Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/List of sexual slang/2005-10-18 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

223: 426:
because if we really do follow verifiability, the list is not going to be terribly long. So, basically, do we want our slang in a list or a paragraph or two? (You will note that my vote is actually not that far off from yours -- this information should stick around, but I am currently a bit laissez-faire as to where.) --
400:, or should that policy itself perhaps be changed? (c) If the article is kept, how are we to police the creeping neologisms, or is it fine for me to start calling my penis "William the Rod of Infinite Pleasure" and add that to the list? There is a general consensus that information on Knowledge (XXG) be 425:
Thanks for your clarification. To respond to point c that you make -- this list should be held to the same standard of veribiability as everything else (or perhaps better, as sometimes we don't hold that up as high as we should). Also, I personally think that place and format are somewhat irrelevant,
376:
I see the Knowledge (XXG) as a catalouge of the world's knowledge in a funsize wrapper. Like it or not this page represents a portion of that knowledge. If the Knowledge (XXG) should remain an interesting and useful tool in this regard it must include articles such as these.
251:. These are terms that have commonly been in use in popular culture (therefore not OR or V). It's also, whether the submitter wants to hear this or not, one of the kinds of things that people come to wikipedia for. We're not urban dictionary (thank god), but we're not 388:). The issue is not so much whether this information belongs - clearly there is consensus that Knowledge (XXG) needs an article on sexual slang. Rather is issues as I see them, and the appropriate subjects of an AfD, are: (a) Does the article belong at 412:
anyway? I don't think the presence of this information is harmful in any way—quite the contrary, I'd like it to stay available insofar as it is verifiable and notable—I just don't think it belongs in the place where it currently lives.
255:
either -- and that's part of our draw. I'd like to keep most of this around, but if it helps to build consensus, I would support trimming, and/or changing it from a list to more of an article-type article, and/or moving it to
384:
since pretty much everyone reacted to what they expected I might say instead of reading what I actually said: I am not offended. It is enjoyable. "Cleanup" means format and contents, not language (
373:
Keep It!!! It is for mere enjoyment. No one is being hurt by this article. The title describes the article so people should know what to expect. If you are offended, then don't look at it.
21: 304: 103: 319:. There are issues with people introducing protologisms, but it does often prevent them from being created as articles, and gives a good redirect target if they do. 169:), but keep a select few examples. Add a interwiki link to wiktionary as needed, or... is there a wikithesaurus? that would be more appropriate in this case. — 357:
KEEP!! This article provides good information on slang words. Don't clean it up, how are people going to know these terms if they are cleaned up?
17: 450: 430: 417: 367: 350: 333: 311: 291: 264: 242: 229: 201: 153: 132: 76: 443: 465: 40: 286: 464:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
328: 39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
141: 106:
as it violates the same policies. However, I would be in favor of moving the few paragraphs that consititute
427: 261: 252: 216: 277: 447: 389: 272: 211: 172: 56: 322: 308: 125: 62: 238:
here. Don't see the issue with OR or V. Article is encyclopedic and people are contributing. --
33:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
397: 385: 70: 363:. But cleanup possibly. Not many lists of this magnitude are found elsewhere on the web. - 408:- how many of these terms really fit that description, and shouldn't terms be moved to 405: 401: 66: 396:? (b) Should the article contain a comprehensive list of slang terms in violation of 393: 364: 257: 162: 115: 409: 222: 150: 446:
slang, I have to keep up with it in order to understand what my parents say.--
414: 347: 239: 166: 129: 119: 73: 386:
WP:WIN#Knowledge (XXG) is not censored for the protection of minors
458:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
344:- it does often prevent them from being created as articles 305:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Body parts slang 2
102:(nominator) - I nominated this now to go in tandem with 192: 307:) Worthwhile look at vulgate (and vulgar) vernacular. 104:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Body parts slang
118:
which currently redirects to the nominee List of. --
43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 468:). No further edits should be made to this page. 193: 8: 63:WP:ISNOT#Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictionary 173: 83:Keep this extremely valuable research tool! 124:Edit: for further detail on reasoning see 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 28: 221: 52:] 04:17, 24 October 2005 (UTC) 1: 122:23:10, 18 October 2005 (UTC) 48:The result of the debate was 451:20:05, 22 October 2005 (UTC) 431:05:42, 21 October 2005 (UTC) 418:19:11, 19 October 2005 (UTC) 368:06:09, 19 October 2005 (UTC) 351:13:01, 19 October 2005 (UTC) 334:03:15, 19 October 2005 (UTC) 312:02:47, 19 October 2005 (UTC) 292:02:23, 19 October 2005 (UTC) 265:01:52, 19 October 2005 (UTC) 243:00:20, 19 October 2005 (UTC) 230:23:42, 18 October 2005 (UTC) 202:23:33, 18 October 2005 (UTC) 154:23:27, 18 October 2005 (UTC) 144:23:16, 18 October 2005 (UTC) 133:03:12, 19 October 2005 (UTC) 77:23:07, 18 October 2005 (UTC) 485: 247:I too see this as a clear 461:Please do not modify it. 142:User:Purplefeltangel/sig 36:Please do not modify it. 253:Encyclopedia Brittanica 303:(note: see my vote on 398:clearly stated policy 382:Claifying my position 346:- Excellent point. -- 126:this brief discussion 390:List of sexual slang 57:List of sexual slang 22:List of sexual slang 165:over redirect (per 199: 185: 177: 476: 463: 448:HistoricalPisces 332: 325: 289: 284: 275: 226: 225: 219: 214: 197: 195: 189: 186: 179: 175: 38: 484: 483: 479: 478: 477: 475: 474: 473: 472: 466:deletion review 459: 428:Jacquelyn Marie 410:Knowledge (XXG) 323: 320: 287: 278: 273: 262:Jacquelyn Marie 217: 212: 210: 191: 183: 60: 41:deletion review 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 482: 480: 471: 470: 454: 453: 436: 435: 434: 433: 371: 370: 358: 354: 353: 337: 336: 324:brighterorange 314: 294: 267: 245: 232: 227: 204: 181: 156: 145: 136: 97: 91: 85: 59: 54: 46: 45: 29: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 481: 469: 467: 462: 456: 455: 452: 449: 445: 441: 438: 437: 432: 429: 424: 421: 420: 419: 416: 411: 407: 403: 399: 395: 391: 387: 383: 380: 379: 378: 374: 369: 366: 362: 359: 356: 355: 352: 349: 345: 342: 339: 338: 335: 330: 326: 318: 315: 313: 310: 309:Youngamerican 306: 302: 298: 295: 293: 290: 285: 283: 282: 276: 271: 268: 266: 263: 259: 254: 250: 246: 244: 241: 237: 233: 231: 228: 224: 220: 215: 208: 205: 203: 200: 196: 188: 187: 168: 164: 160: 157: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 135: 134: 131: 127: 121: 117: 113: 111: 105: 101: 98: 95: 92: 89: 86: 84: 81: 80: 79: 78: 75: 72: 68: 64: 58: 55: 53: 51: 44: 42: 37: 31: 30: 23: 19: 460: 457: 439: 422: 394:sexual slang 381: 375: 372: 360: 343: 340: 316: 300: 296: 280: 279: 269: 258:sexual slang 248: 235: 234:Got to vote 209: 206: 171: 170: 163:sexual slang 161:and move to 159:Trim greatly 158: 147: 138: 123: 116:Sexual slang 112:sexual slang 109: 107: 99: 93: 87: 82: 61: 49: 47: 35: 32: 442:Although I 317:strong keep 108:an article 96:feedyoureye 402:verifiable 20:‎ | 444:dislike 423:Comment 406:notable 341:Comment 301:Cleanup 288:Butcher 213:Molotov 176:REAK OF 392:or at 365:Andrew 274:Privat 218:(talk) 151:Ifnord 148:Delete 100:Delete 71:WP:NOR 110:about 16:< 440:Keep 415:Kgf0 404:and 361:Keep 348:JJay 329:talk 299:but 297:Keep 270:Keep 260:. -- 249:keep 240:JJay 236:Keep 207:Keep 194:TALK 184:TURE 167:Kgf0 139:Keep 130:Kgf0 128:. -- 120:Kgf0 94:Keep 90:chad 88:Keep 74:Kgf0 67:WP:V 65:#3, 50:KEEP 114:to 413:-- 321:— 180:UR 69:, 331:) 327:( 281:e 198:) 190:( 182:x 178:N 174:F

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
List of sexual slang
deletion review
List of sexual slang
WP:ISNOT#Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictionary
WP:V
WP:NOR
Kgf0
23:07, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Body parts slang
Sexual slang
Kgf0
this brief discussion
Kgf0
03:12, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
User:Purplefeltangel/sig
Ifnord
23:27, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
sexual slang
Kgf0
FREAK OF NURxTURE
TALK
23:33, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Molotov
(talk)

23:42, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
JJay
00:20, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
Encyclopedia Brittanica

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.