pursue a redirect further, it doesn't need AfD (see
293:
124:
236:
64:). However, there is no consensus to redirect as a result of this discussion.
371:
This is an extensive list, and that is why lengthy! Simple redirecting it to
153:
there is a maintained list of notable
Spanish political parties at
147:
there is little additional information apart from the red wikilink;
379:, and the daughter has outgrown the mother (in terms of size)! As
425:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
120:
116:
112:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
202:; I can't think of a purer content fork than this.
435:). No further edits should be made to this page.
235:as mentioned above. No reason for this fork.
87:List of registered political parties in Spain
79:List of registered political parties in Spain
8:
138:at 242k, this page is practically unusable;
52:to redirect. Sjakkalle's argument to
7:
406:List of political parties in Spain
377:List of political parties in Spain
373:List of political parties in Spain
357:List of political parties in Spain
280:Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend?
271:Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend?
200:List of political parties in Spain
155:List of political parties in Spain
56:wasn't adequately answered by the
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
452:
416:10:09, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
393:07:32, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
364:20:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
348:18:06, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
322:16:40, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
297:16:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
274:16:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
262:15:35, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
228:15:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
191:07:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
168:04:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
73:04:25, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
428:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
299:
224:
188:
443:
430:
404:be mentioned in
346:
278:
255:
252:
249:
246:
243:
240:
226:
223:
218:
215:
210:
186:
128:
110:
69:
34:
451:
450:
446:
445:
444:
442:
441:
440:
439:
433:deletion review
426:
330:
329:, per Diavian.
318:
253:
250:
247:
244:
241:
238:
219:
211:
206:
203:
101:
85:
82:
67:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
449:
447:
438:
437:
421:
420:
419:
418:
381:User:Sjakkalle
366:
350:
324:
316:
302:
301:
300:
264:
230:
193:
159:
158:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
135:
134:
81:
76:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
448:
436:
434:
429:
423:
422:
417:
414:
411:
407:
403:
399:
396:
395:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
367:
365:
362:
358:
354:
351:
349:
344:
340:
336:
333:
328:
325:
323:
319:
313:
310:
306:
303:
298:
295:
291:
288:
285:
281:
277:
276:
275:
272:
268:
265:
263:
260:
257:
256:
234:
231:
229:
225:
222:
221:(talk to me!)
216:
214:
209:
201:
197:
194:
192:
189:
184:
179:
175:
172:
171:
170:
169:
166:
163:
156:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
136:
132:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:
75:
74:
71:
70:
68:Daniel Bryant
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
427:
424:
401:
397:
368:
352:
326:
307:per above. —
304:
286:
266:
237:
232:
220:
212:
207:
195:
177:
173:
160:
65:
57:
53:
50:no consensus
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
369:Strong Keep
267:Strong Keep
258:•
410:Physchim62
343:review me!
162:Physchim62
385:Dwaipayan
332:Cremepuff
183:Sjakkalle
361:Davewild
353:Redirect
327:Redirect
317:contribs
309:Disavian
305:Redirect
290:contribs
233:Redirect
196:Redirect
187:(Check!)
131:View log
62:WP:MERGE
58:redirect
398:Comment
294:Uncle G
178:mention
104:protect
99:history
413:(talk)
402:should
208:irides
165:(talk)
108:delete
213:centi
125:views
117:watch
113:links
16:<
389:talk
339:talk
284:talk
174:Keep
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
54:keep
46:keep
355:to
335:222
204:-
198:to
129:– (
391:)
341:,
320:)
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
48:,
387:(
345:)
337:(
314:/
311:(
287:·
282:(
254:n
251:a
248:y
245:k
242:r
239:A
157:.
133:)
127:)
89:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.